Data Tables

Related Pages
 CDC FoodCORE Year One Salmonella Metrics Data
Report Period: October 1, 2010 to September 30, 2011
Performance Metrics:
(See associated document for complete language and definitions)		 Salmonella Measures
Mean (Range)
1a. Total number of isolates and isolate-yielding specimens 1181 (394 – 2066)
1b. Number of primary isolates/isolate-yielding specimens 1097 (366 – 1804)
2a. Total number of STEC clinical specimens or samples received at PHL  
2b. Number; Percent isolate-yielding STEC specimens or samples  
3. Median days from isolation /isolate-yielding specimen collection to receipt at PHL 7 days (5 – 10 days)
4. Median days from receipt of isolate-yielding specimens at PHL to recovery of isolate 2 days (1 – 3 days)
5. Percent of primary isolates with serotype information 99% (93 – 100%)
6. Median days from isolate receipt (or recovery) at PHL to serotype result 6 days (3 – 8 days)
7. Percent of primary isolates with PFGE information 92% (52 – 100%)
8. Median days from isolate receipt (or recovery) at PHL to PFGE upload to PulseNet 7 days (2 – 20 days)
9. Number of laboratory confirmed cases reported to epidemiology staff 1006 (285 – 1818)
10a. Percent of cases with attempted interview 93% (71 – 100%)
10b. Median days from case report to interview attempt 0.6 days (0 – 2 days)
10c. Percent of cases with complete demographic data 87% (71 – 100%)
10d. Percent of cases with exposure history 72% (36 – 89%)
10d-i. Percent of SSL cases with full shotgun or case exposure completed No cumulative data available1
10e. Percent of cases with serotype information 94% (88 – 100%)
10f. Percent of cases with PFGE information 85% (42 – 100%)
10f-i. Percent of cases with PFGE with complete epi data 57% (34 – 82%)
10g. Reasons for not interviewing cases
10g-i. Lost to Follow-up: Number; Percent 38 (4 – 85); 7% (2 – 15%)
10g-ii. Refused: Number; Percent 16 (0 – 24); 8% (0 – 13%)
10g-iii. Time lag too long: Number(Percent) No cumulative data available1
10g-iv. Other: Number; Percent 136 (117 – 172); 53% (7 – 86%)
11. Number of clusters 64 (16 – 99)
11a. Median and range of cluster size(primary cases only) No cumulative data available1
12. Number; Percent of clusters with cases in multiple states 35 (13 – 72); 50% (15 – 73%)
13a. Number; Percent of clusters with routine interview of cases 69 (34 – 98); 96% (86 – 100%)
13b. Number; Percent of clusters with supplemental/targeted interviewing of cases 17 (3 – 45); 27% (11 – 64%)
13c. Number; Percent of clusters where an analytic epidemiologic study conducted (>10 Salmonella cases) 9 (0 – 44); 33% (0 – 100%)
13d. Median duration ( in days) of epidemiologic investigation, from cluster notification to end of investigation/close-out 26 days (18 – 30)
14. Number; Percent of clusters with suspect vehicle/source identified 11 (3 – 44); 16% (4 – 45%)
15. Number; Percent of clusters with confirmed vehicle/source identified 4 (1 – 9); 6% (1 – 13%)
16a. Number; Percent of clusters with identified vehicle/source with control measure taken 12 (0 – 44); 29% (0 – 63%)
16b. Number; Percent of clusters with identified vehicle/source with public health action taken 9 (0 – 44); 22% (0 – 50%)
17. Number; Percent of clusters linked to a restaurant/food establishment with EHA 2 (0 – 4); 15% (0 – 80%)
18. Number; Percent of clusters with food/environmental sample collected for testing 2 (0 – 7); 3% (0 – 9%)
19. Number; Percent of clusters where EH, Ag, regulatory, or food safety program staff contacted 23 (0 – 86); 35% (0 – 100%)
20. Number; Percent of outbreaks with NORS form completed 10 (0 – 48); 37% (3 – 94%)
20a. Number; Percent of outbreaks with supplemental form completed No cumulative data available1

1Cumulative data for this metric were not reported from 3 or more centers

 

 CDC FoodCORE Year One STEC Metrics Data
Report Period: [October 1, 2010] to [September 30, 2011]
Performance Metrics:
(See associated document for complete language and definitions)		 STEC Measures
Mean (Range)
1a. Total number of isolates and isolate-yielding specimens 130.9 (15 – 284)
1b. Number of primary isolates/isolate-yielding specimens 112.4 (15 – 272)
2a. Total number of STEC clinical specimens or samples received at PHL 237.9 (73 – 693)
2b. Number; Percent isolate-yielding STEC specimens or samples No cumulative data available1
3. Median days from isolation /isolate-yielding specimen collection to receipt at PHL 5.3 days (3 – 8) days
4. Median days from receipt of isolate-yielding specimens at PHL to recovery of isolate 3.2 days (1 – 5) days
5. Percent of primary isolates with serotype information 88% (66 – 100%)
6. Median days from isolate receipt (or recovery) at PHL to serotype result 10.8 days (1 – 42) days
7. Percent of primary isolates with PFGE information 98.3% (90 – 100%)
8. Median days from isolate receipt (or recovery) at PHL to PFGE upload to PulseNet 4.7 days (2 – 9) days
9. Number of laboratory confirmed cases reported to epidemiology staff 117.1 (11 – 271)
10a. Percent of cases with attempted interview 96.7% (89 – 100%)
10b. Median days from case report to interview attempt 1 days (0 – 2) days
10c. Percent of cases with complete demographic data 87.1% (64 – 100%)
10d. Percent of cases with exposure history 77% (64 – 86%)
10d-i. Percent of SSL cases with full shotgun or case exposure completed No cumulative data available1
10e. Percent of cases with serotype information 73% (52 – 100%)
10f. Percent of cases with PFGE information 86.6% (55 – 100%)
10f-i. Percent of cases with PFGE with complete epi data 65.7% (37 – 90%)
10g. Reasons for not interviewing cases
10g-i. Lost to Follow-up: Number; Percent 2.3 (0 – 5); 5.7% (0 – 13%)
10g-ii. Refused: Number; Percent 2 (0 – 6); 5.3% (0 – 16%)
10g-iii. Time lag too long: Number(Percent) 5 (0 – 14); 9.3% (0 – 25%)
10g-iv. Other: Number; Percent 11.3 (0 – 26); 22.7% (0 – 68%)
11. Number of clusters 7.9 (0 – 30)
11a. Median and range of cluster size(primary cases only) No cumulative data available1
12. Number; Percent of clusters with cases in multiple states 2.6 (0 – 9); 34.4% (0 – 100%)
13a. Number; Percent of clusters with routine interview of cases 9.2 (2 – 30); 100% (100 – 100%)
13b. Number; Percent of clusters with supplemental/targeted interviewing of cases 4.6 (0 – 12); 47.6% (0 – 100%)
13c. Number; Percent of clusters where an analytic epidemiologic study conducted (>10 Salmonella cases) 0.5 (0 – 2); 25% (0 – 100%)
13d. Median duration ( in days) of epidemiologic investigation, from cluster notification to end of investigation/close-out No cumulative data available1
14. Number; Percent of clusters with suspect vehicle/source identified 2 (0 – 5); 36.2% (0 – 100%)
15. Number; Percent of clusters with confirmed vehicle/source identified 1.7 (0 – 5); 26.7% (0 – 100%)
16a. Number; Percent of clusters with identified vehicle/source with control measure taken 2.8 (0 – 7); 62.5% (0 – 100%)
16b. Number; Percent of clusters with identified vehicle/source with public health action taken 2.3 (1 – 4); 53.8% (33 – 100%)
17. Number; Percent of clusters linked to a restaurant/food establishment with EHA 0.7 (0 – 3); 20% (0 – 100%)
18. Number; Percent of clusters with food/environmental sample collected for testing 1.7 (0 – 5); 9.2% (0 – 36%)
19. Number; Percent of clusters where EH, Ag, regulatory, or food safety program staff contacted 11.2 (0 – 50); 35.8% (0 – 100%)
20. Number; Percent of outbreaks with NORS form completed 2.7 (0 – 9); 55.3% (24 – 100%)
20a. Number; Percent of outbreaks with supplemental form completed No cumulative data available1

1Cumulative data for this metric were not reported from 3 or more centers

 

 CDC FoodCORE Year One Listeria Metrics Data
Report Period: [October 1, 2010] to [September 30, 2011]
Performance Metrics:
(See associated document for complete language and definitions)		 Listeria Measures
Mean (Range)
1a. Total number of isolates and isolate-yielding specimens 12.7 (5 – 28)
1b. Number of primary isolates/isolate-yielding specimens 11.9 (5 – 26)
2a. Total number of STEC clinical specimens or samples received at PHL  
2b. Number; Percent isolate-yielding STEC specimens or samples  
3. Median days from isolation /isolate-yielding specimen collection to receipt at PHL 7 days (4 – 10) days
4. Median days from receipt of isolate-yielding specimens at PHL to recovery of isolate 2.5 days (1 – 4) days
5. Percent of primary isolates with serotype information  
6. Median days from isolate receipt (or recovery) at PHL to serotype result  
7. Percent of primary isolates with PFGE information 100% (100 – 100%)
8. Median days from isolate receipt (or recovery) at PHL to PFGE upload to PulseNet 4.4 days (2 – 10) days
9. Number of laboratory confirmed cases reported to epidemiology staff 13.1 (5 – 27)
10a. Percent of cases with attempted interview 96.5% (83 – 100%)
10b. Median days from case report to interview attempt 1 days (0 – 2) days
10c. Percent of cases with complete demographic data 91.4% (80 – 100%)
10d. Percent of cases with exposure history 84% (67 – 100%)
10d-i. Percent of SSL cases with full shotgun or case exposure completed No cumulative data available1
10e. Percent of cases with serotype information  
10f. Percent of cases with PFGE information 92.3% (80 – 100%)
10f-i. Percent of cases with PFGE with complete epi data 59.4% (0 – 79%)
10g. Reasons for not interviewing cases
10g-i. Lost to Follow-up: Number; Percent 0.5 (0 – 1); 11% (0 – 33%)
10g-ii. Refused: Number; Percent 0 (0 – 0); 0% (0 – 0%)
10g-iii. Time lag too long: Number(Percent) 0.3 (0 – 1); 2.8% (0 – 11%)
10g-iv. Other: Number; Percent 1.3 (0 – 2); 43.8% (0 – 100%)
11. Number of clusters 0.7 (0 – 2)
11a. Median and range of cluster size(primary cases only) No cumulative data available1
12. Number; Percent of clusters with cases in multiple states 1 (0 – 2); 66.7% (0 – 100%)
13a. Number; Percent of clusters with routine interview of cases 1.7 (1 – 2); 100% (100 – 100%)
13b. Number; Percent of clusters with supplemental/targeted interviewing of cases No cumulative data available1
13c. Number; Percent of clusters where an analytic epidemiologic study conducted (>10 Salmonella cases) 0.7 (0 – 2); 33.3% (0 – 100%)
13d. Median duration ( in days) of epidemiologic investigation, from cluster notification to end of investigation/close-out No cumulative data available1
14. Number; Percent of clusters with suspect vehicle/source identified 0.7 (0 – 2); 33.3% (0 – 100%)
15. Number; Percent of clusters with confirmed vehicle/source identified 1 (0 – 2); 66.7% (0 – 100%)
16a. Number; Percent of clusters with identified vehicle/source with control measure taken 1 (0 – 2); 66.7% (0 – 100%)
16b. Number; Percent of clusters with identified vehicle/source with public health action taken 0 (0 – 0); 0% (0 – 0%)
17. Number; Percent of clusters linked to a restaurant/food establishment with EHA 0 (0 – 0); 0% (0 – 0%)
18. Number; Percent of clusters with food/environmental sample collected for testing 1 (0 – 2); 66.7% (0 – 100%)
19. Number; Percent of clusters where EH, Ag, regulatory, or food safety program staff contacted 0 (0 – 0);
20. Number; Percent of outbreaks with NORS form completed No cumulative data available1
20a. Number; Percent of outbreaks with supplemental form completed No cumulative data available1

1Cumulative data for this metric were not reported from 3 or more centers
Page last reviewed: April 12, 2019
Content source: National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases (DFWED)