CDC FoodCORE Year Ten Cumulative Metrics Data – Salmonella, Shiga Toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC), and Listeria (SSL) plus Shigella and Campylobacter

Data Report Period: January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020

Ten state and local health departments participate in FoodCORE. Data are only reported when available from three or more centers; ‘n’ indicates the number of centers reporting each metric.

Table showing the Mean (Range) for Salmonella, STEC, Listeria, Shigella, and Campylobacter
Performance Metrics: (See FoodCORE website for complete language and definitions) Salmonella Mean (Range) STEC Mean (Range) Listeria Mean (Range) Shigella Mean (Range) Campylobacter Mean (Range)
1a. Total number of isolates and isolate-yielding specimens 794 (372–1599)
n=10
173 (44–327)
n=10
16 (5–36)
n=10
89 (29–195)
n=9
267 (31–766)
n=9
1b. Number of primary isolates/isolate-yielding specimens 732 (321–1582)
n=10
158 (42–322)
n=10
15 (5–33)
n=10
81 (24–185)
n=9
262 (29–746)
n=9
2a. Total number of preliminary positive clinical specimens 688 (383–1666)
n=9
267 (87–649)
n=10
n/a 106 (11–283)
n=8
371 (24–1053)
n=8
2b. Number; Percent isolate-yielding preliminary positive clinical specimens 634 (343–1582)
92% (86%–99%)
n=9
153 (20–327)
57% (23%–98%)
n=10
n/a 65 (8–163)
61% (31%–87%)
n=8
280 (19–766)
84% (71%–100%)
n=8
3. Median days from isolation/isolate-yielding specimen collection to receipt at PHL 4 (3–6)
n=10
4 (2–9)
n=10
5 (1–10)
n=10
4 (2–6)
n=9
4 (2–7)
n=9
4. Median days from receipt of isolate-yielding specimens at PHL to recovery of isolate 2 (1–4)
n=7
3 (2–5)
n=8
2 (0–4)
n=7
3 (2–4)
n=7
2 (0–4)
n=8
5. Percent of primary isolates with serotype information 100% (99%–100%)
n=10
90% (66%–100%)
n=10
n/a 93% (40%–100%)
n=9
98% (92%–100%)
n=6
6. Median days from isolate receipt (or recovery) to serotype result 5 (1–11)
n=10
4 (0–10)
n=10
n/a 3 (1–7)
n=9
5 (1–14)
n=6
7. Percent of primary isolates with WGS information 99% (97%–100%)
n=10
99% (95%–100%)
n=10
94% (54%–100%)
n=10
72% (0%–100%)
n=9
72% (0%–100%)
n=8
8a. Median days from isolate receipt (or recovery) to WGS sequence being shared 7 (4–10)
n=10
8 (4–10)
n=10
6 (4–10)
n=10
8 (5–15)
n=8
9 (4–13)
n=6
8b. Median days from isolate receipt (or recovery) at WGS lab to upload to sequence being shared 6 (4–10)
n=10
6 (4–9)
n=10
5 (4–8)
n=10
7 (4–13)
n=8
7 (4–12)
n=6
9a. Number of reported laboratory confirmed cases 679 (318–1549)
n=10
131 (26–258)
n=10
15 (7–36)
n=10
91 (25–222)
n=9
565 (285–1184)
n=9
9b. Number of reported probable cases 94 (22–194)
n=10
118 (35–266)
n=10
0 (0–1)
n=10
71 (7–275)
n=9
449 (123–1249)
n=8
9c. Number of reported suspect cases 2 (0–18)
n=10
3 (0–9)
n=10
0 (0–2)
n=10
2 (0–11)
n=9
n/a
10a.1 Percent of confirmed cases with attempted interview 97% (91%–100%)
n=10
97% (88%–100%)
n=10
96% (78%–100%)
n=10
84% (20%–100%)
n=8
79% (5%–100%)
n=8
10a.2 Percent of probable/suspect cases with attempted interview 90% (38%–100%)
n=10
94% (81%–100%)
n=10
80% (0%–100%)
n=5
82% (24%–100%)
n=8
78% (2%–100%)
n=8
10b. Median days from confirmed/probable/suspect case report to interview attempt 2 (0–6)
n=10
2 (0–6)
n=10
1 (0–4)
n=10
1 (0–2)
n=8
3 (1–5)
n=8
10c. Median days from confirmed/probable/suspect case report to completed interview 3 (0–9)
n=10
3 (1–8)
n=10
3 (0–8)
n=10
2 (1–5)
n=8
4 (1–8)
n=8
10d. Percent of confirmed cases with complete demographic data 91% (77%–100%)
n=10
92% (78%–100%)
n=10
95% (78%–100%)
n=10
91% (65%–100%)
n=8
83% (44%–98%)
n=8
10e. Percent of confirmed cases with exposure history 85% (74%–100%)
n=10
87% (79%–94%)
n=10
85% (69%–100%)
n=10
72% (62%–88%)
n=8
79% (64%–95%)
n=8
10e.1 Percent of confirmed cases with full exposure interview 89% (77%–100%)
n=10
89% (70%–100%)
n=10
89% (56%–100%)
n=10
90% (71%–100%)
n=8
89% (70%–100%)
n=8
10f. Percent of confirmed cases with serotype information 85% (13%–99%)
n=10
77% (25%–100%)
n=10
n/a 77% (1%–100%)
n=9
n/a
10g. Percent of confirmed cases with WGS information 91% (79%–99%)
n=10
87% (68%–99%)
n=10
87% (61%–100%)
n=10
58% (0%–96%)
n=9
36% (0%–91%)
n=8
10g.1 Percent of confirmed cases with WGS with exposure history obtained 80% (73%–87%)
n=10
82% (70%–93%)
n=10
81% (56%–100%)
n=10
77% (45%–100%)
n=8
81% (56%–100%)
n=7
10h. Reasons for not interviewing cases
10h.1 Number; Percent Lost to Follow-up/Refused Interview 115 (37–312)
16% (6%–24%)
n=10
19 (7–44)
15% (6%–26%)
n=10
2 (0–3)
15% (0%–43%)
n=10
n/a n/a
10h.2 Number; Percent Lag Time Too Long 2 (0–8)
0% (0%–2%)
n=9
0 (0–2)
0% (0%–3%)
n=9
0 (0–0)
0% (0%–0%)
n=9
n/a n/a
10h.3 Number; Percent Other 23 (0–89)
3% (0%–12%)
n=9
2 (0–13)
2% (0%–8%)
n=9
1 (0–3)
6% (0%–33%)
n=9
n/a n/a
11. Number of investigations 40 (11–77)
n=10
9 (0–24)
n=10
1 (0–6)
n=10
n/a n/a
12a. Number; Percent of investigations with routine interview of cases 36 (10–77)
81% (8%–100%)
n=10
10 (4–24)
90% (14%–100%)
n=9
2 (0–6)
57% (0%–100%)
n=7
n/a n/a
12b. Number; Percent of investigations with supplemental/targeted interviewing of cases 8 (2–14)
21% (8%–48%)
n=9
3 (1–9)
29% (11%–69%)
n=8
0 (0–1)
10% (0%–33%)
n=5
n/a n/a
12c. Number; Percent of investigations where an analytic epidemiologic study conducted 3 (0–12)
6% (0%–18%)
n=10
2 (0–7)
6% (0%–54%)
n=9
0 (0–1)
7% (0%–33%)
n=7
n/a n/a
13. Number; Percent of investigations with suspect vehicle/source identified 6 (2–15)
17% (0%–64%)
n=10
2 (0–8)
19% (0%–75%)
n=9
0 (0–1)
31% (0%–100%)
n=7
n/a n/a
14. Number; Percent of investigations with confirmed vehicle/source identified 7 (0–16)
18% (0%–55%)
n=10
1 (0–5)
11% (0%–38%)
n=9
0 (0–1)
5% (0%–33%)
n=7
n/a n/a
15. Number; Percent of investigations with source identified with:
a. Exclusion of ill person(s) 1 (0–5)
2% (0%–9%)
n=10
1 (0–6)
7% (0%–46%)
n=9
0 (0–0)
0% (0%–0%)
n=6
n/a n/a
b. Remediation or closure 1 (0–5)
2% (0%–17%)
n=10
1 (0–3)
4% (0%–23%)
n=9
0 (0–1)
6% (0%–33%)
n=6
n/a n/a
c. Educational campaign 1 (0–5)
5% (0%–25%)
n=10
1 (0–6)
5% (0%–46%)
n=9
0 (0–0)
0% (0%–0%)
n=6
n/a n/a
d. Media/public messaging 4 (0–13)
11% (0%–45%)
n=10
1 (0–4)
5% (0%–31%)
n=9
0 (0–1)
6% (0%–33%)
n=6
n/a n/a
e. Regulatory action (recall, hold) 2 (0–5)
4% (0%–10%)
n=10
1 (0–3)
8% (0%–25%)
n=9
0 (0–1)
8% (0%–33%)
n=6
n/a n/a
16. Number; Percent of investigations linked to a restaurant/food establishment with EHA 3 (0–7)
30% (0%–100%)
n=10
1 (0–2)
26% (0%–100%)
n=9
0 (0–1)
14% (0%–100%)
n=7
n/a n/a
17. Number; Percent of investigations with food/environmental sample collected for testing 2 (0–12)
7% (0%–41%)
n=10
0 (0–3)
3% (0%–17%)
n=9
0 (0–1)
5% (0%–33%)
n=7
n/a n/a
18. Number; Percent of investigations where environmental health partners were contacted 7 (0–25)
19% (0%–86%)
n=10
2 (0–7)
19% (0%–54%)
n=9
1 (0–2)
14% (0%–67%)
n=6
n/a n/a
19. Number; Percent of outbreaks with NORS form completed 9 (1–23)
83% (13%–100%)
n=10
2 (0–6)
60% (0%–100%)
n=9
0 (0–1)
7% (0%–33%)
n=7
n/a n/a

All data are cumulative. Core performance metrics that are required for reporting are in bold.

*CDC FoodCORE centers reported on Year Ten (2020) cumulative metrics in 2021. Performance measures where n<10 may be indicative of limitations in reporting due to restricted staff capacity as state and local health departments prioritized activities related to COVID-19 response efforts.

Download Table pdf icon[PDF – 4 pages]