
Assessing the Accuracy and Completeness of OpenStreetMap Sidewalks: A Comparative Study With Google Street View
ORIGINAL RESEARCH — Volume 23 — October 1, 2026
PEER REVIEWED
| Comparison | Google Street View: Both sides | Google Street View: 1 side | Google Street View: Neither side | Google Street View: Not available |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OpenStreetMap: Both sides | 554 | 2 | 0 | 15 |
| OpenStreetMap: 1 side | 300 | 254 | 9 | 29 |
| OpenStreetMap: Neither side | 1,886 | 678 | 2,420 | 903 |
Figure 1. Point-level agreement between Google Street View and OpenStreetMap. Green cells indicate concordant pairs; yellow cells indicate discordant pairs, denoting inaccuracy in OpenStreetMap; red cells indicate discordant pairs, denoting incompleteness in OpenStreetMap; and gray cells indicate that data were not available in Google Street View. Only the points in “Google Street View: Both sides” and “Google Street View: 1 side” were used in logistic mixed models.
The map shows Baltimore, Maryland, and parts of Maryland just outside Washington, DC, depicting census tracts that have and do not have sidewalks as well as areas with no Google Street View images. The maps show the percentage of OpenStreetMap–Google Street View agreement.
Figure 2. Agreement in presence of sidewalks between OpenStreetMap and Google Street View for randomly selected census tracts, categorized by Jenks natural breaks, in Maryland.
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.