PCD logo

Clinician Discussion of Family Cancer Risk and Use of Genetic Testing Among US Adults With a Family History of Cancer

PEER REVIEWED

Of 29,522 adult survey respondents to the 2023 National Health Interview Survey, 17,741 were excluded: 15,960 were without family cancer history and 1,781 were missing data (ranging from 0.02% to 6.5%). Missing data included the following categories: family cancer history (n = 820), race (n = 408), self-reported severe difficulty or inability to remember/concentrate (n = 375), clinician discussion (n = 44), education level (n = 33), genetic testing (n = 32), age (n = 20), number of urgent care visits in the past 12 months (n = 16), self-reported personal cancer history (n = 13), health insurance (n= 11), usual place of care (n = 7), and sex (n = 2). This process yielded 11,781 adults in the analysis cohort. Of these, 5,464 (45%) had family cancer history and clinician discussion, and 6,317 (55%) had family cancer history and no clinician discussion. PS matching and 1:1 greedy nearest-neighbor PS matching without replacement was conducted. The result was 9,476 PS–matched cohort (unweighted) with an exact match on age, sex, race, education level, rural/urban; health insurance, usual place of care; number of times visited urgent care past 12 months; and personal cancer history. Finally, 4,738 (50%) were in the group with family cancer history and clinician discussion, and 4,738 (50%) were in the group with family cancer history and no clinician discussion.

Figure. Flow diagram for a study on clinician discussion of family cancer risk and use of genetic testing among US adults with a family history of cancer. The PS matched cohort (unweighted n = 9,476) represented 72.6 million US adults. Percentages account for the complex survey design by incorporating strata, primary sampling units, and sampling weights. Abbreviation: PS, propensity score. Data source: 2023 National Health Information Survey (13).

Return to Article

Top


The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.