PCD logo

Longitudinal Spatial Analysis of Health-Related Quality of Life in Mississippi: Clustering, Trends, and Socioeconomic Drivers

PEER REVIEWED

LISA cluster classification Counties
2016 (n = 22) 2025 (n = 15)
High-High Coahoma, Humphreys, Leflore, Sharkey, Sunflower, Tallahatchie, Washington, Yazoo Carroll, Coahoma, Grenada, Humphreys, Leflore, Quitman, Sunflower, Tallahatchie, Washington
Low-Low Forrest, George, Hancock, Harrison, Hinds, Jackson, Marshall, Pearl River, Perry, Stone Hinds, Marshall, Rankin, Stone
Low-High Carroll, Franklin, Warren Attala
High-Low Scott Scott

 

Figure 1. Local indicators of spatial association (LISA) cluster maps for the principal component analysis–based composite health-related quality-of-life score in Mississippi Counties. A) 2016; B) 2025. Data source: County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, 2015–2025 releases.

Return to Article

EHSA trend classification No. of counties County names
Consecutive cold spot 4 Jefferson Davis, Oktibbeha, Panola, Pearl River
Consecutive hot spot 3 Jefferson, Leflore, Marion
New hot spot 1 Jackson
Sporadic cold spot 8 Hinds, Lamar, Lauderdale, Madison, Monroe, Tate, Tunica, Winston
Sporadic hot spot 9 Benton, Claiborne, Coahoma, Itawamba, Sharkey, Smith, Warren, Wayne, Yazoo
No pattern detected 57 All others

 

Figure 2. Emerging hot spot analysis (EHSA) of trends in health-related quality-of-life scores in Mississippi counties from 2015 through 2025. Data source: County Health Rankings & Roadmaps, 2015–2025 releases.

Return to Article

Top


The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.