National air quality has improved since the 1990s, but many challenges remain in protecting public health and the environment from air quality problems. Air pollution in the United States poses a public health threat affecting potentially millions of people throughout the country. It is associated with health problems that include asthma, increased emergency department visits and hospital stays for breathing and heart problems and increases in illnesses such as pneumonia and bronchitis.
Since the 1950s, air quality has been a major public health and environmental concern. Local, state, and national programs have helped us learn more about the problems and how to solve them. Federal, state, local, and tribal air agencies operate and maintain a wide variety of outdoor air monitoring systemsexternal icon across the United States. Many of these systems serve several environmental objectives. At a basic level, they let us know how clean or polluted the air is, help us track progress in reducing air pollution, and inform the public about air quality in their communities. The Tracking Network hosts and uses data from some of these sources to help paint a more complete picture of air quality in the United States.
CDC works closely with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agencyexternal icon, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), external iconthe National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA), external iconand the National Weather Serviceexternal icon to provide air quality data on the Tracking Network and to better understand how air pollution affects our health.
Monitor + Modeled Air Data
After careful study, EPA and CDC found that air pollution modeled predictions are very similar to actual monitor data in areas where the two can be compared. In some areas, the modeled data underestimates or overestimates the air pollutant concentration levels when compared to the Air Quality System (AQS) monitoring data. Therefore, the best way to use modeled air data is in conjunction with actual monitoring data. On the Tracking Network, both AQSexternal icon and modeled datasets are available to track possible exposures to ozone and PM2.5, evaluate health impacts, conduct analytical studies linking health effects and the environment, and guide public health actions.
- Ozone Days Above Regulatory Standard
The number of days in which the daily maximum 8-hour average ozone concentration exceeds a standard provides an indication of short-term spikes in ozone concentrations. This may give you an idea of how many days per year you may be exposed to unhealthy levels of ozone.
- PM2.5 – Days Above Regulatory Standard
These data help summarize short-term trends in particle pollution concentrations. This may give you an idea of how many days per year you may be exposed to unhealthy levels of particulate matter.
- Annual PM2.5 – Level
These data help summarize long-term trends in particle pollution concentrations. This will give you an idea of what the yearly level of PM2.5 is in an area.
Health Impacts of Fine Particles in Air: Mortality Benefits Associated with Reducing PM2.5 Concentration Levels
To calculate these data, CDC is using EPA’s BenMAPexternal icon with modeled air data for fine particulates, death data from CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics, population data from the U.S. Census Bureauexternal icon, and information from scientific literature about the relationship between change in air pollution and how that influences health effects. These data summarize the estimated number of deaths prevented and percent change in deaths associated with lowering PM2.5 concentration levels. The Tracking Network lets the user sort many results by categories of county-level sociodemographic variables such as percentage of population in poverty, percentage of adult smokers, population density, and more.
- prioritize emission sources as potential targets for risk reduction activities and further study,
- identify locations of interest for further investigation, and
- show the geographic distribution of air toxics.
This indicator displays locations of predicted surface smoke concentrations from wildfires that are layered on top of county- and census tract-level measures of access to care and social vulnerability, health status, annual air quality levels, or population characteristics
The health effects of air pollution are influenced by social, demographic, and economic factors. The Tracking Network allows users to analyze factors that may increase vulnerability to health effects including income, race and ethnicity, health insurance status, and age. Tracking air quality in a standard way over time can help us
- track potential exposures and evaluate health impacts.
- estimate the positive health impacts that could be achieved with a change in outdoor air quality.
- prioritize emission sources as potential targets for risk reduction activities and for further study.
- identify locations of interest for further investigation.
- assist public health practitioners and emergency responders identify populations at risk for exposure to wildfire smoke and make informed decisions before, during, and after wildfire smoke emergencies.
Read these success stories to learn about air quality related work happening in our funded Tracking Programs.
- Air Quality
- Air Now external icon(EPA)
- National Ambient Air Quality Standards external icon(EPA)
- Wildfires, Climate, & Health