Health-Related Behavioral Risk Factors and Obesity Among American Indians and Alaska Natives of the United States: Assessing Variations by Indian Health Service Region

Guixiang Zhao, MD, PhD¹; Jason Hsia, PhD¹; Alexander Vigo-Valentín, PhD²; William S. Garvin, BS¹; Machell Town, PhD, MS¹ (View author affiliations)

Suggested citation for this article: Zhao G, Hsia J, Vigo-Valentín A, Garvin WS, Town M. Health-Related Behavioral Risk Factors and Obesity Among American Indians and Alaska Natives of the United States: Assessing Variations by Indian Health Service Region. Prev Chronic Dis 2022;19:210298. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd19.210298external icon.

PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction

Health-related behavioral risk factors and obesity are linked to high risk for multiple chronic diseases. We examined the prevalence of these risk factors among American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/ANs) compared with that of non-Hispanic Whites and across Indian Health Service (IHS) regions.

Methods

We used 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from participants in 50 states and the District of Columbia to assess 4 behavioral risk factors (current cigarette smoking, heavy drinking, binge drinking, and physical inactivity) and obesity. We analyzed disparities in these risk factors between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White participants, nationwide and by IHS region, by conducting log-linear regression analyses while controlling for potential confounders.

Results

Nationwide, crude prevalence of current smoking, physical inactivity, and obesity were significantly higher among AI/AN than non-Hispanic White participants. After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, AI/AN participants were 11% more likely to report current smoking (P < .05) and 23% more likely to report obesity (P < .001) than non-Hispanic White participants. These patterns persisted in most IHS regions with some exceptions. In the Southwest region, AI/AN participants were 39% less likely to report current smoking than non-Hispanic White participants (P < .001). In the Pacific Coast region, compared with non-Hispanic White participants, AI/AN participants were 54% less likely to report heavy drinking (P < .01) but 34% more likely to report physical inactivity (P < .05). Across IHS regions, AI/AN participants residing in Alaska and the Northern Plains regions had the highest prevalence of current smoking and binge drinking, and those in the Southwest and Pacific Coast regions had the lowest prevalence of current smoking. AI/AN participants in the Southwest region had the lowest prevalence of physical inactivity, and those in the Southern Plains region had the highest prevalence of obesity.

Conclusions

The findings of this study support the importance of public health efforts to address and improve behavioral risk factors related to chronic disease in AI/AN people, both nationwide and among IHS regions, through culturally appropriate interventions.

Top

Introduction

Behavioral risk factors, such as cigarette smoking or commercial tobacco use, excessive alcohol use (eg, heavy and binge drinking), and sedentary lifestyle, as well as obesity are linked to increased risk for multiple chronic diseases including heart disease, hypertension, stroke, diabetes, and cancer (1–4). Improving lifestyle behaviors plays an important role in the prevention and control of these diseases (4–6).

American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) people comprise a population with distinctive sociohistorical characteristics (7). In the US, the AI/AN population alone reached 3.7 million and the AI/AN population alone or in combination with other racial groups reached 7.1 million in 2020, which increased by 85.2% from 2010 to 2020 (8). The projected AI/AN population alone or in combination will reach 10.1 million in 2060 (8). AI/AN people have a higher burden of many chronic diseases including type 2 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, cancers, and mental illnesses (9–12). A national survey of the US adult population in 2014–2018 reported that, compared with all US adults, AI/AN adults had a significantly higher prevalence of having a severe disability (16.3% vs 8.9%), diagnosed hypertension (33.7% vs 28.7%), diagnosed diabetes (15.0% vs 8.6%), and multiple chronic conditions (31.9% vs 24.2%) (12). Significant disparities in all-cause or cancer mortality also existed among AI/AN individuals, especially in comparison with non-Hispanic White individuals (13). The high prevalence of these conditions may be linked to the health-related behaviors of AI/AN people; however, there is a growing consensus that historical trauma experienced by AI/AN communities as a consequence of the US federal policies of relocation, assimilation, and tribal termination are the underlying causes of many of these health behaviors and outcomes (14,15).

The health-related risk factors of AI/AN individuals have been reported for the periods of 1997–2000 (16,17), 2000–2006 (18), and 2000–2010 (19). These studies were conducted either among AI/AN people nationwide (16–18) or among the AI/AN population living in the Indian Health Service (IHS) Contract Health Service Delivery Areas (19). These studies have shown significantly higher prevalence of current smoking, excessive alcohol use, physical inactivity, and obesity among AI/AN people as compared with people from other racial and ethnic groups, especially non-Hispanic White people (16–19). However, due to the limited sample size of AI/AN people, these studies reported estimates based on multiple-year combined data (16–19). Consequently, the Office of Minority Health at the US Department Health and Human Services and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched an initiative in 2017 to oversample participants in states that have a high proportion of AI/AN people to improve understanding of the health status of AI/AN communities. The aim of this study was to expand knowledge of the health-related behaviors and obesity prevalence of AI/AN people. With an increased sample size of AI/AN individuals, we were able to examine these risk factors stratified by IHS region, which has not been done previously.

Top

Methods

Study sample

The Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) is a state-based, landline- and cellular-telephone survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 years or older conducted annually to collect health information about participants’ general health status, health-related behavioral risk factors, health care access and use of preventive services, and chronic diseases and conditions in 50 states, the District of Columbia (DC), and participating US territories. Detailed information on BRFSS has been described elsewhere (20). BRFSS data provide compatible estimates for major health outcomes and health-related behaviors in comparison with other national surveys (21).

In 2017, as part of a collaboration between CDC and the Office of Minority Health in an effort to improve understanding of the health status of AI/AN individuals, the BRFSS oversampled participants residing in 11 states (Alaska, Arizona, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, and Wisconsin) that have a high proportion of AI/AN people. The oversample was to target specific banks of telephone numbers (with the same sampling frame of BRFSS) that were expected to yield a higher percentage of AI/AN respondents within these states. For this study, we analyzed data from 342,978 noninstitutionalized AI/AN (non-Hispanic) and non-Hispanic White participants residing in 50 states and the District of Columbia. The median response rate was 45.9% (ranging from 30.6% in Illinois to 64.1% in Wyoming) for the 2017 BRFSS (20).

Measures

We examined the prevalence of obesity and 4 health-related behavioral risk factors: 1) current cigarette smoking, 2) heavy drinking, 3) binge drinking, and 4) physical inactivity. Participants were considered current smokers if they had smoked at least 100 cigarettes during their lifetime and were still smoking at the time the survey was conducted. Heavy drinking was defined as average daily consumption of more than 2 alcoholic drinks for men or more than 1 alcoholic drink for women during the previous 30 days. Binge drinking was defined as having 1 or more occasions of consuming 5 or more drinks for men or 4 or more drinks for women on an occasion during the previous 30 days. Physical inactivity was defined as not engaging in any moderately or vigorously intensive activities during leisure time over the previous 30 days. Obesity was defined as having a body mass index (BMI, kg/m²) of 30 or higher.

The 6 IHS regions were defined by state as previously reported (13,22): 1) Alaska; 2) Northern Plains (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming); 3) Southern Plains (Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas); 4) Southwest (Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah); 5) Pacific Coast (California, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii); and 6) East (the remaining 25 states and the District of Columbia).

Sociodemographic covariates were age (18–44, 45–64, and ≥65 y), sex (male, female), educational attainment (less than a high school diploma, high school diploma/GED, and more than a high school diploma), marital status (married, previously married [ie, divorced, widowed, or separated], and other [ie, never married or living with a partner]), and federal poverty level (FPL, <100%, 100%–199%, ≥200%, and unknown). The BRFSS protocol was approved by the CDC institutional review board and was determined to be exempt.

Statistical analyses

Participants who responded “don’t know/not sure,” refused to answer, or had missing responses to any of the study covariates (except for income; the missing income/FPL was treated as an unknown group) were excluded from analysis, leaving 8,287 AI/AN and 334,691 non-Hispanic White participants eligible for analysis (N = 342,978). We calculated weighted prevalence with 95% CIs for health-related behavioral risk factors and obesity among AI/AN and non-Hispanic White BRFSS participants, nationwide and by IHS region. Adjusted prevalence ratios (APRs) and prevalence ratios with 95% CIs were estimated by conducting log-linear regression analyses with a robust variance estimator while adjusting for sociodemographic covariates, using non-Hispanic White participants (for comparisons between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White participants) or East region (for comparisons across IHS regions) as the reference groups. SAS-callable SUDAAN software (Research Triangle Institute) was used to account for the multistage, complex sampling design.

Top

Results

Of US adults, compared with non-Hispanic Whites, AI/AN participants were younger (mean age, 46.3 y vs 50.0 y), attained a lower level of education (46.3% vs 63.7% having more than a high school diploma), had lower proportions of being married (39.8% vs 55.7%), and had a lower income level (28.2% vs 49.5% with household income ≥200% FPL) (Table 1). Across 6 IHS regions, 2.8% of AI/AN participants lived in Alaska, 15.8% in the Northern Plains, 15.3% in the Southern Plains, 16.9% in the Southwest, 13.8% in the Pacific Coast, and 35.4% in the East regions; approximately 0.2%, 18.5%, 8.3%, 6.2%, 12.8%, and 53.9% of non-Hispanic Whites resided in these regions, respectively, in 2017.

The sociodemographic characteristics of AI/AN participants differed significantly across 6 IHS regions (Table 1). Notably, the Pacific Coast region had the highest percentage of people who were of AI/AN race or ethnicity and aged 65 years or older (28.4%) compared with the other regions (ranging from 12.1% to 18.0%) and had the highest percentage of AI/AN education level of more than a high school diploma (57.2%) compared with other regions (ranging from 34.5% to 47.7%). AI/AN participants residing in the Southern Plains region had the highest proportion of being married (47.0%) when compared with AI/AN participants living in other IHS regions (ranging from 32.1% to 41.9%) and had the highest proportion of a household income of 200% or higher of the FPL (40.1%) when compared with AI/ANs living in other IHS regions (ranging from 21.3% to 37.1%).

Nationwide, the crude prevalence of current smoking, physical inactivity, and obesity was significantly higher among AI/AN than non-Hispanic White participants (Table 2). The prevalence of heavy and binge drinking did not differ significantly between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White participants. After multivariable adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, AI/AN participants remained 11% (P < .05) more likely to report current smoking and 23% (P < .001) more likely to report obesity than non-Hispanic White participants. These patterns persisted in most IHS regions, with some exceptions. In the Southwest region, although the crude prevalence of current smoking did not differ significantly between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White participants (15.7% vs 14.4%), after multiple adjustment for sociodemographic variables, AI/AN participants were 39% (P < .001) less likely to report current smoking than non-Hispanic White participants (Adjusted prevalence, 9.0% [95% CI, 7.5%–11.0%] vs 14.9% [95% CI, 14.3%–15.5%]). In contrast, in the Southern Plains region, although the crude prevalence of current smoking was significantly higher among AI/AN participants than non-Hispanic White participants (28.1% vs 17.0%, P < .001), the difference was attenuated after multiple variable adjustment (APR = 1.04 [95% CI, 0.72–1.53]). In the Pacific Coast region, the prevalence of current smoking did not differ significantly between the 2 groups; however, AI/AN participants were 54% (P < .01) less likely to report heavy drinking, 34% (P < .05) more likely to report physical inactivity, and 28% (P < .05) more likely to report obesity than non-Hispanic White participants after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics.

When comparing AI/AN participants across the IHS regions, after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, the prevalence of current smoking was highest among AI/AN participants residing in Alaska and the Northern Plains region and lowest among those in the Southwest and Pacific Coast regions (Table 3). Compared with AI/AN participants residing in the East region, those living in the Northern Plains region were 23% (P < .05) more likely to report current smoking and 34% (P < .05) more likely to report binge drinking. AI/ANs living in the Southern Plains were 29% (P < .01) more likely to report obesity; AI/ANs living in the Southwest were 53% (P < .001) less likely to report current smoking and 23% (P < .01) less likely to report physical inactivity; and AI/ANs living in the Pacific Coast region were 38% (P < .01) less likely to report current smoking, after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics (Table 3).

Top

Discussion

Our results from a large, population-based survey demonstrated that AI/AN people nationwide were significantly more likely to report current smoking and having obesity compared with non-Hispanic White people. These patterns persisted in most of the IHS regions with a few exceptions: 1) AI/ANs were 39% less likely to report current smoking than non-Hispanic Whites in the Southwest region, and 2) the prevalence of current smoking did not differ significantly between the 2 groups in the Southern Plains and the Pacific Coast, after adjustment for sociodemographic variables. Moreover, we found that, in the Pacific Coast region, AI/AN people were 54% less likely to report heavy drinking but 34% more likely to report physical inactivity than non-Hispanic White people, which was not observed when analyses were conducted at the nationwide level. Furthermore, across IHS regions, AI/AN people residing in Alaska and the Northern Plains region had the highest prevalence of current smoking and binge drinking; AI/AN people in the Southwest and Pacific Coast regions had the lowest prevalence of current smoking. AI/AN people in the Southwest region also had the lowest prevalence of physical inactivity, and AI/AN people in the Southern Plains region had the highest prevalence of obesity, after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics.

Our findings that AI/AN individuals are more likely than non-Hispanic White individuals to report current smoking and having obesity at the nationwide level are consistent with reports of previous studies. For example, 3 studies reported that the prevalence of current smoking and obesity were higher in AI/AN individuals than non-Hispanic White individuals during the periods of 1997−2000, 2000−2006, and 2000−2010 (16,18,19). For alcohol consumption, some inconsistent results were reported in the literature. An early study reported that the rates of alcohol-attributable deaths were higher among an AI/AN population than a White population, mainly resulting from alcohol-related causes that were acute (eg, hypothermia, alcohol poisoning) or chronic (eg, alcoholic psychosis, alcoholic liver disease) (23). Of note, these higher mortality rates were reported using data collected from 1999 to 2009 in IHS Contract Health Service Delivery Areas counties with an IHS patient registration database (23). However, several other studies based on nationwide surveillance data from the 1997–2000 and 2000–2006 BRFSS did not show significant difference in overall alcohol consumption between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White people (16,18). When analyses were stratified by sex, Steele et al reported the prevalence of heavy drinking among AI/AN men was significantly higher than among non-Hispanic White men (8.8% vs 6.7%), whereas the prevalence was lower among AI/AN women than among non-Hispanic White women (3.5% vs 5.3%) (18). Another study using data from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health also reported that Native American individuals had lower or comparable rates for several alcohol measures examined when compared with White individuals, which was in contrast to the “Native American elevated alcohol consumption” belief (24). Our findings further demonstrated that no significant difference in alcohol consumption between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White individuals existed, even after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics. Similarly, no significant differences in heavy or binge drinking were observed among AI/AN individuals across the 6 IHS regions, except for AI/AN residents of the Northern Plains region, who were 34% more likely to report binge drinking than those residing in the East region. Future research should focus on evaluating the time trend of alcohol consumption among AI/AN individuals and further evaluate the long-term effects of alcohol use on mortality risk among both AI/AN and non-Hispanic White populations.

For physical inactivity, both Denny et al and Steele et al reported that AI/AN people had higher prevalence estimates of no leisure-time physical activity than non-Hispanic White people, using data from the 1997–2000 (32.5% vs 27.5%) and 2000–2006 (31.0% vs 21.5%) BRFSS (16,18). We did not observe significant differences in physical inactivity between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White people at the nationwide level after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics. Nevertheless, our findings indicate that approximately one-third of AI/AN people remain physically inactive and one-sixth of AI/AN people engage in binge drinking. Given that these health-related behaviors are linked to increased risk of developing multiple chronic diseases and conditions (1–4), public health interventions aiming to improve the overall health of AI/AN people should still target these risk factors (ie, health-related behavioral risk factors and obesity) that put people at high risk for other health outcomes (25).

We did find significant regional variations in 2 aspects: 1) variations in the magnitude of the differences between AI/AN and non-Hispanic White participants regarding their health-related behaviors or obesity, overall and by IHS region, and 2) variations in health-related behaviors or obesity among AI/AN participants by IHS region, even after multivariable adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics. Across 6 IHS service regions, AI/AN participants were 10% (in East) to 53% (in Southwest) more likely to report obesity than non-Hispanic White participants. Although AI/AN participants were 17% (in East), 44% (in Northern Plains), and 56% (in Alaska) more likely to report current smoking than non-Hispanic White participants in those regions, the prevalence of current smoking did not differ significantly between the 2 racial groups in the Southern Plains and Pacific Coast regions. However, AI/AN participants residing in the Southwest region were 39% less likely to report current smoking than non-Hispanic White participants of this region. These findings are consistent with what has been reported previously (26,27). In our study, AI/AN people living in the Pacific Coast region seem to have unique characteristics, being less likely to engage in heavy drinking and more likely to be physically inactive compared with non-Hispanic White people of the same region.

Regional variations were particularly apparent within the AI/AN population. After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, AI/AN people residing in Alaska and the Northern Plains region had the highest prevalence of current smoking (39.1% and 39.6%, respectively), whereas AI/AN people in the Southwest and Pacific Coast regions had the lowest prevalence of current smoking (15.2% and 20.0%, respectively). AI/AN individuals in the Southwest region had the lowest prevalence of physical inactivity (26.3%); AI/AN individuals in the Southern Plains region had the highest prevalence of obesity (47.1%), and AI/AN individuals in the East region had the lowest prevalence of binge drinking (14.5%). Although specific reasons that contribute to the significant disparities across IHS regions remain unclear, these variations do suggest that some AI/AN communities may be more at risk than others; therefore, our findings could help prioritize public health intervention programs, health education, and resources from IHS and other government agencies focusing on at-risk AI/AN communities. Studies indicate that health-related behaviors are associated with self-rated health status (28) and health-related quality of life (29,30), as well as multiple chronic conditions (31,32). Disparities in health outcomes associated with the 5 risk factors we assessed will be evaluated further for the AI/AN communities.

Healthy People 2030 Objectives for health-related risk factors include 1) reduce current cigarette smoking in adults to 5.0% (TU-02), 2) reduce the proportion of people aged 21 years or older who engaged in binge drinking in the past month to 25.4% (SU-10), 3) reduce the proportion of adults who do no physical activity in their free time to 21.2% (PA-01), 4) increase the proportion of adults who do enough aerobic physical activity for substantial health benefits to 59.2% (PA-02), and 5) reduce the proportion of adults with obesity to 36.0% (NWS-03) (33). Our findings suggest that, for some of the risk factors (eg, current cigarette smoking, physical inactivity), greater efforts are needed to achieve those objectives for both AI/AN and non-Hispanic White people. Greater efforts in reducing obesity are needed for AI/AN populations in almost all IHS regions.

Limitations

Our study has several limitations. First, BRFSS data are self-reported and may be subject to recall and social-desirability bias. Second, although BRFSS oversampled AI/AN people in 11 states in 2017, the overall sample size of AI/AN people remains small, and some of the estimates (especially for heavy drinking) were unstable or unreportable. Third, for current cigarette smoking, BRFSS did not inquire via the core questions about the types of cigarette smoked; in particular, no information was collected on the traditional tobacco products used in Indigenous populations. Fourth, data on physical activity included only leisure-time physical activities and did not consider other forms of physical activity, such as active transportation or jobs with a high demand for energy expenditure. Lastly, although this study demonstrated that significant regional disparities existed in health-related behavioral risk factors and obesity among AI/AN people after considering individual-level sociodemographic characteristics, because of lack of information we were unable to explore the reasons why some health-related risk factors may be more or less severe in one region than in other regions. Future research is warranted to examine the trends of health-related risk factors over time in all IHS regions to help refine public health programs that focus on AI/AN individuals. Multi-level analyses can be conducted to further examine the regional factors including cultural and socioeconomic determinants, as well as previous or ongoing public health intervention programs, that may contribute to regional disparities when information is available.

Conclusion

This study expands on scientific knowledge exploring racial and ethnic disparities, specifically in AI/AN people in health-related behavioral risk factors and obesity. Our analysis of population-based surveillance data demonstrated that AI/AN people continue to experience a greater burden of obesity and behavioral risk factors, especially current smoking, than non-Hispanic White people at the nationwide level as well as by IHS region. The significant disparities across IHS regions that we found provide a strong evidence base for tribal communities. Our findings support the importance of public health efforts to address and improve these risk factors in AI/AN people through culturally appropriate interventions. As the programs for chronic disease prevention and intervention among AI/AN populations continue, our findings can be applied to future intervention program planning and also serve as references for key measures for program evaluation. Moreover, prevention and intervention programs may be designed within an ecologic perspective that incorporates family relations, neighborhood environment, and culturally appropriate dissemination of information to enhance psychosocial traits (eg, attitudes, knowledge, intentions) toward healthier lifestyles in AI/AN communities.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the survey participants and state BRFSS coordinators for their efforts and time to collect the data.

G.Z. and M.T. participated in the conceptualization and design of the study, the analysis of the data, drafted the initial version of the manuscript and participated in critical revision of the manuscript. G.Z. had full access to the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Acquisition of data: G.Z. Analysis of data: G.Z. Interpretation of data: G.Z., J.H., M.T. Drafting of the manuscript: G.Z., M.T. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: G.Z., J.H., A.V., W.G., M.T. Study supervisor: M.T. No authors have financial support or competing interest to declare, and no funding was provided for this research. No copyrighted materials or tools were used in this research. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of CDC.

Top

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Machell Town, PhD, MS, Division of Population Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy, MS 107-6, Atlanta, GA 30341. Telephone: 770-488-4681. Email: mpt2@cdc.gov.

Author Affiliations: ¹Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia . ²Division of Policy and Data, Office of Minority Health, US Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Maryland.

Top

References

1. Lee I, Kim S, Kang H. Lifestyle risk factors and all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: data from the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16(17):3040-50. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
2. Colpani V, Baena CP, Jaspers L, van Dijk GM, Farajzadegan Z, Dhana K, et al. Lifestyle factors, cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality in middle-aged and elderly women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Epidemiol 2018;33(9):831–45. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
3. Griswold MG, Fullman N, Hawley C, Arian N, Zimsen SRM, Tymeson HD, et al. ; GBD 2016 Alcohol Collaborators. Alcohol use and burden for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet 2018;392(10152):1015–35. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
4. Virtanen M, Vahtera J, Singh-Manoux A, Elovainio M, Ferrie JE, Kivimäki M. Unfavorable and favorable changes in modifiable risk factors and incidence of coronary heart disease: The Whitehall II cohort study. Int J Cardiol 2018;269:7–12. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
5. Carlsson AC, Wändell PE, Gigante B, Leander K, Hellenius ML, de Faire U. Seven modifiable lifestyle factors predict reduced risk for ischemic cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality regardless of body mass index: a cohort study. Int J Cardiol 2013;168(2):946–52. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
6. Zhao G, Li C, Ford ES, Fulton JE, Carlson SA, Okoro CA, et al. Leisure-time aerobic physical activity, muscle-strengthening activity and mortality risks among US adults: the NHANES linked mortality study. Br J Sports Med 2014;48(3):244–9. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
7. Whitbeck LB, Sittner Hartshorn KJ, Walls ML. Indigenous adolescent development: psychological, social and historical contexts. New York (NY): Routledge; 2014.
8. US Census Bureau. Race and ethnicity in the United States: 2010 Census and 2020 Census. https:/www.census.gov/library/visualizations/interactive/race-and-ethnicity-in-the-united-state-2010-and-2020-census.html. Accessed October 20, 2021.
9. Breathett K, Sims M, Gross M, Jackson EA, Jones EJ, Navas-Acien A, et al. ; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; and Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health. Cardiovascular health in American Indians and Alaska Natives: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2020;141(25):e948–59. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
10. Burnette CE, Ka’apu K, Scarnato JM, Liddell J. Cardiovascular health among U.S. indigenous peoples: a holistic and sex-specific systematic review. J Evid Based Soc Work 2020;17(1):24–48.
11. Hutchinson RN, Shin S. Systematic review of health disparities for cardiovascular diseases and associated factors among American Indian and Alaska Native populations. PLoS One 2014;9(1):e80973. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
12. Villarroel MA, Clarke TC, Norris T. Health of American Indian and Alaska Native adults, by urbanization level: United States, 2014–2018. NCHS Data Brief 2020;(372):1–8. PubMedexternal icon
13. Espey DK, Jim MA, Cobb N, Bartholomew M, Becker T, Haverkamp D, et al. Leading causes of death and all-cause mortality in American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Public Health 2014;104(Suppl 3):S303–11. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
14. Walls ML, Whitbeck LB. The intergenerational effects of relocation policies on indigenous families. J Fam Issues 2012;33(9):1272–93. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
15. Teufel-Shone NI, Tippens JA, McCrary HC, Ehiri JE, Sanderson PR. Resilience in American Indian and Alaska Native public health: an underexplored framework. Am J Health Promot 2018;32(2):274–81. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
16. Denny CH, Holtzman D, Cobb N. Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives. Findings from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 1997–2000. MMWR Surveill Summ 2003;52(7):1–13. PubMedexternal icon
17. Doshi SR, Jiles R. Health behaviors among American Indian/Alaska Native women, 1998–2000 BRFSS. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2006;15(8):919–27. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
18. Steele CB, Cardinez CJ, Richardson LC, Tom-Orme L, Shaw KM. Surveillance for health behaviors of American Indians and Alaska Natives–findings from the behavioral risk factor surveillance system, 2000–2006. Cancer 2008;113(5 Suppl):1131–41. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
19. Cobb N, Espey D, King J. Health behaviors and risk factors among American Indians and Alaska Natives, 2000–2010. Am J Public Health 2014;104(Suppl 3):S481–9. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/. Accessed October 20, 2021.
21. Hsia J, Zhao G, Town M, Ren J, Okoro CA, Pierannunzi C, et al. Comparisons of estimates from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and other national health surveys, 2011–2016. Am J Prev Med 2020;58(6):e181–90. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
22. Espey DK, Jim MA, Richards TB, Begay C, Haverkamp D, Roberts D. Methods for improving the quality and completeness of mortality data for American Indians and Alaska Natives. Am J Public Health 2014;104(Suppl 3):S286–94. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
23. Landen M, Roeber J, Naimi T, Nielsen L, Sewell M. Alcohol-attributable mortality among American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States, 1999–2009. Am J Public Health 2014;104(Suppl 3):S343–9. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
24. Cunningham JK, Solomon TA, Muramoto ML. Alcohol use among Native Americans compared to whites: Examining the veracity of the ‘Native American elevated alcohol consumption’ belief. Drug Alcohol Depend 2016;160:65–75. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
25. The Community Preventive Services Task Force. Rural community works together to stay “Fun and Fit.” https://www.thecommunityguide.org/sites/default/files/assets/FunandFit-AK.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2021.
26. Nez Henderson P, Jacobsen C, Beals J; AI-SUPERPFP Team. Correlates of cigarette smoking among selected Southwest and Northern plains tribal groups: the AI-SUPERPFP Study. Am J Public Health 2005;95(5):867–72. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
27. Hodge FS, Struthers R. Persistent smoking among Northern Plains Indians: lenient attitudes, low harm value, and partiality toward cigarette smoking. J Cult Divers 2006;13(4):181–5. PubMedexternal icon
28. Tsai J, Ford ES, Li C, Zhao G, Pearson WS, Balluz LS. Multiple healthy behaviors and optimal self-rated health: findings from the 2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey. Prev Med 2010;51(3-4):268–74. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
29. Bloom EL, Minami H, Brown RA, Strong DR, Riebe D, Abrantes AM. Quality of life after quitting smoking and initiating aerobic exercise. Psychol Health Med 2017;22(9):1127–35. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
30. Cohrdes C, Mensink GBM, Hölling H. How you live is how you feel? Positive associations between different lifestyle factors, cognitive functioning, and health-related quality of life across adulthood. Qual Life Res 2018;27(12):3281–92. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
31. Ng R, Sutradhar R, Yao Z, Wodchis WP, Rosella LC. Smoking, drinking, diet and physical activity-modifiable lifestyle risk factors and their associations with age to first chronic disease. Int J Epidemiol 2020;49(1):113–30. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
32. Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks. Geneva (CH): World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/healthinfo/global_burden_disease/GlobalHealthRisks_report_full.pdf. Accessed October 20, 2021.
33. US Department of Health and Human Services. Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy people 2030: Browse objectives. https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives#health-behaviors. Accessed October 6, 2021.

Top

Tables

Abbreviations: AI/AN, American Indians/Alaska Native; HS, high school diploma; FPL, federal poverty level; NHW, non-Hispanic White.
^a Values are weighted percentages. IHS regions were defined as follows: 1) Alaska; 2) Northern Plains (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming); 3) Southern Plains (Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas); 4) Southwest (Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah); 5) Pacific Coast (California, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii); and 6) East (the remaining 25 states and DC).

Abbreviations: AI/AN, American Indian/Alaska Native; APR, adjusted prevalence ratio; IHS, Indian Health Service.
^a Values are weighted percentages. APRs adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, federal poverty level, and IHS region (for overall). IHS regions were defined as follows: 1) Alaska; 2) Northern Plains (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming); 3) Southern Plains (Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas); 4) Southwest (Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah); 5) Pacific Coast (California, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii); and 6) East (the remaining 25 states and DC).
^b P < .05.
^c P < .001.
^d Estimates suppressed because of relative standard errors >30%.
^e P < .01.
^f Unstable estimates with relative standard errors ranging from 20% to ≤30%.

Abbreviations: AI/AN, American Indian/Alaska Native; APR, adjusted prevalence ratio.
^a Adjusted for age, sex, education, marital status, and federal poverty level. IHS regions were defined as follows: 1) Alaska; 2) Northern Plains (Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Wisconsin, and Wyoming); 3) Southern Plains (Oklahoma, Kansas, and Texas); 4) Southwest (Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah); 5) Pacific Coast (California, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Hawaii); and 6) East (the remaining 25 states and DC).
^b P < .05.
^c P < .01.
^d P < .001.

Top