Awareness Among US Adults of Dental Sealants for Caries Prevention

Michele L. Junger, DDS, MPH¹; Susan O. Griffin, PhD¹; Srdjan Lesaja, MS²; Lorena Espinoza, DDS, MPH¹ (View author affiliations)

Suggested citation for this article: Junger ML, Griffin SO, Lesaja S, Espinoza L. Awareness Among US Adults of Dental Sealants for Caries Prevention. Prev Chronic Dis 2019;16:180398. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd16.180398external icon.

PEER REVIEWED

Abstract

Introduction

Dental sealants applied in childhood can help prevent caries, but knowledge of the availability of sealants and their function is not widespread. We assessed knowledge of dental sealants among US adults and adult parents of children younger than 18 and the differences in knowledge among demographic and socioeconomic groups.

Methods

We used data on 3,550 respondents to the 2015 FallStyles B survey of noninstitutionalized US adults aged 18 or older. Authors constructed estimates by using weights provided to reflect the distribution of the US population. Knowledge of dental sealants was assessed by sex, age, race/ethnicity, education, household income, and parental status. Multivariate analysis was conducted by using a main effects logistic regression model.

Results

Overall, 46.3% of adults and 55.1% of parents of children younger than 18 had knowledge of dental sealants. Sealant knowledge was highest among parents, women, respondents aged 45 to 59, and respondents with incomes greater than 200% of the federal poverty level and more than a high school education. Non-Hispanic blacks had less than half the odds of non-Hispanic whites of having knowledge of sealants (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 0.4), and nonparents had half the odds as parents (OR = 0.5) of knowing. The strongest predictors of parental sealant knowledge were race/ethnicity, sex, and income.

Conclusion

Disparities in sealant knowledge correspond to disparities in sealant prevalence. Increasing knowledge among low-income and racial/ethnic minority parents could reduce disparities in sealant prevalence and untreated caries.

Top

Introduction

Although largely preventable, dental caries is one of the most common chronic diseases among children and adolescents (1). National data from 2011 through 2014 show that approximately 18% of children aged 6 to 11 and 58% of children aged 12 to 19 in the United States had treated or untreated caries in their permanent teeth (2). Disparities in caries prevalence exist across races and ethnicities and family income levels, and prevalence is highest among minority and socio-economically disadvantaged populations (2). If left untreated, dental caries can cause pain, speech problems, and missed time from school (1).

About 90% of caries in permanent teeth occur in the posterior teeth (3). Dental sealants are widely recommended by professional health organizations (4,5) because they prevent about 90% of posterior caries one year after placement and about 50% 5 years after placement (6). Prevalence of sealant use in children aged 6 to 11 rose 12.4 percentage points from 1999–2004 to 2011–2014, from 31.1% to 43.6% (7). Children from low-income households (<185% of the Federal Poverty level [FPL), however, are about 20% less likely to receive a sealant than children from higher income households (7).

Recent attention to health literacy highlights the complex relationship between knowledge and actions that support health (8). A recent analysis of sealant prevalence in children found that among high income parents (≥100% of the federal poverty level), sealant prevalence increased with parental education (a proxy for health literacy) (9). Because oral health literacy is required to make informed health decisions and can affect receipt of services, determining public knowledge of the purpose of sealants is important. No national data characterize knowledge of sealants among all US adults and among parents of children younger than 18. We assessed knowledge of the purpose of sealants and the differences in knowledge among demographic and socioeconomic groups. Information from our study provides a baseline for future studies of sealant knowledge and can be used to identify need for promoting oral health education and increasing oral health literacy.

Top

Methods

Styles is a consumer survey of US adults that is conducted in multiple waves throughout the year. Data for our study were taken from the FallStyles B 2015 survey, which was conducted from September 28 through October 16, 2015 (unpublished raw data from Porter Novelli Public Services Styles 2015 Survey via Deanne Weber). The 2015 FallStyles B survey is a follow-up to the SpringStyles survey. FallStyles was obtained from 3 sampling waves of GfK KnowledgePanel (GfK), a probability-based online panel of 55,000 noninstitutionalized adults that is representative of the adult US population (10). The first wave of Styles, SpringStyles, was sent to a random sample of panelists aged 18 or older (n = 11,028). SpringStyles included questions about general media habits, product use, interests, and lifestyle. The second wave, SummerStyles, which included questions on health orientations and practice, was sent to a random sample of respondents to the SpringStyles survey (n = 6,172). FallStyles, the third wave, was released in 2 separate surveys — A and B. FallStyles B, which included our question, “Which of the following best describes the purpose of dental sealants?,” was sent to 4,665 respondents who completed the SummerStyles survey and had 3,550 respondents, a response rate of 76.1%. FallStyles data were weighted by sex, age, household income, race/ethnicity, household size, education, census region, metro status (if respondents live in a metropolitan area or not), and prior internet access to create a sample reflective of the US Current Population Survey proportions. We were granted access to the FallStyles B data through a data-use agreement with Porter Novelli Public Services. Our study was exempt from institutional review board review because personal identifiers were not included.

Dental sealant knowledge, our dependent variable, was recorded as present if a respondent selected “to prevent tooth decay” in answer to the multiple choice question, “Which of the following best describes the purpose of dental sealants?” Incorrect responses included “to fill cavities,” “to improve appearance of teeth,” “to hold dentures in place,” “to protect teeth while playing sports,” or “I don’t know.” Independent variables included sex (male, female), age (18–29, 30–44, 45–59, ≥60 y), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, other), education (<high school diploma, high school diploma, more than a high school diploma), parental status (having a child aged <18 y), having young children (oldest child aged <6 y), and household income relative to the FPL (based on income and household size). Household poverty status was calculated by using self-reported household size and family income and applying the Department of Health and Human Services 2015 US Federal Poverty Guidelines (11). Household income was dichotomized into 2 categories: poor (≤200% of the FPG) and not poor (>200% of the FPG).

We examined the distribution of independent variables for all adults and for parents. Because sealants typically are delivered to children and adolescents under parental authority, all analyses were conducted both for all adults and for parents. We used the χ² test of independence to determine if sealant knowledge was associated with our explanatory variables. To explore factors associated with sealant knowledge after controlling for covariates, we performed multivariate analyses by using a main effects logistic regression model. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for overall adult and parental knowledge. All reported findings were significant at P < .05.

We used SAS version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc) for all data management, analysis, and modeling. Missing data represented a small percentage of the overall sample: 7 respondents, 2 of whom were parents, did not respond to the sealant question. Because we did not assume that failure to respond meant that a respondent did not know the answer to the question, missing data were excluded.

Top

Results

Of the 3,550 adult respondents to the 2015 FallStyles B survey, 27.5% indicated that they had at least one child younger than 18. Most of both the overall adult and parent samples were non-Hispanic white, were not poor, and had more than a high school education. Approximately half of the adult sample was aged 30 to 59, compared with over 80% of the parent sample (Table 1).

Dental sealant knowledge among all adults was 46.3% (Table 2). In the bivariate analysis, sealant knowledge was associated with all independent variables. More than half of respondents who were parents, who had more than a high school education, or who were women, aged 45 to 59 years, non-Hispanic white, and not poor had sealant knowledge. In the multivariate analysis, all independent variables were significant. Adults who were non-Hispanic black, poor, had not graduated from high school, or were not parents had half the odds of knowing of dental sealants as those who were non-Hispanic white, not poor, had more than a high school education, or were parents.

Approximately 55% of parents had knowledge of dental sealants. Knowledge among parents was consistently higher compared to knowledge among all adults across all subcategories (Table 2). The greatest difference between adult and parental sealant knowledge was among respondents aged 60 or older. In the bivariate analysis, parental sealant knowledge varied significantly among all variables except age. Parental knowledge mirrored that of adults in general: higher among respondents who were women, non-Hispanic white, had higher-incomes, had more than a high school education, or had older children. Parents who were male, members of racial/ethnic minority populations, poor, less educated, or had children aged under 6 all had less knowledge. (Table 3) In the multivariate analysis, sex, race/ethnicity, and income remained significantly associated with parental knowledge.

Top

Discussion

We found that approximately 50% of adults overall and 55% of parents knew the purpose of dental sealants. Results from our study are consistent with previous research that found adult sealant knowledge was higher among women, non-Hispanic whites, parents, and those with more than a high school education and who were not socioeconomically disadvantaged. (12–15). Additional variables found in the literature to be associated with adult knowledge were marital status, past-year dental visit, and being dentate (having teeth) (13–15). We did not include these variables in our analysis because FallStyles did not include questions on use of dental care or dentate status, and parental status was highly correlated with marital status. Consistent with findings from other studies (14,15), our analysis found that parental status was a strong predictor of sealant knowledge, and parental knowledge was associated with sex, race/ethnicity, and income (16,17).

A factor associated with increased parental sealant knowledge not included in our study is children’s use of dental care. A survey of Australian parents found that dentists were parents’ main source of dental information and that sealant awareness was associated with frequency of dental visits, type of dental center attended, and discussion of caries prevention with a dental professional (18). Similarly, studies have found the presence of sealants to be associated with a recommendation from a dental health care professional, having dental insurance and a regular source of dental care for the child, knowing of or being exposed to information about sealants, and sources of sealant information (19–22).

Studies indicate that children of parents with knowledge of dental sealants are more likely to have dental sealants (19,20). However, these studies did not assess whether knowledge was obtained before or after the child’s receipt of sealants, whether knowledge was a driving factor for the parent to seek the intervention, or if knowledge was a result of receiving the intervention. Nonetheless, these studies highlight the importance of sealant knowledge and suggest that discussion of sealants with a dental professional increases parental sealant knowledge and may lead to increased sealant prevalence.

Although knowledge without access to dental care will likely not change behavior, neither will access without knowledge (9). A basic premise of health literacy is that people must know about services to benefit from them. To make an informed decision whether to accept sealants in a clinical setting or to allow a child to participate in a school program, parents must have knowledge of dental sealants. Dental professionals play an important role in educating parents and caregivers about these programs and increasing sealant knowledge. Studies indicate that dentists can successfully persuade patients to accept procedures when the dentist has better knowledge than the patient about the needed procedure. This could explain why when states provide incentives for sealant placement for children covered by Medicaid, an incentive for dentists to increase sealant knowledge, more sealants are placed (23).

The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) provides guidance on preventive dental services and anticipatory guidance for children (24). For children aged 2 to 6, AAPD recommends that dental health care personnel provide sealants for caries-susceptible primary molars and permanent molars, premolars, and anterior teeth; children should be reassessed at recall appointments to determine the need for new sealants or maintenance of existing sealants. In addition, the American Dental Association supports the use of sealants and encourages dentists to speak to their patients or parents about them (4). For parents of young children, especially those who are poor or from racial/ethnic minorities, initiating these discussions as early as possible could better prepare parents for sealant placement. However, because dental care is reduced among low-income and racial/ethnic minority families and among parents with only very young children, relying on dental professionals to provide sealant information is problematic (25).

School nurses and pediatricians could help increase knowledge of dental sealants. School sealant programs are a successful and cost-effective strategy to increase sealant receipt among children who typically lack access to clinical dental care (7,26). A major barrier to successful implementation of these programs is low consent rates, which might be influenced by parental lack of sealant knowledge. Our finding that parents with only children younger than 6 have less knowledge of sealants is consistent with a recent study in Maryland that conducted a focus group of low-income parents or caregivers of children aged 6 and younger and pregnant women. That study found that very few of the participating parents had heard of dental sealants (27).

Our study had limitations. Styles uses market research databases and is not intended for health surveillance. Survey respondents had already replied to 2 surveys before completing the FallStyles B survey and were more likely to be responders than the average population. Although our data cannot be considered nationally representative, a study comparing Styles to 9 items from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System found Styles data to be both reliable and valid (28). Styles was only offered in English and does not represent non-English speakers. In addition, compared with similar previous surveys, the 2015 survey included a markedly decreased number of parents of children younger than 18. Because the sample size of parents was small, parental knowledge results should be interpreted with caution. Next steps that might be helpful in developing health promotion and educational efforts at the national, state, or local level include identification of stakeholders and potential collaborators, collection of area-specific data and data among non-English speaking populations (especially non-English–speaking parents), and the identification of methods successfully used to improve knowledge among selected populations. Efforts should be made to standardize questions used to assess health literacy so results across different studies can be compared.

Although prevalence of dental sealants has increased, they are still underutilized among children at risk for untreated caries (7). We found corresponding disparities in knowledge of the preventive purpose of sealants. The dental community remains a major source of information on the preventive benefits of sealants. Further efforts by dental professional organizations and public health organizations to develop oral health promotion and education programs to reach low-income and racial/ethnic minority parents and parents with only young children could reduce disparities in sealant knowledge and untreated dental caries.

Top

Acknowledgments

Financial support was not provided for this project. No copyrighted figures, images, or other material was used for this article. The Styles surveys are proprietary products of Porter Novelli Public Services, and the FallStyles survey data used for this project were used with permission from Porter Novelli. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Top

Author Information

Corresponding Author: Michele L. Junger, DDS, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Oral Health, 4770 Buford Highway, MS F-80, Atlanta, GA 30341. Telephone: 770-488-7361. Email: ilk6@cdc.gov.

Author Affiliations: ¹Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Oral Health, Atlanta, Georgia. ²DB Consulting Group, Atlanta, Georgia.

Top

References

1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Oral health in America: a report of the Surgeon General. Rockville (MD): US Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health; 2000.
2. Dye BA, Mitnik GL, Iafolla TJ, Vargas CM. Trends in dental caries in children and adolescents according to poverty status in the United States from 1999 through 2004 and from 2011 through 2014. J Am Dent Assoc 2017;148(8):550–565.e7. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
3. Gooch BF, Griffin SO, Gray SK, Kohn WG, Rozier RG, Siegal M, et al. ; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing dental caries through school-based sealant programs: updated recommendations and reviews of evidence. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140(11):1356–65. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
4. Wright JT, Crall JJ, Fontana M, Gillette EJ, Nový BB, Dhar V, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the use of pit-and-fissure sealants: a report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2016;147(8):672–682.e12. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
5. National Quality Forum. Oral health performance measurement: environmental scan, gap analysis and measure topics prioritization — technical report. Washington (DC): National Quality Forum; 2012. Accessed January 16, 2019. http://www.qualityforum.org/Publications/2012/07/Oral_Health_Performance_Measurement_Technical_Report.aspx
6. Wright JT, Tampi MP, Graham L, Estrich C, Crall JJ, Fontana M, et al. Sealants for preventing and arresting pit-and-fissure occlusal caries in primary and permanent molars: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials-a report of the American Dental Association and the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. J Am Dent Assoc 2016;147(8):631–645.e18. Erratum in: J Am Dent Assoc 2017;148(4):210. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
7. Griffin SO, Wei L, Gooch BF, Weno K, Espinoza L. Vital signs: dental sealant use and untreated tooth decay among US school-aged children. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65(41):1141–5. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
8. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. National Action Plan to Improve Health Literacy. Washington (DC):US Department of Health and Human Services, 2010.
9. Al Agili DE, Griffin SO. Effect of family income on the relationship between parental education and sealant prevalence, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2005–2010. Prev Chronic Dis 2015;12:E138. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
10. Porter Novelli Public Services. Styles 2015 Methodology. Washington (DC): Porter Novelli; 2015.
11. US Department of Health and Human Services. 2015 Poverty Guidelines. https://aspe.hhs.gov/2015-poverty-guidelines#threshholds. Accessed December 7, 2017.
12. Corbin SB, Maas WR, Kleinman DV, Backinger CL. 1985 NHIS findings on public knowledge and attitudes about oral diseases and preventive measures. Public Health Rep 1987;102(1):53–60. PubMedexternal icon
13. Gift HC, Corbin SB, Nowjack-Raymer RE. Public knowledge of prevention of dental disease. Public Health Rep 1994;109(3):397–404. PubMedexternal icon
14. Jaramillo F, Griffin SO, Jones KA, Beltran ED, Moonesinghe R. Trends in knowledge about dental sealants in US population, 1999–2003. Baltimore (MD): International Association of Dental Research; 2005.
15. Junger ML, Corley T, Orgain L, Betancourt M, Barker L. Factors associated with sealant and fluoridation knowledge — Health Styles 2009. San Diego (CA): International Association of Dental Research; 2011.
16. Horowitz AM, Kleinman DV, Wang MQ. What Maryland adults with young children know and do about preventing dental caries. Am J Public Health 2013;103(6):e69–76. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
17. Jones K, Griffin SO, Moonesinghe R, Jaramillo F. Reducing dental sealant disparities in school-aged children through better targeting of informational campaigns. Prev Chronic Dis 2005;2(141042). http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2005/
    apr/04_0142p.htm.
18. Mafeni JO, Messer LB. Parental knowledge and attitudes towards pit and fissure sealants. Aust Dent J 1994;39(3):172–80. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
19. Gonzalez CD, Frazier PJ, LeMay W, Stenger JP, Pruhs RJ. Sealant status and factors associated with sealant presence among children in Milwaukee, WI. ASDC J Dent Child 1995;62(5):335–41. PubMedexternal icon
20. Lang WP, Weintraub JA, Choi C, Bagramian RA. Fissure sealant knowledge and characteristics of parents as a function of their child’s sealant status. J Public Health Dent 1988;48(3):133–7. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
21. Selwitz RH, Colley BJ, Rozier RG. Factors associated with parental acceptance of dental sealants. J Public Health Dent 1992;52(3):137–45. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
22. Mejia GC, Weintraub JA, Cheng NF, Grossman W, Han PZ, Phipps KR, et al. Language and literacy relate to lack of children’s dental sealant use. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2011;39(4):318–24. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
23. Sintonen H, Linnosmaa I. Economics of Dental Services. In: Culyer AJ, editor. Handbook of health economics. Amsterdam (NL): North Holland/Elsevier; 2000. p.1251–96.
24. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Periodicity of examination, preventive dental services, anticipatory guidance/counseling, and oral treatment for infants, children, and adolescents; 2013. Reference Manual V 39, No 16, p. 17–18. http://www.aapd.org/media/Policies_Guidelines/BP_Periodicity.pdf. Accessed December 7, 2017.
25. Griffin SO, Barker LK, Wei L, Li CH, Albuquerque MS, Gooch BF; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Use of dental care and effective preventive services in preventing tooth decay among U.S. children and adolescents — Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, United States, 2003–2009 and National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, United States, 2005–2010. MMWR Suppl 2014;63(2):54–60. PubMedexternal icon
26. Griffin S, Naavaal S, Scherrer C, Griffin PM, Harris K, Chattopadhyay S. School-based dental sealant programs prevent cavities and are cost-effective. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016;35(12):2233–40. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
27. Horowitz AM, Kleinman DV, Child W, Maybury C. Perspectives of Maryland adults regarding caries prevention. Am J Public Health 2015;105(5):e58–64. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
28. Pollard W. Use of Consumer Panel Survey data for public health communication planning: an evaluation of survey results. In: Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Health Policy Statistics, pp. 2720–24. Alexandria (VA): American Statistical Association.

Top

Tables

Abbreviations: —, not applicable; SD, standard deviation.
^a FallStyles B, a product of GfK’s KnowledgePanel (10) was sent to 4,665 participants and had 3,550 respondents, a response rate of 76.1%.
^b Of a child aged <18.

Abbreviations: —, not applicable; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.
^a FallStyles B, a product of GfK’s KnowledgePanel (10) was sent to 4,665 participants and had 3,550 respondents, a response rate of 76.1%.
^b Of a child <18.

Abbreviations: —, not applicable; AOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; SD, standard deviation.
^a FallStyles B, a product of GfK’s KnowledgePanel (10) was sent to 4,665 participants and had 3,550 respondents, a response rate of 76.1%.

Top

Post-Test Information

To obtain credit, you should first read the journal article. After reading the article, you should be able to answer the following, related, multiple-choice questions. To complete the questions (with a minimum 75% passing score) and earn continuing medical education (CME) credit, please go to http://www.medscape.org/journal/pcdexternal icon. Credit cannot be obtained for tests completed on paper, although you may use the worksheet below to keep a record of your answers.

You must be a registered user on http://www.medscape.orgexternal icon. If you are not registered on http://www.medscape.orgexternal icon, please click on the “Register” link on the right hand side of the website.

Only one answer is correct for each question. Once you successfully answer all post-test questions, you will be able to view and/or print your certificate. For questions regarding this activity, contact the accredited provider, CME@medscape.net. For technical assistance, contact CME@medscape.net. American Medical Association’s Physician’s Recognition Award (AMA PRA) credits are accepted in the US as evidence of participation in CME activities. For further information on this award, please go to https://www.ama-assn.orgexternal icon. The AMA has determined that physicians not licensed in the US who participate in this CME activity are eligible for AMA PRA Category 1 Credits™. Through agreements that the AMA has made with agencies in some countries, AMA PRA credit may be acceptable as evidence of participation in CME activities. If you are not licensed in the US, please complete the questions online, print the AMA PRA CME credit certificate, and present it to your national medical association for review.

Top

Post-Test Questions

Study Title: Awareness Among US Adults of Dental Sealants for Caries Prevention

CME Questions

1. You are advising a large dental practice regarding improving uptake of dental sealant use among their patients. On the basis of the analysis of data from the 2015 Styles Survey by Junger and colleagues, which one of the following statements about knowledge among US adults of dental sealants is correct?
   1. Dental sealant knowledge, that is, knowing that their purpose is to prevent tooth decay, was 26.3% among all adults
   2. Dental sealant knowledge among parents was 35.1%
   3. More than half of respondents who were parents, who had some college education, or who were non-Hispanic white women aged 45 to 59 years and who were not poor had sealant knowledge
   4. The Styles Survey findings differ markedly from those of previous studies
2. According to the analysis of data from the 2015 Styles Survey by Junger and colleagues, which one of the following statements about factors associated with knowledge among US adults of dental sealants is correct?
   1. Compared with non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks had less than half the odds of having knowledge of sealants (odds ratio, 0.4)
   2. Adults in lower- vs higher-income households had one quarter the odds of having sealant knowledge, as did nonparents vs parents (odds ratio, 0.25 for both)
   3. The strongest predictor of parental sealant knowledge was educational level
   4. The Styles Survey showed that past-year dental visit and having teeth strongly predicted parental sealant knowledge
3. On the basis of the analysis of data from the 2015 Styles Survey by Junger and colleagues, which one of the following statements about clinical implications regarding knowledge among US adults of dental sealants is correct?
   1. The American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry recommends that children aged 2 to 6 years receive sealants only for caries-susceptible primary molars
   2. Only dental professionals should provide sealant information to parents
   3. School sealant programs are expensive and ineffective
   4. Improving knowledge among low-income and racial/ethnic minority parents and those with young children could lower disparities in sealant prevalence and untreated caries

Top