PCD logo

Mobile Mammography Participation Among Medically Underserved Women: A Systematic Review

PEER REVIEWED

During the identification process, titles and abstracts were identified through electronic sources (n = 80) and bibliographies (n = 13). After duplicates (n = 38) were removed, 55 records were screened. Records not meeting eligibility were removed (n = 39); 16 articles were eligible for full text review. Of these, 6 were excluded because they did not assess mobile mammography participation (n = 5) or were under embargo (n = 1). A final 10 articles were included in the review.

Figure.
The process of including and excluding articles analyzed in a systematic review of mobile mammography among medically underserved women, United States, January 2010–March 2018.

Return to Article

Top


The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.

Page last reviewed: November 15, 2018