Evaluating Healthy Corner Stores: A Survey of Assessment Tools Used in the San Francisco Bay Area, 2016
RESEARCH BRIEF — Volume 14 — June 1, 2017
PEER REVIEWED
Figure 1. Average number of items assessed in evaluations of healthy corner stores, by type of method used, San Francisco Bay Area, 2016. None of the owner interviews assessed dairy, so no bar appears for that item. Error bars indicate standard deviation.
| Variable | Observation, Average No. (SD) | Consumer Interview, Average No. (SD) | Owner Interview, Average No. (SD) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dairy | 2.5 (2.3) | 3.0 (3.0) | 0.0 (0.0) |
| Protein | 2.3 (2.5) | 3.4 (1.9) | 0.8 (1.0) |
| Grain | 2.5 (2.3) | 5.2 (5.2) | 0.8 (1.0) |
| Fruits and vegetables | 4.2 (1.8) | 5.2 (1.1) | 1.3 (1.5) |
| Snacks | 3.1 (3.7) | 1.4 (1.9) | 2.3 (2.9) |
| Beverages | 3.9 (1.1) | 2.6 (2.3) | 1.3 (1.9) |
| Other food | 0.5 (0.9) | 0.6 (0.5) | 0.8 (1.0) |
| Nonfood goods and/or services | 1.1 (1.6) | 0.4 (0.5) | 0.8 (1.5) |
| Store characteristic | 5.6 (4.9) | 2.8 (2.2) | 4.8 (4.0) |
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.
Page last reviewed: June 1, 2017