PCD logo

Utility of State-Based Basic Screening Survey Reports for National Oral Health Surveillance in Older Adults

PEER REVIEWED

A flowchart describes how potential BSSs were identified and screened for inclusion criteria. Twenty-five states were identified for possible BSS data using reference documents from ASTDD and Oral Health America. Of those, 8 were excluded for lack of information (Alaska, Delaware, Indiana, Kentucky, Nebraska, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Virginia). Two additional state reports were identified through internet searches. One BSS report was excluded because the mean age of its sample population was <65 years (Indian Health Service). For Aim 1, 18 BSS reports were chosen (Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Iowa, Kansas [2012], Maryland, Michigan [2014–2015], Minnesota, New Hampshire, North Carolina, North Dakota [2016], Texas, Vermont, Washington [2016], Wisconsin, and West Virginia [2012]). Seven BSS reports were excluded because they reported community-dwelling adults only. 11 BSS reports were included in Aim 2 (Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Georgia, Kansas, Maryland, Minnesota, North Carolina, North Dakota, Vermont, and Wisconsin).

Figure 1. Process for identifying reports from the Basic Screening Survey (BSS) for older adults that met inclusion criteria. ASTDD, Association of State and Territorial Dental Directors.

Return to Article

 

Figure 2. Prevalence of oral health indicators among older adults in long-term care (LTC) facilities as reported in state basic screening surveys. Abbreviations: BSS, basic screening survey; NA, not applicable; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NR, not reported.

Prevalence of oral health indicators among older adults in long-term care (LTC) facilities as reported in state basic screening surveys. Abbreviations: BSS, basic screening survey; NA, not applicable; NHANES, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey; NR, not reported.
State Untreated Decay, % Periodontal Disease, % Urgent Need for Dental Care, % Edentulism, % Has Upper Denture, % Has Lower Denture, % Has No Functional Occlusal Contacts, %
Arkansas 49 14 3 43 52 43 NR
California 48 27 7 35 NR NR 40
Connecticut 53 10 4 37 51 36 43
Georgia 28 33 5 27 4 32 NR
Kansas 34 NR 4 33 44 35 NR
Maryland 39 43 21 NR NR NR NR
Minnesota 41 6 3 25 NR NR NR
North Carolina 49 18 12 29 NR NR 34
North Dakota 23 20 NR 32 41 22 NR
Vermont 48 57 8 39 19 28 43
Wisconsin 46 39 NR 32 NR NR 32
Median 46 24 5 32 42 33 40
NHANES 16 NA NA 17 NA NA NA

Return to Article

Top


The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.

Page last reviewed: April 8, 2021