PCD logo

Developing a Web-Based Cost Assessment Tool for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs

PEER REVIEWED

Figure 1.
Percentage distribution of funding sources, by year, Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009–2014. Error bars indicate confidence intervals.

Source % (95% Confidence Interval)
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 All Years
Other 7.2 (0.5–13.9) 7.7 (2.1–13.3) 7.5 (1.2–13.8) 7.4 (1.2–13.6) 3.5 (0–7.7) 6.6 (4.0–9.2)
In kind 8.0 (3.5–12.5) 8.2 (4.1–12.3) 9.3 (4.6–14.0) 7.4 (3.1–11.7) 5.9 (0.7–11.1) 7.8 (5.8–9.8)
CDC 84.8 (76.3–93.3) 84.1 (76.8–91.4) 83.2 (74.5–91.9) 85.3 (76.6–94.0) 90.7 (83.4–98.0) 85.6 (82.0–89.2)

Return to Article

 

Figure 2.
Percentage distribution of total cost by budget category, Colorectal Cancer Control Program, 2009–2014.

Category Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 All Years
Contracts, materials, and supplies 45.7 37.6 40.0 36.3 39.3 39.4
Labor 24.0 25.3 28.3 27.1 29.4 26.9
Screening and diagnostic services 21.4 29.3 22.9 29.1 21.7 25.2
Administrative 5.1 5.3 6.4 5.7 6.9 5.9
Consultants 3.8 2.6 2.4 1.7 2.8 2.6

Return to Article

Top


The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.

Page last reviewed: May 2, 2019