Creating Walkable Communities: Understanding Trade-offs
RESEARCH BRIEF — Volume 15 — July 12, 2018
PEER REVIEWED
Figure.
Percentage reporting level of support for trade-offs to create walkable communities among adults, SummerStyles 2014 (N = 3,995). Error bars represent the upper and lower bounds of the 95% confidence interval. Of the 4,269 respondents, 274 were excluded for missing data (n = 78) or because they indicated they were unable to walk when asked about how often they usually walk for at least 10 minutes at a time (n = 196).
| Level of Support | Trade-off | |
|---|---|---|
| Designing streets with sidewalks, crosswalks, stop signs, and other features to make it safer to walk, even if it means driving slower, % | Designing communities so that more stores and other places are within walking distance of homes, even if this means building homes closer together, % | |
| Strongly oppose | 1.9 (1.4–2.4) | 6.7 (5.8–7.7) |
| Oppose | 8.6 (7.6–9.7) | 24.6 (23.1–26.2) |
| Don’t know | 7.3 (6.4–8.3) | 13.1 (11.8–14.4) |
| Favor | 48.9 (47.1–50.8) | 36.3 (34.5–38.1) |
| Strongly favor | 33.3 (31.5–35.1) | 19.4 (17.9–20.9) |
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.