PCD logo

Obesogenic Environments: Access to and Advertising of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Soweto, South Africa, 2013

Gillian Moodley; Nicola Christofides, PhD; Shane A. Norris, PhD; Thomas Achia, PhD; Karen J. Hofman, MBBCh, FAAP

Suggested citation for this article: Moodley G, Christofides N, Norris SA, Achia T, Hofman KJ. Obesogenic Environments: Access to and Advertising of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages in Soweto, South Africa, 2013. Prev Chronic Dis 2015;12:140559. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.140559external icon.





Rates of obesity and overweight among South Africans are increasing. Food marketing has a profound impact on children and affects their lifelong eating patterns; in urban areas of South Africa, disposable incomes are growing and ultra-processed food is increasingly available at low cost. The combination of these factors will strain an already fragile health system. Our aim was to investigate the density of outdoor sugar sweetened beverage (SSB) advertising and the number of formal and informal vendors selling SSBs in a transforming, historically disadvantaged urban setting of South Africa.


A digital camera and global positioning system navigation system were used to record the location of SSB advertisements and food vendors in a demarcated area in Soweto. Data were collected by walking or driving through each street; a food inventory was completed for every food vendor. Spatial analyses were conducted using a geographic information system.


A total of 145 advertisements for SSBs were found over a driven or walked distance of 111.9 km. The density of advertisements was 3.6 per km2 in relation to schools, and 50% of schools had branded advertising of SSBs on their school property. Most (n = 104; 58%) of the 180 vendors in the study sold SSBs.


This is the first study in South Africa to document the location of billboard advertisements and vendors in relation to schools. Marketing of products that contribute to obesity is common in urban Soweto. Our findings have implications for policies that regulate SSB advertising, especially in the proximity of schools.



Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) will be the leading cause of death on the African continent by 2030 (1). Between 1992 and 2005, obesity prevalence increased by 35% in sub-Saharan Africa (2). In 2012, South Africa had an obesity prevalence of 39.2% among females and 10.6% among males (3). The level of obesity among adolescent girls has increased significantly; 25% of female adolescents are overweight or obese (4,5).

Most South Africans have poor dietary habits, many of which start during childhood; black South Africans have the lowest dietary diversity of all South Africans and a higher-than-average sugar intake (3). Analysis of sugar sweetened beverage (SSB) consumption in Soweto indicated that adolescents consume between 1.1 and 1.4 servings of SSBs daily (6). This amount translates into 10 to 12 teaspoons per day, which exceeds the proposed World Health Organization daily recommendation of 6 teaspoons of sugar per day (7). This high sugar intake from a single source significantly increases the risk of developing obesity-related NCDs, especially type 2 diabetes (6). Furthermore, sugar has been implicated as a contributor to obesity (8).

A combination of rising incomes and discretionary spending, coupled with marketing, advertising, and availability of high-energy, processed food and beverages, the biggest source of added sugar, play a role in fostering this trend (3). The increasing consumption of processed products is linked to commercial advertising and their greater availability. Marketing by the food and beverage industry strongly influences long-term food and beverage preferences, and its success relies on children’s brand recognition and subsequent preference for familiar brand foods (9–11).

Neighborhoods of various socioeconomic statuses have different levels of exposure and intensity to advertisements of ultra-processed food and beverage products (10,11). The effect of advertising on creating and promoting an obesogenic environment has been demonstrated in the United States, where a 30% increase in food advertising resulted in increased obesity levels, and every 10% increase in the number of fast food advertisements was accompanied by a 6% increase in the consumption of SSBs (11). The higher density of advertisements of unhealthy foods in low-income areas was accompanied by an absence of exposure to goods and activities that promote healthier lifestyles (11,12).

In addition to selling SSBs, street vendors in South Africa sell other high-sugar–content items, such as candy and deep-fried doughnuts known as “vetkoek” (13). Other easily available street foods include burgers, deep-fried potato chips, and “kotas” (a quarter loaf of bread with a combination of deep fried chips, cheese, and meat fillings) (13). Advertising and access to obesity-promoting beverages and street foods contribute to obesity in South Africa (10).

Limited data are available on the density of outdoor advertising and vendors in South Africa. This study examined 2 aspects of the obesogenic environment in an urban setting in South Africa by exploring the frequency and location of outdoor advertising for SSBs and the proportion of food vendors selling SSBs. The goal was to understand how to best craft advocacy activities that limit the promotion of unhealthy products, particularly in settings in close proximity to schools.



Soweto is a historically disadvantaged area of Johannesburg that covers more than 200 square kilometers and has a population of 1.3 million. There are 1,776 households and 6,357 inhabitants per square kilometer (14). During the past decade, Soweto transformed economically; by 2013, four large shopping malls and several fast-food chains entered the market. This study covered 5 areas in Soweto: Klipspruit West, Mofolo South, Dube, Meadowlands, and Orlando East. During July and August 2013, data on all outdoor SSB advertising and SSB branding in a 38.3 km2 area were collected.

Ethics approval was granted by the University of the Witwatersrand Ethics Committee. The study did not include human participants, and both the advertisements of SSBs and the food and beverages being sold by vendors were in the public domain.

Data were collected by 3 trained research assistants who either walked or drove through each street in the study area. SSB advertisements and food vendors were identified, and data were collected using 2 separate data coding sheets. In addition to collecting information on the location (global positioning systems [GPS] coordinates were determined using a Garmin Nuvi 30, Garmin Ltd.), type, and size of the advertisement, a digital photograph was taken using a Sony Cybershot DSC-W270 12.1 megapixel camera (Sony Corporation). The study team completed an inventory of all food and drink items for sale from vendors. The type of vendor was noted as informal (ie, temporary building structure), formal (ie, permanent building structure with limited resources, for example, no access to electricity or refrigeration), or a shop (ie, permanent structure with access to electricity and refrigeration), and an inventory of beverages sold at these vendors was recorded.

For the purpose of this study, outdoor advertising was defined as billboards, bus stop advertisements, signs placed along the sidewalk, urban art on streets or buildings, large posters, and signage for restaurants or food vendors. Items excluded were branded clothing, packaging, and taxis and buses (ie, moving targets). Advertisements of SSBs and a combination of SSBs and fast foods were included in the analysis.

Researchers were unable to measure the size of the advertisements, so an estimation of each advertisement size was made. Advertisements were classified as small if their dimensions were less than approximately 70 by 40 centimeters or, in terms of paper and cardboard sizes, between A4 (8.3 × 11.7 in) and A3 (11.7 × 16.5 in). Medium advertisements had dimensions of A0 (33.1 ×46.6 in) and large advertisements had dimensions that were measured in meters (eg, billboards).

The GPS coordinates of SSB advertisements and vendors in the study area were used to create distinct spatial point pattern objects in the R library Spatstat (www.spatstat.org). A point pattern that consisted of all the advertisements and vendors in the study area was also created. Using Spatstat, the intensity (number of points per km) of each point pattern was computed. The intensity of each point pattern formed the outcome variables in the spatial point pattern analysis. To assess the association between the point patterns and the distribution of schools in the study, a covariate that measured distance from any given point in the study region to the nearest school was created using the distmap function in Spatstat. We assessed the association between the intensity of each point pattern and the covariates of interest using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test of goodness-of-fit (15,16).

Homogeneous and inhomogeneous Poisson models were fitted using the R library Spatstat (15–19), and the Akaike Information Criterion was used as a basis for selecting the best fitting model (20,21). In each model, the distance to the nearest school (z) was the primary covariate considered. Models 1, 2, and 3 were best-fitting inhomogeneous Poisson models that were fitted to the SSB, vendor, and both SSB and vendor point patterns, respectively. A fourth model (Model 4) was an inhomogeneous Poisson model with marks labeled as SSB and vendors.



In total, 145 advertisements for SSBs were identified ( Table 1). More than half (53%) of SSB advertisements were found outside houses. Many informal vendors operated stalls from their homes. Nearly two-thirds (62%) of branded SSB advertisements were part of a display sign for a shop name, including branded signs for tuckshops (ie, small shops located in or near a school that sell snacks, candies, beverages, and food items that target children) found outside houses. Half of the primary and high schools (14 of 28) in the sample area displayed advertisements of SSBs on school premises, and 13 of these were branded school signs.

A total of 180 vendors were included in the study area; 27% were informal fast-food outlets, 12% were formal outlets, and 61% were shops. More than 85% of shops stocked SSBs ( Table 2). Formal and informal vendors both supplied fast food, although few of these vendors stocked SSBs because of lack of refrigeration.

The findings from the spatial analysis described the intensity of SSB advertisements and vendors in relation to schools. The intensity of the SSB point patterns in the study area of 38.3 km2 was 3.58 points per square kilometer ( Table 3). Figure 1 depicts the density of SSB advertisements and their distances to schools and vendors. The figures indicate 2 school clusters in the northwestern and southeastern parts of the study area. The vendor and SSB advertisements identified were distributed around school “hotspots” (Figure 2).

Kernel density and contour plots, demonstrating the density of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) advertisements and their distances to schools and vendors, Soweto, South Africa, 2013. Graph A shows the school point pattern, Graph B shows the SSB point pattern, Graph C shows the vendor point pattern, and Graph D shows all point patterns.

Figure 1. Kernel density and contour plots, demonstrating the density of sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) advertisements and their distances to schools and vendors, Soweto, South Africa, 2013. Graph A shows the school point pattern, Graph B shows the SSB point pattern, Graph C shows the vendor point pattern, and Graph D shows all point patterns. [A text description of this figure is also available.]

 Kernel density and contour plots of school point pattern overlayed on vendor and sugar-sweetened beverage point patterns, Soweto, South Africa, 2013.

Figure 2. Kernel density and contour plots of school point pattern overlayed on vendor and sugar-sweetened beverage point patterns, Soweto, South Africa, 2013. [A text description of this figure is also available.]

Table 3 presents the intensity of the SSB and vendor point patterns against the distance to the nearest school. Intensity of SSB and vendor point patterns increases with proximity to the nearest school. The results of the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test indicated that the SSB (D = 0.98, P < .001) and vendor (D = 0.43, P < .001) point patterns were dependent on the distance to the nearest school. Homogenous and inhomogeneous Poisson models were fitted to the SSB advertisements and vendor point patterns. Results indicated an increase in the intensity of SSB advertisements (risk interval [RI] = −2.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = −2.62 to −1.72) and the vendor (RI = −2.08, 95% CI = −2.48 to −1.82) point patterns with decreasing proximity to the nearest school. Approximately each square kilometer contained 1 primary or high school, 4 SSB advertisements, and 5 vendors, 3 of which sold SSBs; the most frequent advertisements were for 1 beverage company.



Findings from this study indicate that vendors selling both SSBs and advertisements for SSBs are located in close proximity to primary and high schools in Soweto and that this placement is not random. Approximately each square kilometer contained 1 primary or high school, 4 SSB advertisements, and 5 vendors, 3 of which sold SSBs. The most frequent advertisements were for 1 beverage company.

This is the first study of its kind in one of the most densely populated urban areas in South Africa in the process of economic transition. Findings provide an understanding of the obesogenic environment by determining the geospatial intensity and distribution of SSB advertising, as well as the availability of ultra-processed foods and beverages. By strategically positioning advertisements in schoolyards or in close proximity to schools, children are being targeted. In another South African–based study, conducted in Western Cape schools, more than 60% of schools had a branded food or beverage advertisement board displaying the school name (13). Principals of these schools indicated that they had not received any monetary or program support from the sponsoring food and beverage companies, but those advertisements send an implicit message to students and the community (13).

A similar study in Sydney, Australia, found that the most frequent outdoor advertisements in close proximity to schools were for SSBs and alcoholic beverages; 24% of the total number of food advertisements located around these primary schools promoted SSBs (22). In New Zealand, 22% of the outdoor advertisements in close proximity to secondary schools were for SSBs (23). The frequency of these marketing messages influences social norms and promotes the perception that calorie-dense, nutrient-poor beverages and food products are normal (24–26).

To ensure the development of healthy dietary practices, especially in transforming low- and middle-income households in urban areas of South Africa, resources and efforts should be directed toward preventing obesity in these communities and understanding the causes of social determinants of obesity at a population level (27). Policy makers should consider developing mandatory regulations that target advertising in and around schools (28). This type of regulation has a precedent in the example of legislation to restrict tobacco advertising (23). However, an unintended consequence of restrictions placed on outdoor advertising may encourage a switch by industry to other modalities of advertising, such as television or social media (27).

Preventing obesity cannot be solved with a single solution, and managing the obesity epidemic requires efforts at both the population and individual levels (1). The South African Department of Health’s National Strategic Plan for Non-Communicable Diseases 2013–2017 calls for intersectoral and multidisciplinary action (1). Unhealthy product promotion should be limited and substituted with the sponsorship of healthy choices (28). A package of interventions directed toward making the environment healthier and making healthy eating a norm is needed (28). One of these interventions includes a ban on advertising ultra-processed products during television viewing hours for children. Others might involve regulating food and beverages in school vending machines. Finally, tuckshops could ensure that healthy, balanced school lunches are provided (29).

People feel most empowered when they make their own decisions. Children in particular are disempowered and are unable to negotiate the advertising content to which they are exposed (25). Ideally, prohibiting advertising of SSBs to children should be voluntary. If this does not occur in a short period, government should consider setting mandatory standards for the marketing of beverages and food to children and adolescents, as is already occurring in many world settings. The South African government released a set of draft guidelines on the labeling and advertising of food and beverages to children in 2014. Our research supplies data that will provide policy makers with evidence as they move forward (29). Given the growing burden of obesity in South Africa and the challenges of losing weight after adolescence, establishing these standards is now a matter of urgency (30).

A limitation of this study was that it focused on exploring the density and nature of outdoor advertising and did not account for other forms of advertising exposure, such as television, radio, telephone messaging, and print media. Further research is needed to develop a comprehensive picture of the exposure of children to advertising in other formal and informal settings and in rural and urban settings. In addition, the study determined the geospatial intensity and distribution of advertising and availability of SSBs but did not determine a causal relationship between these factors and the prevalence of obesity in Soweto. However, other studies have identified the effect of food availability and advertising on consumption patterns. Our findings have implications for policies that regulate SSB advertising, especially in the proximity of schools.



Funding was provided by PRICELESS SA (Priority Cost Effective Lessons in System Strengthening), which is funded by the SA Medical Research Council (SA MRC) (grant no. D1305910-01), by IDRC (International Development Research Centre), Canada (grant no. PROP020911E), by SA MRC and the UK MRC/DfID African Research Leader Scheme and the School of Public Health, University of the Witwatersrand. Study concept and design of advertising component by K.H. and N.C. Food vendor component was led by S.N. Data collection was carried out by G.M. Spatial statistics modelling was done by T.A. The first draft was written by G.M. and K.H. N.C. and S.N. edited further iterations. The authors acknowledge Donela Besada for her assistance with editing. Thanks to Dr Nolwazi Mkhwanazi, Department of Social Anthropology, University of Witwatersrand, for comments on early drafts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Author Information

Corresponding Author: Karen J. Hofman, MBBCh, FAAP, Director, Priority Cost Effective Lessons for Systems Strengthening, MRC/Wits Rural Public Health and Health Transitions Unit, Room 231, Wits School of Public Health, Education Campus, 27 St Andrews Rd, Parktown 2193, Johannesburg, South Africa. Telephone: 011-717-2083. Email: Karen.Hofman@wits.ac.za.

Author Affiliations: Gillian Moodley, School of Public Health, Faculty Health Sciences University of Witwatersrand, Priority Cost Effective Lessons for Systems Strengthening, Johannesburg, South Africa; Nicola Christofides, Thomas Achia, School of Public Health, Faculty Health Sciences University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Shane A. Norris, Faculty Health Sciences University of Witwatersrand, MRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Department of Paediatrics, School of Clinical Medicine, Johannesburg, South Africa.



  1. National Department of Health. Strategic plan for the prevention and control of non-communicable diseases 2013–2017. Pretoria (SA): South African National Government; 2013.
  2. Ziraba AK, Fotso JC, Ochako R. Overweight and obesity in urban Africa: a problem of the rich or the poor? BMC Public Health 2009;9(1):465. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  3. Shisana OLD, Rehle T, Simbayi L, Zuma K, Dhansay A, Reddy P, et al. South African National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (SANHANES-1) full report. Human Sciences Research Council; 2013. http://www.hsrcpress.ac.za/product.php?productid=2314&cat=0&page=1&featured&freedownload=1#sthash.aopoZUaO.dpuf. Accessed September 30, 2013.
  4. Peer N, Bradshaw D, Laubscher R, Steyn N, Steyn K. Urban-rural and gender differences in tobacco and alcohol use, diet and physical activity among young black South Africans between 1998 and 2003. Glob Health Action 2013;6(0):19216. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  5. Kahn K. Population health in South Africa: dynamics over the past two decades. J Public Health Policy 2011;32(Suppl 1):S30–6).
  6. Feeley AB, Norris SA. Added sugar and dietary sodium intake from purchased fast food, confectionery, sweetened beverages and snacks among Sowetan adolescents. SAJCH 2014;8(3):88–91. CrossRefexternal icon
  7. Moynihan PJ, Kelly SAM. Effect on caries of restricting sugars intake: systematic review to inform WHO Guidelines. J Dent Res 2014;93(8):7–18.
  8. Bremer AA, Lustig RH. Effects of sugar-sweetened beverages on children. Pediatr Ann 2012;41(1):26–30. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  9. Hawkes C. Regulating and litigating in the public interest: regulating food marketing to young people worldwide: trends and policy drivers. Am J Public Health 2007;97(11):1962–73. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  10. Arredondo E, Castaneda D, Elder JP, Slymen D, Dozier D. Brand name logo recognition of fast food and healthy food among children. J Community Health 2009;34(1):73–8. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  11. Lesser LI, Zimmerman FJ, Cohen DA. Outdoor advertising, obesity, and soda consumption: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2013;13(1):20. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  12. Day PL, Pearce J. Obesity-promoting food environments and the spatial clustering of food outlets around schools. Am J Prev Med 2011;40(2):113–21. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  13. de Villiers A, Steyn NP, Draper CE, Fourie JM, Barkhuizen G, Lombard CJ, et al. “HealthKick”: formative assessment of the health environment in low-resource primary schools in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. BMC Public Health 2012;12:794. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  14. Stats SA Library Cataloguing-in-Publication (CIP) Data. Statistics South Africa Census 2011; 2012. http://www.statssa.gov.za/publications/p03014/p030142011.pdf.
  15. Baddeley A, Turner R, Moller J, Hazelton M. Residual analysis for spatial point processes. J R Stat Soc B 2005;67(5):617–66. Statistical Methodology CrossRefexternal icon
  16. Baddeley A, Turner R, Klitgaard Berthelsen K, Jalilian A, Van Lieshout MC, Rubak E, et al. Spatial Point pattern analysis, model-fitting, simulation, tests, version 1.34–1.; 2013.
  17. Berman M, Turner TR. Approximating point process likelihoods with GLIM. Appl Stat 1992;41(1):31–8. CrossRefexternal icon
  18. Lewis PA. Recent results in the statistical analysis of univariate point processes. Monterey (CA): Naval Postgraduate School; 1971.
  19. Lindsey J. The analysis of stochastic processes using GLIM. Berlin (DE): Springer-Verlag; 1992.
  20. Sakamoto Y, Ishiguro M, Kitagawa G. Akaike information criterion statistics. Dordrecht (NL): Reidel D, editor; 1987.
  21. Vrieze SI. Model selection and psychological theory: a discussion of the differences between the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC). Psychol Methods 2012;17(2):228–43. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  22. Kelly B, Cretikos M, Rogers K, King L. The commercial food landscape: outdoor food advertising around primary schools in Australia. Aust NZ J Publ Heal 2008;32(6):522–8.
  23. Maher A, Wilson N, Signal L. Advertising and availability of ‘obesogenic’ foods around New Zealand secondary schools: a pilot study. N Z Med J 2005;118(1218):U1556. PubMedexternal icon
  24. Hoek J. Marketing communications and obesity: a view from the dark side. N Z Med J 2005;118(1220):U1608. PubMedexternal icon
  25. Quigley R, Watts C. Challenging beliefs about the marketing of food. N Z Med J 2005;118(1218):U1554. PubMedexternal icon
  26. Temple NJ, Steyn NP, Myburgh NG, Nel JH. Food items consumed by students attending schools in different socioeconomic areas in Cape Town, South Africa. Nutrition 2006;22(3):252–8. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  27. Robinson TN, Borzekowski DL, Matheson DM, Kraemer HC. Effects of fast food branding on young children’s taste preferences. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161(8):792–7. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  28. Faber M, Laurie S, Maduna M, Magudulela T, Muehlhoff E. Is the school food environment conducive to healthy eating in poorly resourced South African schools? Public Health Nutr 2014;17(6):1214–23. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  29. Draft guidelines: labelling and advertising of foods (R429 of 29 May 2014). South African National Department of Health; 2014. http://www.saafost.org.za/Legislation/2014/D/2014-%20Food%20labelling%20Guidelines%20for_R429.pdf. Accessed December 4, 2014.
  30. Harris JL, Graff SK. Protecting children from harmful food marketing: options for local government to make a difference. Prev Chronic Dis 2011;8(5):A92. PubMedexternal icon



Return to your place in the textTable 1. Size, Location, and Format of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage (SSB) Advertisements (N = 145), Soweto, South Africa, 2013
Characteristic of advertisement n (%)
House 77 (53.1)
Small shopping centre 23 (15.9)
Street/side of road 20 (13.8)
Primary or high school 13 (9.0)
Other building 7 (4.8)
Shebeen 3 (2.1)
Crèche/preschool 1 (0.7)
Transport hub/taxi stand 1 (0.7)
Shop sign 79 (54.5)
Poster 24 (16.6)
Painted advertisement 15 (10.3)
School sign 12 (8.3)
Bus stop 6 (4.1)
Banner 3 (2.1)
Pole sign 3 (2.1)
Billboard 2 (1.4)
Umbrella/refrigerator 1 (0.7)
Small 11 (7.6)
Medium 94 (64.8)
Large 37 (25.5)
Large billboard 3 (2.1)


Return to your place in the textTable 2. Vendors (N = 180) That Sold Sugar-Sweetened Beverages (SSBs), Diet SSBs, Fruit Juice, and Milk, by Vendor Type, Soweto, South Africa, 2013
Vendor Type No. of Vendors No. of Vendors That Sold Beverage Type
SSBs Diet SSBs Fruit Juice Milk
Informal (housed in a nonpermanent structure) 49 1 0 0 0
Formal (housed in permanent structure with no access to electricity/refrigeration [eg, spaza shop]) 22 3 0 0 0
Shops (housed in a permanent structure with access to electricity/refrigeration) 109 100 40 48 74
Percentage of vendors that sold the item NA 58 22 27 41


Return to your place in the textTable 3. Intensity of Advertisements (Points/km2) Versus No. of Schools, Sugar-Sweetened Beverage (SSB) Advertisements, and Vendors in a Sample Area of 38.3 km2, Soweto, South Africa, 2013
Type of Pattern Point Type No. of Points Intensity (Points/km2)
Point SSB 137 3.58
Covariate School 28 0.73
Vendor 184 4.81


View Page In:pdf icon

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors’ affiliated institutions.

Page last reviewed: October 29, 2015