At a glance
The Discussion Guide for Public Health Decision-making in a Nuclear/Radiological Response provides a structured process with six customizable components to design activities that fit a jurisdiction’s needs, resources, and time.

Description of components
The Discussion Guide for Public Health Decision-making in a Nuclear/Radiological Response follows a facilitated process to help answer questions related to the role of public health agencies.
There are six major components to building your discussion-based activity or activities using this guide:
- Complete checklist to determine role of a public health agency in a nuclear/radiological response
- Define your activity scope
- Choose your discussion scenario
- Identify your discussion partners
- Choose your discussion category(ies) and prompts
- Put it all together
You can mix and match components to create activities that best suit your jurisdiction's time, needs, and available resources to discuss public health agencies' role.
Checklist
Use this checklist to help determine potential areas of coordination, support, or management responsibilities for public health agencies in your jurisdiction. At a minimum, the lead public health agency for the discussion-based activity should complete the checklist.
The checklist provides a framework for public health agencies to assess current capabilities, rethink assumptions, and dig a little deeper to determine roles and responsibilities. Ultimately, the checklist will help narrow roles, expectations, and response actions for public health agencies and other partner agencies. It will also help inform areas of focus for discussion-based activities.
Considerations when completing the checklist
- If you choose to create a planning team, involve them in completing the checklist.
- Do not disregard checklist areas based on specific answers. If you select "No" to developing health messages, consider why this is not part of your agency's responsibilities. Double check any assumptions by considering scenarios where this could be necessary.
- Consider getting partner input (e.g., emergency management, radiation control, healthcare coalition) and refine checklist answers to be more inclusive of partner perspectives.
- Use the checklist as a starting point for more in-depth discussion.
Define your scope
Consider whether you will focus discussions within your public health agency, toward partner agencies, or include both. For example, you may choose to focus on one activity within the capacity and limitations of your local public health department, healthcare coalition, or state health department. You may also choose to conduct a second activity with an expanded scope to include partner agencies.
As stated in the Considerations section, the usefulness of the information gathered depends on the partners involved in the discussion and how you structure your activity. For a more robust discussion, invite decision makers or key personnel from partner agencies (e.g., emergency management, radiation control) with a role in supporting decision-making.
Choose your discussion scenario
This discussion guide provides five scenarios from which to choose:
- Small-scale Transportation Incident
- Nuclear Power Plant Incident
- Nuclear/Radiological Emergency
- Healthcare Facility Incident
- Overexposed Patients Incident
Note: You are not required to use these scenarios in your discussion-based activity. You and your planning team can develop a scenario that is more applicable to your jurisdiction. As a guide for developing your scenario, Table 1 provides a listing of types of radiation emergencies[1].
[1] For more information on each type of radiation emergency, go to the About Radiation Emergencies website.
Table 1. Types of radiation emergencies
Please see CDC's Radiation Emergencies: Infographics website for descriptions of these types of emergencies in infographic format. Also, the International Atomic Energy Agency's (IAEA's) Accident Reports website provides examples of real-life nuclear/radiological incidents that the jurisdiction can adapt into a usable scenario.
Identify your discussion partners
There are a wide range of potential partner agencies that may be called upon during response to a nuclear/radiological emergency. A list of potential partners is provided in the table below. Please note that not all these partners need to be represented in every discussion-based activity.
For each activity, choose only those that are pertinent to the nuclear/radiological scenario and activity scope you have chosen. Additional partner agencies may be needed depending on the specifics for your jurisdiction and scenario.
| Partner | Partner | Partner |
|---|---|---|
| Public health agency | 9-1-1 Call Centers | Fire/police |
| Hospitals | Pharmacies | Fatality management |
| Other healthcare providers | Primary care providers | Local government |
| Emergency management agency | Urgent care clinics | Long-term care |
| Emergency medical services | Emergency operations center | HazMat response team |
| Joint information center/PIO personnel | Mutual aid organizations | Organizations supporting groups at higher risk (e.g., economic instability)* |
| Health physicist/radiation control** | Faith-based organizations | State and federal partners |
| Community-based organizations | Public Health Laboratories | - |
*See CDC’s Glossary Terminology Considerations for preferred terms for groups at higher risk.
** See the Conference of Radiation Control Program Directors (CRCPD) list of Radiation Control Programs and Directors.
Choose your discussion category
Select the areas of involvement and discussion prompts that best fit your discussion needs and activity objectives. Consider your planning priorities, findings from your checklist, and discussions with your planning team and other partners. We encourage planners to customize the prompts based on their jurisdiction's needs and the goal of the planned discussion.
Discussion categories
The discussion categories align with CDC's Public Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Capabilities[2].
- Community Preparedness
- Community Recovery
- Emergency Operations Coordination
- Emergency Public Information and Warning
- Fatality Management
- Information Sharing
- Mass Care
- Medical Countermeasures Dispensing and Administration
- Medical Materiel Management and Distribution
- Medical Surge
- Non-pharmaceutical Interventions
- Public Health Laboratory Testing
- Public Health Surveillance and Epidemiological Investigation
- Responder Health and Safety
- Volunteer Management
Prompts
Discussion prompts can be focused on one specific category or sub-topic, or they can be mixed and matched based on your priorities.
Put it all together
Customize a discussion-based activity based on the five components below. The activity will look different for each jurisdiction.
- Complete checklist to determine role of a public health agency in a nuclear/radiological response
- Define your activity scope
- Choose your discussion scenario
- Identify your discussion partners
- Choose your discussion category and prompts
The activity combinations available to create compelling discussions are endless. Below are just a few examples of the types of activities you could put together using this discussion guide.
| Scope | Scenario | Category/Prompts | Partners | Length/Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Local public health department | Small transportation accident | Community preparedness | Public health agencies, environmental health organizations | One 1-hour in-person discussion |
| Healthcare coalition | Healthcare facility incident | Medical response coordination | Public health agencies, healthcare, emergency management agencies | Three 2-hour virtual discussions (series) |
| County response agencies, including the public health agency | Nuclear power plant | Emergency response coordination | Public health agencies, emergency management agencies, healthcare providers, emergency medical services, others | One 4-hour workshop |
| State agencies, including the state public health agency | 10 kiloton IND, population movement from metro into rural area | Community preparedness Emergency response coordination | All state agencies, federal, local, agencies in rural area | Three 2-hour virtual discussions, then one 8-hour workshop |