Hantavirus Outbreak Caused by Andes Virus Linked to International Cruise Ship Travel — United States, 2026

Ozair H. Naqvi, PhD1,2; Mary J. Choi, MD1; Katrin S. Sadigh, MD1; Rita Austin, PhD1,2; Bryon P. Backenson, MS3; Harveen Bergquist, MD4; Alexis Beyer, PharmD5; David Blythe, MD6; Sarah Bowden, PhD1; Andrew T. Boyd, MD1; Chris K. Brown, PhD1; Bryan F. Buss, DVM1,7; Thomas G. Calogrides Jr.5; Wesley R. Campbell, MD4; Julia Y. Charles, JD1; Bryan Christensen, PhD1; Athalia Christie, DrPH1; James R. Cope, PhD1; Caitlin M. Cossaboom, DVM, PhD1; Gretchen Cowman, DrPH1; Benjamin A. Dahl, PhD1; Matthew M. Dahm, PhD1; Mary Beth Danforth, PhD8; Deena S. Disraelly, PhD5; Christine Dubray, MD1; Jeffrey Eason, MPH9; Jeanne Eckes, MBA5; Denis FitzGerald, MD5; Laurie Forlano, DO10; Michael Garner, MPA5; Eric Glassford, MS1; Cria O. Gregory, PhD1; Jennifer Hannah5; Yonette Hercules, DMSc1; Kevin Horahan, JD5; Brendan R. Jackson, MD1; Aaron D. Kofman, MD1; Inna Krapiunaya, MS1; David T. Kuhar, MD1; Joseph Lamana5; James V. Lawler, MD11; Lily Lee, MD1,2; Kelcie Lever Landon, MPH1; Julia Limage, PhD5; John K. Lowe, PhD11; Helen MacGregor, MSN, MPH1; Brian M. Mazanec, PhD5; Andrea M. McCollum, PhD1; Emily L. McCutchen, MS11,12; Eva D. McLanahan, PhD1,5; Jocelyn Mullins, DVM, PhD13; Jennifer M. Nelson, MD1; Kate Noelte, MPH1; Jennifer Renjel, MPH1; Sheila Roy, MD1; Leanna Sayyad, MS1; Helga Scharf-Bell, DNP5; Amy J. Schuh, PhD1; Trevor R. Shoemaker, PhD1; Kirstin Short, MPH14; Emily Sims, MPH1; Rachel L. Snyder, MPH1; Christina F. Spiropoulou, PhD1; Sydney R. Stein, DVM7; Brittany Sunshine, MPH1; Melissa Sutton, MD15; Julie M. Thompson, DVM, PhD1; Alison M. Todres, MPH1; Alexandra Tuttle, MPH1; Axel A. Vazquez Deida, PharmD1; Aimee Williams, DHSc5; Emily C. Zielinski-Gutierrez, DrPH1; Joel M. Montgomery, PhD1; David Fitter, MD1; 2026 U.S. Hantavirus Response Team (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Andes virus (ANDV), the only hantavirus known to be transmitted person-to-person, is endemic to areas of South America.

What is added by this report?

On May 4, 2026, CDC was notified of seven cases of severe acute respiratory illness, including three deaths, later confirmed to be caused by ANDV, on a cruise ship in the Atlantic Ocean. CDC collaborated with domestic and international partners to identify and monitor 88 U.S. residents with potential ANDV exposure. No secondary ANDV infections were identified among monitored contacts.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Rapid coordination supported identification, monitoring, and follow-up of exposed persons. Health care providers should consider ANDV infection among patients with compatible illness after travel to areas with endemic ANDV or exposure to a person with suspected or confirmed ANDV infection and promptly notify public health authorities of any cases.

Article Metrics
Altmetric:

Related Materials

Abstract

Andes virus (ANDV), the only hantavirus known to be transmitted person-to-person, is endemic to areas of South America and can cause hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, which has a case-fatality rate of approximately 40%. On May 4, 2026, CDC was notified of seven cases of severe acute respiratory illness, including three deaths, among 147 persons aboard a cruise ship in the Atlantic Ocean; the illnesses were later confirmed to be caused by ANDV. No cases occurred among passengers who were U.S. residents. Ten of 28 U.S. resident passengers disembarked before ANDV infection was confirmed aboard the ship. On May 10, the remaining 18 U.S. resident passengers were repatriated to the National Quarantine Unit in Omaha, Nebraska, for risk assessment and monitoring, and where optimized advanced care was available, should symptoms develop. CDC and U.S. health departments monitored 60 additional U.S. residents potentially exposed on flights involving a passenger with symptomatic ANDV infection from the cruise, totaling 88 contacts across 27 jurisdictions. All 88 contacts completed 42 days of monitoring, with no secondary ANDV infections identified. Worldwide, local health authorities assessed and monitored approximately 653 potentially exposed persons from 33 countries. This response highlights the value of rapid coordination among partners to locate and monitor potentially exposed persons during an international outbreak to reduce the risk for ANDV transmission. Prompt notification to public health authorities can facilitate testing, patient care, contact identification, and implementation of measures to limit secondary transmission.

Introduction

Andes virus (ANDV) is a New World hantavirus endemic to areas of South America (1). Human infection can occur through exposure to infected rodents or their excreta, and like illness caused by Sin Nombre virus (the most common cause of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome [HPS] in North America), illness caused by ANDV typically starts with nonspecific symptoms (1,2). ANDV is the only hantavirus known to spread person-to-person; transmission occurs via close prolonged contact or exposure to a symptomatic person’s body fluids (1). The incubation period is 4–42 days (1,3). Infection can cause mild illness or HPS, which can rapidly progress to respiratory failure and shock and might require advanced care, including extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) (4). The reported HPS case-fatality rate is approximately 40% (1–4). No specific treatment or vaccine is available (4). The United States has reported one documented case of ANDV, an imported case in 2018 (5). This report describes the U.S. public health response and coordination among partners to identify and monitor potential contacts of persons with ANDV infection.

Investigation and Findings

Outbreak Detection

On May 4, 2026, CDC received an International Health Regulations (IHR) notification of seven persons with severe acute respiratory illness aboard a cruise ship in the Atlantic Ocean, three of whom died. At the time of the report, the ship, which originally departed from Argentina, carried 147 persons, including 88 passengers and 59 crew members, representing 23 nationalities (6). The index patient developed symptoms on April 3 (6). Initial patients had fever and gastrointestinal symptoms, and four rapidly progressed to respiratory failure and shock (6,7). One critically ill passenger was medically evacuated to South Africa on April 27, where diagnostic testing confirmed ANDV infection on May 5 (6). No cases occurred among passengers who were U.S. residents. Onboard passengers were advised to remain in their cabins and maximize physical distancing (7). On May 10, the vessel docked in Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain, where remaining passengers disembarked and received medical and public health assistance (Figure).

U.S. Contact Identification

Cruise contacts. Twenty-eight U.S. residents traveled on the cruise (Supplementary Figure). Ten disembarked before ANDV transmission was identified; seven returned to their states of residence before May 2, and three remained abroad. Eighteen remained aboard the ship until its arrival in Tenerife. Through IHR notifications and information from federal partners, state and local health departments, and passengers, CDC located the seven potentially exposed U.S. residents who had returned to their states of residence and notified local public health jurisdictions for follow-up.

Airline contacts. Sixty U.S. resident contacts (as determined by authorities leading the investigations in South Africa or the Netherlands) were identified on two April 25 commercial flights boarded by a symptomatic cruise passenger later confirmed to have ANDV infection. The symptomatic passenger first boarded a flight from Saint Helena to Johannesburg, South Africa, carrying 11 U.S. residents (including eight cruise passengers). Eight U.S. residents (including six cruise passengers) from this flight returned to the United States for monitoring. The symptomatic passenger also boarded a flight from Johannesburg to Amsterdam, Netherlands, carrying 57 U.S. residents (no cruise passengers).* All 57 U.S. residents from this flight returned to the United States where they were monitored.

Total contacts. Overall, 88 unique U.S. resident contacts were identified, including 28 cruise passengers and 60 additional air travel contacts. Eighteen of these persons (cruise passengers) were transported to the United States (i.e., repatriated) for facility-based evaluation or monitoring, 66 (including seven cruise passengers) were monitored in home jurisdictions, and four (including three cruise and one air travel contact) were monitored abroad (Supplementary Figure).

Laboratory Diagnostics

Before U.S. residents’ arrival at the National Quarantine Unit (NQU) in Nebraska, the Nebraska Public Health Laboratory (NPHL) rapidly validated an ANDV-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay for testing of whole blood collected in ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) tubes. CDC recommended New World hantavirus serologic (immunoglobulin M [IgM] and immunoglobulin G [IgG]) testing of serum specimens from contacts with HPS-compatible symptoms, including fever, myalgia, chills, or acute gastrointestinal or respiratory symptoms (8,9). State and local health departments coordinated specimen collection from contacts with HPS-compatible symptoms; specimens were shipped to CDC for serologic testing for hantavirus. Repeat serologic testing was recommended >72 hours after symptom onset for persons whose initial specimen was collected ≤72 hours after symptom onset.

Public Health Response

Repatriation and Postarrival Evaluation

In coordination with a U.S. Department of State (DOS) biocontainment transport team, CDC conducted predeparture interviews with the 18 U.S. resident passengers in Tenerife to identify persons with ANDV-compatible symptoms and guide disembarkation, return flight seating, and repatriation procedures. The 18 passengers departed Tenerife on May 10 and arrived in the United States on May 11 aboard a DOS-chartered flight with biocontainment capability. Two physicians from the National Emerging Special Pathogens Training and Education Center (NETEC) provided technical guidance on infection prevention and control and clinical care during transport. Sixteen passengers were transported to the University of Nebraska Medical Center in Omaha, Nebraska; 15 were transported to NQU, and one asymptomatic passenger with an indeterminate ANDV PCR test result from a respiratory swab† who was admitted to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Region 7 Regional Emerging Special Pathogen Treatment Center (RESPTC) for evaluation. In addition, one symptomatic passenger and a travel companion were transferred to the HHS Region 4 RESPTC in Georgia for evaluation. Whole blood (EDTA) samples collected from the repatriated passengers were transferred to NPHL for PCR analysis; all test results were negative for ANDV. After receiving negative whole blood ANDV PCR and New World hantavirus serologic test results, all three passengers were transferred from RESPTCs to NQU on May 13 and May 15 (Supplementary Figure).

Exposure Risk Stratification

CDC developed interim guidance (9) for managing ANDV contacts using a two-level risk-based approach (Table 1). Based on their presence aboard the vessel when patients with ANDV infection were symptomatic (April 3–May 10), all 28 U.S. cruise passengers were classified as having high-risk exposures.§ CDC and state and local health departments interviewed these 28 passengers to identify symptoms, confirm travel histories, characterize exposures to symptomatic patients, and support monitoring. Flight contact risk level was stratified by seat proximity to a person with symptomatic ANDV infection. Among 60 flight contacts, 12 (20%) and 48 (80%) had high- and low-risk exposures, respectively (Table 2).

Monitoring and Testing

Postarrival monitoring. In collaboration with federal partners, CDC confirmed traveler details and identified 88 U.S. residents from 27 jurisdictions who required monitoring. CDC, the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), NQU, local jurisdictions, and international partners coordinated 42-day monitoring (upper end of the known ANDV incubation period) for all 88 U.S. resident passengers; 18 were monitored at NQU, four abroad through coordination with DOS and international authorities, and 66 in their home jurisdictions (Table 1) (9). The 18 contacts who disembarked in Tenerife were monitored at NQU for ≥21 days. ASPR deployed a team to manage NQU operations and logistics and to provide psychosocial support and other services, such as management of room service and personal item orders, to the passengers throughout the monitoring period.

After a ≥21-day monitoring period, ASPR coordinated with the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and state and local health departments to transfer 12 contacts from NQU to their home jurisdictions. ASPR regional staff members worked with receiving jurisdictions to facilitate continued monitoring for the full 42 days and coordinated with NETEC and RESPTC on contingency plans to evaluate and manage persons who developed symptoms after returning home. The remaining six persons completed the 42-day monitoring period at NQU. Monitoring ended on June 5 (for one person), June 6 (for 69), and June 21 (for 18).

Clinical consultations and testing. CDC provided 33 clinical consultations to health departments and providers. In total, 127 PCR tests were completed for 21 contacts, including 18 repatriated cruise passengers, and three contacts who developed symptoms during monitoring; all ANDV PCR test results were negative. Serologic testing was completed for 27 contacts, including 18 cruise passengers, and nine contacts who developed symptoms during monitoring. Both IgM and IgG test results were negative for 26 persons; for one contact who might have been exposed to hantavirus previously, only the IgG test result was positive.

U.S. and International Coordination

Through the HHS Disaster Leadership Group, ASPR led federal interagency response coordination among DHS, DOS, CDC, and other HHS partners. Two CDC Health Alert Network (HAN) notices informed clinicians and health departments about case identification, testing, and biosafety (2026 Multi-Country Hantavirus Cluster Linked to Cruise Ship | HAN | CDC; 2026 Hantavirus Outbreak: Testing for Potential Infection | HAN | CDC). Frequent partner and press briefings and state, tribal, local, and territorial health department calls disseminated information. CDC and ASPR coordinated outbreak response activities with U.S. agencies, international partners (World Health Organization, Pan American Health Organization, and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control), and international government public health agencies. CDC also developed a risk assessment to help guide domestic monitoring and response planning. The One CDC Data Platform, which supports data collection, integration, analysis, and visualization, facilitated secure sharing of jurisdictional monitoring data and tracking of daily updates. This activity was reviewed by CDC, deemed not research, and conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.

Discussion

By June 2, 2026, six additional ANDV outbreak cases had been identified (for a total of 13 cases, including three deaths) worldwide (7). All cases occurred among persons aboard the cruise ship (7). Globally, health authorities assessed and monitored approximately 653 persons from 33 countries (7). Because approximately 4 weeks had elapsed between the index patient’s symptom onset and confirmation of ANDV infection, potentially exposed U.S. travelers had dispersed across multiple U.S. and international jurisdictions. Non-U.S. resident contacts were monitored by health officials in their respective countries. All 88 U.S.-associated contacts completed monitoring, and no secondary ANDV infections associated with this cohort were identified. One contact was presumed to have had a previous New World hantavirus infection unrelated to the outbreak, highlighting the importance of interpreting serologic results in the context of epidemiologic data.

The absence of secondary infections among monitored U.S. contacts should not be interpreted as evidence that no transmission risk existed. Close quarters and shared spaces aboard the ship created numerous opportunities for exposure. Additional studies might help identify factors associated with person-to-person transmission of ANDV.

Health care providers should obtain a thorough travel history and consider ANDV in any acutely ill patient with compatible illness who has been in an area where ANDV infection is endemic or in close contact with someone with suspected or confirmed ANDV infection, irrespective of contact location. ANDV can be difficult to distinguish clinically from Sin Nombre virus infection because early signs and symptoms are nonspecific. However, because ANDV (unlike Sin Nombre virus) can be transmitted person-to-person, prompt notification to public health authorities of persons with potential ANDV infection can facilitate testing, contact identification, and implementation of measures to reduce secondary transmission. In this outbreak, enhanced contact monitoring facilitated rapid clinical evaluation with ability to transfer patients to ECMO-equipped centers, if necessary. Because viremia can precede symptom onset, PCR testing can facilitate early identification of infections (10). Modified activity recommendations and isolation were intended to reduce transmission risk during early illness, when person-to-person transmission had been reported (1,2). Multijurisdictional investigations can be complex, particularly for outbreaks involving cross-jurisdictional or international travel. In this outbreak response, rapid coordination among domestic and international public health and other partners reduced the risk for additional infections.

Acknowledgments

The Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; CDC Hantavirus Response Team; Houston Health Department epidemiology and hantavirus response teams; Grant County Health District; Public Health – Seattle & King County; Arlington County Public Health; Fairfax County Health Department; Deschutes County Health Services; New York State Department of Health Incident Management System Response Team; New York county response teams; California local health departments serving Los Angeles County, Orange County, Sacramento County, Santa Barbara County, Santa Clara County, and San Mateo County; Bureau of Global Health Security and Diplomacy, Bureau of Medical Services, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, Spain Desk, Bureau of African Affairs, U.S. Embassy Madrid, U.S. Embassy Cabo Verde, U.S. Department of State; U.S. Department of Homeland Security; Phoenix Air Group; National Guard Bureau, Office of the Joint Surgeon General; participating state, tribal, local, and territorial public health agencies; participating cruise ship passengers, crew members, and commercial flight passengers; international public health partners; One CDC Data Platform, Palantir, and Response Ready Enterprise Data Integration teams.

2026 U.S. Hantavirus Response Team

Geoffrey C. Bartlett, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Shelsy Cannon, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Onieka Carpenter, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Peter T. Cassell, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Christina Cederberg, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Jill M. D’Abrosca, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Jeanette A. Dickinson, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Dwight Ferguson, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Artensie Flowers, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Joseph M. Foss, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Lydian Green, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; India Johns, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; John F. Koerner, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Patrick J. Lindner, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Erin Mullen, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Christine M. Nappa, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Anthony Paquette, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Matthew Peitzman, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Jenny Raspberry, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Kimberley Ricketts, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Catherine Roth, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Cynthia Rubio, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Erica Ruchard, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Luis E. Torrens, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Stephany Vento, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Katie R. Watson, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Margaret Wilk, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Mallory Wright, Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response; Francisco Alvarado-Ramy, CDC; Beau B. Bruce, CDC; Heather Burke, CDC; Kevin Chatham-Stevens, CDC; Samuel J. Crowe, CDC; Chad H. Dowell, CDC; James C. Graziano, CDC; Anastasia Grindstaff, CDC; Inga Holmdahl, CDC; Reginald Jones, CDC; Rebecca Kahn, CDC; Cory M. Kokko, CDC; William T. Koval, CDC; Modinat Lawal, CDC; Sarah Leonard, CDC; Nekole S. Locke, CDC; Thomas C. McHale, Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; Stephanie M. Morrison, CDC; Yoshinori Nakazawa, CDC; Rachel Nelson, CDC; Molly Nicholson, CDC; Scott W. Olesen, CDC; Meeyoung Park, CDC; Kara M. Pilote, CDC; Juliet R.C. Pulliam, CDC; Amanda Raziano, CDC; Erica Reott, CDC; Shahrokh Roohi, CDC; Laird Ruth, CDC; Tara Sealy, CDC; Melisa M. Shah, CDC; Alice Shumate, CDC; Dallas J. Smith, CDC; Rachel M. Smith, CDC; Jessica R. Spengler, CDC; Courtney Victor, Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; Kendra Walker, CDC; Dennis Wang, CDC; Stephen R. Welch, CDC; Michael Wellman, CDC; Christina M. Winfield, CDC; Holly Howard, California Department of Public Health; Vit Kraushaar, California Department of Public Health; Eric M. Sergienko, California Department of Public Health; Cameron Stainken, California Department of Public Health; Alex Yu, California Department of Public Health; Andrea Bessler, Georgia Department of Public Health, Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; Skyler Brennan, Georgia Department of Public Health; Amanda Feldpausch, Georgia Department of Public Health; Julie Gabel, Georgia Department of Public Health; Robert Thornton, Georgia Department of Public Health; Farah S. Ahmed, Kansas Department of Health and Environment; Dereck D. Totten, Kansas Department of Health and Environment; Dennis Shoemaker, University of Kansas Medical Center; Justin Frederick, Douglas County Health Department; Lindsay Huse, Douglas County Health Department; Reed Thompson, Douglas County Health Department; Samir Koirala, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services; Robin Williams, Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services; Angie M. Vasa, Nebraska Medicine; David Brett-Major, University of Nebraska Medical Center; M. Jana Broadhurst, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Angela Hewlett, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Angela Ling, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Elizabeth Schnaubelt, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Michael C. Wadman, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Katherine Willet, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Wesley Zeger, University of Nebraska Medical Center; Amanda Bartling, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Public Health Laboratory; Stevie McGill, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Public Health Laboratory; Amy Roden, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Nebraska Public Health Laboratory; William A. Fischer, II, University of North Carolina; Steven P. Dziura, Jr., New York State Department of Health; Emily Lutterloh, New York State Department of Health; Michelle Dethloff, North Dakota Health and Human Services; Molly Howell, North Dakota Health and Human Services; Brenton Nesemeier, North Dakota Health and Human Services; Levi Schlosser, North Dakota Health and Human Services; Michelle Ashby, Deschutes County Health Services; Richard W. Fawcett, Deschutes County Health Services; Carissa Heinige, Deschutes County Health Services; Daphne Moffett, Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority; Dean Sidelinger, Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority; Janeana White, Houston Health Department; Briana O’Sullivan-Kovacs, Texas Department of State Health Services; Brendan Sullivan, Texas Department of State Health Services; Stephen White, Texas Department of State Health Services; Susan McClellan, University of Texas Medical Branch; Christopher A. Foster, U.S. Department of State; Jeremy Langford, U.S. Department of State; Sarah Mirabal, U.S. Department of State; Joseph F. Uddo, U.S. Department of State; Kevin Wilson, U.S. Department of State; Evan Crook, Utah Department of Health and Human Services; Kacy Nowak, Utah Department of Health and Human Services; Bethelhem Kebede, Arlington Health Department; Shawn Harper, Fairfax County Health Department; James R. Moss, Virginia Department of Health; Caitlin S. Pedati, Virginia Department of Health; Denise C. Sockwell, Virginia Department of Health; Amber McCoy, Grant County Health District; BreeAnna Dell, Public Health – Seattle & King County; Sargis Pogosjans, Public Health – Seattle & King County; Michelle L. Holshue, Career Epidemiology Field Officer Program, CDC, Washington State Department of Health; Hanna Oltean, Washington State Department of Health.

Corresponding author: Ozair H. Naqvi, spathinfo@cdc.gov.


1CDC Hantavirus Response; 2Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 3New York State Department of Health; 4U.S. Department of State, Washington DC; 5Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response, Washington DC; 6Maryland Department of Health, Baltimore, Maryland; 7Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services; 8California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California; 9Utah Department of Health and Human Services; 10Virginia Department of Health; 11University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska; 12Nebraska Public Health Laboratory, Omaha, Nebraska; 13Public Health – Seattle & King County, Seattle, Washington; 14Houston Health Department, Houston, Texas; 15Public Health Division, Oregon Health Authority, Portland, Oregon.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Sydney R. Stein reports receipt of travel support from the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) for Spring State Epidemiologists forums and CSTE conferences, and uncompensated service as the Epidemic Intelligence Service (EIS) class of 2023 representative to the EIS Alumni Association Executive Committee. Kirstin Short reports serving as the Syndromic Surveillance Consortium of Southeast Texas Consortium chair. John K. Lowe reports receipt of grants from the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR) for the Regional Emerging Special Pathogen Treatment Center and for training, simulation, and quarantine. James V. Lawler reports receipt of a Regional Disaster Health Response System grant and a Regional Emerging Special Pathogen Treatment Center grant from ASPR; receipt of consulting fees from CSL Seqirus, USA and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences Henry M. Jackson Foundation for service on the scientific advisory committee; receipt of speaker honoraria from the Florida Hospital Association, the Metro Health & Medical Preparedness Coalition, and the Missouri Hospital Association; receipt of payment for expert testimony from Coblentz Patch Duffy & Bass, LLP, Sacramento Kings; and service on the Kinsa Health Scientific Advisory Board. Jeffrey Eason reports service as a public health member of the Utah Health Data Committee. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.


* Investigation revealed that a symptomatic non-U.S. cruise passenger who was later confirmed to have ANDV infection briefly boarded then disembarked from the flight from Johannesburg to Amsterdam.

† The asymptomatic passenger’s PCR result came from testing performed at a reference laboratory in the Netherlands on a specimen collected before disembarkation.

§ CDC determined that presence on board the cruise ship constituted a high-risk exposure because of the likelihood of prolonged close contact among passengers and crew, shared living spaces, and the potential for recall bias when assessing exposures and symptom onset.

45 C.F.R. part 46.102(l)(2), 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. Sect. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. Sect. 552a; 44 U.S.C. Sect. 3501 et seq.

References

  1. Martínez VP, Di Paola N, Alonso DO, et al. “Super-spreaders” and person-to-person transmission of Andes virus in Argentina. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2230–41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2009040 PMID:33264545
  2. MacNeil A, Nichol ST, Spiropoulou CF. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Virus Res 2011;162:138–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virusres.2011.09.017 PMID:21945215
  3. Martinez-Valdebenito C, Calvo M, Vial C, et al. Person-to-person household and nosocomial transmission of Andes hantavirus, Southern Chile, 2011. Emerg Infect Dis 2014;20:1629–36. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2010.140353 PMID:25272189
  4. Mertz GJ, Hjelle B, Crowley M, Iwamoto G, Tomicic V, Vial PA. Diagnosis and treatment of new world hantavirus infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2006;19:437–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.qco.0000244048.38758.1f PMID:16940866
  5. Kofman A, Eggers P, Kjemtrup A, et al. Notes from the field: contact tracing investigation after first case of Andes virus in the United States—Delaware, February 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;67:1162–3. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6741a7 PMID:30335741
  6. Andes Virus Outbreak Working Group. Andes hantavirus outbreak on a cruise ship, 2026. N Engl J Med 2026;394:2477–9. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2606496 PMID:42160737
  7. World Health Organization. Disease outbreak news: hantavirus outbreak linked to cruise ship travel, multi-locations. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2026. https://www.who.int/emergencies/disease-outbreak-news/item/2026-DON611
  8. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists. Public health reporting and national notification for hantavirus infection. Atlanta, GA: Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists; 2014. https://cdn.ymaws.com/www.cste.org/resource/resmgr/2014PS/14_ID_08upd.pdf
  9. CDC. Interim guidance for public health assessment and management of people with potential exposure to Andes virus; Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2026. https://archive.cdc.gov/#/details?url=https://www.cdc.gov/hantavirus/php/emergency-guidance/index.html
  10. Ferrés M, Vial P, Marco C, et al.; Andes Virus Household Contacts Study Group. Prospective evaluation of household contacts of persons with hantavirus cardiopulmonary syndrome in Chile. J Infect Dis 2007;195:1563–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/516786 PMID:17471425
Return to your place in the textFIGURE. Timeline of hantavirus outbreak caused by Andes virus and public health measures — United States, 2026*
The figure is a timeline of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome outbreak caused by Andes virus and public health measures implemented by the Unted States in 2026.

Abbreviations: HAN = Health Alert Network; NQU = National Quarantine Unit.

* Monitoring ended on June 5 (for one person), June 6 (for 69), and June 21 (for 18).

TABLE 1. Interim public health monitoring measures for contacts of patients with Andes virus infection, by risk classification exposure criteria — U.S. jurisdictions, 2026Return to your place in the text
Risk classification Exposure criteria Public health monitoring measures
High risk Being on board the affected cruise ship at any time from April 3 (the date of symptom onset for the index patient with ANDV infection) through the date of disembarkation of the exposed passenger cohort;
answering “yes” to any of the exposure questions*;
or being on an aircraft with a person with symptomatic ANDV infection and seated in the same row as the person or within two rows in front of or behind the person (high-risk zone)†,§
Twice-daily monitoring for fever and symptoms for 42 days after last potential exposure;
modified activities to reduce close contact and potential exposures to others;
movement and travel coordinated with public health authorities;
and immediate isolation and evaluation if symptoms develop
Low risk Being on an aircraft with a person with ANDV infection and seated outside of the high-risk zone Daily symptom monitoring for 42 days after last potential exposure;
no activity modifications or travel restrictions;
jurisdictional coordination for travel;
and immediate isolation and evaluation if symptoms develop

Abbreviation: ANDV = Andes virus.
* Exposure questions assessed direct contact with a symptomatic person or their body fluids, shared living or sleeping spaces, shared personal items, caregiving activities, and prolonged close contact (≤6 ft [1.8 m] for ≥15 cumulative minutes).
† Aircraft crew members and anyone who provided direct assistance to the patient on board the aircraft were individually assessed for high-risk exposures.
§ Interim aircraft exposure criteria were updated during the response from a seat-based definition to a five-row zone comprising the patient’s row and two rows in front of and behind that row.

TABLE 2. Number and percentage of U.S. residents identified with potential high- or low-risk Andes virus exposure, by exposure setting — U.S. jurisdictions, 2026*Return to your place in the text
Exposure setting Risk classification
No. (%)
Total
High risk† Low risk§
Cruise ship 28 (100) 0 (—) 28
Commercial flight from Saint Helena to Johannesburg, South Africa 0 (—) 3 (100) 3
Commercial flight from Johannesburg, South Africa, to Amsterdam, Netherlands 12 (21) 45 (79) 57
Total 40 (45) 48 (55) 88

* Four of the 88 U.S. residents did not return home during their monitoring period and were therefore not monitored by U.S. health departments.
† All cruise passengers were classified as having high-risk exposures. Aircraft passengers seated in the same row as the infected traveler or within two rows in front of or behind the infected traveler were classified as having high-risk exposures.
§ Aircraft passengers seated more than two rows in front of or behind the infected traveler were classified as having low-risk exposures.
Eight additional U.S. residents on the flight from Saint Helena to Johannesburg were also cruise ship passengers and are included in the cruise ship total but not the flight total.


Suggested citation for this article: Naqvi OH, Choi MJ, Sadigh KS, et al. Hantavirus Outbreak Caused by Andes Virus Linked to International Cruise Ship Travel — United States, 2026. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2026;75:632–639. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7543a1.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.