Environmental Investigation of a Campylobacteriosis Outbreak Among Wedding Attendees — York County, Pennsylvania, 2025

Rugiatu Z. Kamara, MBChB1,2; Shanna Miko, DNP1; Amy M. Kahler, MS1; Alexis V. Roundtree1,3; Haley J. McKeel1; Yang Gao, PhD1; Charlotte Lane1; Kristina Zwolenik, MPH4; Kelly E. Kline, MPH5; Aaron Smee4; Olivia Fitzmaurice-Shean, MPH4; Bevin S. Durant Fidler, MPH4; Nicholas Cesari, MPH4; Shannon McGinnis, PhD4; Mia Catharine Mattioli, PhD1 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Unregulated private springs are a known risk factor for gastrointestinal illness, including campylobacteriosis.

What is added by this report?

A Campylobacter jejuni outbreak among wedding attendees in Pennsylvania was linked to consumption of untreated water from an on-site spring; environmental sampling detected Campylobacter DNA in the spring and a tap it supplied. The broken springhouse roof permitted entry of debris and animal feces, an ultraviolet water treatment light was nonfunctional, and evidence of animal activity was observed in and around the spring.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Routine inspection and maintenance of untreated private springs and clear signage indicating whether water is potable might reduce the risk for waterborne outbreaks. Pairing environmental testing with epidemiology helps confirm exposure routes and can guide mitigation efforts.

Article Metrics
Altmetric:

Related Materials

In early June 2025, approximately 80 persons attended a wedding at a venue in York County, Pennsylvania. Within 3 days, multiple attendees reported experiencing gastrointestinal illness. On June 23, the Pennsylvania Department of Health (PDOH) and the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (PDA) contacted CDC to request assistance after PDOH became aware of a laboratory-confirmed Campylobacter jejuni infection and reports of approximately 20 additional symptomatic attendees, with epidemiologic information implicating exposure to untreated spring water at the venue as a common exposure source. The focus of this report is on environmental inspection, testing, and identification of pathogens. This activity was reviewed by CDC, deemed not research, and conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.*

Investigation and Outcomes

Survey of Event Attendees

On June 30, PDOH sent a link to an online questionnaire to all wedding attendees to identify additional cases and characterize exposures. Because some attendees shared email addresses, the exact number of attendees who received the questionnaire could not be determined; however, 46 responses were received. Among these, 15 (33%) persons reported gastrointestinal illness 1–10 days after the event; however, no specific food item associated with illness was identified.

Use of On-Site Spring Water During the Event and Inspection of the Spring

The venue manager reported that the site normally relied on vendors to supply potable water and ice. However, after the vendor’s bottled water supply was exhausted during the event, employees of the vendor began drawing water from a kitchen tap connected to an on-site spring for food preparation and beverage service; no signage identified the water as nonpotable.

An onsite inspection by PDOH and PDA officials identified substantial deficiencies at the spring, including 1) a broken springhouse roof allowing entry of debris and animal feces (Figure), 2) a nonfunctional ultraviolet treatment unit (inoperable for ≥2 months), 3) evidence of animal activity, and 4) proximity of the spring to a chicken coop and an area occupied by horses.

Testing of Water Samples

On July 9, PDOH and PDA officials collected paired large-volume (100-L) ultrafiltered and (500-mL) grab samples† from the spring and the kitchen tap (1); point-of-use ultraviolet filters§ had been installed in the kitchen tap after the wedding but before sample collection. CDC’s Environmental Microbiology and Engineering Laboratory analyzed samples for Campylobacter spp. (2), culturable fecal indicator bacteria (total coliforms and Escherichia coli), and microbial source tracking molecular markers targeting fecal contamination from birds and ruminants (3,4), potential reservoirs of Campylobacter organisms present on the property.

Culturable Campylobacter organisms were not recovered from any sample, but Campylobacter DNA was detected in both spring and tap water. Fecal indicator bacteria were markedly elevated in spring water (total coliforms >2,419.6 most probable number [MPN]/100 mL; E. coli 547.5 MPN/100 mL)** but undetectable at the tap, suggesting that point-of-use treatment reduced but did not eliminate detectable Campylobacter DNA. Source tracking markers for birds and ruminants were not detected at either site, leaving the source or sources of fecal contamination undetermined.

Preliminary Conclusions and Actions

Epidemiologic linkage of illness to spring-water consumption, environmental deficiencies at the spring, and detection of Campylobacter DNA and fecal indicator bacteria in the spring water support untreated spring water as the most likely outbreak source. Absence of culturable pathogens does not rule out prior contamination, because Campylobacter organisms can enter a viable but nonculturable state (5), and sampling occurred after symptom onset. After the investigation, the venue installed two point-of-use water filters, repaired the springhouse roof, and posted signage identifying water from spring-fed taps as nonpotable. State officials recommended that the venue improve communication with external vendors to prevent future use of the nonpotable water source for food preparation and drinking.

Private springs are largely unregulated in the United States, and, in the absence of visible contamination, users might assume such water is safe. These findings suggest that timely environmental testing paired with epidemiologic investigation could improve source attribution and guide the development and implementation of remediation efforts at venues serving the public. Routine inspection and maintenance of untreated private water sources might reduce the risk for waterborne outbreaks.

Acknowledgments

Channing Greenland, Phillip Keener, Nicole Mundorf, Stefanie Smith, Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture Bureau of Food Safety & Laboratory Services; the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Safe Drinking Water.

Corresponding author: Shanna Miko, rhu6@cdc.gov.


1Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; 2Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 3Chenega Enterprise Systems & Solutions, LLC, Chesapeake, Virginia; 4Pennsylvania Department of Health, Bureau of Epidemiology; 5Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Food Safety & Laboratory Services.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.


* 45 C.F.R. part 46, 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. Sect. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. Sect. 552a; 44 U.S.C. Sect. 3501 et seq.

† A single discrete sample collected at a specific location to provide a measurement of contamination at a specific point in time.

§ Ultraviolet treatment systems use ultraviolet light to disinfect water or reduce the number of harmful microorganisms in water.

Microbial source tracking uses tests that identify fecal bacteria linked to specific hosts to help determine where contamination in environmental water comes from.

** Measured using Environmental Protection Agency standard methods, IDEXX Colilert-18, on 100-mL grab samples.

References

  1. US Environmental Protection Agency; CDC. Protocol for the collection of water samples for detection of pathogens and bioterrorism agents. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development; Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2022. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi/P1017HMN.PDF?Dockey=P1017HMN.PDF
  2. Lund M, Nordentoft S, Pedersen K, Madsen M. Detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken fecal samples by real-time PCR. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42:5125–32. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.42.11.5125-5132.2004 PMID:15528705
  3. Mieszkin S, Yala JF, Joubrel R, Gourmelon M. Phylogenetic analysis of Bacteroidales 16S rRNA gene sequences from human and animal effluents and assessment of ruminant faecal pollution by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol 2010;108:974–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04499.x PMID:19735325
  4. Weller D, Belias A, Green H, Roof S, Wiedmann M. Landscape, water quality, and weather factors associated with an increased likelihood of foodborne pathogen contamination of New York streams used to source water for produce production. Front Sustain Food Syst 2020;3:124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2019.00124 PMID:32440656
  5. Pitkänen T. Review of Campylobacter spp. in drinking and environmental waters. J Microbiol Methods 2013;95:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2013.06.008 PMID:23810971
Return to your place in the textFIGURE. Bottom of the spring that provided water to a wedding venue and was associated with an outbreak of Campylobacter jejuni gastroenteritis, showing algal growth, pieces of the broken roof, and evidence of animal activity — York County, Pennsylvania, 2025
The figure is a photograph depicting the bottom of the spring pond that provided water to a wedding venue associated with Campylobacter jejuni gastroenteritis, showing algal growth, pieces of broken roof, and evidence of animal activity.

Photo/Pennsylvania Department of Health, 2025


Suggested citation for this article: Kamara RZ, Miko S, Kahler AM, et al. Environmental Investigation of a Campylobacteriosis Outbreak Among Wedding Attendees — York County, Pennsylvania, 2025. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2026;75:573–575. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7537a2.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.