Management

Asthma action plan

asthma action plan
Data Standard Asthma action plan
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0- 17 years with current asthma who have received an asthma action plan from a health professional
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received an asthma action plan from a health professional among all children with current asthma
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have ever received an asthma action plan from a health professionalSurvey question (Source: NHIS):
YES response to:
  • “An asthma action plan is a printed form with specific instructions based on [child’s name]’s asthma that tells when to change the amount or type of medicine, when to call the doctor for advice, and when to go to the emergency room. Has a doctor or other health professional EVER given [child’s name] an asthma action plan?”

Note: In the NHIS, this question is only asked of those who were ever diagnosed by a health professional, and who still had asthma at the time of the survey, and/or those who had at least one asthma attack in the past 12 months, i.e., those with current asthma or with recent asthma symptoms.

Benchmark data source:

Note: the question wording for ACBS is slightly different than NHIS. The ACBS wording is “An asthma action plan, or asthma management plan, is a form with instructions about when to change the amount or type of medicine, when to call the doctor for advice, and when to go the emergency room. Has a doctor or other health professional EVER given you or [child’s name] an asthma action plan?”Denominator definitionDenominator for at-risk rate:
Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma (in the demographic group of interest)Survey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence:
YES response to both questions:

  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that [child’s name] had asthma?”
    AND
  • “Does [child’s name] still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background

In 2008, 44% of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma had ever received an asthma action plan. (1) Providing all patients with asthma with a written asthma action plans was included as one of six priority actions in the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Asthma Guidelines identified by the Guideline Implementation Panel (GIP), given evidence that education about recognition and appropriate treatment of asthma symptoms reduces risk and impairment(2). The six priority messages were chosen to help address disparities in asthma outcomes. Key components of an asthma action plan are instructions for: 1) daily medication and environmental control and, 2) how to recognize and address worsening asthma. Action plans are an important way to communicate management plans to schools and enhance coordination of care across multiple caregivers and sites.

Healthy People https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory-diseases/objectivesExternal

  • Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.2: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma with prescribed inhalers who receive instruction on their use according to NAEPP guidelines.

Significance to disparitiesAnalysis of the 2006-2007 Child Asthma Call-back Survey showed that there were no racial/ethnic disparities for asthma action plan receipt: non-Hispanic black, Hispanic, and other race children were no more or less likely to receive an asthma action plan from a health professional than non-Hispanic white children(3). However, this same study also found that having a routine care visit and an ED visit were positively associated with receiving an asthma action plan. Receiving an action plan may be a marker for more severe asthma. Given that minority children are at higher risk of adverse outcomes (4), it could be expected that a higher percentage would be identified as at risk for poor outcomes and thus more likely to receive asthma action plans.Data considerations

  • Does not measure the percentage with a current or up-to-date plan, only those who have ever received a plan.
  • Relies on recall and self (or proxy) report of receiving an asthma action plan (as opposed to documentation in medical records).
  • Measures the number/percentage of children for whom a caregiver recalls receiving an asthma action plan, and thus have had the opportunity to be educated by a provider about the components of a plan.

Data resourcesBRFSS Asthma Call-back Survey (ACBS): Child prevalence tables 2006-2010: https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/acbs/acbstables.htm (see Table 6: Estimated percent receiving an asthma management plan among children with current or active asthma)Related data standards

Because children with severe asthma may be more likely to seek routine and urgent care and use preventive medication, receiving an asthma action plan may also be a similar marker for disease severity. Additional indicators of increased asthma healthcare use and severity include:

  • Asthma attack prevalence (crude measure of asthma control)
  • Asthma emergency department visits
  • Asthma hospitalizations
  • Preventive medication/ICS use
  • Routine asthma visit in past year

References(1) Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60(17):547-552 (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6017a4.htm?s_cid=mm6017a4_w)
(2) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines Implementation Panel Report for: Expert Panel Report 3—Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH Publication No. 09-6147. December 2008 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/gip_rpt.pdfCdc-pdfExternal)
(3) Zahran HS, Person CJ, Bailey C, Moorman JE. Predictors of asthma self-management education among children and adults–2006-2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call Back Survey. J Asthma 2012; 49:98-106.
(4) Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Simon AE, Schoendorf KC. Trends in racial disparities for asthma outcomes among children 0 to 17 years, 2001-2010. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2014, 134(3):547-553.

Taught how to recognize early symptoms

Taught how to recognize early symptoms
Data Standard Taught How to Recognize Early Symptoms
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received (or their parents/guardians have received) education on how to recognize early signs or symptoms of an asthma episode.
  • At rate risk: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received (or their parents/guardians have received) education on how to recognize early signs or symptoms of an asthma episode among all children with current asthma
  • Population-based rate: N/A.

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received (or their parents/guardians have received) education on how to recognize early signs or symptoms of an asthma episodeSurvey Question (Source: NHIS):
“Has a doctor or other health professional EVER taught [child’s name] or [his/her] parent or guardian how to recognize early signs or symptoms of an asthma episode?”Benchmark data sources:
  • National: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) periodic modules: 2003, 2008, 2013 (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm)
  • State: BRFSS Asthma Call-Back Survey (ACBS), average annual estimates for survey years starting in 2006 for participating states. Aggregation of at least 2 survey years is recommended to obtain reliable estimates by state. (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/acbs/index.htm). Note: although the ACBS question wording (“Has a doctor or other health professional ever taught you or [child’s name] how to recognize early signs or symptoms of an asthma episode?”) differs slightly from the NHIS question, the questions are similar enough to yield comparable estimates.

Denominator definitionDenominator (at-risk rate): Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions: used to determine current asthma prevalence:
YES response to both of two survey questions

  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that your child had asthma?”
  • AND
  • “Does your child still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background

Results from the 2008 NHIS indicate that 72.1% of children with current asthma had ever been taught to recognize early signs or symptoms of an asthma episode(1). The EPR-3 recommends that every patient who has asthma be taught to recognize symptom patterns that indicate inadequate asthma control. There is evidence that asthma education about recognition of asthma symptoms reduces risk and impairment (2).

This measure is related to Healthy People 2020 Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.3: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma who receive education about appropriate response to an asthma episode, including recognizing early signs and symptoms or monitoring peak flow results, according to National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines, http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory-diseases/objectivesExternal.

Significance to disparitiesAdults with less than a high school education were less likely to report that they had been taught to recognize signs of an asthma episode (3). Access to medical care for asthma and the quality of care provided is often lower among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations (2).Data considerationsThis item is a measurement of the respondent’s recall of receiving education, and thus may be an indicator of effective communication of education to patients and caretakers.Data resourcesBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS): Asthma Call-Back Survey (ACBS), starting 2006. (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/acbs/2006/pdf/acbs_2006_child_codebook.pdfCdc-pdf)Related data standards

Because being taught how to recognize early symptoms may be done at the same time as other asthma education in a health care encounter, similar measures include:

  • Taught how to use an inhaler
  • Taught how to respond to episodes of asthma
  • Taught how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy
  • Asthma Action Plan
  • Advised to change home/school/work environment
  • Insurance coverage
  • Usual source of health care
  • Personal doctor

References(1) Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60(17):547-552 (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6017a4.htm?s_cid=mm6017a4_w)
(2) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines Implementation Panel Report for: Expert Panel Report 3—Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH Publication No. 09-6147. December 2008 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/gip_rpt.pdfCdc-pdfExternal)
(3) Zahran HS, Person CJ, Bailey C, Moorman JE. Predictors of asthma self-management education among children and adults–2006-2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call Back Survey. J Asthma 2012; 49:98-106.

Taught how to use inhaler

how to use inhaler
Data Standard Taught how to use inhaler
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have ever used a prescription inhaler who have received (or their parents/guardians have received) instruction on inhaler use from a health professional.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have ever used a prescription inhaler who have received (or their parents/guardians have received) instruction on inhaler use from a health professional among all children with current asthma who have ever used a prescription inhaler.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years who have ever used a prescription inhaler who have received (or their parents/guardians have received) instruction on how to use it from a health professional.Survey Question (Source: NHIS):
  • “Has a health professional shown [child name] how to use [his/her] inhaler? (This includes showing parents for young children.)”

Benchmark data sources:

Note: although the ACBS question wording (“Did a health professional show [him/her] how to use the inhaler?”) differs from the NHIS question, both questions are believed to yield comparable results

Denominator definition Denominator (at-risk rate): Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions: used to determine current asthma prevalence ):
YES response to both of two survey questions
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that your child had asthma?”
  • AND
  • “Does your child still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background

Results from the 2006-2007 BRFSS Asthma Call-Back Survey (ACBS) indicate that 78.6% of children with current asthma who have ever used a prescription inhaler have been taught how to use their prescription inhaler. This measure is related to the use of asthma action plans, which should include instructions for daily treatment and are a prominent National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guideline recommendation (1). Results from the 2008 NHIS indicate that 44% of children with asthma had ever received an asthma action plan (2).

This measure is related to Healthy People 2020 Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.2: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma with prescribed inhalers who receive instruction on their use according to NAEPP guidelines, http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory- diseases/objectivesExternal.

Significance to disparitiesAccess to medical care for asthma and the quality of care provided is often lower among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations (1).Data considerationsThis item is a measurement of the respondent’s recall of receiving instruction on inhaler, and thus may be an indicator of effective communication of education of patients and caretakers. However, it may not reflect the rate at which health care providers provide instruction on inhaler use given that no comparison to medical records is performed.Data resourcesBehavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS): Asthma Call-Back Survey (ACBS), starting 2006. (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/acbs/2006/pdf/acbs_2006_child_codebook.pdfCdc-pdf ) The ACBS has the advantage of being collected annually and providing state level estimates. ACBS is not collected in all states.Related data standards

Because being taught how to use an inhaler may be done at the same time as other asthma education during a health care encounter, similar measures include:

  • Taught how to recognize early symptoms
  • Taught how to respond to episodes of asthma
  • Taught how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy
  • Asthma Action Plan
  • Advised to change home/school/work environment
  • Insurance coverage
  • Usual source of health care
  • Personal doctor

References(1) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines Implementation Panel Report for: Expert Panel Report 3—Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH Publication No. 09-6147. December 2008 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/gip_rpt.pdfCdc-pdfExternal)
(2) Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60 (17):547-552 (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6017a4.htm?s_cid=mm6017a4_w)

Taught how to respond to episodes of asthma

Taught how to respond to episodes of asthma
Data Standard Taught how to respond to episodes of asthma
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received (or their parents/guardians have received) education on how to respond to episodes of asthma.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received (or their parents/guardians have received) education on how to respond to episodes of asthma among all children with asthma.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received (or their parents/guardians have received) education on how to respond to episodes of asthmaSurvey Question (Source: NHIS):
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER taught [child name] or [his/her] parent or guardian how to respond to episodes of asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

  • National: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) periodic modules: 2003, 2008, 2013 (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm)
  • State: BRFSS Asthma Call-Back Survey (ACBS), average annual estimates for survey years starting in 2006 for participating states. Aggregation of at least 2 survey years is recommended to obtain reliable estimates by state. (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/acbs/index.htm).
    Note: Although the ACBS question wording (“Has a doctor or other health professional ever taught you or {child name} what to do during an asthma episode or attack?”) differs from the NHIS question, the estimates are likely to be comparable.
Denominator definition Denominator (at-risk rate): Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence
YES response to both of two survey questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that your child had asthma?” AND
  • “Does your child still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background

Results from the 2008 NHIS indicate that 78.3% of children with current asthma had ever been taught to respond to an asthma episode (1). This measure is related to the use of asthma action plans, which should include instructions for how to recognize and handle worsening asthma and are a prominent to National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guideline recommendation (2).

This measure is related to Healthy People 2020 Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.3: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma who receive education about appropriate response to an asthma episode, including recognizing early signs and symptoms or monitoring peak flow results, according NAEPP guidelines, http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory-diseases/objectivesExternal.

Significance to disparitiesAdults with less than a high school education were less likely to report that they had been taught to respond to an asthma episode (3). Access to medical care for asthma and the quality of care provided is often lower among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations (2).Data considerationsThis item is a measurement of the respondent’s recall of being taught how to respond to an episode of asthma, and thus may be an indicator of effective communication of education of patients and caretakers. However, it may not reflect the rate at which health care providers provide education given that no comparison to medical records is performed.Data resources

The ACBS has the advantage of being collected annually and providing state level estimates. ACBS is not collected in all states.

Related data standards

Because being taught how to respond to episodes of asthma may be done at the same time as other asthma education in a health care encounter, similar measures include:

  • Taught how to recognize early symptoms
  • Taught how to use an inhaler
  • Taught how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy
  • Asthma Action Plan
  • Advised to change home/school/work environment
  • Insurance coverage
  • Usual source of health care
  • Personal doctor

References(1) Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60(17):547-552 (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6017a4.htm?s_cid=mm6017a4_w)
(2) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines Implementation Panel Report for: Expert Panel Report 3—Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH Publication No. 09-6147. December 2008 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/gip_rpt.pdfCdc-pdfExternal)
(3) Zahran HS, Person CJ, Bailey C, Moorman JE. Predictors of asthma self-management education among children and adults–2006-2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call Back Survey. J Asthma 2012; 49:98-106.

Taught how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy

Taught how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy
Data Standard Taught how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received (or their guardians have received) education on how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received (or their guardians have received) education on how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy among all children with asthma.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*
    * This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.
Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received (or their guardians have received) education on how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy.Survey Question (Source: NHIS):
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER taught [child name] or [his/her] parent or guardian how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy?”

Benchmark data sources:

  • National: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) periodic modules: 2003, 2008, 2013 (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm)
  • State: BRFSS Asthma Call-Back Survey (ACBS), average annual estimates for survey years starting in 2006 for participating states. Aggregation of at least 2 survey years is recommended to obtain reliable estimates by state. (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/acbs/index.htm).
    Note: Although the ACBS question wording (“Has a doctor or other health professional ever taught you or {child’s name} how to use a peak flow meter to adjust his/her daily medications?”) differs from the NHIS survey question, the two questions are believed to generate comparable estimates.
Denominator definition Denominator (at-risk rate): Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence:
YES response to both of two survey questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that your child had asthma?”
  • AND
  • “Does your child still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background

Results from the 2008 NHIS indicate that 49.4% of children with current asthma had ever been taught to use a peak flow meter (1). The EPR-3 recommends that every patient who has asthma be taught to recognize symptom patterns and/or Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) measures that indicate inadequate asthma control. There is evidence that asthma education about recognition of asthma symptoms reduces risk and impairment (2).

This measure is related to Healthy People 2020 Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.3: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma who receive education about appropriate response to an asthma episode, including recognizing early signs and symptoms or monitoring peak flow results, according to National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines, http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory- diseases/objectivesExternal.

Significance to disparitiesAccess to medical care for asthma and the quality of care provided is often lower among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations (2).Data considerationsThis item is a measurement of the respondent’s recall of being taught how to use a peak flow meter, and thus may be an indicator of effective communication of education of patients and caretakers. However, it may not reflect the rate at which health care providers provide education given that no comparison to medical records is performed.Data resources

Related data standards

Because being taught how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy may be done at the same time as other asthma education in a health care encounter, similar measures include

  • Taught how to recognize early symptoms
  • Taught how to respond to episodes of asthma
  • Taught how to use an inhaler
  • Asthma Action Plan
  • Advised to change home/school/work environment
  • Insurance coverage
  • Usual source of health care
  • Personal doctor

References(1) Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60(17):547-552 (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6017a4.htm?s_cid=mm6017a4_w)
(2) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines Implementation Panel Report for: Expert Panel Report 3—Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH Publication No. 09-6147. December 2008 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/gip_rpt.pdfCdc-pdfExternal)

Advised to change home/school/work environment

Advised to change home/school/work environment
Data Standard Advised to change home/school/work environment
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose parents/guardians have been advised to change their home/school/work environment to improve their asthma.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose parents/guardians have been advised to change their home/school/work environment to improve their asthma among all children with current asthma
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose parents/guardians have been advised to change their home/school/work environment to improve their asthma.Survey Question (Source: NHIS):
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER advised you to change things in [child name]’s home, school, or work environment to improve [his/her] asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Denominator definition Denominator (at-risk rate): Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence
YES response to both of two survey questions
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that your child had asthma?”
  • AND
  • “Does your child still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

  • National: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 2001 onward ()
  • State: Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS), data available for children 0-17 years of age for selected states, 2006 onward (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/)
Background Results from the 2008 NHIS indicate that 50.6% of children with current asthma had been given advice on environmental control of asthma (1). One of the six priority messages of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines is allergen and irritant exposure control. The Guideline Implementation Panel recommends: “clinicians should review each patient’s exposure to allergens and irritants and provide a multipronged strategy to reduce exposure to those allergens and irritants to which a patient is sensitive and exposed, i.e., that make a patient’s asthma worse.” (2)

This measure is related to Healthy People 2020 Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.5: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma who have been advised by a health professional to change things in their home, school, and work environments to reduce exposure to irritants or allergens to which they are sensitive according to NAEPP guidelines, http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory- diseases/objectivesExternal.

Significance to disparities Adults with less than a high school education were less likely to report that they had been given advice on environmental control (3). Access to medical care for asthma and the quality of care provided is often lower among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations. Exposure to environmental factors that worsen asthma is also more frequent in these populations (2).
Data considerations This item is a measurement of the respondent’s recall of being advised to change home/school/work environment, and thus may be an indicator of effective communication of education of patients and caretakers. However, it may not reflect the rate at which health care providers provide education given that no comparison to medical records is performed.
Data resources
Related data standards Because being advised to change home/school/work environment may be done at the same time as other asthma education in a health care encounter, similar measures include:
  • Taught how to recognize early symptoms
  • Taught how to respond to episodes of asthma
  • Taught how to use an inhaler
  • Taught how to monitor peak flow for daily therapy
  • Asthma Action Plan
  • Insurance coverage
  • Usual source of health care
  • Personal doctor
References (1) Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60(17):547-552 (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6017a4.htm?s_cid=mm6017a4_w)
(2) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines Implementation Panel Report for: Expert Panel Report 3—Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH Publication No. 09-6147. December 2008 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/gip_rpt.pdfCdc-pdfExternal)
(3) Zahran HS, Person CJ, Bailey C, Moorman JE. Predictors of asthma self-management education among children and adults–2006-2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call Back Survey. J Asthma 2012; 49:98-106.

Asked about symptom frequency

Asked about symptom frequency
Data Standard Asked about symptom frequency
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose health care provider asked them how often they had asthma symptoms at the last visit.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose health care provider asked them how often they had asthma symptoms at the last visit among all children with asthma.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose health care provider asked them how often they had asthma symptoms at the last visit.Survey Question (Source: NHIS):
  • “At his/her last visit, did [child name]’s doctor or other health professional ask HOW OFTEN [he/she] had asthma symptoms?”

Benchmark data source:

Denominator definition Denominator (at-risk rate): Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence
YES response to both of two survey questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that your child had asthma?”
  • AND
  • “Does your child still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background Two of the six priority messages of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines are asthma severity and asthma control, which are both assessed by asking about symptom frequency (among other things). The Guideline Implementation Panel recommends: “all patients should have an initial severity assessment based on measures of current impairment” and “at planned follow up visits, asthma patients should review level of control … based on multiple measures of current impairment.” Measures of impairment include frequency of symptoms(1).

This measure is related to Healthy People 2020 Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.7: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma whose doctor assessed their asthma control at the last visit according to NAEPP guidelines, http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory- diseases/objectivesExternal.

Significance to disparities Access to medical care for asthma and the quality of care provided is often lower among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations(1).
Data considerations This item is a measurement of the respondent’s recall of being asked about symptoms frequency, and thus may be an indicator of effective communication between patients and caretakers. However, it may not reflect the rate at which health care providers ask about symptoms given that no comparison to medical records is performed.
Data resources
Related data standards Because being asked about symptom frequency may be done at the same time as other asthma management assessment in a health care encounter, a similar measure include:
  • Asked about relief inhaler frequency
  • Asked about limitation of daily activities
  • Insurance coverage
  • Usual source of health care
  • Personal doctor
References (1) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines Implementation Panel Report for: Expert Panel Report 3—Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH Publication No. 09-6147. December 2008 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/gip_rpt.pdfCdc-pdfExternal)

Asked about relief inhaler frequency

Asked about relief inhaler frequency
Data Standard Asked about relief inhaler frequency
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose health care provider asked about frequency of inhaler use.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children age 0-17 years with current asthma whose health care provider asked about frequency of inhaler use.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose health care provider asked about frequency of inhaler use.Survey Question (Source: NHIS):
  • “At his/her last visit, did [child name]’s doctor or other health professional ask HOW OFTEN he/she used relief inhaler at the last visit?”

Benchmark data source:

Denominator definition Denominator (at-risk rate): Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence
YES response to both of two survey questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that your child had asthma?”
  • AND
  • “Does your child still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background Two of the six priority messages of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines are asthma severity and asthma control, which are both assessed by asking about relief inhaler use frequency (among other things). The Guideline Implementation Panel recommends: “all patients should have an initial severity assessment based on measures of current impairment” and “at planned follow up visits, asthma patients should review level of control … based on multiple measures of current impairment.” Measures of impairment include relief inhaler use frequency(1).

This measure is related to Healthy People 2020 Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.7: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma whose doctor assessed their asthma control at the last visit according to NAEPP guidelines, http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory- diseases/objectivesExternal.

Significance to disparities Access to medical care for asthma and the quality of care provided is often lower among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations(1).
Data considerations This item is a measurement of the respondent’s recall of being asked about frequency of relief inhaler use, and thus may be an indicator of effective communication between patients and caretakers. However, it may not reflect the rate at which health care providers ask about medication use given that no comparison to medical records is performed.
Data resources
Related data standards Because being asked about relief inhaler frequency may be done at the same time as other asthma management assessments at a health care encounter, similar measures include:
  • Asked about symptom frequency
  • Asked about limitation of daily activities
  • Insurance coverage
  • Usual source of health care
  • Personal doctor
References (1) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines Implementation Panel Report for: Expert Panel Report 3—Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH Publication No. 09-6147. December 2008 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/gip_rpt.pdfCdc-pdfExternal)

Asked about activity limitation

Asked about activity limitation
Data Standard Asked about activity limitation
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose health care provider asked how often asthma symptoms limited daily activities.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children age 0-17 years with current asthma whose health care provider asked how often asthma symptoms limited daily activities.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma whose health care provider asked how often asthma symptoms limited daily activities.Survey Question (Source: NHIS):
  • “At his/her last visit, did [child name]’s doctor or other health professional ask HOW OFTEN asthma symptoms limited [his/her] daily activities?”

Benchmark data source:

Denominator definition Denominator (at-risk rate): Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence
YES response to both of two survey questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that your child had asthma?” AND
  • “Does your child still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background Two of the six priority messages of the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines are asthma severity and asthma control, which are both assessed by asking about relief inhaler use frequency (among other things). The Guideline Implementation Panel recommends: “all patients should have an initial severity assessment based on measures of current impairment” and “at planned follow up visits, asthma patients should review level of control … based on multiple measures of current impairment.” Measures of impairment include relief inhaler use frequency(1).

This measure is related to Healthy People 2020 Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.7: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma whose doctor assessed their asthma control at the last visit according to NAEPP guidelines, http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory- diseases/objectivesExternal.

Significance to disparities Access to medical care for asthma and the quality of care provided is often lower among minority and socioeconomically disadvantaged populations (1).
Data considerations This item is a measurement of the respondent’s recall of being asked about frequency of activity limitation, and thus may be an indicator of effective communication between patients and caretakers. However, it may not reflect the rate at which health care providers ask about medication use given that no comparison to medical records is performed.
Data resources
Related data standards Because being asked about activity limitation may be done at the same time as other asthma management assessments at a health care encounter, similar measures include:
  • Asked about symptom frequency
  • Asked about relief inhaler frequency
  • Insurance coverage
  • Usual source of health care
  • Personal doctor
References (1) National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Guidelines Implementation Panel Report for: Expert Panel Report 3—Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Asthma. NIH Publication No. 09-6147. December 2008 (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/files/docs/guidelines/gip_rpt.pdfCdc-pdfExternal)

Flu vaccination

Flu Vaccination
Data Standard Flu vaccination
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma receiving a flu vaccine in the past year
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma receiving a flu vaccine in past year among all children with asthma
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator:
Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have received influenza vaccination in the past 12 months.Survey questions (Source NHIS):
  • “During the past 12 months, has [child’s name] had a flu vaccination? A flu vaccination is usually given in the fall and protects against influenza for the flu season.”
  • Additional information about mode of vaccination:
  • “Was this a shot, or was it a vaccine sprayed in the nose?”

Benchmark data source:

  • National: National: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 2001 onward (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm)
  • State: Behavioral Risk Factors Surveillance System (BRFSS): Asthma Call-back Survey (ACBS), starting 2006. (https://www.cdc.gov/brfss/acbs/2012/pdf/acbs_2012_child_llcp_codebook.pdfCdc-pdf). Note: The survey questions for the ACBS differ from NHIS, but likely give comparable estimates: YES response to either:
    • “A flu shot is an influenza vaccine injected in your arm. During the past 12 months, did [child’s name] have a flu shot?” OR>/em>
    • “A flu vaccine that is sprayed in the nose is called FluMistTM. During the past 12 months, did [he/she] have a flu vaccine that was sprayed in [his/her] nose?
Denominator definition Denominator (at-risk rate): Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence:
YES response to both of two survey questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that your child had asthma?” AND
  • “Does your child still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background During the 2013-2014 influenza season, 46.3% of high-risk adults ages 18-64 received influenza vaccine. (1) Asthma appears to be related to influenza infection. Children and adults with asthma are at higher risk for influenza-related adverse health outcomes, including pneumonia, hospitalization for acute respiratory disease, and death. Because 5 to 10% of the US population has asthma, the potential public health impact of influenza infection on this vulnerable subgroup is large(2).

Healthy People 2020 Objective IID-12: Increase the percentage of children and adults who are vaccinated annually against seasonal influenza. http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=23External.

Significance to disparities Persistent disparities in influenza mortality between American Indian/Alaska Native persons and whites have been documented(3). Significant disparities by race/ethnicity were found in exposure, susceptibility to complications, and access to health care during the U.S. H1N1 influenza pandemic(4).

Disparities in influenza vaccination coverage between non-Hispanic whites and black, Hispanic and other and multiple race children have been reported(5). However, more recent data show similar vaccination rates for children of all races/ethnicities(6).

Data considerations Estimates are not specific to one influenza season; influenza vaccinations reported in the past 12 months could have been received for one or more of up to three prior influenza seasons.
Data resources

(2) Eisner MD. Asthma and influenza vaccination. Chest 2003;124:775-777.
(3) Groom AG, Hennessy TW, Singleton RJ, et al. Pneumonia and influenza mortality among American Indian and Alaska Native People, 1990-2009. AJPH 2014;104:S460-S469.
(4) Quinn SC, Kumar S, Freimuth VS, et al. Racial disparities in exposure, susceptibility, and access to health care in the US H1N1 influenza pandemic. Am J Public Health. 2011;101:285–293. http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/pdf/10.2105/AJPH.2009.188029External
(5) CDC. Influenza vaccination coverage—United States, 2000–2010. In: CDC health disparities and inequalities report—United States, 2011. MMWR 2011;60(Suppl; January 14, 2011):38–41.
(6) CDC. Seasonal influenza vaccination coverage – United States, 2009-10 and 2010-11. In: CDC health disparities and inequalities report—United States, 2013. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2013 Nov 22;62 Suppl 3:65-8. https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6203.pdfCdc-pdf

Routine asthma visits in past year

Routine asthma visits in past year
Data Standard Routine asthma visits in past year
Measure Annual estimate of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with one or more routine checkup visits for asthma.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with one or more routine checkup visits for asthma among all children with asthma.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who have had at least one routine follow-up visit in the past 12 months.Survey question (Source: NHIS):
  • “During the past 12 months, how many times did [child’s name] see a doctor or other health professional for a routine checkup for [his/her] asthma? Please do not include emergency room visits, visits to urgent care centers, or other visits for acute care for an asthma episode or attack.”

Benchmark data source:

Denominator definition Denominator for at-risk rate:
Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence
YES response to both questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that [child’s name] had asthma?” AND
  • “Does [child’s name] still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background For better asthma care and management, the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) Expert Panel recommends regular follow-up visit with a frequency of visits depending on the level of asthma control(1). Patients who have intermittent or mild or moderate persistent asthma that has been under control for at least 3 months should be seen by a clinician for assessment of asthma control about every 6 months, whereas patients who have uncontrolled and/or severe persistent asthma and those who need additional supervision to help them follow their treatment plan should be seen more often. Routine follow-up visit can be assessed at national and state level.

Nearly 74% of children aged 0-17 years reported routine checkup visits for their asthma based on 2006–2007 ACBS data analyses findings and those who reported at least one routine checkup visit are more likely to receive self-management education and appropriate medication than those who did not(2).

Healthy People 2020: Respiratory Diseases Objectives (RD-7.6): Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma who have had at least one routine follow-up visit in the past 12 months according to NAEPP guidelines. (https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics- objectives/topic/respiratory-diseases/objectivesExternal)

Significance to disparities
Data considerations Respondents were specifically asked to exclude ER visits, visits to urgent care centers, or other visits for acute care for an asthma episode or attack
Data resources
Related data standards Having routine follow-up visits may indicate higher socio-economic status (SES) and better health care coverage. Therefore, routine care visits measure may also be a marker for
  • Insurance coverage
  • Usual source of health care
  • Unable to pay medical bills
  • Personal doctor
References (1) National Institutes of Health, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Expert panel report 3. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 2007. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/index.htmExternal. Accessed February 19, 2015.
(2) Zahran HS, Person CJ, Bailey C, Moorman JE. Predictors of asthma self-management education among children and adults–2006-2007 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Asthma Call Back Survey. J Asthma 2012; 49:98-106.

Any preventive medication use

Any preventive medication use
Data Standard Any preventive medication use
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who are currently taking a preventive asthma medication.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who are currently taking a preventive asthma medication among all children with asthma.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children with current asthma who used any form of preventive asthma medicineSurvey question (Source: NHIS):
  • “The second kind of asthma medication is different from inhalers used for quick relief. It is the preventive kind that is used to protect your lungs and keep you from having attacks. It can be either a pill or an inhaler.
    Is [fill: S.C. name] NOW taking a preventive asthma medication every day or almost every day, less often, or never?”
    Note: This question is in a period asthma module fielded in 2013.

Benchmark data source:

Denominator definition Denominator for at-risk rate:
Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence
YES response to both questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that [child’s name] had asthma?” AND
  • “Does [child’s name] still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:
National: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 2001 onward (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm)

Background Asthma symptoms can be controlled with appropriate medical treatment, self-management education, and by avoiding exposure to environmental allergens and irritants that can trigger an attack according to the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines(1). Taking a preventive asthma medication is recommended to control asthma symptoms for people with persistent asthma symptoms.

Approximately 34% percent of persons (31.3% children and 34.4% adults) with current asthma had taken prescription preventive asthma medicine in 2008. Anti-inflammatory medications, especially inhaled corticosteroids are most commonly prescribed preventive asthma medications to control asthma symptoms(2).

Significance to disparities Non-Hispanic black, Mexican American children and those lacking health insurance are less likely to use preventive asthma medications(3). Furthermore, in a nationally representative population of children with asthma who were prescribed preventive asthma medication, non-Hispanic black children were more likely than non-Hispanic white children to discontinue preventive asthma medications(4).
Data considerations
Data resources
  • Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60(17):547-552
Related data standards Preventive asthma medication use may indicate uncontrolled asthma and persistent asthma. Preventive asthma medication use may be associated with measures on asthma severity and asthma control:
  • Overuse of short-acting beta agonists
  • Asthma control
  • Daytime symptoms
  • Nighttime awakenings
  • Activity limitation
  • Short acting beta agonist use
References (1) National Institutes of Health, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Expert panel report 3. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 2007. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/index.htmExternal.
(2) Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60(17):547-552
(3) Kit BK, Simon AE, Ogden CL, Akinbami LJ. Trends in preventive asthma medication use among children and adolescents, 1988-2008.Pediatrics. 2012 Jan;129(1):62-9.
(4) Capo-Ramos DE, Duran C, Simon AE, Akinbami LJ, Schoendorf KC. Preventive asthma medication discontinuation among children enrolled in fee-for- service Medicaid. J Asthma. 2014 Aug;51(6):618-26

Regular use of preventive medication

Regular use of preventive medication
Data Standard Regular use of preventive medication
Measure Annual estimate of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who were taking a preventive asthma medication every day or almost every day.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who were taking a preventive asthma medication every day or almost every day among all children with asthma.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children with current asthma who were taking a preventive asthma medication every day or almost every day.Survey question (Source: NHIS):
  • “Is [fill: S.C. name] NOW taking a preventive asthma medication every day or almost every day, less often, or never?”

Benchmark data source:

Denominator definition Denominator for at-risk rate:
Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence
YES response to both questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that [child’s name] had asthma?” AND
  • “Does [child’s name] still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:
National: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 2001 onward (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm)

Background Asthma symptoms can be controlled with appropriate medical treatment, self-management education, and by avoiding exposure to environmental allergens and irritants that can trigger an attack according to the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines(1). Taking a preventive asthma medication every day is an important step in controlling asthma symptoms for persons with persistent as.

In 2008, 33.5 percent of persons (31.3% children and 34.4% adults) with current asthma had taken prescription preventive asthma medicine(2). Anti- inflammatory medications, especially inhaled corticosteroids are most commonly prescribed preventive asthma medications to control asthma symptoms(2).

Significance to disparities Minority race and low parental education have been associated with underuse of preventive asthma medication among those prescribed such medications(3). Having a primary care physician, a written asthma action pan, a follow up visit, and having seen an asthma specialist have been associated with lower rates of preventive asthma medication underuse(3).
Data considerations Starting 2013, the question differentiates between those who take a prescription asthma preventive medicine every day or almost every day, less often, or never. Persons are classified as having used preventive asthma medicine properly if they responded “every day or almost every day” to the question listed above.
Data resources
Related data standards Proper use of preventive medication use may influence asthma symptoms and control:
  • Overuse of short-acting beta agonists
  • Asthma control
  • Daytime symptoms
  • Nighttime awakenings
  • Activity limitation
  • Short acting beta agonist use
References (1) National Institutes of Health, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Expert panel report 3. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 2007. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/index.htmExternal
(2) Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60(17):547-552
(3) Finkelstein JA1, Lozano P, Farber HJ, Miroshnik I, Lieu TA. Underuse of controller medications among Medicaid-insured children with asthma. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2002 Jun;156(6):562-7.

Short acting beta agonist overuse

Short acting beta agonist overuse
Data Standard Short acting beta agonist overuse
Measure Annual estimate of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who used more than three canisters of PRESCRIPTION inhaler that gives QUICK relief from asthma symptoms in the past three months.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who used more than three canisters of PRESCRIPTION inhaler that gives QUICK relief from asthma symptoms in the past three months among all children with asthma.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children with current asthma who used more than three canisters of PRESCRIPTION inhaler that gives QUICK relief from asthma symptoms in the past three months.Survey question (Source: NHIS):
  • “DURING THE PAST 3 MONTHS did [PERSON] use more than three canisters of this type of inhaler?”

Benchmark data source:

Denominator definition Denominator for at-risk rate:
Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence
YES response to both questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that [child’s name] had asthma?” AND
  • “Does [child’s name] still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:
National: National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), 2001 onward (https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhis/quest_data_related_1997_forward.htm)

Background Asthma symptoms can be controlled with appropriate medical treatment, self-management education, and by avoiding exposure to environmental allergens and irritants that can trigger an attack according to the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines. Overuse of quick relief medicine from asthma symptoms may indicate inadequate asthma control and the need to initiate or adjust anti-inflammatory medications. Furthermore, excessive use of relief medications is associated with poorer quality of life and increased risk for future asthma exacerbations.(1).

Respiratory Disease Objective RD-7.4: Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma who do not use more than one canister of short-acting inhaled beta agonist per month according to National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines. (2,3)

Significance to disparities In 2008, 12.1% of persons with current asthma did used more than one canister of short-acting inhaled beta agonist (SABA) per month. Using more than one canister of SABA use per month is considered overuse and may indicate inadequate asthma control and the need to initiate or adjust anti-inflammatory medications(2).
Data considerations
  • Note that this indicator differs from “Use of short-acting beta agonists” which measures SABA use according to NAEPP criteria for asthma control (2). SABA overuse, in contrast, specifically addresses excessive use that may be associated with poor outcomes (1).
  • Questions asked to determine inhaler overuse in the ACBS include:
    • “Has [he/she] ever used a prescription inhaler?”
    • “In the past 3 months has [child’s name] taken prescription asthma medicine using an inhaler?”
    • “How many canisters of this inhaler has [he/she] used in the past 3 months?” This question was asked for each quick relief medications, but is not available for nebulizers.
  • Questions for nebulizers ask about time used per day or per week, which can’t be used to quantify overuse of nebulizers.
Data resources
Related data standards SABA overuse may indicate uncontrolled asthma and inadequate preventive asthma medication use:
  • Preventive medication use
  • Asthma control
  • Daytime symptoms
  • Nighttime awakenings
  • Activity limitation
  • SABA use
References (1) Schatz M, Zeiger RS, Vollmer WM, Mosen D, Apter AJ, Stibolt TB, et al. Validation of a beta-agonist long-term asthma control scale derived from computerized pharmacy data. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:995-1000.
(2) National Institutes of Health, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Expert panel report 3. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 2007. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/index.htmExternal
(3)Healthy People 2020; Respiratory Diseases Objectives. available at: http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory-diseases/objectivesExternal

Action taken to address environmental risks

Action taken to address environmental risks
Data Standard Action taken to address environmental risks
Measure Annual estimates of:
  • Count: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who followed the advice of a doctor or health professional to change things at home, school, or work to improve their asthma.
  • At-risk rate: Percent of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who followed the advice of a doctor or health professional to change things at home, school, or work to improve their asthma.
  • Population-based rate: N/A*

* This outcome is primarily of interest among persons with asthma—comparisons between groups should account for differences in asthma prevalence, and thus be made using at-risk rates.

Numerator definition Numerator: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthma who followed the advice of a doctor or health professional to change things at home, school, or work to improve their asthmaSurvey question (Source: NHIS):
YES or “was told no changes needed” response:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional ever advised you to change things in (your/child’s) home, school, or work to improve (your/his/her) asthma?”
  • AND response “some/most/all” to “How much of this advice did you follow?”

Benchmark data source:

Denominator definition Denominator for at-risk rate: Number of children aged 0-17 years with current asthmaSurvey questions used to determine current asthma prevalence:
YES response to both questions:
  • “Has a doctor or other health professional EVER told you that [child’s name] had asthma?” AND
  • “Does [child’s name] still have asthma?”

Benchmark data sources:

Background Asthma symptoms can be controlled with appropriate medical treatment, self-management education, and by avoiding exposure to environmental allergens and irritants that can trigger an attack according to the National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines(1).

Healthy People 2020: Respiratory Diseases Objectives (RD-7.5): Increase the proportion of persons with current asthma who have been advised by a health professional to change things in their home, school, and work environments to reduce exposure to irritants or allergens to which they are sensitive according to National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) guidelines (http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/respiratory-diseases/objectivesExternal).

Significance to disparities In 2008, 50.6% of children with current asthma were advised by a health professional to change things in their home, school, and work environments to reduce exposure to irritants or allergens to which they are sensitive. Receiving advice on environmental control did not differ by race or ethnicity(2).
Data considerations
  • The measure is about ever receiving advice to change things in home, school, or work and how much of this advice was followed, but does not measure how long or how effectively the advice was followed.
  • Given that those who followed advice are more likely to recall receiving advice, this measure may provide reliable estimates of the number/percentage of children for whom a caregiver recalls receiving advice and making changes in their home, school, or work.
Data resources BRFSS Asthma Call-back Survey (ACBS):
Child prevalence tables 2006-2010: https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/acbs/acbstables.htm (see Table 8a: Estimated percent advised to make environmental changes for active and inactive asthma status among children ever diagnosed with asthma by state/territory – BRFSS Asthma Call-back Survey, United States, 2006-2010).
Related data standards Because following advice on environmental control is one of several asthma education and management components, this measure may also be associated with other effective asthma management practices:
  • Routine asthma visits in past year
  • Any preventive medication use
  • Regular use of preventive medication
  • Short acting beta agonist overuse
References (1) National Institutes of Health, National Asthma Education and Prevention Program. Expert panel report 3: guidelines for the diagnosis and management of asthma. Expert panel report 3. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. 2007. Available at: http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/asthma/index.htmExternal. Accessed February 19, 2015.
(2) Vital Signs: Asthma prevalence, disease characteristics and self-management education–United States, 2001-2009. MMWR May 6, 2011 / 60(17):547-552 https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6017a4.htm?s_cid=mm6017a4_w
Page last reviewed: July 14, 2016