Notes from the Field: Infections After Receipt of Bacterially Contaminated Umbilical Cord Blood–Derived Stem Cell Products for Other Than Hematopoietic or Immunologic Reconstitution — United States, 2018

Kiran M. Perkins, MD1; Samantha Spoto, MSPH2; Danielle A. Rankin, MPH2; Nychie Q. Dotson, MPH2; Mary Malarkey3; Melissa Mendoza, JD3; Lorrie McNeill3; Paige Gable1; Krista M. Powell, MD1 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation
Article Metrics
Altmetric:
Citations:
Views:

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Related Materials

The only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)–approved stem cell products are derived from umbilical cord blood, and their only approved use is hematopoietic and immunologic reconstitution (1). On September 17, 2018, the Texas Department of State Health Services received notification of Enterobacter cloacae and Citrobacter freundii bloodstream infections in three patients who had received injections or infusions of non-FDA–approved umbilical cord blood-derived stem cell products processed by Genetech, Inc., and distributed by Liveyon, LLC, for other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution at an outpatient clinic on September 12. Patient isolates of E. cloacae had identical pulsed-field gel electrophoresis patterns, suggesting a common source. On September 22, the Florida Department of Health received notification of Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis, and Proteus mirabilis joint infections in four patients who had received injections of these same products at an orthopedic clinic during February 15–August 30, 2018, also for other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution. Cultures of unopened products from the clinic by a Florida hospital identified contamination with E. coli and E. faecalis. In response, on September 28, Liveyon issued a voluntary recall and immediately discontinued purchase of the Genetech-processed stem cell products (2,3). On October 4, CDC issued a nationwide call for reports of culture-confirmed infections in patients who had received the Liveyon product.

As of December 14, CDC has received reports of infections in 12 patients from three states, including the initial Florida and Texas cases: Texas (seven), Florida (four), and Arizona (one). Infection types included bloodstream infections, joint infections, and epidural abscesses, among others. All 12 patients received infusions or injections of Liveyon’s product before the recall. Among 11 patients for whom conditions prompting product administration were known, all had nonhematopoietic conditions such as pain or orthopedic conditions. All patients were hospitalized; none died (Table).

CDC tested unopened vials obtained from the Texas and Florida clinics where the initial patients had received the product. The six vials from Texas had the same cord-blood donor and processing date as those that had been administered to the patients with infections. E. cloacae was isolated from all six vials; C. freundii also was isolated from five. The four vials from Florida were from different donors and processing dates than were the vials from Texas. E. coli was isolated from one of two vials from the same cord-blood donor and processing date; E.coli and E. faecalis were isolated from one of two vials from two unique donors with unique processing dates.

Ongoing investigations include active case finding, additional laboratory testing to compare clinical and product isolates, onsite assessments of health care facility infection control and injection safety practices, and investigation of manufacturing practices (including distribution); initial investigation suggests that bacterial contamination occurred before distribution. Umbilical cord blood cannot be decontaminated after collection because there are currently no validated processes for sterilization, so manufacture of derived products must be highly controlled to prevent distribution of contaminated products (4). The Genetech-processed, Liveyon-distributed product is not FDA-approved or lawfully marketed. Though Genetech and Liveyon are registered with FDA, such registration is not a form of FDA approval. FDA registration alone does not demonstrate compliance of firms or their products with the law.

Regardless of when contamination occurred, this investigation highlights the serious potential risks to patients of stem cell therapies administered for unapproved and unproven uses other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution (5). Although the safety and efficacy of stem cells for other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution have not been well established (1,4), many companies, clinics, and clinicians continue to market products from various sources as treatment for orthopedic, neurologic, and rheumatologic conditions without FDA approval. Such clinics and providers operate in outpatient settings, which often have less robust oversight of infection control measures, including injection safety and medication preparation (6), potentially amplifying risk to patients. Therefore, FDA has recommended that patients avoid receiving such products outside controlled clinical studies being conducted under an investigational new drug application; these settings help ensure that appropriate manufacturing and safety reporting procedures are followed (1). Health care professionals and consumers should report any adverse events related to treatment with the Genetech/Liveyon products or any unapproved stem cell therapies to FDA’s MedWatch Safety Information and Adverse Event Reporting Program (https://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/).

Acknowledgments

Rachana Bhattarai, PhD, Kara Tarter, MPH, Arizona Department of Health Services; Robert Hunter, MS, Jon Rosenberg, MD, California Department of Public Health; Scott Pritchard, MPH, Virginia Warren, MPH, Bureau of Public Health Laboratories, Florida Department of Health; Texas Department of State Health Services; Ana Cecilia Bardossy, Gregory Eckert-Raczniak, MD, PhD, Kathleen Hartnett, PhD, MD, Heather Moulton-Meissner, PhD, CDC.

Corresponding author: Kiran M. Perkins, KPerkins@cdc.gov, 404-639-1161.


1Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; 2Florida Department of Health; 3Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland.

All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

References

  1. Food and Drug Administration. FDA warns about stem cell therapies. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2017. https://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm286155.htm
  2. Food and Drug Administration. Recall notification to clients with possible product on-hand, effective 9/28/18. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2018. https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/Recalls/ucm622190.htm
  3. Food and Drug Administration. Liveyon, LLC issues a voluntary nationwide recall of the Regen Series® product, manufactured by Genetech, Inc. Silver Spring, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2018. https://www.fda.gov/Safety/Recalls/ucm623039.htm
  4. Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: biologics license applications for minimally manipulated, unrelated allogeneic placental/umbilical cord blood intended for hematopoietic and immunologic reconstitution in patients with disorders affecting the hematopoietic system. Rockville, MD: Food and Drug Administration; 2014. https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/CellularandGeneTherapy/UCM357135.pdf
  5. Marks PW, Witten CM, Califf RM. Clarifying stem-cell therapy’s benefits and risks. N Engl J Med 2017;376:1007–9. CrossRef PubMed
  6. Guh AY, Thompson ND, Schaefer MK, Patel PR, Perz JF. Patient notification for bloodborne pathogen testing due to unsafe injection practices in the US health care settings, 2001–2011. Med Care 2012;50:785–91. CrossRef PubMed
TABLE. Clinical characteristics of patients with culture-confirmed infections after receiving umbilical cord blood-derived stem cell products for other than hematopoietic or immunologic reconstitution — United States, 2018Return to your place in the text
Patient Route/Site
of administration
Date administered Setting Condition prompting product administration* Specimen collection date, first positive culture Organism isolated Infection site Days of initial hospitalization to treat infection
1 Intra-articular injection, knee and shoulder Feb 15, 2018 Orthopedic clinic Degenerative joint disease Feb 21, 2018 Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis Knee 15
2 Intra-articular injection, lumbar spine Jun 13, 2018 Pain clinic Pain Jun 14, 2018 Escherichia coli Bloodstream 4
3 Intra-articular injection, lumbar spine Jul 27, 2018 Ambulatory surgery center Pain Aug 1, 2018 Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis Bloodstream, lumbosacral epidural abscess, discitis, and vertebral osteomyelitis 58
4 Intra-articular injection, knee and shoulder Aug 3, 2018 Orthopedic clinic Unknown Aug 10, 2018 Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis Knee 30
5 Intra-articular injection, shoulders Aug 14, 2018 Chiropractic clinic Osteoarthritis Aug 29, 2018 Escherichia coli Bloodstream, shoulders 8
6 Intra-articular injection, shoulder Aug 22, 2018 Orthopedic clinic Rotator cuff tear with intrasynovial cyst Sep 9, 2018 Escherichia coli Shoulder 6
7 Intra-articular injection, lumbar spine Aug 28, 2018 Spine treatment clinic Lumbar back pain Sep 1, 2018 Citrobacter koseri Bloodstream 6
8 Intra-articular injection, lumbar spine Aug 29, 2018 Pain clinic Pain Sep 4, 2018 Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis Bloodstream 35
9 Intra-articular injection, knee Aug 30, 2018 Orthopedic clinic Osteoarthritis Sep 7, 2018 Escherichia coli, Enterococcus faecalis Knee 5
10 Intra-articular injection, cervical spine Sep 12, 2018 Pain clinic Pain Sep 15, 2018 Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii Bloodstream, cellulitis at injection site§ 9
11 Intra-articular injection, cervical and lumbar spine Sep 12, 2018 Pain clinic Pain (history of rheumatoid arthritis) Sep 16, 2018 Enterobacter cloacae, Citrobacter freundii Bloodstream 12
12 Intra-articular injection, lumbar spine and index fingers; intravenous infusion Sep 12, 2018 Pain clinic Pain, rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis Sep 16, 2018 Enterobacter cloacae Bloodstream, lumbar epidural abscess 12

* As reported to CDC by health departments.
Abscess and vertebrae were not cultured; both organisms were isolated from blood, and E. faecalis only was isolated from disc space.
§ No organisms were isolated from skin; both organisms were isolated from blood.


Suggested citation for this article: Perkins KM, Spoto S, Rankin DA, et al. Notes from the Field: Infections After Receipt of Bacterially Contaminated Umbilical Cord Blood–Derived Stem Cell Products for Other Than Hematopoietic or Immunologic Reconstitution — United States, 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;67:1397–1399. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6750a5.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

View Page In: PDF [81K]