State Strategies to Address Opioid Use Disorder Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women and Infants Prenatally Exposed to Substances, Including Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome
Weekly / September 13, 2019 / 68(36);777–783
Charlan D. Kroelinger, PhD1; Marion E. Rice, MPH2; Shanna Cox, MSPH1; Hadley R. Hickner, MS3; Mary Kate Weber, MPH3; Lisa Romero, DrPH1; Jean Y. Ko, PhD1; Donna Addison, MPH1; Trish Mueller, MPH1; Carrie Shapiro-Mendoza, PhD1; S. Nicole Fehrenbach, MPP3; Margaret A. Honein, PhD3; Wanda D. Barfield, MD1 (View author affiliations)View suggested citation
What is already known about this topic?
Opioid use disorder (OUD) during pregnancy contributes to adverse maternal and infant outcomes, including neonatal abstinence syndrome. In response to the opioid crisis, changes in state-level systems are critical for improving health outcomes.
What is added by this report?
Multidisciplinary state teams most commonly identified strategies focused on increasing access to and coordination of quality services or improving provider awareness and training to improve outcomes for pregnant and postpartum women with OUD and infants prenatally exposed to substances, including opioids.
What are the implications for public health practice?
As identified by multidisciplinary state teams, implementing strategies to improve health care quality and training providers are important to addressing the opioid crisis. Future work with states’ teams might focus on increasing surveillance and evaluation, sustaining coverage, and reducing stigma experienced by women and infants.
Views equals page views plus PDF downloads
- PDF pdf icon[292K] [PDF]
Since 1999, the rate of opioid use disorder (OUD) has more than quadrupled, from 1.5 per 1,000 delivery hospitalizations to 6.5 (1), with similar increases in incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) observed for infants (from 2.8 per 1,000 live births to 14.4) among Medicaid-insured deliveries (2). CDC’s response to the opioid crisis involves strategies to prevent opioid overdoses and related harms by building state capacity and supporting providers, health systems, and payers.* Recognizing systems gaps in provision of perinatal care and services, CDC partnered with the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) to launch the Opioid Use Disorder, Maternal Outcomes, and Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Initiative Learning Community (OMNI LC). OMNI LC supports systems change and capacity building in 12 states.† Qualitative data from participating states were analyzed to identify strategies, barriers, and facilitators for capacity building in state-defined focus areas. Most states focused on strategies to expand access to and coordination of quality services (10 of 12) or increase provider awareness and training (nine of 12). Fewer states focused on data, monitoring, and evaluation (four of 12); financing and coverage (three of 12); or ethical, legal, and social considerations (two of 12). By building capacity to strengthen health systems, state-identified strategies across all focus areas might improve the health trajectory of mothers, infants, and families affected by the U.S. opioid crisis.
Guidance for pregnant and postpartum women with OUD includes universal screening for substance use during pregnancy; provision of medication-assisted treatment and behavioral counseling during pregnancy and the postpartum period; anticipation and management of NAS for infants prenatally exposed to substances; and multidisciplinary, long-term follow-up care for mothers and infants to improve outcomes.§ Provision of services requires coordinated effort among providers, health departments, and other state and local agencies, including residential treatment programs, housing authorities, and child welfare agencies.¶ OMNI LC uses a learning collaborative framework (3) that is designed to support states in developing and implementing systems change on complex public health issues.
As part of the learning collaborative framework, 12 state teams, comprising leaders from multidisciplinary agencies,** participated in a 2-day meeting in Arlington, Virginia, in November 2018, with support from ASTHO, CDC, and other federal and academic partners.†† Five focus areas were defined: 1) access to and coordination of quality services; 2) provider awareness and training; 3) data, monitoring, and evaluation; 4) financing and coverage; and 5) ethical, legal, and social considerations. State teams developed plans of action within one or more focus areas and outlined activities to accomplish goals. CDC abstracted data from state action plans and other information sources (i.e., topic-specific discussion notes and state presentations). CDC coded data and identified strategies, existing barriers, and facilitators.§§ Codes were validated by a separate group of CDC researchers using the same codebook; differences were resolved through consensus.
Access to and coordination of quality services. Among the 12 state teams, 10 developed action plans to address access to and coordination of quality services for pregnant and postpartum women with OUD and infants prenatally exposed to substances, including infants with NAS (Table 1). Existing barriers included geographic and logistic challenges (e.g., limited resources in rural areas and lack of transportation or child care) and lack of coordinated clinical and social services (Table 2). Strategies included coordination of OUD treatment, wraparound services (e.g., nutrition or mental health services), and trauma-informed, family-centered care; improvement in collaboration between state agencies and other state organizations; and implementation of statewide perinatal quality collaboratives (Table 3). Telemedicine could facilitate access to care in rural areas or areas with limited services (Table 2).
Provider awareness and training. Nine of 12 state team action plans focused on improving health care provider awareness and training related to care for vulnerable populations¶¶ (Table 1). Identified barriers included lack of awareness and experience among providers in identifying women with OUD and prescribing medication-assisted treatment to pregnant and postpartum women (Table 2). Strategies identified included implementing clinical protocols and standardized services; educating health care providers about evidenced-based screening and treatment standards; and developing plans of safe care (i.e., best practices for infants affected by substance use or withdrawal symptoms to ensure their safety and well-being once released from the hospital, and referral to services for caregivers, including mothers, with substance use disorder) requirements*** (Table 3). Resources such as screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment training and provider 24-hour hotlines might facilitate efforts (Table 2).
Data, monitoring, and evaluation. Four of 12 state team action plans included establishing or modifying quality assurance and monitoring systems for vulnerable populations (Table 1). Reported barriers included inconsistent data collection and monitoring practices and limitations in data processing capacity (Table 2). Strategies included plans to develop quality improvement protocols, data systems, and standard data elements that identify pregnant and postpartum women with OUD and infants with NAS to improve care and service coordination (Table 3). Leveraging existing statewide data systems might advance implementation of data-related activities (Table 2).
Financing and coverage. Three of 12 state teams developed plans to address financing and insurance coverage (Table 1). Reported barriers were variable coverage of OUD treatment for pregnant and postpartum women and care of infants with NAS, issues with service reimbursement, and limited funding for services (Table 2). Strategies included collaborating with insurers and other stakeholders to expand coverage of services, implementing care bundles (e.g., groups of health services), limiting prior authorization requirements, and providing full health insurance coverage up to 1 year postpartum (Table 3). Modifying current billing and reimbursement structures might facilitate coverage of appropriate care for OUD (Table 2).
Ethical, legal, and social considerations. Two of 12 state teams focused on ethical, legal, or social considerations (Table 1). State teams reported that pregnant and postpartum women with OUD and infants with a diagnosis of NAS might experience stigma, including discrimination and criminalization, and gaps in provision of social services (Table 2). States noted that providers had ethical concerns about screening, reporting, or treating OUD during pregnancy because some states require reporting to child welfare or protection agencies.††† State teams highlighted broader issues, including polysubstance use and systemic factors contributing to the opioid crisis. Strategies included creating nonstigmatizing messages for health care and service providers, training providers on unconscious bias and antidiscrimination practices for pregnant women with mental health conditions or OUD, and incorporating family-focused policies and practices into agencies and organizations (Table 3). Existing statewide efforts on substance use can be leveraged to improve care coordination and address stigma (Table 2).
OMNI LC aims to build state capacity to support systems change in states. Most states focused on increasing access to and coordination of quality services and provider awareness and training, with fewer states focused on data, monitoring, and evaluation; financing and coverage; or ethical, legal, and social issues. Implementing strategies to provide quality services and trained providers might be the initial areas of focus for states building capacity to improve perinatal outcomes for families affected by the opioid crisis. Future work in OMNI LC might focus on the importance of surveillance and evaluation, coverage, and stigma experienced by women and infants (4,5).
As has been found in other learning communities, stakeholder partnerships were identified by OMNI LC states as important across all focus areas and a necessary component of capacity-building (6). Stakeholder partnerships can act as levers to address barriers and are a critical aspect of implementing systems change (6,7). For example, states planned to engage hospital leadership, professional organizations, and provider champions in establishing statewide perinatal health networks.
Perinatal quality collaboratives are highlighted as a strategy and facilitator in the focus areas of access to and coordination of quality services and of provider awareness and training. These collaboratives are state-based networks for implementing quality improvement activities using rapid data analysis to improve the health of mothers and infants.§§§ Many state perinatal quality collaboratives address OUD and implement the patient-safety obstetric care bundle for pregnant and postpartum women with OUD, developed by the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health program.¶¶¶ The bundle includes developing partnerships with health care facilities and organizations, training providers on clinical care practices and standards, identifying state and local reporting guidelines, connecting women to appropriate care, and implementing requirements for plans of safe care.****
Beyond immediate care for pregnant and postpartum women with OUD, broader social and contextual issues discussed by state teams included lack of resources for mental health treatment, lack of sustainable funding for social programs, polysubstance use, and systemic factors such as intergenerational poverty. States noted difficulty with addressing OUD independent of other substance use (e.g., tobacco, alcohol, or marijuana). Approximately 90% of pregnant women who use opioids for nonmedical reasons concurrently use other legal and illicit substances (8), and with the changing nature of drug use, drug overdose deaths involving opioids, cocaine, or other psychostimulants are increasing (9). Social determinants of health, described as contributors to the opioid crisis, include intergenerational or persistent poverty, unstable housing, substandard education, and bias by race or ethnicity that might introduce stigma and unequal access to treatment and care (10). States in OMNI LC might focus on polysubstance use and additional social, ethical, and legal considerations, including the social determinants of health, by supporting multidisciplinary collaboration among various agencies (e.g., departments of housing, education, and public health).
The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, qualitative information collected reflects the activities and experiences of members of the state teams participating in OMNI LC. Thus, it is not representative of a state’s entire opioid crisis response activities, which might be directed by state priorities and available funding and capacity. Second, abstracted information sources required interpretation because verbatim transcripts were unavailable; however, the qualitative analysis protocol required consensus-based decision-making to limit over-interpretation. Finally, the findings of this analysis from 12 states are not generalizable to all states; however, strategies, barriers, and facilitators might be informative for states seeking to address the opioid crisis for vulnerable populations.
OMNI LC highlights strategies in five focus areas to address the needs of pregnant and postpartum women with OUD and infants prenatally exposed to substances and demonstrates the use of participatory multidisciplinary teams to identify possible strategies for intervention. By building capacity through statewide collaboration and leveraging of stakeholder partnerships (6), states might establish long-term, sustainable systems change and optimize maternal and child health outcomes.
Participating OMNI LC state teams from Alaska, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, West Virginia; Sanaa Akbarali, Ramya Dronamraju, Natalie Foster, Gabriela Garcia, Christine Mackie, Katrin Patterson, Ellen Pliska, Eighmey Zeeck, Association of State and Territorial Health Officials team; Carla de Sisto, Mari Dumbaugh, Cameron Estrich, Keriann Uesugi, Alisa Velonis, University of Illinois at Chicago faculty and evaluation team.
Corresponding author: Charlan D. Kroelinger, email@example.com, 770-488-6545.
1Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC; 2CDC Foundation, Atlanta, Georgia; 3Division of Congenital and Developmental Disorders, National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, CDC.
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
* CDC opioid portal site. https://www.cdc.gov/opioids/strategy.html.
† Twelve states were identified for participation in the first year of OMNI LC: Alaska, Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Vermont, Washington, and West Virginia. States were invited to participate in OMNI LC based on a high prevalence or incidence of opioid-related behaviors and outcomes (e.g., NAS incidence, OUD prevalence, overdose death rates), available treatment for OUD (e.g., medication-assisted treatment for pregnant and postpartum women), a declared state of emergency, and state-initiated or -developed interventions to address the opioid crisis.
** The following leaders participated on state teams: state health official; Medicaid medical director; behavioral, mental health, or alcohol and drug abuse director; Title V director; and a provider or facility champion. Each state team was composed of a minimum of five members representing the leadership described above. States might have included additional state staff members to support leadership participating in the meeting.
†† Participants of the in-person meeting included representatives of the following organizations: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Health Resources and Services Administration, National Association of State Alcohol and Drug Abuse Directors, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Administration for Children and Families, and University of Illinois at Chicago.
§§ A strategy is defined as a method or technique used to enhance the adoption, implementation, and sustainability of a program, practice, or policy. Strategies should identify/define discrete components operationally, including: who enacts the strategy (actor); actions, steps, or processes, using active verb statements (action); and the target of the strategy (action target). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3882890/external icon. Barriers and facilitators are defined as factors obstructing or enabling improvements, presenting problems or providing incentives, by moderating or mediating public health practice, programs, or policies.
¶¶ Vulnerable populations are defined in this report as pregnant or postpartum women with OUD and infants prenatally exposed to substances, including infants with NAS.
*** Plans of safe care are defined in the Comprehensive Addiction and Recovery Act of 2016, amended version (July 22, 2016). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/524/textexternal icon.
- Haight SC, Ko JY, Tong VT, Bohm MK, Callaghan WM. Opioid use disorder documented at delivery hospitalization—United States, 1999–2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2018;67:845–9. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Winkelman TNA, Villapiano N, Kozhimannil KB, Davis MM, Patrick SW. Incidence and costs of neonatal abstinence syndrome among infants with Medicaid: 2004–2014. Pediatrics 2018;141:e20173520. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- DeSisto CL, Estrich C, Kroelinger CD, et al. Using a multi-state learning community as an implementation strategy for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Implement Sci 2017;12:138. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Chiang KV, Okoroh EM, Kasehagen LJ, Garcia-Saavedra LF, Ko JY. Standardization of state definitions for neonatal abstinence syndrome surveillance and the opioid crisis. Am J Public Health 2019;109:1193–7. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Patrick SW, Schiff DM; Committee on Substance Use and Prevention. A public health response to opioid use in pregnancy. Pediatrics 2017;139:e20164070. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Kroelinger CD, Morgan IA, DeSisto CL, et al. State-identified implementation strategies to increase uptake of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception policies. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2019;28:346–56. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Kroelinger CD, Romero L, Lathrop E, et al. Meeting summary: state and local implementation strategies for increasing access to contraception during Zika preparedness and response—United States, September 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:1230–5. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Jarlenski M, Barry CL, Gollust S, Graves AJ, Kennedy-Hendricks A, Kozhimannil K. Polysubstance use among U.S. women of reproductive age who use opioids for nonmedical reasons. Am J Public Health 2017;107:1308–10. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Kariisa M, Scholl L, Wilson N, Seth P, Hoots B. Drug overdose deaths involving cocaine and psychostimulants with abuse potential—United States, 2003–2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:388–95. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Matthew DB. Un-burying the lead: public health tools are the key to beating the opioid epidemic. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution; 2018. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/es_20180123_un-burying-the-lead-final.pdfpdf iconexternal icon
Suggested citation for this article: Kroelinger CD, Rice ME, Cox S, et al. State Strategies to Address Opioid Use Disorder Among Pregnant and Postpartum Women and Infants Prenatally Exposed to Substances, Including Infants with Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:777–783. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6836a1external icon.
MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.
All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to firstname.lastname@example.org.