Receipt of Breast Milk by Gestational Age — United States, 2017

Katelyn V. Chiang, MPH1,2; Andrea J. Sharma, PhD1; Jennifer M. Nelson, MD1; Christine K. Olson, MD3; Cria G. Perrine, PhD1 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation


What is already known about this topic?

Breast milk is the optimal source of infant nutrition. Data on breast milk intake by gestational age are limited.

What is added by this report?

Rates of receipt of breast milk among extremely preterm, early preterm, late preterm, and term infants were 71.3%, 76.0%, 77.3%, and 84.6%, respectively, among infants delivered to residents of 48 states and the District of Columbia in 2017.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Disparities in receipt of breast milk by gestational age exist. Hospital implementation of policies and practices that ensure that all mothers and their infants receive support for breast milk feeding and that preterm infants receive breast milk as soon as is medically feasible might help reduce these disparities.

Article Metrics
Related Materials

Breast milk is the optimal source of infant nutrition. For the nearly one in 10 infants born prematurely in the United States annually (1), breast milk is especially beneficial, helping prevent sepsis and necrotizing enterocolitis and promoting neurologic development (2). National estimates of newborn feeding practices by gestational age have not been available previously. CDC analyzed 2017 birth certificate data from 48 states and the District of Columbia (3,194,873; 82.7% of all births) to describe receipt of breast milk among extremely preterm (20–27 weeks), early preterm (28–33 weeks), late preterm (34–36 weeks), and term (≥37 weeks) infants with further stratification by maternal and infant characteristics. The prevalence of infants receiving any breast milk was 83.9% overall and varied by gestational age, with 71.3% of extremely preterm infants, 76.0% of early preterm infants, 77.3% of late preterm infants, and 84.6% of term infants receiving any breast milk. Disparities in receipt of breast milk by several sociodemographic factors, including maternal race/ethnicity, were noted across gestational age groups. These estimates suggest that many infants, particularly infants at high risk for medical complications, might not be receiving breast milk. Efforts are needed to increase the implementation of existing evidence-based policies and practices that support breast milk feeding, particularly for medically fragile infants (2,3).

The National Vital Statistics System birth data are a census of all live births in the United States. Federal guidance includes procedures for collecting uniform birth data using the U.S. Standard Certificate of Live Birth (4).* Data collected include nutrition information determined from medical record indication of receipt of any breast milk or colostrum during the period between delivery and hospital discharge, including both mother’s own and donor breast milk (4). Preterm infants often have extended hospital stays (5); however, state statutes require completion and filing of birth certificates soon after delivery, usually within 5–10 days of birth. Therefore, among preterm infants, this item likely captures receipt of breast milk only between delivery and completion of the birth certificate. Gestational age was ascertained from the birth certificate’s obstetric estimate of completed weeks of gestation and categorized as extremely preterm (20–27 weeks), early preterm (28–33 weeks), late preterm (34–36 weeks), and term (≥37 weeks) (4). On birth certificates, maternal sociodemographic data are typically collected through maternal self-report and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission is collected from the medical record (4).

Analysis was restricted to infants with gestational ages ≥20 weeks who were not transferred to another facility within 24 hours of delivery and who were living at the time of birth certificate completion. Only births delivered to residents of 48 states and the District of Columbia in 2017 were included; births delivered to residents of California and Michigan were not available for analysis (15.1% of U.S. resident births). The percentage of infants who received breast milk was calculated overall and by gestational age using SAS (version 9.4; SAS Institute). Receipt of breast milk was further stratified by maternal characteristics and infant NICU admission.

Overall, 83.9% of infants received breast milk during the first few days of life (Table). Term infants were more likely to have received breast milk than were preterm infants, with percentages increasing with gestational age: 71.3% of extremely preterm infants, 76.0% of early preterm infants, 77.3% of late preterm infants, and 84.6% of term infants.

Among extremely preterm infants, 67.1% of those delivered to black mothers and 60.7% of those delivered to American Indian/Alaska Native mothers received breast milk, compared with approximately 75% of extremely preterm infants delivered to mothers of other racial/ethnic groups. This racial/ethnic disparity was observed across gestational age groups. In general, across gestational age groups, infants of mothers who were younger, less educated, unmarried, and participating in Medicaid or the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) were less likely to receive breast milk than were infants of older, more educated, and married mothers, those with private insurance, other coverage, or who were self-pay, and those not participating in WIC. In addition, receipt of breast milk by NICU admission differed by gestational age, with higher prevalences of receipt of breast milk among late preterm and term infants who were not admitted to a NICU.


Although breast milk is especially beneficial for preterm infants, fewer preterm than term infants received breast milk in the first few days of life. Disparities in receipt of breast milk by gestational age could be explained by multiple factors. Gastrointestinal tract or oral-motor immaturity might inhibit enteral feeding (through the mouth or through a tube directly into the infant’s stomach) for some preterm infants, necessitating the use of parenteral, or intravenous, nutrition (6). In addition, mothers of preterm infants might be unable to produce sufficient breast milk and might lack access to donor milk. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends that all preterm infants receive breast milk; if mother’s milk is unavailable or contraindicated, then fortified pasteurized donor milk should be used (2). Data from CDC’s 2015 Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care survey indicate that among U.S. hospitals with level 3 and level 4 NICUs, approximately 66% and 73%, respectively, report using any donor milk (7).

Multiple demographic factors are known to be associated with breastfeeding, including maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, and marital status.§ This analysis determined that many of these demographic predictors of breastfeeding are consistent across gestational ages. Infants delivered to black and American Indian/Alaska Native mothers are more likely to be born at earlier gestational ages (1) and are less likely to receive any breast milk. Together, these factors place these infants at increased risk for morbidity and mortality (2,8).,**

Hospitals and health care providers have the opportunity to improve infant nutrition. Substantial evidence has demonstrated that use of maternity care practices supportive of breastfeeding have resulted in increased breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity among term infants (3). Mothers of preterm infants will likely need additional support to establish and maintain a milk supply (9). Hospitals and health care providers can implement evidence-based policies and practices to ensure that all mother-infant dyads receive support for breast milk feeding (3). Prenatal breastfeeding education delivered consistently throughout the entire prenatal period might help ensure that all mothers, even those who deliver prematurely, are prepared to breastfeed or pump breast milk (3). In addition, hospitals can support increased access to donor milk for mothers of preterm infants, if needed and desired, to help preterm infants receive breast milk as soon as receipt is medically feasible (2). Finally, to address the challenges that caregivers could encounter when feeding infants hospitalized for extended periods, hospitals might also consider providing support such as helping mothers prepare for long-term breast milk pumping and providing follow-up lactation consultations throughout an infant’s hospitalization.

Quality improvement initiatives, such as CDC-supported state-based perinatal quality collaboratives,†† seek to rapidly implement these best practices in hospitals and work to increase use of human milk in the neonatal intensive care setting and improve support for breastfeeding in hospitals and in the community. Increased implementation of similar initiatives in hospitals serving larger proportions of racial/ethnic groups with lower breast milk feeding rates might help to decrease disparities in breast milk feeding and improve infant morbidity and mortality.

CDC’s National Immunization Survey is used for routine surveillance of breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exclusivity; however, this data source does not include gestational age. Overall rates of receipt of breast milk calculated from 2017 birth certificate data are comparable to breastfeeding initiation rates estimated from the survey data (83.2% among infants born in 2015).§§

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, birth certificate data do not allow for analysis of breast milk feeding duration or exclusivity, which are important indicators of optimal infant feeding practices. Second, because an infant’s birth certificate might be completed before enteral nutrition is medically feasible, birth certificate data might not capture properly delayed introduction of breast milk among preterm or medically fragile infants. Finally, although analysis was restricted to infants not transferred to another facility, some variables might be misclassified. A comparison of birth certificate data with medical records in eight hospitals across two states found high exact agreement for obstetric estimate of gestation within 2 weeks (99.7% and 98.1% in each state) and high sensitivity for receipt of breast milk (90.7% and 96.2%). However, moderate false discovery rates for receipt of breast milk (the percentage of births with birth certificate but not medical record indication) (19% and 16% for each of the two states) suggest there might be discrepancies between medical records and birth certificate reporting in some hospitals (10). In addition, rates of breast milk feeding among extremely and early preterm infants not admitted to the NICU should be interpreted with caution. These infants likely required advanced medical care but might have been misclassified as non-NICU admissions because of incorrect birth certificate data or NICU admission after completion of the birth certificate.

Infants’ receipt of breast milk as soon as is medically feasible can help prevent infection and promote growth and development. Receipt of breast milk is important for preterm infants because breast milk also helps protect against necrotizing enterocolitis (2), an important contributor to gastrointestinal morbidity and mortality among preterm infants. Hospital enactment and provision of evidence-based policies and practices that support breast milk feeding and donor milk access for all infants at high risk (2,3), as well as development of infant feeding policies and practices that promote breast milk feeding among mother-infant dyads facing challenges associated with extended infant hospitalizations, could help reduce gestational age disparities in the receipt of breast milk and increase the proportion of all infants receiving the benefits of breast milk.


National Center for Health Statistics, CDC; the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions that provide data through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program.

Corresponding author: Katelyn V. Chiang,, 404-498-0612.

1Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC; 2Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 3Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.

* icon.

Gestational age terms are those commonly used by various medical, research, and public health organizations. However, because there is a lack of consensus regarding the age ranges for each category, categories were defined in this report using completed weeks’ gestation as the following: extremely preterm (20–27 weeks), early preterm (28–33 weeks), late preterm (34–36 weeks), and term (≥37 weeks). The lower limit of 20 completed weeks’ gestation was used to exclude births where resuscitation was unlikely.






  1. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJK, Driscoll AK, Drake P. Births: final data for 2017. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2018;67:1–50 icon. PubMedexternal icon
  2. American Academy of Pediatrics. Breastfeeding and the use of human milk: breastfeeding. Pediatrics 2012;129:e827–41. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  3. World Health Organization. Evidence for the ten steps to successful breastfeeding. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, Division of Child Health and Development; 1998. iconexternal icon
  4. National Center for Health Statistics. Guide to completing the facility worksheet for the certificate of live birth and report of fetal death. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC, National Center for Health Statistics; 2016. icon
  5. Manuck TA, Rice MM, Bailit JL, et al.; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: a contemporary cohort. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;215:103.e1–14. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  6. Neu J. Gastrointestinal development and meeting the nutritional needs of premature infants. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:629S–34S. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  7. Perrin MT. Donor human milk and fortifier use in United States level 2, 3, and 4 neonatal care hospitals. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018;66:664–9. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  8. Chen A, Rogan WJ. Breastfeeding and the risk of postneonatal death in the United States. Pediatrics 2004;113:e435–9. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  9. Lau C. Breastfeeding challenges and the preterm mother-infant dyad: a conceptual model. Breastfeed Med 2018;13:8–17. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  10. Martin JA, Wilson EC, Osterman MJ, Saadi EW, Sutton SR, Hamilton BE. Assessing the quality of medical and health data from the 2003 birth certificate revision: results from two states. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2013;62:1–19. PubMedexternal icon
TABLE. Number of infants receiving breast milk among live infants not transferred to another facility,* by gestational age and maternal and infant characteristics — 48 states§ and the District of Columbia, National Vital Statistics System, 2017Return to your place in the text
Characteristic Receipt of breast milk by gestational age Overall
Extremely preterm Early preterm Late preterm Term
Total no. No. received (%) Total no. No. received (%) Total no. No. received (%) Total no. No. received (%) Total no. No. received (%)
Overall 13,225 9,433(71.3) 60,385 45,883 (76.0) 225,279 174,084 (77.3) 2,895,984 2,451,442 (84.6) 3,194,873 2,680,842 (83.9)
Maternal race/ethnicity**
Hispanic 2,704 1,981 (73.3) 12,014 9,588 (79.8) 46,371 38,551 (83.1) 597,800 528,165 (88.4) 658,889 578,285 (87.8)
White 4,820 3,557 (73.8) 28,131 21,913 (77.9) 114,473 89,810 (78.5) 1,599,178 1,371,958 (85.8) 1,746,602 1,487,238 (85.2)
Black 4,620 3,102 (67.1) 15,198 10,455 (68.8) 44,636 29,580 (66.3) 436,677 320,136 (73.3) 501,131 363,273 (72.5)
Asian 545 415 (76.1) 2,700 2,217 (82.1) 10,886 9,553 (87.8) 155,841 143,134 (91.8) 169,972 155,319 (91.4)
American Indian/Alaska Native 107 65 (60.7) 527 360 (68.3) 2,268 1,525 (67.2) 24,199 18,739 (77.4) 27,101 20,689 (76.3)
Native Hawaiian/Other Pacific Islander 20 15 (75.0) 147 118 (80.3) 587 444 (75.6) 6,586 5,510 (83.7) 7,340 6,087 (82.9)
Multiracial 322 243 (75.5) 1,257 956 (76.1) 4,864 3,759(77.3) 60,134 50,523 (84.0) 66,577 55,481 (83.3)
Maternal age group (yrs)
≤19 902 622 (69.0) 3,227 2,334 (72.3) 11,649 8,122 (69.7) 150,865 111,202 (73.7) 166,643 122,280 (73.4)
20–29 6,325 4,520 (71.5) 27,406 20,653 (75.4) 105,814 79,487 (75.1) 1,447,576 1,192,173 (82.4) 1,587,121 1,296,833 (81.7)
30–39 5,421 3,882 (71.6) 26,716 20,563 (77.0) 97,796 78,407 (80.2) 1,214,657 1,075,184 (88.5) 1,344,590 1,178,036 (87.6)
≥40 577 409 (70.9) 3,036 2,333 (76.8) 10,020 8,068 (80.5) 82,886 72,883 (87.9) 96,519 83,693 (86.7)
Maternal highest education level
Less than a high school diploma 1,929 1,250 (64.8) 8,891 5,987 (67.3) 32,739 21,455 (65.5) 375,711 277,369 (73.8) 419,270 306,061 (73.0)
High school diploma 3,936 2,716 (69.0) 16,562 11,734 (70.8) 60,428 42,069 (69.6) 728,084 557,575 (76.6) 809,010 614,094 (75.9)
Some college 4,177 3,048 (73.0) 18,037 14,114 (78.3) 66,933 53,016 (79.2) 825,306 707,817 (85.8) 914,453 777,995 (85.1)
College graduate 3,035 2,338 (77.0) 16,229 13,623 (83.9) 63,359 56,336 (88.9) 947,414 893,004 (94.3) 1,030,037 965,301 (93.7)
Maternal marital status
Married 6,044 4,571 (75.6) 31,440 25,806 (82.1) 125,837 106,251 (84.4) 1,758,860 1,593,226 (90.6) 1,922,181 1,729,854 (90.0)
Unmarried 7,181 4,862(67.7) 28,945 20,077 (69.4) 99,442 67,833 (68.2) 1,137,124 858,216 (75.5) 1,272,692 950,988 (74.7)
Payment source at delivery
Medicaid 6,665 4,484 (67.3) 28,806 20,184 (70.1) 105,068 72,518 (69.0) 1,220,031 935,374 (76.7) 1,360,570 1,032,560 (75.9)
Private insurance 5,371 4,100 (76.3) 26,561 21,868 (82.3) 102,270 87,359 (85.4) 1,426,621 1,295,629 (90.8) 1,560,823 1,408,956 (90.3)
Self-pay 580 385 (66.4) 2,260 1,618 (71.6) 8,122 6,158 (75.8) 121,236 107,838 (88.9) 132,198 115,999 (87.7)
Other 505 398 (78.8) 2,374 1,936 (81.6) 8,445 7,037 (83.3) 111,100 98,552 (88.7) 122,424 107,923 (88.2)
WIC participation during pregnancy
Yes 4,919 3,409 (69.3) 22,841 16,644 (72.9) 88,406 62,876 (71.1) 1,057,343 815,648 (77.1) 1,173,509 898,577 (76.6)
No 8,106 5,896 (72.7) 36,716 28,681 (78.1) 134,117 109,275 (81.5) 1,805,233 1,608,321 (89.1) 1,984,172 1,752,173 (88.3)
Infant NICU admission
Yes 12,188 8,802 (72.2) 53,277 40,482 (76.0) 80,465 61,245 (76.1) 120,583 94,370 (78.3) 266,513 204,899 (76.9)
No 1,036 630 (60.8) 7,091 5,391 (76.0) 144,675 112,742 (77.9) 2,773,425 2,355,451 (84.9) 2,926,227 2,474,214 (84.6)

Abbreviations: NICU = neonatal intensive care unit; WIC = Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.
* Excludes infants transferred to another facility within 24 hours of delivery and those who died before completion of the birth certificate.
Extremely preterm: 20–27 weeks’ gestation; early preterm: 28–33 weeks’ gestation; late preterm: 34–36 weeks’ gestation; term: ≥37 weeks’ gestation.
§ Includes all states except California and Michigan.
Denominators might not sum to total because of missing maternal or infant data.
** All racial/ethnic groups are non-Hispanic unless otherwise specified.

Suggested citation for this article: Chiang KV, Sharma AJ, Nelson JM, Olson CK, Perrine CG. Receipt of Breast Milk by Gestational Age — United States, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:489–493. DOI: icon.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version ( and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to

View Page In:pdf icon
Page last reviewed: June 6, 2019