State Laws Regarding Indoor Public Use, Retail Sales, and Prices of Electronic Cigarettes — U.S. States, Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands, September 30, 2017
Weekly / December 15, 2017 / 66(49);1341–1346
Views: Views equals page views plus PDF downloadsMetric Details
Kristy Marynak, MPP1; Brandon Kenemer, MPH1; Brian A. King, PhD1; Michael A. Tynan1; Allison MacNeil, MPH1; Elizabeth Reimels, JD1 (View author affiliations)View suggested citation
What is already known about this topic?
E-cigarettes are the most commonly used tobacco product among U.S. youths. E-cigarettes typically deliver nicotine, and the U.S. Surgeon General has concluded that nicotine exposure during adolescence can cause addiction and can harm the developing adolescent brain. In addition to federal regulation, states, localities, territories, and tribes maintain broad authority to adopt additional or more stringent requirements regarding tobacco product use, sales, marketing, and other topics.
What is added by this report?
As of September 30, 2017, eight states, the District of Columbia (DC), and Puerto Rico prohibited indoor e-cigarette use and smoking in restaurants, bars, and worksites; 26 states prohibited e-cigarette self-service displays; 16 states, DC, and the U.S. Virgin Islands required a retail license to sell e-cigarettes; five states, DC, and Guam had tobacco-21 laws; and eight states, DC, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands taxed e-cigarettes. Sixteen states had no such laws.
What are the implications for public health practice?
State, local, and territorial strategies to reduce youths’ initiation of e-cigarettes and population exposure to e-cigarette aerosol, which include educational initiatives, coupled with federal regulation of tobacco product manufacturing, labelling, and marketing, could help reduce e-cigarettes’ public health risks, especially among young persons.
Electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) are the most frequently used tobacco product among U.S. youths, and past 30-day e-cigarette use is more prevalent among high school students than among adults (1,2). E-cigarettes typically deliver nicotine, and the U.S. Surgeon General has concluded that nicotine exposure during adolescence can cause addiction and can harm the developing adolescent brain (2). Through authority granted by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prohibits e-cigarette sales to minors, free samples, and vending machine sales, except in adult-only facilities (3). States, localities, territories, and tribes maintain broad authority to adopt additional or more stringent requirements regarding tobacco product use, sales, marketing, and other topics (2,4). To understand the current e-cigarette policy landscape in the United States, CDC assessed state and territorial laws that 1) prohibit e-cigarette use and conventional tobacco smoking indoors in restaurants, bars, and worksites; 2) require a retail license to sell e-cigarettes; 3) prohibit e-cigarette self-service displays (e.g., requirement that products be kept behind the counter or in a locked box); 4) establish 21 years as the minimum age of purchase for all tobacco products, including e-cigarettes (tobacco-21); and 5) apply an excise tax to e-cigarettes. As of September 30, 2017, eight states, the District of Columbia (DC), and Puerto Rico prohibited indoor e-cigarette use and smoking in indoor areas of restaurants, bars, and worksites; 16 states, DC, and the U.S. Virgin Islands required a retail license to sell e-cigarettes; 26 states prohibited e-cigarette self-service displays; five states, DC, and Guam had tobacco-21 laws; and eight states, DC, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands taxed e-cigarettes. Sixteen states had none of the assessed laws. A comprehensive approach that combines state-level strategies to reduce youths’ initiation of e-cigarettes and population exposure to e-cigarette aerosol, coupled with federal regulation, could help reduce health risks posed by e-cigarettes among youths (2,5).
Effective and enacted dates for laws enacted as of September 30, 2017, were obtained from the CDC State Tobacco Activities Tracking and Evaluation (STATE) System for the 50 states, DC, Puerto Rico, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and Guam.* Legislation information is collected quarterly from the Westlaw online legal research database and is analyzed, coded, and entered into STATE by CDC.† State laws and regulations prohibiting self-service displays of e-cigarettes were obtained from the Tobacco Control Legal Consortium (6); effective and enacted dates and territory laws were reviewed in the Westlaw database and on territory websites.
As of September 30, 2017, eight states, DC, and Puerto Rico prohibited indoor e-cigarette use and conventional tobacco smoking in worksites, restaurants, and bars (Figure 1). E-cigarette self-service display restrictions were the most commonly enacted of the five types of laws (26 states), followed by retail license requirements (16 states, DC, and the U.S. Virgin Islands) (Table). Tobacco-21 was the least common law, taking effect in California, Hawaii, and DC in 2016; in Maine, New Jersey, and Oregon in 2017; and in Guam in 2018. Eight states, DC, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands taxed e-cigarettes, with approaches varying by state. Five of these tax laws have been adjusted since enactment: California, Minnesota, and the U.S. Virgin Islands increased the tax rate, and Kansas and DC decreased the tax rate.
The number of newly enacted laws increased from four to 16 during 2013–2014 and from 16 to 21 during 2014–2015, but decreased from 21 to 15 during 2015–2016. Eight laws were enacted during January–September 2017 (Figure 2). A total of 72 laws were enacted in 34 states, DC, and three territories during January 2010–September 2017. Sixteen states did not have any of the five assessed laws, and California was the only state with all five of the assessed laws.
Several states have enacted laws related to e-cigarettes in recent years, ranging from tobacco-21 laws in five states, DC, and Guam, to self-service display restrictions in approximately half of the states. Legislative activity increased during 2013–2015, peaked in 2015, and has since slowed. One third of states did not have any of the five assessed laws. State, local, and territorial strategies to reduce youths’ initiation of e-cigarettes and population exposure to e-cigarette aerosol, including educational initiatives, coupled with federal regulation of tobacco product manufacturing, labeling, and marketing, could help reduce the risks of e-cigarettes on population health, especially among young persons (2,5).
On October 23, 2017, New York became the ninth state to include e-cigarettes in its comprehensive smoke-free indoor air law.§ Thus, one third of the 27 states and DC with comprehensive smoke-free laws that prohibit conventional tobacco smoking in restaurants, worksites, and bars also prohibit e-cigarette use in these venues. Therefore, approximately 75.4% of the U.S. population (an estimated 243.6 million U.S. residents, including 55.7 million children) live in states in which bystanders can be exposed to secondhand e-cigarette aerosol in indoor public spaces. Previous research indicates that one in four U.S. middle and high school students reported past-month exposure to e-cigarette aerosol in a public place in 2015 (7). This exposure is of public health concern because the U.S. Surgeon General has concluded that e-cigarette aerosol is not harmless water vapor, and environmental studies have documented harmful and potentially harmful ingredients in secondhand e-cigarette aerosol, including nicotine, heavy metals, ultrafine particulate matter, and volatile organic compounds (2). Including e-cigarettes in comprehensive smoke-free laws can prevent involuntary exposures to secondhand e-cigarette aerosol, especially among vulnerable populations such as youths and pregnant women; simplify enforcement of smoke-free policies; and reduce the potential for the renormalization of tobacco product use (2).
The remaining types of laws assessed in this study leverage conventional smoking prevention strategies for youths, which have the potential to prevent youths’ e-cigarette access (2,5). Licensing requirements for tobacco retailers and manufacturers can increase the incentive to comply with tobacco-related laws, including those prohibiting sales to youths (2). In addition, restricting self-service tobacco displays can reduce youths’ tobacco access by reducing theft and increasing interactions between customers and retailers (8). Increasing the minimum age of tobacco product sales to 21 years is a potential prevention strategy, because 95% of adult smokers begin before age 21, and young adulthood represents a critical period when many smokers progress from experimental to regular tobacco use (9). Finally, substantial increases in conventional cigarette prices reduce consumption, especially among youths. To date, data are limited on the impact of e-cigarette taxes on conventional cigarette use; however, similar to conventional cigarettes, e-cigarette price increases would be expected to reduce use by youths (2,5). Further evaluations of the effectiveness of these strategies can help inform public health practice and planning (2,5).
FDA is authorized to regulate the manufacturing, sales, distribution, and marketing of tobacco products sold in the United States. In May 2016, the agency asserted jurisdiction over products that meet the definition of a tobacco product, including e-cigarettes. FDA generally cannot restrict public tobacco use, tax tobacco products, or establish a minimum age for tobacco sales above age 18 years (2). However, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act ensures that localities, states, territories, and tribes can continue to play a central role in tobacco prevention and control policies by preserving their authority to regulate sales, marketing, advertising, and use of tobacco products by persons of any age.¶ Thus, state, local, territorial, and tribal tobacco control strategies are an important complement to federal regulation, which can help reduce the public health risks of e-cigarettes, particularly among young persons (2).
The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, STATE does not account for local laws, bills under consideration, regulations, opinions of attorneys general, or case law decisions for tobacco control topics other than preemption. For example, at least 400 localities prohibit indoor e-cigarette use and smoking in worksites, restaurants, and bars,** and at least 200 localities have tobacco-21 laws.†† Second, statutory requirements and definitions vary across states. For example, although 26 states have laws or regulations prohibiting self-service displays of e-cigarettes, only three of these states (California, Iowa, and New Mexico) prohibit all self-service displays of e-cigarettes; the remaining 21 states restrict self-service displays to adult-only facilities or tobacco specialty stores and vape shops (6). Moreover, some states have regulated e-cigarettes by expanding the statutory definition of a tobacco product to include e-cigarettes, regardless of nicotine content, to simplify enforcement (2). However, some states define the products as alternative nicotine or vapor products that are exempt from other tobacco product laws, such as licensure requirements and taxes (2).
Given that cigarettes and other combusted tobacco products are responsible for the overwhelming burden of tobacco-related death and disease in the United States (5), the Surgeon General has recommended actions to uphold and accelerate strategies proven to prevent and reduce combustible tobacco smoking among youths and adults, while simultaneously preventing youths’ use of emerging tobacco products such as e-cigarettes (2). A comprehensive tobacco control framework, which includes strategies to prevent all tobacco product use by youths and public exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke and e-cigarette aerosol, is important to protect the public’s health (2,5).
Kisha-Ann S. Williams, Debbie Yembra, Carter Consulting, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia; Ryan Patrick, Hya Qasmieh, MayaTech Corporation, Silver Spring, Maryland; Mark D. Meaney, Tobacco Control Legal Consortium at the Public Health Law Center, St. Paul, Minnesota; Sara E. Wilczek, University at Buffalo School of Public Health and Health Professions, New York.
Conflict of Interest
No conflicts of interest were reported.
Corresponding author: Kristy Marynak, email@example.com, 770-488-5493.
* Guam, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands are the only U.S. territories tracked in STATE System as of June 2017. Additional territories will be added to STATE in the future. https://www.cdc.gov/STATESystem/.
§ New York Senate Bill No. 2543 was enacted on October 23, 2017, and became effective on November 22, 2017. This population estimate includes New York’s law, but the law is otherwise excluded from the present study’s findings because it was enacted after the September 30, 2017 cutoff date.
- Jamal A, Gentzke A, Hu SS, et al. Tobacco use among middle and high school students—United States, 2011–16. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:597–603. CrossRef PubMed
- US Department of Health and Human Services. E-cigarette use among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/sgr/e-cigarettes/pdfs/2016_sgr_entire_report_508.pdf
- Food and Drug Administration. Deeming tobacco products to be subject to the federal food, drug, and cosmetic act, as amended by the family smoking prevention and tobacco control act; restrictions on the sale and distribution of tobacco products and required warning statements for tobacco products. 81 Fed. Reg. 28974 (2016). https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2016/05/10/2016-10685/deeming-tobacco-products-to-be-subject-to-the-federal-food-drug-and-cosmetic-act-as-amended-by-the
- Marynak K, Holmes CB, King BA, Promoff G, Bunnell R, McAfee T. State laws prohibiting sales to minors and indoor use of electronic nicotine delivery systems—United States, November 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63:1145–50. PubMed
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2014. https://www.surgeongeneral.gov/library/reports/50-years-of-progress/full-report.pdf
- Tobacco Control Legal Consortium. U.S. e-cigarette regulation: a 50-state review. St. Paul, MN: Tobacco Control Legal Consortium; 2017. http://www.publichealthlawcenter.org/sites/default/files/E-Cigarette-Legal-Landscape-50-State-Review-March-2017.pdf
- Wang TW, Marynak KL, Agaku IT, King BA. Secondhand exposure to electronic cigarette aerosol among U.S. Youths. JAMA Pediatr 2017;171:490–2. CrossRef PubMed
- Changelab Solutions. Self-service display of tobacco products: a model ordinance. Oakland, CA: Changelab Solutions; 2017. http://www.changelabsolutions.org/publications/self-service-display-tobacco-products
- Institute of Medicine. Public health implications of raising the minimum age of legal access to tobacco products. Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Institute of Medicine; 2015. http://iom.nationalacademies.org/Reports/2015/TobaccoMinimumAgeReport.aspx
FIGURE 1. States and territories with and without laws* prohibiting smoking and use of e-cigarettes in indoor areas of private worksites, restaurants, and bars — United States, September 30, 2017
Abbreviations: DC = District of Columbia; GU = Guam; PR = Puerto Rico; VI = U.S. Virgin Islands.
*A comprehensive state smoke-free law is defined as one that prohibits smoking in indoor areas of private worksites, restaurants, and bars.
The figure above is a map of the United States showing States and territories with and without laws prohibiting smoking and use of e-cigarettes in indoor areas of private worksites, restaurants, and bars, in the United States as of September 30, 2017.
TABLE. State laws regarding indoor public use, retail sales, and prices of electronic cigarettes — U.S. states and Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands, enacted as of September 30, 2017
|State/Territory||Effective date||Summary of laws† enacted as of September 30, 2017|
|Prohibits e-cigarette use in worksites, restaurants, and bars||Retail license required to sell e-cigarettes over the counter||Self-service displays of e-cigarettes prohibited*||Sales of tobacco products including e-cigarettes to persons aged <21 yrs prohibited||E-cigarette tax (tax rate)|
|Arkansas||—||May 1, 2015||Jul 22, 2015||—||—||RL, SS|
|California||Jun 9, 2016||Jan 1, 2017||Jun 9, 2016||Jun 9, 2016¶||4/1/2017; (27.3% wholesale cost)
7/1/2017; (65.08% wholesale cost)**
|EF, RL, SS, T-21, T|
|Connecticut||—||Mar 1, 2016||—||—||—||RL|
|Delaware||Oct 5, 2015||—||Jun 12, 2014||—||1/1/2018; $0.05 per fluid mL||EF, SS, T|
|District of Columbia||Nov 18,2016||Oct 22, 2015||—||Nov 29, 2016||10/1/2015 (67% wholesale sales price)
10/1/2016 (65% wholesale sales price)**
|EF, RL, T-21, T|
|Florida||—||—||Jul 1, 2014||—||—||SS|
|Guam||—||—||—||Jan 1, 2018††||—||T-21|
|Hawaii||Jan 1, 2016||—||Jul 1, 2014||Jan 1, 2016||—||EF, SS, T-21|
|Idaho||—||—||Jul 1, 2012||—||—||SS|
|Illinois||—||—||Jan 1, 2015||—||—||SS|
|Indiana||—||Jul 1, 2015||Jul 1, 2013||—||—||RL, SS|
|Iowa||—||Jul 1, 2014||Jul 1, 2014||—||—||RL, SS|
|Kansas||—||Jul 1, 2012||Jul 1, 2012||—||Jan 1, 2017 ($0.20 per mL of consumable material)
Jul 1, 2017 ($0.05 per mL of consumable material)**
|RL, SS, T|
|Louisiana||—||May 28, 2014||May 5, 2014||—||Jul 1, 2015 ($0.05 per liquid mL of nicotine)||RL, SS, T|
|Maine||—||Nov 1, 2017||Mar 3, 2016*||Nov 1, 2017§§||—||RL, SS, T-21|
|Maryland||—||Oct 1, 2017||—||—||—||RL|
|Massachusetts||—||—||Sep 25, 2015*||—||—||SS|
|Minnesota||—||Aug 1, 2014||Jul 1, 2014||—||Aug 1, 2010 (35% wholesale sales price)
Jul 1, 2013 (95% wholesale sales price)**
|RL, SS, T|
|Montana||—||Jan 1, 2016||—||—||—||RL|
|Nebraska||—||—||Feb 27, 2015||—||—||SS|
|New Jersey||Jul 11, 2010||—||—||Nov 1, 2017||—||EF, T-21|
|New Mexico||—||—||Jun 19, 2015||—||—||SS|
|New York||—||—||Dec 29, 2014||—||—||SS|
|North Carolina||—||—||—||—||Jun 1, 2015 ($0.05 per fluid mL)||T|
|North Dakota||Dec 6, 2012||—||Aug 1, 2015||—||—||EF, SS|
|Oklahoma||—||—||Nov 1, 2014||—||—||SS|
|Oregon||Jan 1, 2016||—||May 26, 2015||Aug 9, 2017||—||EF, SS, T-21|
|Pennsylvania||—||Jul 13, 2016||—||—||Jul 13, 2016 (40% purchase price)||RL, T|
|Puerto Rico||Apr 11, 2011||—||—||—||May 29, 2017 ($3.00 per e-cigarette)||EF, T|
|Rhode Island||—||Jan 1, 2015||—||—||—||RL|
|South Dakota||—||—||Jul 1, 2014||—||—||SS|
|Texas||—||—||Oct 1, 2015||—||—||SS|
|U.S. Virgin Islands||—||May 16, 2014||—||—||Oct 15, 2014 (20% cost price)
Mar 23, 2016 (45% cost price)**
|Utah||May 8, 2012||Jul 1, 2015||Jul 1, 2015||—||—||EF, RL, SS|
|Vermont||Jul 1, 2016||Jul 1, 2013||Jan 1, 2017||—||—||EF, RL, SS|
|Washington||—||Jun 28, 2016||Jun 28, 2016||—||—||RL, SS|
|West Virginia||—||—||—||—||Jul 1, 2016 ($0.075 per fluid mL)||T|
|Wyoming||—||—||Mar 13, 2013||—||—||SS|
|Total||8 states, DC, and Puerto Rico||16 states, DC, and U.S Virgin Islands||26 states||5 states, DC, and Guam||8 states, DC, Puerto Rico and U.S. Virgin Islands||—|
FIGURE 2. Number of state and territorial* laws that address indoor use, retail sales, and prices of e-cigarettes, enacted as of September 30, 2017† — United States, 2010–2017
* Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands.
† In California, District of Columbia, Kansas, Minnesota, and U.S. Virgin Islands, legislation was updated in later years to reflect changes in tax rates. To avoid duplication, this figure presents the enacted dates only of the original law.
The figure above is a bar chart showing the number of state and territorial laws regarding indoor public use, retail sales, and prices of electronic cigarettes, by year of enactment, as of September 30, 2017.
Suggested citation for this article: Marynak K, Kenemer B, King BA, Tynan MA, MacNeil A, Reimels E. State Laws Regarding Indoor Public Use, Retail Sales, and Prices of Electronic Cigarettes — U.S. States, Guam, Puerto Rico, and U.S. Virgin Islands, September 30, 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:1341–1346. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6649a1.
MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.
All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Page last reviewed: December 14, 2017
- Page last updated: December 14, 2017
- Content source: