Legal Status of EPT in Washington
EPT
is permissible.
| I. Statutes/regs on health care providers’ authority to prescribe for STDs to a patient’s partner(s) w/out prior evaluation (Explanation) |
|
|---|---|
| II. Specific judicial decisions concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation) |
|
| III. Specific administrative opinions by the Attorney General or medical or pharmacy boards concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation) |
|
| IV. Legislative bills or prospective regulations concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation) |
|
| V. Laws that incorporate via reference guidelines as acceptable practices (including EPT) (Explanation) |
|
| VI. Prescription requirements (Explanation) |
|
| VII. Assessment of EPT’s legal status with brief comments (Explanation) |
Statutory laws do not require a physician-patient relationship that would otherwise preclude EPT. The opinions of the Medical Commission and Medical Ass’n House of Delegates clearly favor the use of EPT, which is further supported by local health officers’ authority to incorporate standards of practice (e.g., CDC STD Treatment Guidelines) that may allow EPT for the treatment of particular diseases. |
| Status as of August 16, 2006 | |
Legend
supports the use of EPT
negatively affects the
use of EPT
EPT
is permissible
EPT
is potentially allowable
EPT is
prohibited
This area depicts a map of the United States with clickable regions. The regions are also listed in the table below.
Summary Totals


