Legal Status of EPT in Nevada
EPT
is permissible.
| I. Statutes/regs on health care providers’ authority to prescribe for STDs to a patient’s partner(s) w/out prior evaluation (Explanation) |
|
|---|---|
| II. Specific judicial decisions concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation) |
|
| III. Specific administrative opinions by the Attorney General or medical or pharmacy boards concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation) |
|
| IV. Legislative bills or prospective regulations concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation) |
|
| V. Laws that incorporate via reference guidelines as acceptable practices (including EPT) (Explanation) |
|
| VI. Prescription requirements (Explanation) |
|
| VII. Assessment of EPT’s legal status with brief comments (Explanation) |
Administrative regulations mandate adherence to the CDC STD Treatment Guidelines, as revised, for the treatment of chlamydia and gonorrhea. These regulations, plus the state health department’s use of CDC guidelines as standard of care, and lack of contrary statutory or regulatory provisions, suggest EPT is permissible. |
| Status as of March 16, 2009 | |
Legend
supports the use of EPT
negatively affects the
use of EPT
EPT
is permissible
EPT
is potentially allowable
EPT is
prohibited
This area depicts a map of the United States with clickable regions. The regions are also listed in the table below.
Summary Totals


