Legal Status of EPT in Guam

possible EPT is potentially allowable.

This is a table caption for compliance. Please ignore it.
I. Statutes/regs on health care providers’ authority to prescribe for STDs to a patient’s partner(s) w/out prior evaluation (Explanation)
II. Specific judicial decisions concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation)
III. Specific administrative opinions by the Attorney General or medical or pharmacy boards concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation)
IV. Laws that incorporate via reference guidelines as acceptable practices (including EPT) (Explanation)
V. Prescription requirements (Explanation) minus symbol “Prescription means an order given individually for the person for whom prescribed, either directly from a licensed practitioner of medicine, osteopathy, podiatry, dentistry or veterinary medicine, to the pharmacist or indirectly by means of written order for the compounding or dispensing of drugs bearing the name and address of the prescriber, his license classification, the name and address of patient, the name and quantity of the drug prescribed, directions for use and the date of issue…” 25 Guam R. & Regs. § 13101

plus sign “Dispense means to select, compound, mix, combine, measure, count, or otherwise prepare a drug or drugs for delivery to the patient, or to deliver a drug or drugs to the patient. […] (3) Patient means the individual for whom drugs are prescribed or to whom prescription drugs are administered…” 25 Guam R. & Regs. § 13110

 

 

VI. Assessment of EPT’s legal status with brief comments (Explanation) possible EPT is potentially allowable.
The definition of “patient” under Guam’s laws does not require a physician-patient relationship and therefore could be interpreted to include a sexual partner.  In consideration of potential legal barriers to prescribing and dispensing EPT medications, in the absence of explicit legal authorization of EPT, EPT is potentially allowable in Guam.
Status as of May 22, 2017
Legend

plus sign supports the use of EPT

minus symbol negatively affects the use of EPT

permissible EPT is permissible

potentially allowable EPT is potentially allowable

prohibited EPT is prohibited

This is a table caption for compliance. Ignore it please.
permissible EPT is permissible in 46 states: potentially allowable EPT is potentially allowable in 4 states: prohibited EPT is prohibited in 0 states:
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
EPT is permissible in the District of Columbia.
EPT is permissible in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Alabama
Kansas
Oklahoma
South Dakota
EPT is potentially allowable in Puerto Rico and Guam.

 

Summary Totals

The information presented here is not legal advice, nor is it a comprehensive analysis of all the legal provisions that could implicate the legality of EPT in a given jurisdiction.  The data and assessment are intended to be used as a tool to assist state and local health departments as they determine locally appropriate ways to control STDs.

For comments, feedback and updates, please contact CDC-INFO: https://www.cdc.gov/cdc-info/.