Legal Status of EPT in Montana

permissible EPT is permissible.

This is a table caption for compliance. Ignore it please.
I. Statutes/regs on health care providers’ authority to prescribe for STDs to a patient’s partner(s) w/out prior evaluation (Explanation)
II. Specific judicial decisions concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation)
III. Specific administrative opinions by the Attorney General or medical or pharmacy boards concerning EPT (or like practices) (Explanation)
IV. Laws that incorporate via reference guidelines as acceptable practices (including EPT) (Explanation) plus sign Public health department regulations incorporate by reference CDC’s 2021 STI Treatment Guidelines for chlamydia (Mont.Admin.R. 37.114.515) and gonorrhea (Mont.Admin.R. 37.114.530).
plus signPublic health department regulations incorporate by reference the American Public Health Association’s Control of Communicable Diseases Manual (20th Edition, 2015). Mont.Admin.R. 37.114.501.
plus sign“(1) The department adopts and incorporates by reference the following publications: […] (a) The “Control of Communicable Diseases Manual, An Official Report of the American Public Health Association”, 21st edition, 2022, which lists and specifies control measures for communicable diseases. […](c) The “Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021,” published by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the July 23, 2021, Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, volume 70, hereafter referred to as “Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021,” and specify the most currently accepted effective treatments for sexually transmitted infections.” Mont.Admin.R. 37.114.105
V. Prescription requirements (Explanation) minus symbol Prescription must bear patient’s name and address. Mont. Code Ann. § 37-7-101(43).
VI. Assessment of EPT’s legal status with brief comments (Explanation) permissible EPT is permissible.Administrative regulations incorporate by reference the 2015 CDC STD Treatment Guidelines and the 2015 American Public Health Association’s Control of Communicable Diseases Manual.  These regulations, plus the lack of contrary statutory or regulatory provisions, suggest that EPT is permissible.
Status as of June 7, 2013
Legend

plus sign supports the use of EPT

minus symbol negatively affects the use of EPT

permissible EPT is permissible

potentially allowable EPT is potentially allowable

prohibited EPT is prohibited

This is a table caption for compliance. Ignore it please.
permissible EPT is permissible in 46 states: potentially allowable EPT is potentially allowable in 4 states: prohibited EPT is prohibited in 0 states:
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Carolina
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin
Wyoming
EPT is permissible in the District of Columbia.
EPT is permissible in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands.
Alabama
Kansas
Oklahoma
South Dakota
EPT is potentially allowable in Puerto Rico and Guam.

 

Summary Totals

The information presented here is not legal advice, nor is it a comprehensive analysis of all the legal provisions that could implicate the legality of EPT in a given jurisdiction.  The data and assessment are intended to be used as a tool to assist state and local health departments as they determine locally appropriate ways to control STDs.

For comments, feedback and updates, please contact CDC-INFO: https://www.cdc.gov/cdc-info/.