Chapter 5: Human Papillomavirus
Manual for the Surveillance of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases
Authors: Julia Gargano, PhD; Elissa Meites, MD, MPH; Meg Watson, MPH; Elizabeth Unger, MD, PhD; Lauri Markowitz, MD
Genital human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States.[1,2] An estimated 14 million persons newly infected every year, resulting in approximately $1.7 billion (estimates range from $800 million to $2.9 billion) in direct medical costs. Although the vast majority of HPV infections cause no symptoms and are self-limited, persistent HPV infection can cause cervical cancer in women as well as other anogenital cancers, oropharyngeal cancer, and genital warts in men and women.
More than 200 HPV types have been identified, including approximately 40 that preferentially infect the genital mucosa.[4–6] Genital HPV types are categorized according to their epidemiologic association with cancer. High-risk types (e.g., types 16 and 18) can cause low-grade cervical cell abnormalities, high-grade cervical cell abnormalities that are precursors to cancer, and cancers.[7–9] Nearly all cervical cancers are attributable to high-risk HPV types, and approximately 70% of cervical cancer cases worldwide are caused by types 16 and 18. HPV 16 infection is also responsible for most cases of other anogenital cancers, such as cancers of the vulva, vagina, penis, and anus, as well as cancers arising in some oropharynx sub-sites. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), ten additional HPV types (31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, and 59) have sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in humans based on their association with cervical cancer, and several types are classified as probably or possibly carcinogenic. Other HPV types, including types 6 and 11, can cause genital warts, benign or low-grade cervical cell changes, and recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP).
Among the cancer-related outcomes of HPV infection, invasive cervical cancer has been considered the most important worldwide, with about 570,000 new cases and over 300,000 attributable deaths in 2018. Though the vast majority of women with high-risk HPV infection do not develop cancer, persistent infection with high-risk HPV types is widely recognized as the primary causative factor for development of cervical cancer.[14,17,18]
Most HPV infections are transient and asymptomatic. More than 90% of new HPV infections, including those caused by high-risk HPV types, clear or become undetectable within 2 years, and clearance usually occurs in the first 6 months after infection.[14,15,17] Persistent infection with high-risk HPV is the most important risk factor for HPV-related diseases including cancer precursors and invasive cervical cancer.[14,17,18]
Many aspects of the natural history of HPV are poorly understood, including the role and duration of naturally acquired immunity after HPV infection. The risk for persistence and progression to cancer precursor lesions varies by HPV type as well as host factors. HPV 16 is more likely to persist and progress to cancer than other high-risk HPV types.[19-21] The usual time between initial HPV infection and development of cervical cancer is decades, but more rapid progression has occurred. The median age at diagnosis for cervical cancer in the United States is 49 years.[22-24]
In the United States, increased use of Papanicolaou (Pap) screening and treatment of precancers before they progress to cancer during the past decades has reduced the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancers.[25–27] Since 1975, the incidence of cervical cancer has decreased 57% and mortality rates have decreased approximately 60%. In 2012‒2016, invasive cervical cancer incidence in the United States was 7.2 per 100,000 women, with over 12,000 new cases reported annually.
This number does not include incidence of cervical precancers, for which surveillance data are not collected nationally. However, abnormal lesions and precancers related to HPV are common, with estimates of nearly 200,000 women diagnosed per year. Treatment for cervical precancers may affect pregnancy outcomes and thus is an important aspect of preventable disease burden.[30,31]
In the United States, in samples collected from several cancer registries prior to vaccine implementation, HPV was detected in about 90% of cervical cancers. (See Appendix A.) From the same study, HPV was detected in varying proportions of HPV-associated cancers occurring at non-cervical sites. Those with the largest proportion attributable to HPV were anal cancers (about 90%), followed by vaginal cancers (about 75%), oropharyngeal cancers (about 70%), vulvar cancers (about 70%), and penile cancers (about 60%). Among HPV-attributable cancers, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (SCC) were the most common; from 2012–2016, there were an estimated 9,600 among males and 2,000 among females annually.[22,33] Rates of oropharyngeal SCC were higher among males (8.5%) than females (1.7%). Rates of anal SCC were higher among females (2.3%) than males (1.3%).[23,24]
Anogenital warts typically develop approximately 2–3 months after HPV infection (almost all caused by types 6 or 11); however, not all persons infected with HPV types 6 and 11 develop genital warts.[34,35] Anogenital warts should be assessed by a clinician and can be treated, although many warts (20–30%) regress spontaneously. Recurrence of anogenital warts within 3 months is common (approximately 30%), whether clearance occurs spontaneously or following treatment.
Non–high-risk HPV types (primarily types 6 or 11) can also cause RRP, a rare disease that is characterized by recurrent warts or papillomas in the upper respiratory tract. RRP is usually diagnosed by a specialist based upon clinical and pathologic evaluation. RRP is divided into juvenile onset (JORRP) and adult onset (AORRP) forms based on age at symptom onset. JORRP is believed to result from vertical transmission of HPV from a mother to her baby at the time of delivery; the age of diagnosis is usually under 5 years of age. A multicenter registry including patients with JORRP from 22 US clinical centers demonstrated that the clinical course of JORRP is highly variable and associated with extensive morbidity, requiring a median of 4.3 annual surgeries to remove papillomas, preserve vocal quality, and maintain an open airway.
No treatment is required for asymptomatic HPV infections; instead, treatment is directed at the HPV-associated conditions. Current treatment options for intraepithelial neoplasias (precancerous lesions), cancers, and anogenital warts vary by the severity of disease and the anatomical location as described below. Routine screening for early detection of cervical cancer and precancerous lesions is recommended. Screening is not recommended for other HPV-associated cancers, although some specialized clinics conduct anoscopy to identify precancerous anal lesions in men who have sex with men.
Anogenital warts are usually diagnosed by visual inspection, although biopsy may be helpful in some cases. The primary objective of treatment is removal of the wart and amelioration of symptoms, if present. The appearance of warts also can result in substantial psychosocial distress, and removal can relieve cosmetic concerns. In most patients, treatment results in resolution of the wart(s). Untreated, anogenital warts can resolve spontaneously, remain unchanged, or increase in size or number. Because warts might spontaneously resolve, an acceptable approach for some persons is to forego treatment and monitor for spontaneous resolution within 1 year. Available therapies for anogenital warts might reduce, but probably do not eradicate, HPV infectivity. Whether the reduction in HPV viral DNA resulting from treatment reduces future transmission remains unknown. Detailed treatment guidelines have been published. Treatment of anogenital warts may be guided by considerations such as wart size, number, and anatomic site; patient preference; cost of treatment; convenience; adverse effects; and clinician experience.
Recommended treatment regimens for external anogenital warts can be classified as either patient-applied or provider-administered. Patient-applied therapies for warts include imiquimod 3.75% or 5% cream; podofilox 0.5% solution or gel; and sinecatechins 15% ointment. Provider-administered therapies include cryotherapy with liquid nitrogen or cryoprobe; surgical removal either by tangential scissor excision, tangential shave excision, curettage, laser, or electrosurgery; or application of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) or bichloroacetic acid (BCA) 80%–90% solution.  No definitive evidence suggests that any specific recommended treatment is superior to another, and no single treatment is ideal for all patients or all warts.
Persistent HPV infection can result in precancerous cervical lesions as well as invasive cervical cancer. With regular cervical cancer screening and appropriate follow-up, most cervical cancer precursors can be identified and treated in time to prevent progression to invasive disease. Precancerous cervical lesions and invasive cancers are diagnosed based on the histology of tissues obtained with biopsy or excision, and these specimens guide further treatment decisions.
Recommendations for cervical cancer screening in the United States are based on systematic reviews of evidence. Since harmonization in 2012, these have been largely consistent across the major medical organizations, including the American Cancer Society (ACS), American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF).[40–43] Subsequent guidance on primary HPV screening was issued by various organizations.[26,40,44] Routine cervical screening should be performed starting at 21 years of age and continue through 65 years of age. Available screening tests include conventional and liquid-based cytologic tests (i.e. Pap tests) and testing for high-risk HPV.
Pap testing is recommended every 3 years from 21–29 years of age. From 30–65 years of age, women have 3 options: a Pap test every 3 years, a Pap test plus HPV test (co-test) every 5 years, or an HPV test alone every 5 years. Co-testing can be done by either collecting 1 swab for the Pap test and another for the HPV test or by using the remaining liquid cytology material for the HPV test. The longer screening intervals for screening that incorporates HPV testing are because of the high negative predictive value of HPV tests. Cervical screening recommendations do not currently differ for unvaccinated women and those who have received HPV vaccination. ACS, ACOG, and USPSTF concur that no Pap testing is recommended before 21 years of age, and that women with a history of negative tests can cease screening after 65 years of age.
For cytopathologic and high-risk–HPV testing, clinics should use Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-certified laboratories using acceptable terminology (Bethesda 2001 or Lower Anogenital Squamous Terminology [LAST] terminology).[36,45] Screening for non–high-risk HPV infection is not recommended by any clinical or medical organization.
Abnormal screening results require further evaluation with colposcopic examination of the cervix (i.e., under magnification). During colposcopy, cervical biopsies may be taken for histologic examination to diagnose the presence and severity of lesions.
The suggested nomenclature for precancerous squamous lesions in the anogenital tract has shifted from intraepithelial neoplasia (IN terminology, graded 1, 2, or 3) to intraepithelial lesions (graded as low or high grade, per LAST). In LAST, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) include those formerly called cervical intraepithelial neoplasia CIN 3 and those called CIN 2 that have p16, an immunohistochemical marker of disease. Precancerous cervical lesions include HSIL and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS).
For cervical biopsy results of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL, also called CIN1), the preferred management may be to follow-up with repeat cytology to detect persistence or progression of the lesion. For HSIL or AIS, there are several treatment options including removal of the area of abnormality (via laser, loop electrosurgical excisional procedure [LEEP], or cold knife conization) or destruction of the area of abnormality (via cryotherapy or laser vaporization).[46,47] Each approach has its indications, advantages, and disadvantages, but, importantly, cure rates are comparable. Since 2012, observation has been recommended over treatment for HSIL in young women 21 through 24 years of age or in pregnant women, to avoid reproductive harms. Current management guidelines are based on individual risk assessment.
Treatment of cervical and other HPV-associated cancers
For invasive cervical and other HPV-associated cancers, several treatment options are available including surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy, alone or in combination depending on stage of disease. For cervical cancer, depending on the stage of disease at diagnosis, a woman may have the option to preserve her fertility or keep her ovaries. The survival rate 5 years after diagnosis of cervical cancer varies depending upon the stage of cervical cancer, ranging from 93% among those diagnosed at the earliest invasive state to only about 15% of those diagnosed at the latest stages.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) conducts HPV testing only for certain special studies and surveillance programs. Jurisdictions should not send specimens to CDC except as part of an existing project or study.
HPV cannot be detected through culture methods.
HPV infection of epithelial cells is associated with characteristic morphologic changes, and the presence of HPV may be suggested on the basis of pathologic findings. However, definitive detection of HPV requires molecular testing.
HPV testing can be used in cervical cancer screening (see Cervical Precancer section).[40,41] Only clinically validated tests, i.e., those approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should be used. Currently approved tests detect 14 high-risk types (HPV 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 39, 45, 51, 52, 56, 58, 59, 66, and 68) and report results for detection of any of these types. Some tests also provide separate results for HPV 16 or 18. Clinical tests use a variety of technical approaches, including signal and target amplifications, and have been validated against clinical outcomes, i.e., HSIL/AIS or higher-grade lesions. None of the HPV tests are approved for use in men, adolescents, or detection of infection in partners.
For epidemiologic and research questions using detection of HPV DNA as an endpoint, type-specific HPV research tests yield important information. There are many different formats, and results are dependent on the nature of the assay and the type of sample. The most common approach is to use a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay that amplifies all mucosal HPV types (consensus PCR) with type(s) being determined by subsequent hybridization and/or sequencing of the products. Research tests have not been validated for disease detection and should not be used clinically: their high analytic sensitivity detects low levels of HPV that are not predictive of disease requiring treatment.
Research tests such as serologic testing for HPV antibodies may be useful to monitor population exposure to HPV. As HPV infection is confined to the epithelium and infected cells are shed before cell death, natural HPV infection results in minimal host immune response and not all those infected have detectable antibodies. Serologic assays are currently available only in research settings.
For specific information about the use of human papillomavirus vaccines, refer to The Pink Book, which provides general recommendations, including vaccine use and scheduling, immunization strategies for providers, vaccine content, adverse events and reactions, vaccine storage and handling, and contraindications and precautions.
HPV infections are not nationally notifiable (see section on reporting, below). This is because (1) most sexually active individuals will acquire at least 1 type of HPV infection at some point in their lives and infections usually clear or become undetectable, and (2) most infections will not have any associated clinical disease. However, special studies to monitor HPV infection and HPV-associated diseases can help determine the impact of HPV vaccines. Existing and new systems are in place to monitor coverage and impact of HPV vaccine on short-, medium-, and long-term HPV-related outcomes in the United States (see Enhanced Surveillance section).
After the quadrivalent HPV vaccine was licensed in 2006, Healthy People 2020 stated an objective of 80% coverage with 3 doses of HPV vaccine for females by age 13 to 15 years. It also stated objectives to “Reduce the death rate from cancer of the uterine cervix below a target of 2.2 deaths/100,000 females (from a baseline of 2.4 per 100,000 in 2007)” and “Reduce invasive uterine cancer to 7.2 new cases per 100,000 females.” There is also a stated goal to “increase the proportion of women who receive a cervical cancer screening based on the most recent guidelines” with a target of 90% of women 21 to 65 years of age receiving screening (from a baseline of 84.5% in 2008). There are currently no stated goals for reduction of anogenital warts, RRP, or non-cervical HPV-associated cancers.
Another Healthy People 2020 objective addresses surveillance to “increase the number of central, population-based registries from the 50 States and the District of Columbia which captures case information on at least 95 percent of the expected number of reportable cancers.”
HPV infections and most HPV-associated conditions are not nationally notifiable. However, invasive cancers and in situ cancers (including cancers and precancers caused by HPV) are reportable to central cancer registries, with the exception of in situ cervical cancer and any intraepithelial neoplasia. The explanations provided below are intended to describe classification of HPV-associated endpoints where surveillance is possible.
No national case-reporting system for HPV infections exists. Routine testing for HPV infection is not recommended; screening for high-risk types is clinically indicated in specific situations. For information on clinical indications for high-risk HPV testing, see Section III, Screening and Treatment. For information on laboratory tests that can be used to detect HPV infections, see Section IV, Laboratory Testing.
Abnormal Pap tests and precancerous anogenital lesions
Pap tests assess cells collected by scraping or brushing the surface of the cervix (exfoliative cytology). Abnormal Pap test categories are listed by increasing grade of severity for squamous lesions: atypical squamous cells (ASC)-US; ASC cannot rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H); low-grade intraepithelial lesions (LSIL); and high-grade intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). Categories for glandular lesions include atypical glandular cells (AGC), atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGUS), and adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS). An abnormal cervical cancer screening test (Pap test and/or clinical HPV test) should prompt follow-up colposcopy and biopsy as indicated. Histologic evaluation of the biopsy determines clinical management. Terminology introduced in 2012 for precancerous cervical and other anogenital histologic lesions (vulvar, vaginal, anal) also uses HSIL terminology instead of intraepithelial neoplasia (IN Grade 2 or Grade 3).
Anogenital and oropharyngeal cancers
The primary site and pathologic diagnosis of the cancers are coded using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3).
A diagnosis of anogenital warts is made based on visual inspection of the lesion(s). Although anogenital warts are not nationally notifiable at this time, a 1996 case definition was published based on a clinical description and laboratory criteria.
Recurrent respiratory papillomatosis
A diagnosis of RRP is made based on the presence of wart-like lesions in any upper aerodigestive tract site, and histopathology demonstrating papillomas.
Case reporting within a jurisdiction
In the United States, the impact from cervical disease and other HPV-related cancers is measured by population-based cancer registries participating in the CDC’s National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR) and/or the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) program. Data are collected and analyzed at the state (central cancer registries) as well national (NPCR/SEER) levels. Rates of HPV-associated cancers vary geographically; up-to-date incidence and mortality statistics on HPV-associated cancers can be visualized through a web-based tool.
Case notification to CDC
HPV infection and other HPV-associated clinical conditions are not nationally reportable or required by CDC. However, some states or jurisdictions have made certain HPV-associated conditions reportable. Contact your state or jurisdiction health department for reporting requirements in your area.
The primary goal of HPV vaccination is to prevent cervical cancers, other HPV-associated cancers, and genital warts associated with vaccine-targeted HPV infections. The primary purpose of surveillance for HPV infections and associated conditions is to monitor potential impacts of the vaccination program. Such surveillance poses many challenges: infection with HPV is relatively common, a high proportion of infections are asymptomatic and resolve spontaneously, and some associated disease may not develop until many years after initial infection.
Surveillance data on HPV-associated cancers, including cervical cancer, are collected in 2 population-based central cancer registries—NPCR and SEER—which together collect data on cancers diagnosed in 100% of the US population. Data from the registries have been used to assess the pre-vaccine burden of HPV-associated cancers and will be the basis for monitoring relevant cancers post-vaccine introduction. However, the impact of vaccine on preventing invasive cancers is not expected until several decades after widespread adoption of the vaccine.
Early measures of vaccine impact include outcomes such as incidence of HPV infections, anogenital warts, and cervical cancer precursors. A variety of activities have been established to monitor these endpoints in the United States as described below.
Efforts to monitor HPV vaccine impact on high-grade HPV-associated cervical lesions are on-going. A geographically varied 5-site sentinel population cervical precancer monitoring program has measured the incidence of HPV type-specific CIN grades 2 and 3 (now designated HSIL) and AIS since 2008 and has demonstrated vaccine effectiveness and impact.[54–58] A statewide project in New Mexico has monitored the incidence of cases of CIN1, CIN2, and CIN3 since 2007; this system, which also conducts typing on lesions, and maintains a Pap registry to monitor changes in screening practices, has documented declines in precancer in screened women.[59,60] Another study collects surveillance data on high-grade cervical cancer precursors (CIN3) from 4 central cancer registries (3 entire states and 1 large metropolitan area). Finally, a pilot study was conducted in 5 cancer registries in areas with a high burden of cervical cancer to evaluate baseline type-specific HPV prevalence in cervical and other relevant cancers.
The National Health and Examination Survey (NHANES) is used to monitor the impact of vaccination on HPV prevalence; type-specific HPV prevalence is being monitored in genital specimens in United States females and males; monitoring was conducted in oral specimens in 2009–2016.[62–70] HPV prevalence has also been monitored in women undergoing cervical cancer screening at selected managed care organizations[65–68] and among men who have sex with men through clinic-based studies. Additional ongoing efforts include analysis of data from administrative claims to monitor HPV-associated conditions and determine the impact of HPV vaccine on HPV-related conditions, including anogenital warts and cervical lesions.[70, 71] A project has also been established to monitor trends in JORRP.
Although CDC does not recommend collection of routine surveillance data on HPV-associated conditions other than cancer, such data may be useful in sentinel projects within specific states or jurisdictions with sufficient resources to collect data and where standardized protocols are used. Within these settings, making conditions reportable, such as CIN2/3 (HSIL) and AIS, has been initiated in some jurisdictions and has facilitated complete case ascertainment.
Table A1. Average annual number and rate of HPV–associated cancers and estimated percentage and annual number of cancers attributable to HPV, by HPV type, cancer type, and sex — United States,* 2012–2016
|Cancer type||Reported HPV-associated cancers†||Estimated no.§ (%) of cancers attributable to HPV types¶|
|Total no.**||Rate††||9vHPV-targeted||Other HPV||HPV-negative|
|Cervix||12,015||7.2||9,700 (81)||1,200 (10)||1,100 (9)|
|Vagina||862||0.4||600 (73)||0 (2)||300 (25)|
|Vulva||4,009||2.1||2,500 (63)||300 (6)||1,200 (31)|
|Penis||1,303||0.8||700 (57)||100 (6)||500 (37)|
|Anus||6,810||1.8||6,000 (88)||200 (3)||600 (9)|
|female||4,539||2.3||4,100 (90)||100 (2)||300 (8)|
|male||2,270||1.3||1,900 (83)||100 (6)||300 (11)|
|Oropharynx||19,000||4.9||12,600 (66)||900 (5)||5,500 (29)|
|female||3,460||1.7||2,100 (60)||100 (3)||1,300 (37)|
|male||15,540||8.5||10,500 (68)||800 (5)||4,200 (28)|
|TOTAL||43,999||12.2||32,100 (73)||2,700 (6)||9,200 (21)|
|female||24,886||13.7||19,000 (76)||1,700 (7)||4,200 (17)|
|male||19,113||10.6||13,100 (69)||1,000 (5)||5,000 (26)|
* Compiled from population-based cancer registries that participate in the CDC National Program of Cancer Registries, and/or the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program and meet the criteria for high data quality for all years during 2012–2016, covering 100% of the US population.
† HPV-associated cancers were defined as invasive cancers at anatomic sites with cell types in which HPV DNA frequently is found. All cancers were histologically confirmed. Cervical cancers (ICD-O-3 site codes C53.0–C53.9) are limited to carcinomas (ICD-O-3 histology codes 8010–8671, 8940–8941). Vaginal (ICD-O-3 site code C52.9), vulvar (ICD-O-3 site codes C51.0–C51.9), penile (ICD-O-3 site codes C60.0–60.9), anal (ICD-O-3 site codes C20.9, C21.0–C21.9) and oropharyngeal (ICD-O-3 site codes C01.9, C02.4, C02.8, C05.1, C05.2, C09.0, C09.1, C09.8, C09.9, C10.0, C10.1, C10.2, C10.3, C10.4, C10.8, C10.9, C14.0, C14.2, and C14.8) cancer sites are limited to squamous cell carcinomas (ICD-O-3 histology codes 8050–8084, 8120–8131).
§ HPV-attributable cancers are cancers that are probably caused by HPV (https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/107/6/djv086/872092external icon). Estimates for attributable fraction were based on studies that used population-based data from cancer tissue studies to estimate the percentage of those cancers probably caused by HPV. The estimated number of cancers attributable to HPV was calculated by multiplying the number of reported HPV-associated cancer cases by the percentage of each cancer type attributable to HPV. The total of HPV-attributable cancers is the sum of cancers attributable to types included in the 9vHPV and cancers attributable to other HPV types (e.g. 32,100 + 2,700 = 34,800). Estimated counts were rounded to the nearest 100 (counts <100 are not displayed) and might not sum to total because of rounding.
¶ “9vHPV-targeted” types include oncogenic HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58. “Other HPV” includes other oncogenic HPV types. “HPV-negative” cancers are those that occur at anatomic sites in which HPV-associated cancers are often found, but HPV DNA was not detected.
** The total reported count is the annual count averaged over the 5-year period and might not sum to total because of rounding.
†† Rates are per 100,000 persons; age-adjusted to the 2000 US standard population.
- Markowitz LE, Dunne EF, Saraiya M, et al. Human papillomavirus vaccination: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 2014;63(RR-05):1–30.
- Satterwhite CL, Torrone E, Meites E, et al. Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013;40(3):187–93. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318286bb53.
- Owusu-Edusei K Jr, Chesson HW, Gift TL, et al. The estimated direct medical cost of selected sexually transmitted infections in the United States, 2008. Sex Transm Dis 2013;40(3):197–201. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318285c6d2.
- de Villiers EM. Cross-roads in the classification of papillomaviruses. Virology 2013;445(1-2):2–10. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2013.04.023.
- Doorbar J, Quint W, Banks L, et al. The biology and life-cycle of human papillomaviruses. Vaccine 2012;30(Suppl 5):F55–70. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.06.083.
- International Human Papillomavirus Reference Center. Reference clones, Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet [updated 2019 May 07; cited 2019 September 27].
- IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans. Biological agents. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risk to Humans, No.100B. Lyon: IARC; 2012.
- Combes JD, Guan P, Franceschi S, Clifford GM. Judging the carcinogenicity of rare human papillomavirus types. Int J Cancer 2015;136(3):740–2. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29019.
- Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, et al. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348(6):518–27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021641.
- Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189(1):12–9. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F.
- de Sanjose S, Quint WG, Alemany L, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype attribution in invasive cervical cancer: a retrospective cross-sectional worldwide study. Lancet Oncol 2010;11(11):1048–56. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70230-8.
- Lacey CJ, Lowndes CM, Shah KV. Chapter 4: Burden and management of non-cancerous HPV-related conditions: HPV-6/11 disease. Vaccine 2006;24(Suppl 3):S3/35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.06.015.
- International Agency for Research on Cancer; World Health Organization [2 pages]. Cervix uteri. Geneva: World Health Organization; March 2019 [cited 2019 October 9].
- Franco EL, Villa LL, Sobrinho JP, et al. Epidemiology of acquisition and clearance of cervical human papillomavirus infection in women from a high-risk area for cervical cancer. J Infect Dis 1999;180(5):1415–23. doi: 10.1086/315086.
- Ho GY, Bierman R, Beardsley L, Chang CJ, Burk RD. Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women. N Engl J Med 1998;338(7):423–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199802123380703.
- Molano M, Van den Brule A, Plummer M, et al. Determinants of clearance of human papillomavirus infections in Colombian women with normal cytology: a population-based, 5-year follow-up study. Am J Epidemiol 2003;158(5):486–94. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg171.
- Hildesheim A, Schiffman MH, Gravitt PE, et al. Persistence of type-specific human papillomavirus infection among cytologically normal women. J Infect Dis 1994;169(2):235–40. doi: 10.1093/infdis/169.2.235.
- Schiffman M, Kjaer SK. Chapter 2: Natural history of anogenital human papillomavirus infection and neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2003;13:14–9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a003476.
- Monsonego J, Cox JT, Behrens C, et al. Prevalence of high-risk human papilloma virus genotypes and associated risk of cervical precancerous lesions in a large U.S. screening population: data from the ATHENA trial. Gynecol Oncol 2015;137(1):47–54. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.01.551.
- Moscicki AB, Schiffman M, Kjaer S, Villa LL. Chapter 5: Updating the natural history of HPV and anogenital cancer. Vaccine 2006;24(Suppl 3):42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.06.018.
- Wheeler CM, Skinner SR, Del Rosario-Raymundo MR, et al. Efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of the human papillomavirus 16/18 AS04-adjuvanted vaccine in women older than 25 years: 7-year follow-up of the phase 3, double-blind, randomised controlled VIVIANE study. Lancet Infect Dis 2016;16(10):1154–68. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(16)30120-7.
- CDC. HPV and cancer: HPV-associated cancer diagnosis by age. Atlanta, GA: CDC [updated 2019 August 2; cited 2019 September 27].
- Senkomago V, Thomas HS, Mix CC, et al. Human papillomavirus–attributable cancers — United States, 2012–2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68(33):724–8.
- Viens LJ, Henley SJ, Watson M, et al. Human papillomavirus-associated cancers—United States, 2008–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65(26):661–6. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6526a1.
- Benard VB, Thomas CC, King J, et al. Vital Signs: cervical cancer incidence, mortality, and screening – United States, 2007—2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014; 63(44):1004–9.
- Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, et al., Screening for cervical cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2018;320(7):674–86. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.17772.
- Lippman SM, Hawk ET. Cancer prevention: from 1727 to milestones of the past 100 years. Cancer Res 2009;69(13):5269−84. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1750.
- Howlader N, Krapcho NA, Miller M, et al. (editors). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2016. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2018 [updated 2019 September 5; cited 2019 October 9].
- McClung NM, Gargano JW, Park IU, et al. Estimated number of cases of high-grade cervical lesions diagnosed among women — United States, 2008 and 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68(15):337–43.
- Bjorge T, Skare GB, Bjorge L, Trope A, Lonnberg S. Adverse pregnancy outcomes after treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Obstet Gynecol 2016;128(6):1265–73. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001777.
- Kyrgiou M, Mitra A, Paraskevaidis E. Fertility and early pregnancy outcomes following conservative treatment for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and early cervical cancer. JAMA Oncol 2016;2(11):1496–8. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1839.
- Saraiya M, Unger ER, Thompson TD, et al. US assessment of HPV types in cancers: implications for current and 9-valent HPV vaccines. J Natl Cancer Inst 2015;107(6):djv086. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djv086.
- CDC. HPV and cancer. Atlanta, GA:CDC; 2019 [cited 2019 September 18].
- Garland SM, Steben M, Sings HL, et al. Natural history of genital warts: analysis of the placebo arm of 2 randomized phase III trials of a quadrivalent human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) vaccine. J Infect Dis 2009;199(6):805–14. doi: 10.1086/597071.
- Winer RL, Kiviat NB, Hughes JP, et al. Development and duration of human papillomavirus lesions, after initial infection. J Infect Dis 2005;191(5):731–8. doi: 10.1086/427557.
- Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease C, Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep 2015;64(RR-3):1–137.
- Chuang TY, Perry HO, Kurland LT, Ilstrup DM. Condyloma acuminatum in Rochester, Minn, 1950–1978. II. Anaplasias and unfavorable outcomes. Arch Dermatol 1984;120(4):476–83. doi: 10.1001/archderm.1984.01650400058013.
- Reeves WC, Ruparelia SS, Swanson KI, Derkay CS, Marcus A, Unger ER. National registry for juvenile-onset recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2003;129(9):976–82. doi:10.1001/archotol.129.9.976.
- Workowski KA. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. Clin Infect Dis 2015;61(Suppl 8):S759–62. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ771.
- CDC. What should I know about screening? Atlanta, GA: CDC; 2021 [cited 2021 September 20].
- Committee on Practice Bulletins—Gynecology. ACOG Practice Bulletin Number 131: Screening for cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120(5):1222–38. doi: 10.1097/aog.0b013e318277c92a.
- Moyer VA, U.S. Preventative Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 2012;156(12):880–91. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-156-12-201206190-00424.
- Saslow D, Solomon D, Lawson HW, et al. American Cancer Society, American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology, and American Society for Clinical Pathology screening guidelines for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62(3):147–72. doi: 10.3322/caac.21139.
- Huh WK, Ault KA, Chelmow D, et al. Use of primary high-risk human papillomavirus testing for cervical cancer screening: interim clinical guidance. Gynecol Oncol 2015;136(2):178–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.12.022.
- Darragh TM, Colgan TJ, Cox JT, et al. The lower anogenital squamous terminology standardization project for HPV-associated lesions: background and consensus recommendations from the College of American Pathologists and the American Society for Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2012;16:205–42. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31825c31dd.
- Massad LS, Einstein MH, Huh WK, et al. 2012 updated consensus guidelines for the management of abnormal cervical cancer screening tests and cancer precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2013;17(5 Suppl 1):S1–S27. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318287d329.
- Wright TC Jr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, et al. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or adenocarcinoma in situ. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2007;11(4):223–39. doi: 10.1097/LGT.0b013e318159408b
- Perkins RB, Guido RS, Castle PE, et al. 2019 ASCCP Risk-Based Management Consensus Guidelines for Abnormal Cervical Cancer Screening Tests and Cancer Precursors. J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2020;24(2):102–31.
- American Cancer Society. Survival rates for cervical cancer, by stage. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society [revised 2016 December 5; cited 2017 November 16].
- CDC. 2019 nationally notifiable conditions. Atlanta, GA: CDC [cited 2019 September 20].
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020: Immunization and infectious disease. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services[cited 9 October 2019].
- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy People 2020: Cancer. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services [cited 2017 May 11].
- CDC. Case definitions for infectious conditions under public health surveillance. MMWR Recomm Rep 1997;46(RR-10):1–55.
- Gargano JW, Park IU, Griffin MR, et al. Trends in high-grade cervical lesions and cervical cancer screening in five states — United States, 2008–2015. Clin Infect Dis 2019;68(8):1282–91. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy707.
- Hariri S, Bennett NM, Niccolai LM, et al. Reduction in HPV 16/18-associated high grade cervical lesions following HPV vaccine introduction in the United States—2008–2012. Vaccine 2015;33(13):1608–13. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.084.
- Hariri S, Johnson ML, Bennett NM, et al. Population-based trends in high-grade cervical lesions in the early human papillomavirus vaccine era in the United States. Cancer 2015;121(16):2775–81. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29266.
- Johnson ML, Powell SE, Park IU, et al. Effectiveness of 1, 2, and 3 human papillomavirus vaccine doses against HPV-16/18 positive high-grade cervical lesions. Am J Epidemiol 2019 (in press).
- McClung NM, Gargano JW, Bennett NM, et al. Trends in human papillomavirus vaccine types 16 and 18 in cervical precancers, 2008–2014. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019;28(3):602–9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-18-0885.
- Benard VB, Castle PE, Jenison SA, et al. Population-based incidence rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the human papillomavirus vaccine era. JAMA Oncol 2017; 3(6):833–7. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.3609.
- Joste NE, Ronnett BM, Hunt WC, et al. Human papillomavirus genotype-specific prevalence across the continuum of cervical neoplasia and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015;24(1):230–40. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0775.
- Watson M, Soman A, Flagg EW, et al. Surveillance of high-grade cervical cancer precursors (CIN III/AIS) in four population-based cancer registries, United States, 2009–2012. Prev Med 2017;103:60–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.07.027.
- Chaturvedi AK, Graubard BI, Broutian T, et al. Effect of prophylactic human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination on oral HPV infections among young adults in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2018;36(3):262–7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.0141.
- Gargano JW, Unger ER, Liu G, et al. Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus in males, United States, 2013–2014. J Infect Dis 2017;215(7):1070–9. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jix057.
- Gillison ML, Broutian T, Pickard RK, et al. Prevalence of oral HPV infection in the United States, 2009–2010. JAMA 2012;307(7):693–703. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.101.
- Hariri S, Unger ER, Sternberg M, et al. Prevalence of genital human papillomavirus among females in the United States, the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2003–2006. J Infect Dis 2011;204(4):566–73. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir341.
- Markowitz LE, Hariri S, Lin C, et al. Reduction in human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence among young women following HPV vaccine introduction in the United States, National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, 2003–2010. J Infect Dis 2013;208(3):385–93. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit192.
- McClung NM, Lewis RM, Gargano JW, Querec T, Unger ER, Markowitz LE. Declines in vaccine-type human papillomavirus prevalence in females across racial/ethnic groups: data from a national survey. J Adolesc Health 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.07.003.
- Markowitz LE, Naleway AL, Lewis RM, et al. Declines in HPV vaccine type prevalence in women screened for cervical cancer in the United States: evidence of direct and herd effects of vaccination. Vaccine 2019;37(29):3918–24. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.099.
- Meites E, Gorbach PM, Gratzer B, et al. Monitoring for human papillomavirus vaccine impact among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men—United States, 2012–2014. J Infect Dis 2016;214(5):689–96. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw232.
- Flagg EW, Schwartz R, Weinstock H. Prevalence of anogenital warts among participants in private health plans in the United States, 2003–2010: potential impact of human papillomavirus vaccination. Am J Public Health 2013;103(8):1428–35. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301182.
- Flagg EW, Torrone EA, Weinstock H. Ecological association of human papillomavirus vaccination with cervical dysplasia prevalence in the United States, 2007–2014. Am J Public Health 2016;106(12):2211–8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303472.