Progress Toward Hepatitis B Control — World Health Organization European Region, 2016–2019

Please note: This report has been corrected. An erratum has been published.

Nino Khetsuriani, MD, PhD1; Liudmila Mosina, MD2; Pierre Van Damme, MD, PhD3; Antons Mozalevskis, MD4; Siddhartha Datta, MD2; Rania A. Tohme, MD1 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

In 2019, 14 million persons in the World Health Organization European Region (EUR) were chronically infected with hepatitis B virus.

What is added by this report?

During 2016–2019, EUR made substantial progress towards hepatitis B control. Of 53 countries in EUR, 35, 19, and 17 countries met coverage targets for 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine, the birth dose, and for hepatitis B screening of pregnant women, respectively. Two countries (Italy and the Netherlands) have achieved hepatitis B control.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Improving hepatitis B vaccination coverage, screening of pregnant women, and conducting hepatitis B seroprevalence assessments can help EUR to accelerate progress and document achievement of hepatitis B control targets.

Article Metrics
Altmetric:
Citations:
Views:

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Related Materials

In 2019, an estimated 14 million persons in the World Health Organization (WHO) European Region* (EUR) were chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), and approximately 43,000 of these persons died from complications of chronic HBV infection (1). In 2016, the WHO Regional Office for Europe set hepatitis B control program targets for 2020, including 1) ≥90% coverage with 3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (HepB3), 2) ≥90% coverage with interventions to prevent mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HBV, and 3) ≤0.5% prevalence of HBV surface antigen (HBsAg)§ in age groups eligible for vaccination with hepatitis B vaccine (HepB) (24). This report describes the progress made toward hepatitis B control in EUR during 2016–2019. By December 2019, 50 (94%) of 53 countries in EUR provided routine vaccination with HepB to all infants or children aged 1–12 years (universal HepB), including 23 (43%) countries that offered hepatitis B birth dose (HepB-BD) to all newborns. In addition, 35 (73%) of the 48 countries with universal infant HepB vaccination reached ≥90% HepB3 coverage annually during 2017–2019, and 19 (83%) of the 23 countries with universal birth dose administration achieved ≥90% timely HepB-BD coverage annually during that period. Antenatal hepatitis B screening coverage was ≥90% in 17 (57%) of 30 countries that selectively provided HepB-BD to infants born to mothers with positive HBsAg test results. In January 2020, Italy and the Netherlands became the first counties in EUR to be validated to have achieved the regional hepatitis B control targets. Countries can accelerate progress toward hepatitis B control by improving coverage with HepB and interventions to prevent MTCT and documenting achievement of the HBsAg seroprevalence target through representative serosurveys or, in low-endemicity countries, antenatal screening.

Immunization Activities

As a major intervention to prevent perinatal and childhood hepatitis B infections, WHO recommends that all infants receive ≥3 doses of HepB, including a timely birth dose (5). Most countries in EUR introduced HepB vaccination >15 years ago (Table 1). Countries report information on immunization schedules and coverage annually to WHO and UNICEF using the WHO/UNICEF Joint Reporting Form. WHO and UNICEF review administrative coverage data and surveys to generate country-specific coverage estimates.**

In 2019, 48 (91%) of the 53 countries in EUR provided universal routine infant HepB vaccination, two†† (4%) (Hungary and Slovenia) provided universal routine HepB vaccination to children aged 5–12 years, and three countries (6%) (Denmark, Finland, and Iceland) implemented selective HepB vaccination, only immunizing those born to mothers with positive HBsAg test results.§§ Twenty-three (43%) countries provided HepB-BD to all newborns, and 30 (57%) provided HepB-BD selectively to children born to mothers with positive HBsAg test results. During 2016–2019, regional HepB3 coverage increased from 82% to 92%, partly because three more countries (Norway, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom)¶¶ introduced universal infant HepB vaccination during 2017–2018. Among the countries that provided universal infant HepB vaccination, those that reported ≥90% HepB3 coverage among infants increased from 37 (82%) of 45 countries during 2016–2017 to 41 (85%) of 48 countries in 2019. However, HepB3 coverage was <90% for ≥3 years during 2016–2019 in six countries.*** Of the 21 countries with universal HepB-BD that reported birth dose coverage to WHO,††† coverage with timely HepB-BD during 2016–2019 was ≥90% in start highlight19–20 (90%–95%) countriesend highlight.

Antenatal Screening and Postexposure Prophylaxis

The 30 countries that implement a selective HepB-BD policy aim to prevent MTCT of HBV infection through antenatal HBV screening combined with postexposure prophylaxis of infants born to mothers with positive HBsAg test results. Information on implementation of these interventions is not routinely reported to WHO. Based on the responses to a survey conducted by the WHO Regional Office for Europe in 2018§§§ and published reports, 29 (97%) of those 30 countries¶¶¶ conducted nationwide antenatal screening for HBsAg (Table 1). Antenatal screening coverage data were available for 20 (69%) of these countries, and 17 (85%) reported ≥90% coverage.**** Among infants born to HBV-infected mothers in these countries, immunization coverage data were available for HepB-BD in nine (31%) countries†††† and for HepB3 in five (17%)§§§§ countries. HepB-BD coverage exceeded 90% in all nine countries, and HepB3 coverage exceeded 90% in four of five countries.

HBsAg Seroprevalence

Because most chronic HBV infections are asymptomatic, particularly among young children, the impact of hepatitis B vaccination is assessed based on the HBsAg seroprevalence among children (6). However, in EUR, because of early regional introduction of HepB, the age group for serosurveys for validation purposes is defined as cohorts eligible for HepB vaccination. For EUR countries with low endemicity before vaccine introduction (prevaccine), where conducting large-scale hepatitis B serosurveys might not be justified, HBsAg seroprevalence of ≤0.5% among pregnant women is considered acceptable evidence that the seroprevalence target was achieved.

By December 2019, representative nationwide or regional serosurveys have demonstrated ≤0.5% HBsAg seroprevalence in at least one vaccinated or partially vaccinated age group in five countries and in a prevaccine cohort in one country (the Netherlands) (Table 2). Serosurveys initiated recently for validation purposes in several countries, in some cases with support from WHO and other international partners, have been put on hold because of the COVID-19 pandemic. HBsAg seroprevalence of ≤0.5% among pregnant women has been reported from nine (36%) of 25 countries with low endemicity, sometimes with higher prevalence among foreign-born women than among women who were not foreign-born (e.g., Denmark, Italy, and the Netherlands) (Table 2).

Validation

The Hepatitis B Regional Working Group of the European Technical Advisory Group of Experts was established in 2017 and developed the framework and criteria for validation of achievement of the regional hepatitis B control targets for countries in EUR (Table 3). The validation process was initiated in 2019. In 2019, the regional validation criteria for immunization coverage were met for HepB3 by 35 (73%) of 48 countries providing universal infant HepB vaccination and for timely HepB-BD by 19 (83%) of 23 countries implementing universal newborn vaccination, including 17 (32%) countries that met both criteria (Table 1). In January 2020, Italy and the Netherlands were validated to have achieved the regional hepatitis B control targets. The United Kingdom received conditional validation based on fully meeting the MTCT prevention and seroprevalence criteria (in antenatal screening), and by partially meeting immunization coverage criteria pending availability of 3 full years of data.¶¶¶¶ Croatia received conditional validation pending clarification of methods for assessing coverage with MTCT prevention interventions.

Discussion

During 2016–2019, EUR made substantial progress toward achieving hepatitis B control, resulting in validation of the first two countries (Italy and the Netherlands) and conditional validation of two other countries (Croatia and the United Kingdom). This progress is supported by a recent modeling study, which demonstrated 0.1% HBsAg seroprevalence among children aged 5 years in EUR (3). Among the 49 countries that have not yet initiated the validation process, 17 (74%) of 23 with a universal HepB-BD policy have met the HepB3 coverage and HepB-BD coverage criteria, and six (23%) of 26 countries with a selective birth dose policy met HepB3 coverage and antenatal screening coverage targets. Eight (16%) of these 49 countries met the ≤0.5% HBsAg seroprevalence target.

To accelerate validating achievement of the regional hepatitis B control target in EUR, some countries could consider submitting available documentation for validation, whereas others still need to generate the evidence required for validation. Although conducting nationally representative hepatitis B serosurveys might be challenging, and because the COVID-19 pandemic has further challenged their implementation, hepatitis B testing can be incorporated into other nationally representative serosurveys, including COVID-19 serosurveys, where feasible.

The historic differences in HBsAg prevalence and the diversity of HepB immunization strategies across EUR necessitated a differential approach to validation of hepatitis B control depending on national prevaccine endemicity and HepB vaccination policies. Although HepB3 immunization coverage is high in most countries, it remains consistently <90% in six countries, reflecting challenges in their immunization services. Countries can address these challenges by 1) providing sufficient support to national immunization programs to strengthen immunization systems, 2) monitoring public perception toward vaccinations and developing tailored strategies to create demand for vaccination among all population groups, and 3) strengthening immunization information systems to improve quality and availability of coverage data (68). The two countries in EUR with universal birth dose policy that currently do not report HepB-BD coverage (Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russia) will need to establish systems for monitoring and reporting birth dose coverage.

In countries that provide selective HepB-BD vaccination, establishing systems for continual monitoring of coverage with antenatal screening and HBsAg-positivity among pregnant women and of coverage with HepB-BD and HepB3 among exposed infants is needed to provide reliable data on seroprevalence and interventions to prevent MTCT of HBV for validation purposes. Available seroprevalence data showed a much higher prevalence of hepatitis B among foreign-born populations in several countries in EUR. Ensuring access to MTCT prevention measures for underserved populations, including immigrants, ethnic minorities, and other vulnerable groups, can help mitigate the impact of increased migration from high- and intermediate-endemicity areas on HBsAg prevalence in low-endemicity countries (9).

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, missing HepB-BD coverage data for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russia prevent determining whether these countries have met the HepB-BD coverage target. Second, timely HepB-BD coverage estimates might not be accurate for countries that do not monitor timeliness of HepB-BD administration. Finally, some HBsAg seroprevalence estimates were obtained >15 years ago and might not reflect the current prevalence in cohorts eligible for vaccination.

Despite progress made during 2016–2019, achieving the 2020 hepatitis B control goal in EUR will require programmatic improvements in underperforming countries. To accelerate the validation process, most countries will need to generate additional evidence of having achieved the regional targets. Some low- and middle-income countries will require continued external support to conduct serosurveys. Further, the COVID-19 pandemic has caused disruptions in immunization services and led to delays in implementation of serosurveys. Implementing the regional guidance on interventions to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on immunization programs can help countries maintain or improve HepB vaccination coverage and accelerate progress toward the regional goal (10).

Corresponding author: Nino Khetsuriani, nck7@cdc.gov.


1Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, CDC; 2Vaccine-Preventable Diseases and Immunization Programme, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium; 4HIV and Viral Hepatitis Unit, World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.


* EUR is one of six WHO regions and consists of the following 53 member states (total population, approximately 932 million): Albania, Andorra, Armenia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Moldova, Monaco, Montenegro, Netherlands, North Macedonia, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and Uzbekistan.

In EUR, interventions to prevent MTCT of HBV include either 1) administering a timely birth dose of HepB vaccine to all newborns (universal birth dose policy) or 2) conducting routine antenatal screening of pregnant women for hepatitis B and vaccinating infants born to HBV-infected mothers with HepB birth dose within 24 hours of birth (selective birth dose policy), either of which is followed by ≥2 additional vaccine doses according to the national immunization schedule. In addition, some countries provide antiviral treatment to pregnant women with positive HBsAg test results and administer hepatitis B immune globulin at birth to infants of infected mothers.

§ Before introduction of vaccination, the HBV endemicity in EUR, defined by HBsAg antigen seroprevalence, ranged widely from low (<2.0%) in 25 countries, to intermediate (2.0%–7.9%) in 25 countries, to high (≥8.0%) in three countries.

A timely HepB birth dose is defined as a dose administered within 24 hours of birth.

** https://immunizationdata.who.int/listing.html?topic = coverage&location = eurexternal icon

†† In Hungary, HepB is given at age 12 years, and in Slovenia, it is given at age 5–6 years.

§§ All countries are in northern Europe and have historically had very low HBV endemicity.

¶¶ Norway and the United Kingdom in 2017, and Switzerland in 2018.

*** Austria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Germany, Montenegro, San Marino, and Ukraine.

††† Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russia do not report HepB-BD coverage.

§§§ The survey was sent to the 50 member states of EUR that implement universal HepB vaccination and included questions on HepB vaccination policy, practices, and measures to prevent perinatal transmission of HBV. Survey questions were designed to account for differences in HepB-BD policy between the member states (universal versus selective). Forty-three (86%) countries, including 22 of 23 countries with universal HepB-BD policy and 21 of 30 countries with selective HepB-BD policy, responded to the survey.

¶¶¶ Montenegro reported not having nationwide antenatal screening in place.

**** Six countries (Czechia, Estonia, France, Greece, Ireland, and Luxembourg) also had ≥90% coverage with routine HepB3 among infants each year during 2017–2019 (i.e., met the validation criteria for immunization).

†††† Croatia, Czechia, Denmark, Italy, Malta, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom. Sources: the 2018 WHO Regional Office for Europe survey (Croatia, Czechia, Malta, Slovakia, and Switzerland); reports submitted to the WHO European Regional Hepatitis B Working Group (the Netherlands and the United Kingdom), https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X11016355?via%3Dihubexternal icon (Denmark); https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0163445310003518?via%3Dihubexternal icon (Italy).

§§§§ Czechia, the Netherlands, Slovakia, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom; coverage was <90% only for Switzerland. Sources: the 2018 WHO Regional Office for Europe survey; reports submitted to the WHO European Regional Hepatitis B Working Group (the Netherlands and the United Kingdom).

¶¶¶¶ At the time of review of the validation documents by the WHO European Regional Hepatitis B Working Group, 3 years had not yet passed since introduction of universal HepB vaccination in the United Kingdom in mid-2017.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Global progress report on HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmitted infections, 2021. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2021. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240027077external icon
  2. World Health Organization. Action plan for the health sector response to viral hepatitis in the WHO European Region, 2017. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2017. https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/357236/Hepatitis-9789289052870-eng.pdfpdf iconexternal icon
  3. Razavi-Shearer D, Gamkrelidze I, Nguyen MH, et al.; Polaris Observatory Collaborators. Global prevalence, treatment, and prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in 2016: a modelling study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018;3:383–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(18)30056-6external icon PMID:29599078external icon
  4. Goldstein ST, Zhou F, Hadler SC, Bell BP, Mast EE, Margolis HS. A mathematical model to estimate global hepatitis B disease burden and vaccination impact. Int J Epidemiol 2005;34:1329–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyi206external icon PMID:16249217external icon
  5. World Health Organization. Hepatitis B vaccines: WHO position paper—July 2017. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2017;92:369–92. PMID:28685564external icon
  6. World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on viral hepatitis, 2016–2021. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/246177/WHO-HIV-2016.06-eng.pdf;jsessionid=77F65C031D6D509A751418F18E50BC55?sequence=1external icon
  7. Gianfredi V, Moretti M, Lopalco PL. Countering vaccine hesitancy through immunization information systems, a narrative review. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019;15:2508–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645515.2019.1599675external icon PMID:30932725external icon
  8. Fournet N, Mollema L, Ruijs WL, et al. Under-vaccinated groups in Europe and their beliefs, attitudes and reasons for non-vaccination; two systematic reviews. BMC Public Health 2018;18:196. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5103-8external icon PMID:29378545external icon
  9. Thijssen M, Lemey P, Amini-Bavil-Olyaee S, et al. Mass migration to Europe: an opportunity for elimination of hepatitis B virus? Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;4:315–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30014-7external icon PMID:30860067external icon
  10. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on control of vaccine-preventable diseases: a health risk management approach focused on catch-up vaccination. Copenhagen, Denmark: World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe; 2020. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/334248/WHO-EURO-2020-1086-40832-55187-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=ypdf iconexternal icon
TABLE 1. Year of introduction of hepatitis B vaccine, hepatitis B vaccine routine vaccination and birth dose policies, vaccination schedule, coverage with a third dose of hepatitis B vaccine and a timely hepatitis B birth dose, and antenatal screening for hepatitis B virus infection — World Health Organization European Region, 2016–2019Return to your place in the text
Country (year of HepB introduction*,†) HepB vaccination policy* 2019 HepB schedule* HepB3 coverage,* % Timely HepB-BD coverage,* % Antenatal screening
Infant/Childhood At birth Year ≥90% each year, 2017–2019 Year ≥90% each year, 2017–2019 In place** Coverage, %††
2016 2017 2018 2019 2016 2017 2018 2019
Albania (1994) Universal Universal B, 2, 4, 6 mos 98 99 99 99 Yes 99 99 99 99 Yes
Andorra (1997) Universal Selective 2, 4, 12 mos 94 98 98 98 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes NR
Armenia (2000) Universal Universal B, 6, 12, 18 wks, 18 mos 94 94 92 92 Yes 98 97 97 96 Yes
Austria (1997) Universal Selective 2, 4, 10 mos 87 90 85 85 No NA NA NA NA NA Yes NR
Azerbaijan (2001) Universal Universal B, 2, 3, 4 mos 97 95 95 94 Yes 99 99 99 98 Yes
Belarus (1996) Universal Universal B, 2, 3, 4 mos 96 98 98 97 Yes 98 98 98 98 Yes
Belgium (1996) Universal Selective 8, 12, 16 wks, 15 mos 97 97 97 97 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes 80–85
Bosnia and Herzegovina (2001) Universal Universal B, 1, 6 mos 78 77 80 80 No NR NR NR NR NR
Bulgaria (1991) Universal Universal B, 1, 6 mos; B, 2, 3, 4 mos 91 92 85 85 No 96 97 96 96 Yes
Croatia (1999) Universal Selective 2, 4, 6, 18 mos 92 92 93 93 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes >90
Cyprus (1989) Universal Selective 2, 4, 8–12 mos 97 97 97 94 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes NR
Czechia (2001) Universal Selective 3, 5, 11 mos 96 94 96 97 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes 100
Denmark (2009)§§ Selective Selective NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Yes 99.9
Estonia (2003) Universal Selective 3, 4.5, 6 mos, 2 yrs 93 92 93 91 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes >90
Finland (1993)§§ Selective Selective NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Yes 97.8
France (1994) Universal Selective 2, 4, 11 mos 90 90 91 91 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes 92.4
Georgia (2001) Universal Universal B, 2, 3, 4 mos 92 91 93 94 Yes 94 94 97 94 Yes
Germany (1995) Universal Selective 2, 3, 4, 11–14 mos 87 87 87 87 No NA NA NA NA NA Yes >90
Greece (2000) Universal Selective 2, 4, 6–18 mos 96 96 96 96 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes 91.3
Hungary (1999)¶¶ Universal Selective 12 yrs NR NR NR NR NR NA NA NA NA NA Yes 90
Iceland (2011)§§ Selective Selective NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Yes 50
Ireland (2008) Universal Selective 2, 4, 6 mos 95 95 94 93 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes >95
Israel (1998) Universal Universal B, 1, 6 mos 95 97 96 96 Yes 95 95 95 95 Yes
Italy (1982) Universal Selective 2, 4, 11 mos 93 94 95 95 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes 97.7
Kazakhstan (1998) Universal Universal B, 2, 4 mos 82 99 98 97 Yes 95 90 95 93 Yes
Kyrgyzstan (2001) Universal Universal B, 2, 3.5, 5 mos 96 92 94 95 Yes 96 97 97 96 Yes
Latvia (1997) Universal Selective 2, 4, 6, 12–15 mos 98 98 96 99 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes 88
Lithuania (1998) Universal Universal B, 1, 6 mos 95 94 93 92 Yes 97 97 97 97 Yes
Luxembourg (2003) Universal Selective 2, 3, 13 mos 94 94 96 96 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes 95
Malta (2005) Universal Selective 12, 13, 18 mos 97 88 98 98 No NA NA NA NA NA Yes 100
Moldova (1995) Universal Universal B, 2, 4, 6 mos 90 89 94 94 No 99 96 96 93 Yes
Monaco (1994) Universal Selective 2, 4, 11 mos 99 99 99 99 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes NR
Montenegro (2006) Universal Selective 9, 13 wks, 9 mos 75 73 72 72 No NA NA NA NA NA No
Netherlands (2011)*** Universal Selective 2, 3, 4–11 mos 93 92 92 92 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes 99
North Macedonia (2004) Universal Universal B, 2, 6 mos 94 91 92 92 Yes 98 98 98 98 Yes
Norway (2017)*** Universal Selective 3, 5, 12 mos NA NA NR 96 ID NA NA NA NA NA Yes NR
Poland (1997) Universal Universal B, 7–8 wks, 7 mos 95 93 91 91 Yes 93 93 93 93 Yes
Portugal (1994) Universal Universal B, 2, 6 mos 98 98 98 98 Yes 97 97 97 97 Yes
Romania (1995) Universal Universal B, 2, 4, 11 mos 90 92 93 90 Yes 93 36 68 99 No
Russia (2000) Universal Universal B, 1, 6 mos 97 97 97 97 Yes NR NR NR NR NR
San Marino (1995) Universal Selective 3, 5, 11 mos 86 82 78 87 No NA NA NA NA NA Yes 100
Serbia (2006) Universal Universal B, 4 wks, 10 mos 91 93 91 94 Yes 99 99 99 99 Yes
Slovakia (1997) Universal Selective 2, 4, 10 mos 96 96 96 97 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes NR
Slovenia (1998)¶¶,††† Universal Selective 5 yrs (2 doses), 6 yrs 88 89 87 88 No NA NA NA NA NA Yes NR
Spain (1996) Universal Selective 2, 4, 11 mos 97 95 96 96 Yes NA NA NA NA NA Yes NR
Sweden (2016) Universal Selective 3, 5, 12 mos 67 76 92 97 No NA NA NA NA NA Yes NR
Switzerland (2018)¶¶,§§§ Universal Selective 2, 4, 12 mos; 11–15 yrs, +6 mos 69 69 96 96 ID NA NA NA NA NA Yes 97
Tajikistan (2002) Universal Universal B, 2, 3, 4 mos 97 96 96 97 Yes 92 99 99 99 Yes
Turkey (1998) Universal Universal B, 1, 6 mos 98 96 98 99 Yes 99 99 99 99 Yes
Turkmenistan (2002) Universal Universal B, 2, 3, 4 mos 98 99 99 99 Yes 99 99 99 99 Yes
Ukraine (2003) Universal Universal 8, 12, 16 wks 26 52 67 76 No 37 49 60 60 No
UK (2017)*** Universal Selective B, 2, 6 mos NA NA NR 93 ID NA NA NA NA NA Yes >95
Uzbekistan (2001) Universal Universal B, 2, 3, 4 mos 99 99 98 96 Yes 99 99 95 99 Yes
European Region¶¶¶ 82 84 84 92 66 65 67 68

Abbreviations: B = birth; DTaP-Hib-HepB-IPV = hexavalent vaccine containing diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, acellular pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type b, hepatitis B, and inactivated poliovirus components; HBsAg = hepatitis B virus surface antigen; HepB = hepatitis B vaccine; HepB3 = third dose of HepB; HepB-BD = birth dose of HepB; ID = insufficient data to determine (no reports for 1 or 2 years); NA = not applicable; NR = not reported; UK = United Kingdom; +6 mos = 6 months after the previous dose.
* https://immunizationdata.who.intexternal icon
Introduction of universal infant HepB vaccination into national immunization schedules. Exceptions: HepB was introduced regionally or subnationally before nationwide introduction in the following countries: Bosnia and Herzegovina (1999), Estonia (1999), Georgia (2000), Kyrgyzstan (1999), Poland (1995), Serbia (2002), Spain (1991), Sweden (2014), Ukraine (2001), and Uzbekistan (1997).
§ HepB vaccination policy: universal = all persons in the applicable age group (i.e., all infants, children aged 1–12 years, or adolescents aged 13–15 years for routine HepB vaccination, and all newborns for HepB-BD) receive HepB; selective = only infants born to mothers with positive HBsAg test results receive HepB vaccination, starting with HepB-BD.
Two of the criteria for validation of hepatitis B control are 1) to achieve HepB3 coverage ≥90% for the 3 preceding years, applicable only to countries with universal infant HepB vaccination policy and 2) to achieve timely HepB-BD coverage ≥90% for the 3 preceding years, applicable only to countries with universal HepB-BD policy.
** A criterion for validation of hepatitis B control, applicable only to countries with selective HepB-BD policy; data for other countries not included. Sources: WHO 2018 Regional Office for Europe survey (Andorra, Austria, Belgium, Czechia, Estonia, France, Germany, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Malta, Monaco, Montenegro, the Netherlands, Norway, San Marino, Slovakia, Spain, and Switzerland); https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/85397/9789241564632_eng.pdf?sequence=1pdf iconexternal icon (Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Luxembourg, Slovenia, and Sweden); reports submitted to the Regional Hepatitis B Working Group (Croatia and UK); https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/1475591external icon (Greece).
†† A criterion for validation applicable only to countries with selective HepB-BD policy. Sources: 2018 WHO Regional Office for Europe survey (Czechia, Germany, Italy, Latvia, San Marino, and Switzerland); https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/publications/Publications/antenatal-screening-HIV-hepatitis-B-syphilis-rubella-EU.pdfpdf iconexternal icon (Belgium, Estonia, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Luxembourg, and Malta); reports submitted to the Regional Hepatitis B Working Group (Croatia, the Netherlands, and UK); https://en.ssi.dk/surveillance-and-preparedness/surveillance-in-denmark/annual-reports-on-disease-incidence/pregnancy-screening-2019external icon (Denmark); https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/114883/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-057-3.pdf?sequence = 1&isAllowed = ypdf iconexternal icon (Finland); http://beh.santepubliquefrance.fr/beh/2015/15-16/pdf/2015_15-16_4.pdfpdf iconexternal icon (France); https://europepmc.org/article/PMC/1475591external icon (Greece).
§§ Denmark, Finland, and Iceland do not have universal HepB in their routine childhood immunization schedules but selectively vaccinate only infants born to mothers with positive HBsAg test results.
¶¶ Vaccination of older children or adolescents (Hungary, 12 years; Slovenia, 5–6 years; Switzerland, 11–15 years during 1997–2018, before switching to universal infant HepB immunization).
*** HepB was given only to infants of mothers with positive HBsAg test results before transition to universal infant vaccination in the Netherlands (2002–2010), Norway (2002–2016), and UK (2001– mid-2017).
††† Slovenia does not vaccinate infants against HepB; therefore, WHO/UNICEF estimates are not generated. Instead, country-reported official HepB3 coverage among children aged 6 years is included.
§§§ In Switzerland, reported coverage with HepB for adolescents until 2018. Since 2018, WHO/UNICEF estimates of coverage with the third dose of hepatitis B-containing hexavalent vaccine (DTaP-Hib-HepB-IPV) among infants (reported as DTP3).
¶¶¶ A weighted sum of WHO/UNICEF estimates of national coverage by target population from the United Nations Population Division’s World Population Prospects for all 53 countries of the region. HepB3 coverage includes all 53 countries in EUR. HepB-BD coverage includes 23 countries that implement universal birth dose policy. Two countries, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Russia, do not report HepB-BD coverage, but their population is included in the denominator, resulting in lower coverage in this group than in most individual countries with reported coverage data.

TABLE 2. Hepatitis B virus surface antigen seroprevalence based on representative population-based serosurveys or among pregnant women during antenatal screening in selected countries — World Health Organization European Region, 2003–2019Return to your place in the text
Country Year Geographic area Age group, yrs (sample size) Vaccination status* HBsAg prevalence, % (95% CI)
Population-based representative serosurveys
Germany§ 2008–2011 Nationwide ≥18 (7,047) Prevaccine and partially vaccinated 0.3 (0.2–0.6)
Netherlands 2007 Nationwide 0–79 (6,246) Prevaccine Overall, 0.2 (0.1–0.4)
Dutch, 0.1 (0.0–0.4)
Foreign-born, 1.1 (0.4–2.7)
Portugal** 2012–2014 Nationwide ≥18 (1,685) Pre- and postvaccine Post-vaccine (18–34 yrs), 0.1 (NR)
Spain†† 2017–2018 Nationwide 2–80 (6,056) Pre- and postvaccine Post-vaccine (2–19 yrs), 0 (NR)
Combined pre-and postvaccine (20–80 yrs), 0.22 (0.10–0.35)
Tajikistan§§ 2010 Nationwide 1–24 (2,188) Pre- and postvaccine Postvaccine (1–6 yrs), 0.4 (0.1–1.3)
Among pregnant women (in countries with selective hepatitis B birth dose vaccination policy)
Croatia¶¶ 2016–2018 Nationwide NA NA <0.2
Denmark*** 2019 Nationwide NA NA Overall, 0.25
Danish-born, <0.01
Foreign-born, 0.25
Finland††† 2005–2009 Nationwide NA NA 0.13
Ireland§§§ 2004–2009 Western Ireland NA NA 0.21
Italy¶¶¶ 2008–2009 Twelve regions NA NA Overall, 0.86
Italian-born, 0.4
Foreign-born, 2.5
Netherlands**** 2012–2016 Nationwide NA NA 0.3
Norway†††† 2003–2004 Northern Norway NA NA 0.1
Spain§§§§ 2015 Nationwide NA NA 0.42
UK¶¶¶¶ 2015 England NA NA 0.4

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; HBsAg = hepatitis B virus surface antigen; HepB = hepatitis B vaccine; NA = not applicable; NR = not reported; UK = United Kingdom.
* Postvaccine = age groups eligible for vaccination with HepB; prevaccine = age groups not eligible for HepB vaccination; partially vaccinated = age groups in which some people were vaccinated before nationwide introduction of routine childhood HepB vaccination; combined pre- and postvaccine = age group for which estimates are provided include both pre- and postvaccine cohorts.
Applicable to population-based serosurveys only.
§ https://edoc.rki.de/bitstream/handle/176904/1530/221UAZ0QXaYVg.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed = ypdf iconexternal icon
https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/0A7381A4CB391EE13C5028444DCEDA91/S095026881100224Xa.pdf/prevalence_of_hepatitis_b_virus_infection_in_the_netherlands_in_1996_and_2007.pdfpdf iconexternal icon
** https://journals.lww.com/eurojgh/Fulltext/2016/06000/Hepatitis_B_and_C_prevalence_in_Portugal_.5.aspxexternal icon
†† https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/prevPromocion/vacunaciones/comoTrabajamos/docs/EstudioSeroprevalencia_EnfermedadesInmunoprevenibles.pdfpdf iconexternal icon
§§ https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X15007665external icon
¶¶ The report submitted to the WHO European Regional Hepatitis B Working Group.
*** https://en.ssi.dk/surveillance-and-preparedness/surveillance-in-denmark/annual-reports-on-disease-incidence/pregnancy-screening-2019external icon
††† https://www.julkari.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/114883/URN_ISBN_978-952-302-057-3.pdf?sequence = 1&isAllowed = ypdf iconexternal icon
§§§ http://archive.imj.ie//ViewArticleDetails.aspx?ContentID = 3961external icon
¶¶¶ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2010.11.014external icon
**** The report submitted to the WHO European Regional Hepatitis B Working Group.
†††† Kristiansen MG, Eriksen BO, Maltau JM, et al. Prevalences of viremic hepatitis C and viremic hepatitis B in pregnant women in Northern Norway. Hepato-Gastroenterology 2009;56:1141–5.
§§§§ https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0233528external icon
¶¶¶¶ https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/583576/hpr0217_naism.pdfpdf iconexternal icon

TABLE 3. Criteria for country validation of the achievement of the regional hepatitis B control targets, according to the Hepatitis B Regional Working Group, European Technical Advisory Group of Experts — World Health Organization European RegionReturn to your place in the text
Area of assessment* Criteria Comment
Routine hepatitis B immunization coverage ≥90% coverage for infants with ≥3 doses of hepatitis B vaccine (according to national immunization schedule) For countries that implement universal hepatitis B vaccination; in each of the last 3 years
Prevention of mother-to-child transmission of hepatitis B virus ≥90% coverage with timely hepatitis B birth dose vaccination For countries that implement universal newborn vaccination; in each of the last 3 years
≥90% coverage with hepatitis B screening in pregnant women and ≥90% coverage with postexposure prophylaxis in infants born to infected mothers For countries that implement selective hepatitis B birth dose policy; in each of the last 3 years, if the data are routinely collected; one time, if based on a special assessment
HBsAg seroprevalence ≤0.5% HBsAg prevalence in cohorts eligible for vaccination Required for countries with high and intermediate pre-vaccine endemicity of hepatitis B§
≤0.5% HBsAg prevalence among pregnant women Alternative criterion acceptable only for countries with historically low endemicity of hepatitis B

Abbreviation: HBsAg = Hepatitis B surface antigen.
* For a country to receive validation, the applicable criteria should be met in all three areas.
Includes administration of hepatitis B vaccine within 24 hours of birth, followed by ≥2 additional doses (according to national schedule); coverage targets apply to birth dose and HepB3.
§ Hepatitis B endemicity levels based on the prevalence of HBsAg: low (<2.0%), intermediate (2.0%–7.9%), and high (>8.0%).


Suggested citation for this article: Khetsuriani N, Mosina L, Van Damme P, Mozalevskis A, Datta S, Tohme RA. Progress Toward Hepatitis B Control — World Health Organization European Region, 2016–2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:1029–1035. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7030a1external icon.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

View Page In:pdf icon PDF [843K]
Page last reviewed: August 17, 2021