Assessment of Day-7 Postexposure Testing of Asymptomatic Contacts of COVID-19 Patients to Evaluate Early Release from Quarantine — Vermont, May–November 2020

Amanda Jones, MPH1; Veronica Fialkowski, MPH1; Lauren Prinzing, MPH1; Jeffrey Trites, MS1; Patsy Kelso, PhD1; Mark Levine, MD1 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation
Article Metrics

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Related Materials

On May 8, 2020, the Vermont Department of Health (VDH) issued a Health Update* recommending shortening the duration of quarantine for persons exposed to SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Exposed persons who were in quarantine could be tested by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on or after quarantine day 7. Those who had remained asymptomatic throughout quarantine and who received a negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result on or after day 7 could end quarantine. This policy was based on a report suggesting that symptom onset occurs within this time frame in approximately three quarters of COVID-19 cases (1) and on consultation of the Vermont Health Commissioner with the U.S. Surgeon General. VDH implemented this policy to minimize restrictions on state residents, recognizing that some reduction could occur in the prevention benefit of quarantine to contain the spread of SARS-CoV-2. State-run SARS-CoV-2 testing sites were made available to increase access to no-cost testing and facilitate implementation of this policy. During August 1–December 1, among persons seeking testing at a VDH SARS-CoV-2 testing site, 36% stated that their reason for seeking testing was to end quarantine early (VDH, unpublished data, December 7, 2020), indicating that persons were aware of and following the policy and using the testing services provided. To assess the effectiveness of this policy, VDH analyzed testing data for contacts of persons with a COVID-19 diagnosis. During May 8–November 16, VDH identified 8,798 exposed contacts of COVID-19 patients; 3,983 (45%) had sought testing within 14 days of their exposure, with day 0 defined as the date of last exposure noted in the case investigation record. Among these persons, 2,200 (55%) who received testing on days 7–10 were included in this analysis; 977 (44.9%) of these contacts had a specimen collected for testing on day 7. Among these, 34 (3%) had test results that were positive, 940 (96%) had results that were negative, and three (<1%) had results that were indeterminate (Table). Among the 34 contacts who received a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test result on day 7 after exposure, 12 (35%) were asymptomatic. The remaining 22 contacts with positive test results were symptomatic at the time of testing; approximately one half had developed symptoms on days 4–7 after exposure. Among the 940 contacts who received negative test results on specimens collected on day 7 after exposure, 154 (16%) had a subsequent test within the next 7 days (i.e., days 8–14); among these, 152 (99%) had tests that remained negative, and two (1%) had results that were indeterminate.

In addition to the 977 persons who received testing on day 7 after exposure, 1,223 (55.1% of all contacts tested on days 7–10 postexposure) had a specimen collected for SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing on day 8, 9, or 10. Among those persons, 53 (4%) had test results that were positive, 1,159 (95%) had results that were negative, and 11 (1%) had results that were indeterminate. Among the 53 contacts who received a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR result on specimens collected days 8–10 after exposure, 12 (23%) were asymptomatic (mean time since symptom onset = 6 days). Among the 1,170 contacts who received a negative or indeterminate test result on specimens collected on days 8–10 after exposure, 108 (9%) had a subsequent specimen tested; 107 (99%) remained negative, and one (1%) had a result that was indeterminate. Therefore, among all 2,200 contacts tested on days 7–10 after exposure, 87 (4%) persons had a positive test result, 24 (28%) of whom were asymptomatic.

The findings in this report are subject to at least three limitations. First, this analysis was conducted on a convenience sample that included only positive test results received electronically or by fax and negative test results received electronically. Negative test results that were received by fax were not entered into the surveillance system and so are not included in this analysis. Second, the limited demographic data on contacts of patients could hamper the matching of a contact with a laboratory result; thus, the number of contacts tested might be underreported. Although persons who were retested remained negative (1% indeterminate), they represented only 16% of the total number of persons who discontinued quarantine. Finally, asymptomatic status during quarantine until the time of testing for persons testing negative could not be verified.

These results indicate that among the persons in quarantine who tested negative at day 7 after exposure, none who were retested between day 8 and 14 were positive. Allowing asymptomatic persons to shorten quarantine with a negative test at day 7 or later has not been demonstrated to result in transmission of SARS-CoV-2, indicating that the policy has been effective. These results also indicate that 3.9% of contacts tested on days 7–10 after exposure were infected with SARS-CoV-2. In addition to reducing the duration of quarantine for exposed contacts, Vermont’s policy might have provided additional benefits to the state’s pandemic response by identifying some asymptomatic patients earlier in the course of their illness through enhancing statewide surveillance testing of an exposed group. This assessment supports Vermont’s policy as being effective and offers data to support recommendations to shorten quarantine with testing such as those provided in CDC’s updated quarantine guidance.

Corresponding author: Veronica Fialkowski,

1Vermont Department of Health.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.


  1. Lauer SA, Grantz KH, Bi Q, et al. The incubation period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from publicly reported confirmed cases: estimation and application. Ann Intern Med 2020;172:577–82. CrossRef PubMed
TABLE. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing results among persons tested for SARS-CoV-2 during quarantine,* by quarantine day — Vermont, May 8, 2020–November 16, 2020Return to your place in the text
PCR test result No. (%) of test results
Quarantine day 7 Quarantine day 8–10
All contacts tested days 7–10 977 (100) 1,223 (100)
Positive 34 (3) 53 (4)
Negative 940 (96) 1,159 (95)
Indeterminate 3 (<1) 11 (1)
Contacts who retested after negative or indeterminate results 154 (15.7) 108 (8.8)
Positive§ 0 (—) 0 (—)
Negative§ 152 (99) 107 (99)
Indeterminate§ 2 (1) 1 (1)

* The quarantine period begins with the date of last exposure to a person with a positive test result for SARS-CoV-2.
Percentage of all persons tested.
§ Percentage of persons retested.

Suggested citation for this article: Jones A, Fialkowski V, Prinzing L, Trites J, Kelso P, Levine M. Assessment of Day-7 Postexposure Testing of Asymptomatic Contacts of COVID-19 Patients to Evaluate Early Release from Quarantine — Vermont, May–November 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2021;70:12–13. DOI:

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version ( and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to

View Page In: PDF [104K]