Vital Signs: Prescription Opioid Pain Reliever Use During Pregnancy — 34 U.S. Jurisdictions, 2019

Jean Y. Ko, PhD1; Denise V. D’Angelo, MPH1; Sarah C. Haight, MPH1; Brian Morrow, MA1; Shanna Cox, MSPH1; Beatriz Salvesen von Essen, MPH1; Andrea E. Strahan, PhD2; Leslie Harrison, MPH1; Heather D. Tevendale, PhD1; Lee Warner, PhD1; Charlan D. Kroelinger, PhD1; Wanda D. Barfield, MD1 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation

Summary

What is already known about this topic?

Data on self-reported prescription opioid use during pregnancy are limited.

What is added by this report?

Analysis of 2019 survey data found that 6.6% of women reported prescription opioid use during pregnancy. Among these women, 21.2% reported misuse (a source other than a health care provider or a reason for use other than pain), 27.1% wanted or needed to cut down or stop using, and 31.9% reported not receiving provider counseling about how use could affect an infant.

What are the implications for public health practice?

Obstetric providers should discuss risks and benefits of opioid therapy for chronic pain during pregnancy, screen all pregnant women for substance use, misuse, and use disorders, including those involving prescription opioids, and provide referral and treatment, as indicated.

Article Metrics
Altmetric:
Citations:
Views:

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Related Materials

Abstract

Background: Prescription opioid use during pregnancy has been associated with poor outcomes for mothers and infants. Studies using administrative data have estimated that 14%–22% of women filled a prescription for opioids during pregnancy; however, data on self-reported prescription opioid use during pregnancy are limited.

Methods: CDC analyzed 2019 data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) survey in 32 jurisdictions and maternal and infant health surveys in two additional jurisdictions not participating in PRAMS to estimate self-reported prescription opioid pain reliever (prescription opioid) use during pregnancy overall and by maternal characteristics among women with a recent live birth. This study describes source of prescription opioids, reasons for use, want or need to cut down or stop use, and receipt of health care provider counseling on how use during pregnancy can affect an infant.

Results: An estimated 6.6% of respondents reported prescription opioid use during pregnancy. Among these women, 21.2% reported misuse (a source other than a health care provider or a reason for use other than pain), 27.1% indicated wanting or needing to cut down or stop using, and 68.1% received counseling from a provider on how prescription opioid use during pregnancy could affect an infant.

Conclusions and Implications for Public Health Practice: Among respondents reporting opioid use during pregnancy, most indicated receiving prescription opioids from a health care provider and using for pain reasons; however, answers from one in five women indicated misuse. Improved screening for opioid misuse and treatment of opioid use disorder in pregnant patients might prevent adverse outcomes. Implementation of public health strategies (e.g., improving state prescription drug monitoring program use and enhancing provider training) can support delivery of evidence-based care for pregnant women.

Introduction

During 2017–2018, 42.5% of opioid-related overdose deaths among women in the United States involved a prescription opioid (1). Long-term use of prescription opioids is associated with increased risk for misuse (i.e., use in larger amounts, higher frequency, longer duration, or for a different reason than that directed by a prescribing physician) (2), opioid use disorder, and overdose (3,4). According to commercial insurance (5) and Medicaid (6) claims for reimbursement of pharmacy dispensing, an estimated 14%–22% of women filled at least one opioid prescription during pregnancy (5,6). Opioid use during pregnancy has been associated with poor infant outcomes, such as neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (7), preterm birth, poor fetal growth, and stillbirth (8). PRAMS* and two additional jurisdictions’ maternal and infant health surveys conducted during 2019 were used to describe population-based, self-reported estimates of prescription opioid pain reliever (prescription opioid) use during pregnancy.

Methods

PRAMS is a jurisdiction-specific and population-based surveillance system designed to monitor self-reported behaviors and experiences before, during, and shortly after pregnancy among women with a live birth in the preceding 2–6 months. Detailed PRAMS methodology is published elsewhere (9). Supplementary questions on prescription opioid use during pregnancy were asked in 32 jurisdictions participating in PRAMS and on maternal and infant health surveys in two jurisdictions that do not participate in PRAMS. Data were weighted to adjust for sample design and nonresponse, representing the total population of women with a live birth in each jurisdiction during an approximately 4-month§ or 5-month period in 2019.

Women were asked, “During your most recent pregnancy, did you use any of the following prescription pain relievers?” Use of prescription opioid pain relievers (prescription opioids) during pregnancy was indicated by selection of any of the following: hydrocodone, codeine, oxycodone, tramadol, hydromorphone or meperidine, oxymorphone, morphine, or fentanyl.** Women who self-reported use during pregnancy were asked to check all that apply to additional questions describing the prescription opioid source and reasons for use.†† Qualitative thematic coding was used to recode “other” written-in text responses into existing and new categories, where possible.§§ Remaining responses were retained as “other/undetermined.” Prescription opioid sources were categorized as health care and non–health care provider (based on the responses “I had pain relievers left over from an old prescription,” “friend or family member gave them to me,” or “I got the pain relievers without a prescription some other way”). Reasons for use were categorized as pain and any reason other than pain (based on the responses “to relax or relieve tension or stress,” “to help me with feelings or emotions,” “to help me sleep,” “to feel good or get high,” or “because I was ‘hooked’ or I had to have them”). Misuse was defined as getting opioids from any source other than a health care provider or using for any reason other than pain. Respondents were also asked about their desire to cut down or stop use (“During your most recent pregnancy, did you want or need to cut down or stop using prescription pain relievers?”) and whether they received provider counseling (“At any time during your most recent pregnancy, did a doctor, nurse, or other health care worker talk with you about how using prescription pain relievers during pregnancy could affect a baby?”).

Prevalence of prescription opioid use during pregnancy was estimated overall and by maternal characteristics. Maternal age, race/ethnicity, education, trimester of entry into prenatal care, health insurance at delivery, and number of previous live births were derived from birth certificate data. Self-reported cigarette use during the last 3 months of pregnancy and depression during pregnancy were obtained from the surveys. Among women reporting prescription opioid use during pregnancy, estimates were generated for source, reasons for use, want or need to cut down or stop use, and receipt of health care provider counseling on how use during pregnancy could affect an infant. Prevalence of receipt of health care provider counseling was estimated by maternal characteristics. In addition, the percentage of women who wanted or needed to cut down or stop using was estimated among those who reported misuse as defined in this study and those who did not. Chi-squared tests were used to assess the differential distribution of prescription opioid use during pregnancy and receipt of health care provider counseling by maternal characteristics, as well as the want or need to cut down or stop use by misuse classification. Weighted prevalence estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using SUDAAN (version 11.0; RTI International).

Results

In 2019, among 21,488 respondents, 20,643 (96.1%) provided information regarding prescription opioid use during their most recent pregnancy. Among these women, 1,405 (6.6%) reported prescription opioid use during pregnancy (Table 1). The prevalence of use was statistically different across the following categories: health insurance at delivery, cigarette smoking during the last 3 months of pregnancy, and depression during pregnancy (p<0.05).

Among women who used prescription opioids, 91.3% reported receiving the opioids from a health care provider, 8.9% from a source other than a health care provider (e.g., friend or family member), and 4.3% from other/undetermined sources (Table 2). Specifically, 55.4% of women reported receiving opioids from an obstetrician-gynecologist, midwife, or prenatal care provider and 26.0% from an emergency department doctor. The two most commonly reported non–health care provider sources were having pain relievers left over from an old prescription (5.4%) and obtaining the pain relievers without a prescription some other way (3.0%).

Among women who used prescription opioids, 88.8% reported using the opioids for pain reasons, 14.4% for reasons other than pain, and 4.9% for other/undetermined reasons. In particular, prescription opioids were used to relieve pain from an injury, condition, or surgery that occurred before (22.2%) or during (63.8%) pregnancy or during an unstated time frame (11.7%). Commonly reported reasons for use other than pain were to help sleep (7.9%) and relieve tension or stress (7.7%).

Overall, 21.2% of women who used prescription opioids during pregnancy reported misuse; 4.0% reported both a non–health care provider source and use for reasons other than pain. Among women who used prescription opioids during pregnancy, 27.1% indicated wanting or needing to cut down or stop using (Figure). Among women who used prescription opioids during pregnancy, a higher proportion of women with misuse (36.5%) indicated wanting or needing to cut down or stop using, compared with women without misuse (24.5%) (p<0.05).

Among women with prescription opioid use during pregnancy, 68.1% reported that a health care provider counseled them about the effect of use on an infant (Table 3). The prevalence of receiving counseling did not vary by most maternal characteristics assessed except that a lower proportion of women with no previous live births received counseling than did those with one or more previous births (62.0% versus 71.6%; p<0.05).

Discussion

In this population-based sample of women with recent live births in 34 jurisdictions, one in 15 (6.6%) respondents self-reported using prescription opioid pain relievers during pregnancy. This observed prevalence of use during pregnancy in 2019 is lower than estimates of prescription opioid fills from administrative data (e.g., insurance claims) in previous years (5,6), which do not necessarily correlate with use. Higher use of prescription opioids among women who reported smoking cigarettes or had depression during pregnancy are consistent with findings from studies analyzing administrative Medicaid data (7).

In this study, an estimated one in five women using prescription opioids during pregnancy indicated misuse. In addition, more than one in four (27.1%) women with prescription opioid use indicated wanting or needing to reduce or stop their use, potentially because of concerns about the effect of medication on their infant, possible opioid dependence, or opioid use disorder. Among women reporting prescription opioid use, nearly one in three (31.9%) reported not receiving provider counseling on the effects of prescription opioid use on an infant.

Clinical guidance addresses opioid prescribing and tapering during pregnancy, the risks to the mother and infant, and screening and treatment for opioid dependence and opioid use disorder (3,10). CDC and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommend that clinicians and patients discuss and carefully weigh risks and benefits when considering initiation of opioid therapy for chronic pain during pregnancy (3,10). Opioids, if indicated, should be prescribed only after consideration of alternative pain management therapies (3,10). Risk for physiologic dependence and possibility of an infant developing neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome should be discussed (10). Clinicians caring for pregnant women are advised to perform verbal screening to identify and address substance use, misuse, and substance use disorders (10,11). Co-occurring use of other substances (e.g., tobacco) and mental health conditions are more common among pregnant women who are prescribed or misusing prescription opioids than among those who are not (7,12). Recommended screening and, if applicable, treatment and referral for depression, history of trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, and anxiety should occur (10). Because of the possible risk for spontaneous abortion and premature labor associated with opioid withdrawal (10), clinicians are encouraged to consult with other health care providers as necessary if considering tapering opioids during pregnancy (3). Medications for opioid use disorder, including buprenorphine or methadone, are recommended because of their association with improved maternal outcomes (3,10,13). Collaboration between obstetric and neonatal providers is important to diagnose, evaluate, and treat neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome because it can result from medically indicated opioid prescription use, medication for opioid use disorder, or illicit opioid use (3,10).

Effective public health strategies to support the implementation of evidence-based guidelines might include improving state prescription drug monitoring program use (14), provider training (15), multidisciplinary state learning communities (16), quality improvement collaboratives (17), and consumer awareness (18). For example, some state perinatal quality collaboratives are implementing the Alliance for Innovation on Maternal Health program’s patient safety obstetric care bundle for pregnant and postpartum women with opioid use disorder to implement protocols for screening and referral to treatment (16,19).

The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, these population-based data are only generalizable to women with a recent live birth in the 34 jurisdictions included in this report. Because of the need to provide data on the opioid crisis among pregnant women, a response rate threshold was not required for jurisdictions to be included in the analyses. This might further affect generalizability because 13 jurisdictions fell below the current PRAMS threshold of 55% (9). Second, prescription opioid use was self-reported and might be underestimated because of stigma and legal implications.¶¶ Third, question misinterpretation by respondents is possible. For example, <1% indicated no source or reason for use except for a written-in response regarding use during labor and delivery, even though the initial prompt asked women to not include pain relievers used during labor and delivery. Fourth, not all available misuse indicators (e.g., use for longer time than prescribed) were assessed. Finally, the opioid supplement questions do not reflect current diagnostic criteria and cannot be used to estimate the prevalence of opioid use disorder (20).

Opioid prescribing consistent with clinical practice guidelines can ensure that patients, particularly those who are pregnant, have access to safer, more effective chronic pain treatment and reduce the number of persons at risk for opioid misuse, opioid use disorder, and overdose. Implementation of public health strategies can complement these efforts to improve the health of mothers and infants. The PRAMS surveillance system can be used to identify opportunities for providers, health systems, and jurisdictions to better support pregnant and postpartum women and their families.

Acknowledgments

Kristen Johnson, Alabama Department of Public Health; Enid Quintana-Torres, Arizona Department of Health Services; Miranda Brillante, Chuncui Fan, Katherine Heck, Kristen Marchi, Monisha Shah, Center for Health Equity, University of California, San Francisco; Christine Rinki, Carina Saraiva, Maternal, Child and Adolescent Health Division, California Department of Public Health; Ashley Juhl, Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment; Jennifer Morin, Connecticut Department of Public Health; Fern Johnson-Clarke, District of Columbia Department of Health; Jerri Foreman, Florida Department of Health; J. Michael Bryan, Georgia Department of Public Health; Joyce Prince, Illinois Department of Public Health; Brittany Reynolds, Indiana State Department of Health; Jennifer Pham, Iowa Department of Public Health; Lisa Williams, Kansas Department of Health and Environment; Tracey Jewell, Kentucky Department for Public Health; Rosaria Trichilo, Louisiana Department of Health; Laurie Kettinger, Maryland Department of Health; Emily Lu, Massachusetts Department of Public Health; Rebecca Lander, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services; Tami Conn, Nevada Department of Health and Human Services; Sara Riordan, New Hampshire Department of Health & Human Services; Anne Radigan, New York State Department of Health; Grace Njau, North Dakota Department of Health; Reena Oza-Frank, Bureau of Maternal, Child and Family Health, Ohio Department of Health; Tina Kent, Oregon Department of Human Services; Sara E. Thuma, Pennsylvania Department of Health; Wanda Hernández Virella, Puerto Rico Department of Health; Karine Monteiro, Rhode Island Department of Health; Harley T. Davis, South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control; Linda Ahrendt, South Dakota State Department of Health; Uvonne Leverett, Tennessee Department of Health; Barbara Algarin, Utah Department of Health; John Davy, Vermont Department of Health; Linda Lohdefinck, Washington Department of Health; Monica Pegram, West Virginia Bureau for Public Health; Lorie Wayne Chesnut, Wyoming Department of Health; Holly B. Shulman, PRAMS Team, Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC; National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC.

Corresponding author: Jean Y. Ko, JeanKo@cdc.gov, 770-488-5200.


1Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC; 2Division of Overdose Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, CDC.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.


* PRAMS currently requires that jurisdictions meet a response rate threshold of 55% for publication. However, because of the critical need to report surveillance data related to the opioid crisis, a response rate threshold was not used to determine inclusion in the analysis. Therefore, data in this report are from all PRAMS jurisdictions participating in the opioid supplement (response rate noted): Alabama (57.6%), Arizona (41.9%), Colorado (59.7%), Connecticut (52.6%), District of Columbia (48.4%), Florida (46.1%), Georgia (53.6%), Illinois (62.6%), Indiana (46.4%), Iowa (56.7%), Kansas (66.0%), Kentucky (61.5%), Louisiana (55.9%), Maryland (47.8%), Massachusetts (61.2%), Missouri (56.5%), Nevada (43.5%), New Hampshire (51.0%), New York (51.4%), North Dakota (57.3%), Oregon (69.6%), Pennsylvania (55.6%), Puerto Rico (81.1%), Rhode Island (57.1%), South Carolina (38.3%), South Dakota (69.4%), Tennessee (55.0%), Utah (71.9%), Vermont (61.6%), Washington (60.6%), West Virginia (42.7%), and Wyoming (56.3%)

California (response rate: 59.3%) and Ohio (response rate: 34.2%).

§ California collected data during a 4-month period; the weight was adjusted for this analysis to represent mothers giving birth in this approximately 4-month data collection period in 2019.

For PRAMS jurisdictions and Ohio, 5 months of data were weighted to represent women having a live birth during approximately 5 months in 2019.

** Survey options for prescription opioids included “Hydrocodone (like Vicodin, Norco, or Lortab)”; “Codeine (like Tylenol #3 or #4, not regular Tylenol”); “Oxycodone (like Percocet, Percodan, OxyContin, or Roxicodone)”; “Tramadol (like Ultram or Ultracet); Hydromorphone or meperidine (like Demerol, Exalgo, or Dilaudid)”; “Oxymorphone (like Opana)”; “Morphine (like MS Contin, Avinza, or Kadian)”; or “Fentanyl (like Duragesic, Fentora, or Actiq).”

†† Respondents were asked, “Where did you get the prescription pain relievers that you used during your most recent pregnancy?” (answer options included “OB-GYN, midwife, or prenatal care provider,” “family doctor or primary care provider,” “dentist or oral health care provider,” “doctor in the emergency room,” “I had pain relievers left over from an old prescription,” “friend or family member gave them to me,” “I got the pain relievers without a prescription some other way,” and “other.”) and “What were your reasons for using prescription pain relievers during your most recent pregnancy?” (answer options included “to relieve pain from an injury, condition, or surgery I had before pregnancy,” “to relieve pain from an injury, condition, or surgery that happened during my pregnancy,” “to relax or relieve tension or stress,” “to help me with my feelings or emotions,” “to help me sleep,” “to feel good or get high,” “because I was ‘hooked’ or I had to have them,” and “other”).

§§ Written-in responses regarding receiving prescription opioids from a health care provider (e.g., gastrointestinal provider, specialist, or surgeon) not listed as an option were coded as “other health care provider.” Written-in responses regarding using prescription opioids to relieve pain from a medical condition, but with no indicated timeframe, were coded as “to relieve pain from an injury, condition, or surgery that occurred during an unstated timeframe.” Written-in responses indicating use not occurring during pregnancy (e.g., “only during labor and delivery,” “did not use during pregnancy”) were retained as “other” if no other source or reason was indicated.

¶¶ https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/substance-use-during-pregnancyexternal icon.

References

  1. Wilson N, Kariisa M, Seth P, Smith H IV, Davis NL. Drug and opioid-involved overdose deaths—United States, 2017–2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:290–7. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  2. Han B, Compton WM, Blanco C, Crane E, Lee J, Jones CM. Prescription opioid use, misuse, and use disorders in U.S. adults: 2015 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. Ann Intern Med 2017;167:293–301. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  3. Dowell D, Haegerich TM, Chou R. CDC guideline for prescribing opioids for chronic pain—United States, 2016. JAMA 2016;315:1624–45. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  4. Schiff DM, Nielsen T, Terplan M, et al. Fatal and nonfatal overdose among pregnant and postpartum women in Massachusetts. Obstet Gynecol 2018;132:466–74. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  5. Bateman BT, Hernandez-Diaz S, Rathmell JP, et al. Patterns of opioid utilization in pregnancy in a large cohort of commercial insurance beneficiaries in the United States. Anesthesiology 2014;120:1216–24. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  6. Desai RJ, Hernandez-Diaz S, Bateman BT, Huybrechts KF. Increase in prescription opioid use during pregnancy among Medicaid-enrolled women. Obstet Gynecol 2014;123:997–1002. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  7. Patrick SW, Dudley J, Martin PR, et al. Prescription opioid epidemic and infant outcomes. Pediatrics 2015;135:842–50. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  8. Whiteman VE, Salemi JL, Mogos MF, Cain MA, Aliyu MH, Salihu HM. Maternal opioid drug use during pregnancy and its impact on perinatal morbidity, mortality, and the costs of medical care in the United States. J Pregnancy 2014;2014:906723. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  9. Shulman HB, D’Angelo DV, Harrison L, Smith RA, Warner L. The Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS): overview of design and methodology. Am J Public Health 2018;108:1305–13. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  10. Committee on Obstetric Practice. Committee opinion no. 711: opioid use and opioid use disorder in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2017;130:e81–94. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  11. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for unhealthy drug use: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA 2020;323:2301–9. CrossRefexternal icon
  12. Kozhimannil KB, Graves AJ, Levy R, Patrick SW. Nonmedical use of prescription opioids among pregnant U.S. women. Womens Health Issues 2017;27:308–15. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  13. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Clinical guidance for treating pregnant and parenting women with opioid use disorder and their infants. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2018. https://store.samhsa.gov/product/Clinical-Guidance-for-Treating-Pregnant-and-Parenting-Women-With-Opioid-Use-Disorder-and-Their-Infants/SMA18-5054external icon
  14. CDC. Prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs): what states need to know. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/pdmp/states.html
  15. CDC. Interactive Training Series for healthcare providers: applying CDC’s guideline for prescribing opioids. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/drugoverdose/training/online-training.html
  16. Kroelinger CD, Rice ME, Cox S, et al. State strategies to address opioid use disorder among pregnant and postpartum women and infants prenatally exposed to substances, including infants with neonatal abstinence syndrome. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:777–83. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  17. CDC. Perinatal quality collaboratives. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/reproductivehealth/maternalinfanthealth/pqc.htm
  18. CDC. Rx awareness. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/rxawareness/index.html
  19. Krans EE, Campopiano M, Cleveland LM, et al. National partnership for maternal safety: consensus bundle on obstetric care for women with opioid use disorder. Obstet Gynecol 2019;134:365–75. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
  20. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
TABLE 1. Prevalence of self-reported prescription opioid use during pregnancy by maternal characteristics — 34 U.S. jurisdictions, 2019Return to your place in the text
Characteristic No. of respondents* Prevalence of prescription opioid use during pregnancy
No.* % (95% CI)
Total 20,643 1,405 6.6 (6.0–7.2)
Age group (yrs)
≤19 761 56 9.6 (5.8–15.4)
20–24 3,340 246 7.5 (6.0–9.2)
25–34 12,178 822 6.5 (5.7–7.3)
≥35 4,364 281 5.5 (4.6–6.6)
Race/Ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic 9,833 544 5.9 (5.1–6.8)
Black, non-Hispanic 2,798 255 8.6 (6.9–10.5)
Hispanic 5,072 367 7.0 (5.8–8.4)
Other, non-Hispanic§ 2,665 218 6.6 (5.3–8.2)
Education level (yrs)
<12 2,292 203 8.4 (6.4–11.0)
12 4,568 369 7.1 (6.0–8.4)
>12 13,415 805 6.1 (5.4–6.9)
Trimester of entry into prenatal care
First 16,241 1,072 6.2 (5.6–6.9)
Second, third, or none 3,124 205 6.3 (4.9–7.9)
Health insurance at delivery
Private** 10,653 591 5.2 (4.6–6.0)
Medicaid 8,317 712 8.5 (7.5–9.7)
Other†† or none 1,068 59 4.4 (2.9–6.5)
No. of previous live births
None 7,982 504 6.3 (5.4–7.3)
One or more 12,508 885 6.7 (6.0–7.5)
Smoked cigarettes during last 3 mos of pregnancy
Yes 1,279 192 16.2 (12.7–20.4)
No 19,227 1,200 5.9 (5.4–6.5)
Depression during pregnancy,§§
Yes 2,432 295 13.1 (10.7–15.8)
No 12,319 730 5.4 (4.8–6.1)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.
* Unweighted sample size.
Weighted prevalence (expressed as a percentage).
§ Includes Asian, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, and mixed race/ethnicity.
Indicates chi-squared test p<0.05.
** Includes Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Uniformed Services and TRICARE.
†† Includes Children’s Health Insurance Program and other government programs.
§§ California data not available.

TABLE 2. Sources of prescription opioids and reasons for use among respondents reporting use during pregnancy (N = 1,405) — 34 U.S. jurisdictions, 2019Return to your place in the text
Sources of opioids/Reasons for use No.* Prevalence % (95% CI)
Source of prescription opioid 1,335
Any health care provider source 1,233 91.3 (88.0–93.7)
   Ob/gyn, midwife, or prenatal care provider 787 55.4 (50.4–60.2)
   Family doctor or primary care provider 203 14.9 (11.6–18.9)
   Dentist or oral health care provider 139 12.8 (9.7–16.8)
   Doctor in the emergency department 352 26.0 (22.0–30.4)
   Other health care provider 50 2.7 (1.6–4.7)
Any non-health care provider source 132 8.9 (6.7–11.8)
   Pain relievers left over from old prescription 74 5.4 (3.6–7.9)
   Friend or family member 36 1.9 (1.2–3.1)
   Some other way without a prescription 52 3.0 (1.9–4.7)
Other/Undetermined 53 4.3 (2.6–7.1)
Reason for prescription opioid use 1,303
Any pain reason 1,131 88.8 (85.9–91.2)
   To relieve pain from an injury, condition, or surgery before pregnancy 264 22.2 (18.3–26.7)
   To relieve pain from an injury, condition, or surgery during pregnancy 807 63.8 (59.1–68.2)
   To relieve pain from an injury, condition, or surgery unstated time frame 183 11.7 (9.1–14.9)
Any reason other than pain 204 14.4 (11.2–18.4)
   To relax or relieve tension or stress 118 7.7 (5.5–10.8)
   To help with feelings or emotions 45 3.7 (2.0–6.8)
   To help sleep 115 7.9 (5.4–11.3)
   To feel good or get high 23 1.1 (0.6–2.0)
   Because ”hooked” or had to use 32 2.4 (1.2–4.8)
Other/Undetermined 88 4.9 (3.7–6.6)
Any misuse (non–health care provider source or reasons other than pain) 277 21.2 (17.3–25.6)

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; ob/gyn = obstetrician/gynecologist.
* Unweighted sample size.
Weighted prevalence (expressed as a percentage) will not sum to 100% because of questions that asked respondents to check all answers that applied.

Return to your place in the textFIGURE. Percentage of women reporting desire to cut down or stop using prescription opioids among respondents reporting use*,† during pregnancy (N = 1,405) — 34 U.S. jurisdictions, 2019
The figure is a bar chart showing the percentage of women reporting desire to cut down or stop using prescription opioids among respondents reporting use during pregnancy (N = 1,405) in 34 U.S. jurisdictions during 2019.

* “Any misuse” includes report of any sources other than a health care provider (including “I had pain relievers left over from an old prescription,” “friend or family member gave them to me,” “I got the pain relievers without a prescription some other way” or “other”) or reasons other than pain (including “to relax or relieve tension or stress,” “to help me with feelings or emotions,” “to help me sleep,” “to feel good or get high,” “because I was ‘hooked’ or I had to have them” or “other”).

“No misuse” indicates that respondents reported only health care provider sources and pain reasons.

TABLE 3. Prevalence of provider counseling on how using prescription opioids during pregnancy could affect a baby among women who self-reported prescription opioid use (N = 1,373) — 34 U.S. jurisdictions, 2019Return to your place in the text
Characteristic Total Prevalence of provider counseling
No.* No.* % (95% CI)
Total 1,373 887 68.1 (63.8–72.1)
Age group (yrs)
≤19 55 34 62.2 (36.9–82.2)§
20–24 240 153 60.7 (49.6–70.8)
25–34 807 524 71.1 (65.7–75.9)
≥35 271 176 69.0 (60.1–76.6)
Race/Ethnicity
White, non-Hispanic 528 338 65.2 (58.2–71.6)
Black, non-Hispanic 254 167 70.1 (60.1–78.4)
Hispanic 357 224 72.4 (64.9–78.9)
Other, non-Hispanic 214 143 67.4 (56.2–76.9)
Education level (yrs)
<12 192 118 59.6 (45.1–72.6)
12 361 234 68.8 (60.8–75.9)
>12 793 515 69.4 (63.9–74.4)
Trimester of entry into prenatal care
First 1,052 688 70.2 (65.4–74.6)
Second, third, or none 200 125 61.6 (49.9–72.2)
Health insurance at delivery
Private** 582 379 71.6 (65.5–77.0)
Medicaid 694 455 67.6 (61.1–73.5)
Other†† or none 54 32 57.1 (36.7–75.3)§
No. of previous live births§§
None 494 308 62.0 (54.3–69.2)
One or more 863 570 71.6 (66.5–76.2)
Smoked cigarettes during last 3 mos of pregnancy
Yes 185 107 64.0 (51.4–75.0)
No 1,175 770 68.7 (64.0–73.0)
Depression during pregnancy¶¶
Yes 289 195 76.0 (67.2–83.1)
No 709 457 65.9 (59.9–71.4)

Abbreviation: CI = confidence interval.
* Unweighted sample size.
Weighted prevalence (expressed as a percentage).
§ Denominator is less than <60, so estimate may be unstable.
Includes Asian, American Indian, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, and mixed race/ethnicity.
**Includes Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Department of Uniformed Services and TRICARE.
†† Includes Children’s Health Insurance Program and other government programs.
§§ Indicates chi-squared test p<0.05.
¶¶ California data not available.


Suggested citation for this article: Ko JY, D’Angelo DV, Haight SC, et al. Vital Signs: Prescription Opioid Pain Reliever Use During Pregnancy — 34 U.S. Jurisdictions, 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2020;69:897–903. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6928a1external icon.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

View Page In:pdf icon PDF [335K]
Page last reviewed: July 16, 2020