Notes from the Field: Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli Outbreak Associated with a Potluck Party — North Carolina, June–July 2018
Weekly / February 22, 2019 / 68(7);183–184
Carolyn T.A. Herzig, PhD1,2; Aaron T. Fleischauer, PhD2,3; Brian Lackey, MSN4; Nicole Lee, MPH2; Thomas Lawson, MS2; Zack S. Moore, MD2; John Hergert2; Victoria Mobley, MD2; Jennifer MacFarquhar, MPH2,3; Tammra Morrison2; Nancy Strockbine, PhD5; Haley Martin5 (View author affiliations)View suggested citation
Views equals page views plus PDF downloads
- pdf icon [PDF]
On July 2, 2018, the North Carolina Division of Public Health was notified that approximately three dozen members of an ethnic Nepali refugee community had been transported to area hospitals for severe gastrointestinal illness after attending a potluck party on June 30. The North Carolina Division of Public Health partnered with the local health department and CDC to investigate the outbreak, identify the cause, and prevent further transmission. The investigation included molecular-guided laboratory testing of clinical specimens by CDC, which determined that this was the first confirmed U.S. outbreak of enteroinvasive Escherichia coli (EIEC) in 47 years.
A case was defined as the occurrence of diarrhea, vomiting, or fever ≥101°F (38.3°C) in a person who consumed food served at the party. Cases were identified through medical record review and retrospective cohort investigation with convenience sampling of party attendees. Among approximately 100 attendees, 52 met the case definition. Median age was 31 years (range = 3–76 years); 28 (54%) were hospitalized, including 13 (25%) with sepsis, and eight (15%) who were admitted to an intensive care unit. All patients recovered, and no secondary cases were identified.
Forty-nine persons, including 35 who were ill, were interviewed using a questionnaire to ascertain symptoms, recent travel, and food exposures. Participants also were provided with hand hygiene guidance. Among the 35 ill persons, 30 (86%) reported symptom onset on July 1, the day after the event (Figure). Median interval between eating and symptom onset was 20.5 hours (range = 1–45.5 hours). Overall, 33 (94%) ill persons experienced diarrhea, including 27 (77%), 19 (54%), and two (6%) who reported diarrhea that was watery, mucoid, or bloody, respectively. Thirty-two (91%) ill persons reported fever.
Participants reported eating chicken curry, vegetable curry, rice, lentil soup, fried bread, cold and hot salads, and cake; no imported foods were reported. No single food item was statistically significantly associated with illness; however, 37 persons reported eating chicken curry, and those who did had a 47% higher risk for illness than those who did not (risk ratio = 1.47; 95% confidence interval = 0.76–2.83). No food was available for testing. No interviewed person reported recent travel.
One hospital used a commercial multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) gastrointestinal panel to test stool specimens from 25 patients; all tested positive for Shigella/EIEC (Shigella and EIEC are difficult to differentiate in clinical specimens, and the commercial panel does not distinguish between the two). Twenty-four of these specimens were submitted to the North Carolina State Laboratory of Public Health, and all were negative for Shigella and E. coli O157 by culture and for Shiga toxin genes stx1 and stx2 by PCR. MacConkey broths and stool specimens from 23 patients tested at the state laboratory were submitted to CDC, where a molecular-guided approach was used for the isolation of Shigella/EIEC. Colonies positive for ipaH, the target gene for Shigella/EIEC, were identified as EIEC O8:H19 in specimens from 12 patients.
This was the first confirmed outbreak of EIEC in the United States in 47 years, and the first report of EIEC serotype O8:H19. EIEC is a human enteric pathogen that causes dysentery and is transmitted through contaminated food or water and person-to-person contact (1). Infections occur most commonly in developing countries (1,2). The last known outbreak in the United States was reported in 1971 and was associated with imported cheese (3). More recently, contaminated vegetables were implicated in outbreaks in Italy in 2012 and the United Kingdom in 2014 (4,5). This investigation did not reveal the specific vehicle through which EIEC was transmitted.
Shigella was initially suspected based on preliminary PCR results and because EIEC infections are rarely identified. However, epidemiologic and clinical findings were inconsistent with previous Shigella outbreaks in North Carolina, which are typically associated with person-to-person transmission in child care settings and less severe clinical manifestations. Because of genetic and pathogenic similarities, EIEC and Shigella can be difficult to distinguish (1), and identification required a molecular-guided approach. This investigation highlights the importance of collaboration between epidemiologists and laboratorians when findings are inconsistent with the initial suspected etiology.
Jonathan Strysko, Devon Stoneburg, Samuel Whitley, National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Diseases, CDC; Marion Brown, Atrium Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Carmel Clements, Gibbie Harris, Tiffiney McKoy, Susannah Stone-Gill, Mecklenburg County Public Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; Erica Berl, Jennifer Morillo, India Solomon, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services.
Corresponding author: Carolyn T.A. Herzig, firstname.lastname@example.org, 919-546-1647.
1Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 2Division of Public Health, North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, Raleigh, North Carolina; 3Center for Preparedness and Response, CDC; 4Mecklenburg County Public Health, Charlotte, North Carolina; 5Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, National Center for Emerging Zoonotic and Infectious Diseases, CDC.
All authors have completed and submitted the ICMJE form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
- Gomes TAT, Elias WP, Scaletsky ICA, et al. Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli. Braz J Microbiol 2016;47(Suppl 1):3–30. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Pasqua M, Michelacci V, Di Martino ML, et al. The intriguing evolutionary journey of enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC) toward pathogenicity. Front Microbiol 2017;8:2390. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Marier R, Wells J, Swanson R, Callahan W, Mehlman I. An outbreak of enteropathogenic Escherichia coli foodborne disease traced to imported French cheese. Lancet 1973;302:1376–8. CrossRefexternal icon
- Escher M, Scavia G, Morabito S, et al. A severe foodborne outbreak of diarrhoea linked to a canteen in Italy caused by enteroinvasive Escherichia coli, an uncommon agent. Epidemiol Infect 2014;142:2559–66. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
- Newitt S, MacGregor V, Robbins V, et al. Two linked enteroinvasive Escherichia coli outbreaks, Nottingham, UK, June 2014. Emerg Infect Dis 2016;22:1178–84. CrossRefexternal icon PubMedexternal icon
FIGURE. Number of enteroinvasive Escherichia coli cases (N = 35), by reported date and period of symptom onset — North Carolina, June 30–July 2, 2018
Suggested citation for this article: Herzig CT, Fleischauer AT, Lackey B, et al. Notes from the Field: Enteroinvasive Escherichia coli Outbreak Associated with a Potluck Party — North Carolina, June–July 2018. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:183–184. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6807a5external icon.
MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.
All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to email@example.com.