Notes from the Field: Absence of Asymptomatic Mumps Virus Shedding Among Vaccinated College Students During a Mumps Outbreak — Washington, February–June 2017
Weekly / December 1, 2017 / 66(47);1307–1308
Views: Views equals page views plus PDF downloadsMetric Details
Jesse Bonwitt, BVSc1,2; Vance Kawakami, DVM3; Adam Wharton, MS4; Rachel M. Burke, PhD1,4; Neil Murthy, MD1,4; Adria Lee, MSPH4; BreeAnna Dell, DVM5; Meagan Kay, DVM3; Jeff Duchin, MD3,6; Carole Hickman, PhD4; Rebecca J. McNall, PhD4; Paul A. Rota, PhD4; Manisha Patel, MD4; Scott Lindquist, MD2; Chas DeBolt, MPH2; Janell Routh, MD4 (View author affiliations)View suggested citation
On February 8, 2017, a suspected case of mumps in a member of a fraternity or sorority at the University of Washington, Seattle campus (UW) was reported to Public Health—Seattle & King County (PHSKC). Additional confirmed and probable mumps cases were subsequently identified among UW students and staff members according to the national case definition.* By July 19, 2017, a total of 42 (16 confirmed and 26 probable) mumps cases were reported among UW students and associated community members, with symptom onset February 6–June 4 (Figure).
Among the 42 cases, 32 (76%) occurred in UW fraternity and sorority members. Of these, 12 (37.5%) were confirmed cases, and 20 (62.5%) were probable cases. Cases occurred in residents in 20 (38.5%) of 52 fraternity and sorority houses that lodged 2,259 (48.6%) of 4,646 total fraternity and sorority members on the UW campus (42,000 students). All mumps patients had received ≥2 documented doses of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, as is currently recommended (1); 2-dose MMR coverage among all UW students exceeded 99%. Genotyping of viral isolates from four patients with confirmed mumps identified genotype G in all four, and molecular sequencing demonstrated differences between circulating strains at UW and a concurrent community outbreak in Washington.
On the basis of CDC guidance, PHSKC recommended an additional dose of MMR vaccine to protect fraternity and sorority members who were subject to potential mumps exposure (2). During March 6–9, the week before spring break, PHSKC administered 235 doses of MMR vaccine to members of the eight fraternity and sorority houses reporting the highest number of cases (Figure); the vaccination clinics were open to members of other fraternity and sorority houses.
Previous studies have suggested that mumps might be propagated by vaccinated persons with nonspecific symptoms or asymptomatic infection (3). Before licensure of mumps vaccine in 1967, 15%–27% of mumps infections were asymptomatic (2). How vaccination modifies clinical signs and symptoms of mumps is unknown (2). The prevalence of asymptomatic infection has not been assessed in the postvaccination era.
To assess the presence, prevalence, symptoms, and associated risk factors of asymptomatic mumps virus shedding in vaccinated persons, PHSKC, Washington State Department of Health, and CDC recruited a convenience sample of students at each MMR vaccination clinic. Participants provided written consent, completed a symptom and risk factor questionnaire, and provided a bilateral buccal swab immediately before or after vaccination. The Washington State Institutional Review Board determined this project to be nonresearch and exempt from review. Buccal swabs were collected from 160 of the 161 student participants, who represented at least eight fraternities and sororities; 80 (49.7%) were male. Participants reported the following symptoms during the preceding month, none of which required hospitalization: fever (10, 6%), cough (55, 34%), sore throat (37, 23%), and swelling or pain of the parotid gland or jaw not attributable to dental problems (eight, 5%). Specimens were processed at CDC. All 160 buccal swabs were mumps-virus negative by real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction; positive control testing in the laboratory indicated ˃99% successful specimen collection and processing.
The majority of mumps cases in this outbreak occurred among fraternity and sorority members; other studies have demonstrated that close contact is required for mumps transmission to occur in a population with high mumps vaccination coverage (4,5). This evaluation found no laboratory evidence of asymptomatic mumps virus shedding. Limitations include timing of sample collection, which might have missed the period when viral shedding was highest among infected persons, and the lack of serologic testing to identify infected participants. Serial sampling of exposed persons might yield different results. Mumps outbreaks have increased in recent years in the United States; from 2015 through 2016, the proportion of outbreak-related cases increased from 63% to 78% (6). Further evaluations to better understand the prevalence of mumps virus shedding among vaccinated populations are needed to guide outbreak surveillance and control.
Mumps Laboratory Team, Viral Vaccine Preventable Diseases Branch, Division of Viral Diseases,National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; Washington State Public Health Laboratories and Office of Communicable Disease Epidemiology; Washington State Department of Health; Public Health—Seattle & King County, Washington; University of Washington, Seattle.
Conflict of Interest
No conflicts of interest were reported.
Corresponding author: Jesse Bonwitt, email@example.com, 206–418–5500.
1Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, CDC; 2 Office of Communicable Disease Epidemiology, Washington State Department of Health; 3Public Health—Seattle & King County, Washington; 4National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CDC; 5Department of Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences, University of Tennessee, Knoxville; 6University of Washington, Seattle.
- Watson JC, Hadler SC, Dykewicz CA, Reef S, Phillips L. Measles, mumps, and rubella—vaccine use and strategies for elimination of measles, rubella, and congenital rubella syndrome and control of mumps: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP). MMWR Recomm Rep 1998;47(RR-8). PubMed
- Fiebelkorn AP, Barskey A, Hickman C, Bellini W. Mumps [Chapter 9]. In: Roush, SR, Baldy LM, eds. Manual for the surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases. 5th ed. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2012. https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt09-mumps.pdf
- Fanoy EB, Cremer J, Ferreira JA, et al. Transmission of mumps virus from mumps-vaccinated individuals to close contacts. Vaccine 2011;29:9551–6. CrossRef PubMed
- Barskey AE, Schulte C, Rosen JB, et al. Mumps outbreak in Orthodox Jewish communities in the United States. N Engl J Med 2012;367:1704–13. CrossRef PubMed
- Greenland K, Whelan J, Fanoy E, et al. Mumps outbreak among vaccinated university students associated with a large party, the Netherlands, 2010. Vaccine 2012;30:4676–80. CrossRef PubMed
- Clemmons NS, Redd SB, Routh JA, et al. Mumps, 2016: a national overview. Presented at the Council for State and Territorial Epidemiologist (CSTE) annual conference, Boise, ID; June 7, 2017.
FIGURE. Number of confirmed and probable cases of mumps among fraternity and sorority members and associated community members, by date of parotitis onset — University of Washington, February–June 2017
The figure above is a histogram of the number of confirmed and probable cases of mumps among fraternity and sorority members and associated community members, by date of parotitis onset, at the University of Washington during February–June 2017.
Suggested citation for this article: Bonwitt J, Kawakami V, Wharton A, et al. Notes from the Field: Absence of Asymptomatic Mumps Virus Shedding Among Vaccinated College Students During a Mumps Outbreak — Washington, February–June 2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:1307–1308. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6647a5.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.
All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Page last reviewed: November 30, 2017
- Page last updated: November 30, 2017
- Content source: