Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Notes from the Field: Clostridium perfringens Outbreak at a Catered Lunch — Connecticut, September 2016





Vivian H. Leung, MD1,2; Quyen Phan, MPH2; Cynthia E. Costa2; Christina Nishimura, MPH2; Kelly Pung3; Liz Horn3; Lynn Sosa, MD2 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation

In September 2016, the Connecticut Department of Public Health was notified of a cluster of gastrointestinal illnesses among persons who shared a catered lunch. The Connecticut Department of Public Health worked with the local health department to investigate the outbreak and recommend control measures. Information about symptoms and foods eaten was gathered using an online survey. A case was defined as the onset of abdominal pain or diarrhea in a lunch attendee <24 hours after the lunch. Risk ratios (RRs), 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and Fisher’s exact p-values were calculated for all food and beverages consumed. Associations of food exposures with illness were considered statistically significant at p<0.05.

Among approximately 50 attendees, 30 (60%) completed the survey; 19 (63%) respondents met the case definition. The majority of commonly reported symptoms included diarrhea (17 of 18), abdominal pain (15 of 16), and headache (7 of 15). The median interval from lunch to illness onset was 5.3 hours (range = 0.4–15.5 hours) for any symptom and 7 hours (range = 2.5–13 hours) for diarrhea. Analysis of food exposures reported by 16 ill and 10 well respondents (four respondents did not provide food exposure information) found illness to be associated with the beef dish (RR = undefined; CI = 1.06–∞; p = 0.046) (Table). All 16 ill respondents reported eating the beef. Coffee was also associated with illness; however, all 13 coffee drinkers who became ill also ate the beef. Eating cake approached significance (p = 0.051); all 10 cake eaters who became ill also ate the beef.

The caterer had begun preparing all dishes the day before the lunch. Meats were partially cooked and then marinated in the refrigerator overnight. In the morning, they were sautéed 2 hours before lunch. Inspection of the facility found the limited refrigerator space to be full of stacked containers that were completely filled with cooked food, disposable gloves that appeared to have been washed for reuse, and a porous wooden chopping block.

The caterer’s four food workers reported no recent illness. Stool specimens from the food workers and from four ill attendees all tested negative for norovirus, Campylobacter, Escherichia coli O157, Salmonella, and Shigella at the Connecticut State Public Health Laboratory. All eight specimens were sent to the Minnesota Department of Health Public Health Laboratory, where additional testing was available. Two specimens from food workers were positive for enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli by polymerase chain reaction, but no enterotoxigenic E. coli colonies were isolated. Seven specimens (four from food workers and three from attendees) were culture-positive for Clostridium perfringens, and specimens from all attendees contained C. perfringens enterotoxin. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of 29 C. perfringens isolates from the culture-positive specimens found no matches among attendee isolates, but demonstrated a single matching pattern between two food worker specimens. No leftover food items were available for testing.

C. perfringens, a gram-positive, rod-shaped bacterium, forms spores allowing survival at normal cooking temperatures and germination during slow cooling or storage at ambient temperature (1). Diarrhea and other gastrointestinal symptoms are caused by C. perfringens enterotoxin production in the intestines. Vomiting is rare and illness is usually self-limited, although type C strains can cause necrotizing enteritis (1).

Symptoms reported were consistent with C. perfringens infection, with a predominance of diarrhea, and median diarrhea onset time was at the lower end of the typical C. perfringens incubation period (6–24 hours) (1). C. perfringens enterotoxin detection in the stool of two or more ill persons confirms C. perfringens as the outbreak etiology (2). Both C. perfringens and enterotoxigenic E. coli can colonize asymptomatic persons (3,4), which might explain the presence of these pathogens in the stools of asymptomatic food workers. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis did not identify the C. perfringens strain responsible for the outbreak, but findings add to the evidence for a wide variety of C. perfringens strains, not all producing C. perfringens enterotoxin (5).

C. perfringens outbreaks are typically associated with improper cooling or inadequate reheating of contaminated meats (1), which might have occurred with the beef dish. The restaurant was advised about the need for adequate refrigeration and best practices for cooling foods, including using stainless steel rather than plastic containers, avoiding filling containers to depths exceeding two inches, avoiding stacking containers, and ventilating hot food. Upon follow-up inspection, staff members discarded disposable gloves after one use, used only food-grade cutting boards, and maintained proper food temperatures for hot holding, cold holding, cooling, and reheating, as outlined in the Food and Drug Administration Food Code.

An estimated 1 million illnesses in the United States each year are attributable to C. perfringens, but fewer than 1,200 illnesses are reported annually with C. perfringens outbreaks (6). C. perfringens testing is not routine for foodborne outbreaks; even if testing is unavailable, C. perfringens should be considered when improper cooling, inadequate reheating, and improper temperature maintenance of meat are identified.

Acknowledgments

Elaine Milardo, Tracey Weeks, Eloise Hazelwood, Stephen Civitelli, Diane Noel, Kimberly Holmes-Talbot, Jafar H Razeq, Matthew Cartter, Connecticut Department of Public Health; Carlota Medus, Minnesota Department of Health.

Conflict of Interest

No conflicts of interest were reported.


Corresponding author: Vivian H. Leung, vleung@cdc.gov, 860-805-7995.

1Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 2Connecticut Department of Public Health; 3Minnesota Department of Health.

References

  1. Schlundt J. Foodborne intoxications. In: Heymann, DL, ed. Control of communicable diseases manual. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 2015.
  2. CDC. Guide to confirming an etiology in foodborne disease outbreak. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/foodsafety/outbreaks/investigating-outbreaks/confirming_diagnosis.html
  3. Carman RJ, Sayeed S, Li J, et al. Clostridium perfringens toxin genotypes in the feces of healthy North Americans. Anaerobe 2008;14:102–8. CrossRef PubMed
  4. Croxen MA, Law RJ, Scholz R, Keeney KM, Wlodarska M, Finlay BB. Recent advances in understanding enteric pathogenic Escherichia coli. Clin Microbiol Rev 2013;26:822–80. CrossRef PubMed
  5. Lin Y, Labbe R. Enterotoxigenicity and genetic relatedness of Clostridium perfringens isolates from retail foods in the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 2003;69:1642-6. CrossRef PubMed
  6. Grass JE, Gould LH, Mahon BE. Epidemiology of foodborne disease outbreaks caused by Clostridium perfringens, United States, 1998–2010. Foodborne Pathog Dis 2013;10:131–6. CrossRef PubMed
Return to your place in the textTABLE. Associations between illness and food exposures reported by attendees at a catered lunch — Connecticut, September 2016
Food/Drink exposure Ill persons (n = 16) Well persons (n = 10) Risk ratio (95% CI) P-value
No. who ate item No. who did not eat item No. who ate item No. who did not eat item
Tripe 12 4 5 5 1.59 (0.72–3.51) 0.234
Fish 9 7 3 7 1.50 (0.81–2.78) 0.248
Pork 10 6 5 5 1.22 (0.64–2.34) 0.689
Chicken 9 7 6 4 0.94 (0.51–1.73) 1.000
Beef 16 0 7 3 —* (1.06–∞) 0.046
Noodles 11 5 7 3 0.98 (0.51–1.88) 1.000
Mixed vegetables 8 8 4 6 1.17 (0.64–2.14) 0.702
Spring rolls 14 2 7 3 1.67 (0.55–5.08) 0.340
Cake 10 6 2 8 1.94 (1.01–3.75) 0.051
Pudding 7 9 3 7 1.24 (0.69–2.25) 0.683
Yam dessert 10 6 4 6 1.43 (0.74–2.75) 0.422
Rice 15 1 9 1 1.25 (0.30–5.17) 1.000
Grapes 9 7 5 5 1.10 (0.59–2.04) 1.000
Mango salad 6 10 4 6 0.96 (0.51–1.81) 1.000
Muffin 5 11 1 9 1.52 (0.89–2.58) 0.352
Bagel 8 8 2 8 1.60 (0.90–2.86) 0.218
Coffee 11 5 2 8 2.20 (1.06–4.55) 0.041
Juice 5 11 2 8 1.23 (0.67–2.26) 0.668
Water 15 1 10 0 0.60 (0.44–0.83) 1.000
Soda 4 12 2 8 1.11 (0.57–2.17) 1.000

Abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; RR = risk ratio.
* The risk ratio is undefined because the calculation involves dividing by zero.
Statistically significant finding.

Suggested citation for this article: Leung VH, Phan Q, Costa CE, et al. Notes from the Field: Clostridium perfringens Outbreak at a Catered Lunch — Connecticut, September 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:940–941. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6635a3.

Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

TOP