Japanese Encephalitis Surveillance and Immunization — Asia and Western Pacific Regions, 2016
Weekly / June 9, 2017 / 66(22);579–583
Please note: An erratum has been published for this report. To view the erratum, please click here.
James D. Heffelfinger, MD1; Xi Li, MD1; Nyambat Batmunkh, MD1; Varja Grabovac, MSc1; Sergey Diorditsa, MD1; Jayantha B. Liyanage, MD2; Sirima Pattamadilok, MSc2; Sunil Bahl, MD2; Kirsten S. Vannice, PhD3; Terri B. Hyde, MD4; Susan Y. Chu, PhD4; Kimberley K. Fox, MD4; Susan L. Hills, MBBS5; Anthony A. Marfin, MD6 (View author affiliations)View suggested citation
What is already known about this topic?
Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus is a leading cause of encephalitis in Asia. The World Health Organization recommends integration of JE vaccination into national immunization schedules in all areas where the disease is a public health priority.
What is added by this report?
A review of surveillance and immunization program data in the 24 countries with JE virus transmission risk found that in 2016, 22 countries conducted at least some surveillance for JE, and 12 had implemented a JE immunization program. This represents substantial progress in JE prevention and control measures, but challenges remain, including incomplete case reporting, misclassification of cases, lack of immunization program monitoring data, and inadequate monitoring of JE vaccination coverage following vaccine introduction.
What are the implications for public health practice?
Strengthened surveillance, continued commitment, and adequate resources for JE vaccination should help maintain progress toward prevention and control of JE.
Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus is the most important vaccine-preventable cause of encephalitis in the Asia-Pacific region. The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends integration of JE vaccination into national immunization schedules in all areas where the disease is a public health priority (1). This report updates a previous summary of JE surveillance and immunization programs in Asia and the Western Pacific in 2012 (2). Since 2012, funding for JE immunization has become available through the GAVI Alliance, three JE vaccines have been WHO-prequalified,* and an updated WHO JE vaccine position paper providing guidance on JE vaccines and vaccination strategies has been published (1). Data for this report were obtained from a survey of JE surveillance and immunization practices administered to health officials in countries with JE virus transmission risk, the 2015 WHO/United Nations Children’s Fund Joint Reporting Form on Immunization, notes and reports from JE meetings held during 2014–2016, published literature, and websites. In 2016, 22 (92%) of 24 countries with JE virus transmission risk conducted JE surveillance, an increase from 18 (75%) countries in 2012, and 12 (50%) countries had a JE immunization program, compared with 11 (46%) countries in 2012. Strengthened JE surveillance, continued commitment, and adequate resources for JE vaccination should help maintain progress toward prevention and control of JE.
JE is a mosquito-borne disease that is a leading cause of encephalitis in Asia (1). More than 3 billion persons live in 24 countries that have JE virus transmission risk areas (Figure) (1,3). The majority (75%) of JE cases occur in children aged <15 years (3). Although most JE cases are asymptomatic, the case fatality rate among patients with encephalitis approaches 30%, and approximately 30%–50% of survivors have long-term neurologic sequelae (4). Vaccination is the cornerstone of JE control and prevention measures (1). A 2011 systematic review of JE disease burden estimated that approximately 68,000 cases occur globally each year; only about 10% of these cases are reported to WHO (3).
Information on JE surveillance and immunization programs was obtained from several sources. Health officials from 18 WHO countries with endemic JE who attended the 7th Biregional Meeting on Prevention and Control of JE in 2016 were surveyed; abbreviated surveys† were sent to health officials from six additional countries with endemic JE. Unpublished 2016 meeting notes, 2015 Joint Reporting Form on Immunization§ reports (5), the 2014 report of the 6th Biregional Meeting on Prevention and Control of JE (6), unpublished meeting notes from the 2015 Biregional Workshop on Strengthening the Capacity of the JE Laboratory Network in the WHO South-East Asian and Western Pacific Regions, and published literature and Ministry of Health websites served as additional data sources. Information collected about surveillance programs included a description of the surveillance system; case definitions used; age groups under surveillance; availability of diagnostic testing; and 2015 case numbers. Information collected on immunization programs included whether the country had an established JE immunization program, age of the first dose in the immunization schedule, and types of vaccines used.
Representatives from all 24 countries with JE virus transmission risk completed the surveys.¶ In 2016, 22 (92%) of the 24 countries conducted JE surveillance. Fourteen (58%) countries conducted national JE surveillance, two (8%) conducted subnational surveillance in all JE risk areas, and 11 (46%) conducted sentinel surveillance (including five countries that also conducted surveillance nationally or in all risk areas) (Table 1). Among 11 countries with sentinel surveillance, the median number of sentinel sites was eight (range = 1–223). JE case definitions were used in 22 (92%) countries. Twelve (50%) countries used the WHO acute encephalitis syndrome (AES) case definition (7), four (17%) used an acute meningoencephalitis syndrome (AMES) case definition,** three (12%) used AES or AMES case definitions in different settings, and three (12%) used country-specified case definitions. All countries with JE surveillance reported that some or most suspected cases were confirmed using JE-specific diagnostic testing of serum or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) or both.
During 2015, WHO received reports of 4,087 JE cases from 20 (83%) of 24 countries; 3,549 (87%) of these cases were reported from four countries (China [624 cases], India [1,620], Nepal , and Vietnam ). No other country reported more than 115 cases.
Twelve (50%) of the 24 countries had a JE immunization program in 2016 (Table 2); 10 (42%) programs were implemented nationally or subnationally in all risk areas, and two (8%) were subnational and did not include all risk areas. Six countries used live attenuated vaccine, two used live recombinant vaccine, one used an inactivated Vero cell culture-derived vaccine, one used an inactivated mouse brain-derived vaccine,†† and two used multiple vaccine types.
Since 2012, JE surveillance and immunization programs have expanded and improved. In 2016, 92% of countries with JE virus transmission risk conducted JE surveillance compared with 75% in 2012, and two countries that only conducted sentinel surveillance in 2012 were conducting surveillance nationally or subnationally in all risk areas in 2016 (2). The percentage of countries that had a JE immunization program increased slightly, from 46% in 2012 to 50% in 2016. Larger increases were reported in breadth of implementation: programs in 42% of countries were implemented nationally or in all risk areas compared with only 25% in 2012 (2). Several countries have transitioned from using mouse brain-derived vaccine to newer, less reactogenic vaccines with simpler dosing schedules, as recommended by WHO (1). Only two (8%) countries currently use mouse brain-derived vaccine (including one that uses multiple vaccine types), compared with five (21%) countries that used this vaccine in 2012.
The number of reported JE cases was approximately 60% lower in 2015 than in 2011, and there was a change in the proportions of reported cases by country. In 2011, China and India accounted for nearly 95% of JE cases reported to WHO (2), compared with only 55% in 2015. From 2011 to 2015, the number of cases reported by Nepal increased elevenfold from 75 to 937, and the number reported from Vietnam doubled from 183 to 368. However, because of substantial underreporting of cases, potential inconsistencies in reporting, or changes in surveillance practices, and the known year-to-year variability in intensity of JE virus transmission, the significance of changes based on surveillance data from these two time points is not known. However, JE vaccine impact assessments indicate immunization programs can result in substantial reductions in JE cases; if high coverage can be achieved and maintained in countries with endemic transmission, JE disease might be practically eliminated even while the virus remains in circulation (8).
JE surveillance has been established or strengthened during the last 4 years in several countries; since 2012, national surveillance programs were established in Brunei, North Korea, and Timor Leste, and expanded in India and Nepal. However, the need to enhance the quality of JE surveillance is recognized (6). More countries reported availability of laboratory diagnostic testing for suspected JE cases, and most report testing of both serum and CSF specimens, although the percentage of suspected JE cases for which testing is performed is unknown. Reported increases in diagnostic testing might in part be explained by support provided by the JE laboratory networks that were established in WHO’s South-East Asia and Western Pacific regions during 2006–2008. WHO has developed a JE laboratory accreditation program, which includes proficiency testing, confirmatory testing, and other measures to ensure high quality laboratory testing.
Substantial progress has been made in establishing and strengthening JE immunization programs. During 2015–2016, Nepal’s JE immunization program expanded from a subnational to a national program after conduct of a catch-up campaign, and both Cambodia and Laos established national JE vaccination programs following catch-up campaigns in children aged <15 years. Burma, Indonesia, and the Philippines plan to introduce JE vaccine in late 2017 or early 2018. Progress has been aided by the availability of three WHO-prequalified JE vaccines; enhanced awareness of the importance of JE prevention and control; and increased commitment by governments, international organizations and nongovernmental organizations such as PATH, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the GAVI Alliance.
Despite this progress, gaps and challenges remain, including incomplete case reporting and misclassification of cases. For example, the limited scope of surveillance in some countries results in incomplete case ascertainment, and data needed to improve suspected case classification to guide program expansion and laboratory capacity enhancement are insufficient. Immunization program monitoring data, such as the vaccination histories of JE cases, are often not collected. In addition, monitoring of vaccination coverage following JE vaccine introduction, critical for ensuring achievement of coverage targets, is often inadequate. Finally, more complete and accurate JE disease data are needed to estimate global burden.
The findings in this report are subject to at least two limitations. First, data were collected from self-administered surveys and might be susceptible to social desirability, recall, or other biases. Second, reported data might be incomplete.
Vaccination is the most effective strategy to prevent and control JE, and immunization has been demonstrated to reduce the economic burden of JE disease (1,8). In 2014, the countries of the WHO Western Pacific Region endorsed a goal to accelerate the control of JE by extending vaccination to all JE risk areas where incidence exceeds very low levels (9). Furthermore, countries in the WHO South-East Asia Region are developing a plan for accelerated control of JE by extending vaccination to all areas with any risk of JE transmission. WHO updated its JE vaccine position paper in 2015 (1) and produced a guidance document for measuring the effectiveness and impact of JE vaccination (7). Strengthened surveillance, continued commitment, and adequate resources for JE vaccination should help maintain progress toward prevention and control of JE.
Corresponding author: James D. Heffelfinger, email@example.com, +63-908-872-7320.
1World Health Organization, Regional Office for the Western Pacific Region, Manila, Philippines; 2World Health Organization, Regional Office for South-East Asia, New Delhi, India; 3Immunizations, Vaccines and Biologicals, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland; 4Global Immunization Division, Center for Global Health, CDC; 5Division of Vector-Borne Diseases, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; 6PATH, Seattle, Washington.
* Prequalification by WHO is a process through which the quality, safety, and efficacy of medicinal products is assessed. Prequalified products meet specified requirements, and the associated manufacturing site(s) and contract research organization(s) are determined to be compliant with WHO standards. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs278/en/.
† Surveys requested information on existence of a JE surveillance program, whether a JE case definition is used, integration of encephalitis and meningitis surveillance, age groups under surveillance, availability of laboratory confirmation of JE, existence of a JE immunization program, strategy used for JE immunization, scheduled aged groups for routine JE immunization, and types of JE vaccines used in the national immunization program.
§ The Joint Reporting Form is a standard questionnaire sent annually to all WHO countries, through which WHO and the United Nations Children’s Fund jointly collect immunization data.
¶ A survey was not administered to health officials from Taiwan. Data for Taiwan were obtained from published literature and the Taiwan CDC website.
** AMES (acute meningitis/encephalitis syndrome) is defined as an acute febrile illness that is clinically compatible with meningitis and/or encephalitis.
†† Mouse brain-derived JE vaccine is also used in Taiwan’s JE immunization program.
- World Health Organization. Japanese encephalitis vaccines: WHO position paper—February 2015. Wkly Epidemiol Rec 2015;90:69–87.
- Baig S, Fox KK, Jee Y, et al. . Japanese encephalitis surveillance and immunization—Asia and the Western Pacific, 2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62:658–62. PubMed
- Campbell GL, Hills SL, Fischer M, et al. Estimated global incidence of Japanese encephalitis: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2011;89:766–74. CrossRef PubMed
- Fischer M, Hills S, Staples E, Johnson B, Yaich M, Solomon T. Japanese encephalitis prevention and control: advances, challenges, and new initiatives [Chapter 6]. In: Scheld WM, Hammer SM, Hughes JM, eds. Emerging infections 8. Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press; 2008:93–124.
- World Health Organization. WHO/UNICEF joint reporting process. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2016. http://www.who.int/immunization/monitoring_surveillance/routine/reporting/en/
- World Health Organization. Meeting report. Sixth biregional meeting on prevention and control of Japanese encephalitis. Bangkok, Thailand: World Health Organization, Regional Office for South East Asia; 2014. http://www.searo.who.int/entity/immunization/documents/prevention_and_control_of_je.pdf?ua=1
- World Health Organization. Measuring the effectiveness and impact of Japanese encephalitis vaccination. Geneva, Switzerland; World Health Organization; 2016. http://www.who.int/immunization/diseases/japanese_encephalitis/JE_effectiveness.pdf
- World Health Organization SAGE Working Group on Japanese Encephalitis Vaccines. Background paper on Japanese encephalitis vaccines—SAGE working group. Geneva, Switzerland; World Health Organization; 2014. http://www.who.int/immunization/sage/meetings/2014/october/1_JE_Vaccine_Background_Paper.pdf?ua=1
- World Health Organization. Regional framework for implementation of the global vaccine action plan in the Western Pacific. Geneva, Switzerland; World Health Organization; 2015. http://iris.wpro.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665.1/10921/9789290617099_eng.pdf.
FIGURE. Areas with risk for Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus transmission and JE vaccine introduction* — 24 countries in Asia and the Western Pacific Region,†,§ 2016
Source: World Health Organization (WHO)/Immunization Vaccines and Biologicals database; May 12, 2017.
* Singapore made a decision not to introduce JE vaccine because only rare, sporadic human cases are reported in the country.
† The boundaries and names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the WHO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city, or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there might not yet be full agreement.
§ JE vaccine introduction in Indonesia will be limited to Bali.
The figure above is a map showing areas with risk for Japanese encephalitis (JE) virus transmission and JE vaccine introduction in 24 countries in Asia and the Western Pacific Region in 2016.
TABLE 1. Characteristics of Japanese encephalitis (JE) surveillance in countries with JE virus transmission risk, 2016
|Country||JE surveillance program (no. sentinel sites)||Case definition used||Integration of encephalitis and meningitis surveillance||Age groups under surveillance||Laboratory confirmation of suspected cases||CSF tested*||Serum tested*|
|Australia†||All risk areas§||Other¶||No||All||Yes||Most||Most|
|Bhutan||Sentinel (5)||WHO AES||No||<15 yrs||Yes||Some||Most|
|Cambodia||Sentinel (6)||AMES||No||<15 yrs||Yes||Most||Most|
|China||National and sentinel (27)||WHO AES (national); AMES (sentinel)||Yes**||All||Yes||Most||Most|
|India||All risk areas and sentinel (223)||WHO AES||No||All||Yes||Most||Most|
|Indonesia||Sentinel (34)||WHO AES||No||All||Yes||No||Most|
|Laos||National and sentinel (3)||AMES (national); WHO, AES, AMES (sentinel)||Yes***||All||Yes||Most||Most|
|North Korea||National||AMES||Yes||<15 yrs||Yes||Yes§§§||Yes§§§|
|Papua New Guinea||Sentinel (1)||WHO AES||No||<15 yrs||Yes||Most||Most|
|South Korea||National||WHO AES||No||All||Yes||Most||Most|
|Sri Lanka||National||WHO AES||No||All||Yes||Most||Some|
|Thailand||National and sentinel (40)||WHO AES||No||All||Yes||Most||Most|
|Timor Leste||National||WHO AES||No||All||Yes¶¶¶||Most||No|
|Vietnam||National and sentinel (8)||WHO AES, AMES****||Yes††††||All (AES); <15 yrs (AMES)||Yes||Most||Most|
TABLE 2. Characteristics of Japanese encephalitis (JE) immunization programs in countries with JE virus transmission risk, 2016
|Country||JE immunization program||Strategy||Scheduled age to begin routine immunization||Vaccine used in national program|
|Australia*||All risk areas†||Routine||12 mos||JE-CV|
|Taiwan||All areas||Routine||15 mos||MB|
|Papua New Guinea||None||—||—||—|
|South Korea||National||Routine||12 mos||CD-JEV, MB, VC,|
|Sri Lanka||National||Routine||12 mos||CD-JEV|
|Thailand||National||Routine||12 mos||CD-JEV, JE-CV|
Suggested citation for this article: Heffelfinger JD, Li X, Batmunkh N, et al. Japanese Encephalitis Surveillance and Immunization — Asia and Western Pacific Regions, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:579–583. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6622a3.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.
All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Page last reviewed: June 8, 2017
- Page last updated: June 8, 2017
- Content source: