Notes from the Field: Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome in a Migrant Farm Worker — Colorado, 2016

Grace Marx, MD1,2; Kaylan Stinson, MSPH2; Monte Deatrich, MA2; Bernadette Albanese, MD2 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation
Article Metrics
Altmetric:
Related Materials

On August 8, 2016, Tri-County Health Department (Adams, Arapahoe, and Douglas counties) in Colorado was notified of a confirmed case of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS). The patient was a previously healthy male migrant farm worker aged 25 years, living in farm quarters, and working in vegetable fields for 8 weeks before symptom onset. On July 20, he experienced sudden onset of fever, severe headache, myalgias, cough, and nosebleed. He was evaluated at an emergency department on July 23, where his temperature was 103.9°F (40.0°C), and his physical exam was notable for bronchial breath sounds and pulmonary crackles. Chest radiograph revealed bilateral interstitial infiltrates and small pleural effusions, and thrombocytopenia (47,000/μL) was a noted laboratory finding. The patient was hospitalized for 3 days, required minimal oxygen and supportive care, and survived. Serology obtained on hospital admission was positive for hantavirus immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G antibodies, with a positive result for Sin Nombre virus (SNV) (the primary etiologic agent of HPS in the United States) IgM at 1:6400, consistent with acute infection (Table).

Hantaviruses are a genus within the Bunyaviridae family that can cause HPS, a rare and sometimes fatal respiratory disease in humans. The majority of HPS cases in the United States are caused by SNV, which is primarily transmitted by the deer mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) (1). The average incubation period is 1–5 weeks after exposure to infected deer mouse urine or droppings (2). HPS typically manifests with fever, myalgias, progressive respiratory insufficiency, thrombocytopenia, and leukocytosis. Treatment is supportive. Approximately 60% of hospitalized patients experience pulmonary edema and respiratory failure and require mechanical ventilation (3). HPS case-fatality ratio is 38% (4).

Tri-County Health Department performed an environmental assessment of the farm on August 17. The residential dwelling was shared with 12 other male farm workers in a 1,000 square-foot wood frame house. Open food containers were found throughout the house; rodent droppings were observed in the kitchen, cement foundation, and ceiling. The patient reported that during the incubation period, he took daytime naps under trees and in abandoned farm buildings on the property, information that was corroborated by the farm owner and foreman. Those napping areas had evidence of rodent habitation including nesting, burrowing, and rodent runs. None of the other housemates reported an acute respiratory illness during the same exposure period and were not medically evaluated. Tri-County Health Department recommended implementing an integrated pest management program in the residential dwelling and workplace, which the farm owner agreed to execute.

Review of HPS cases in Tri-County Health Department’s jurisdiction during the preceding 2 years revealed a fatal case in a farm worker in November 2014 (Colorado Electronic Disease Reporting System, unpublished data, 2016) on a ranch approximately 50 miles east of the farm described in this report. Environmental assessment of that patient’s farm home in 2014 revealed multiple rodent nests and excrement throughout the rural residential dwellings.

This report highlights the importance of considering HPS in farm workers and in other occupations with risk for rodent exposure either at the workplace or in housing provided by the employer (5,6). Nationally, 23% of reported HPS cases with a reported occupation were working in agriculture (Dr. Annabelle de St. Maurice, CDC, personal communication, 2016). The lack of a vaccine or specific treatment for HPS underscores the importance of focusing on behavioral and environmental risk reduction to prevent SNV infections, including for at-risk occupations, such as farming. Adding supplemental questions to the national HPS case report form* about occupational exposures, including occupation, industry, workplace, and work-related housing or other outdoor activities, will improve identification of work practices and characteristics that increase risk for SNV exposure. Rapid public health assessment of environmental exposure to SNV is critical to mitigate ongoing hazards.

Acknowledgments

Mary Ann De Groote, MD, Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Pathology, Colorado State University, Western Infectious Diseases Consultants; Alexis Burakoff, MD, Epidemic Intelligence Service, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, CDC; Barbara Knust, DVM, Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, CDC; Marie De Perio, MD, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, CDC.

Corresponding author: Grace Marx, gmarx@cdc.gov, 720-200-1683.


1Epidemic Intelligence Service, Division of Scientific Education and Professional Development, CDC; 2Tri-County Health Department, Greenwood Village, Colorado.


References

  1. Knust B, Rollin PE. Twenty-year summary of surveillance for human hantavirus infections, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 2013;19:1934–7. CrossRefExternal PubMedExternal
  2. Hartline J, Mierek C, Knutson T, Kang C. Hantavirus infection in North America: a clinical review. Am J Emerg Med 2013;31:978–82. CrossRefExternal PubMedExternal
  3. Mertz GJ, Hjelle B, Crowley M, Iwamoto G, Tomicic V, Vial PA. Diagnosis and treatment of new world hantavirus infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2006;19:437–42. CrossRefExternal PubMedExternal
  4. CDC. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/hantavirus/hps/symptoms.html.
  5. Gonzalez LM, Lindsey AE, Hjelle B, et al. Prevalence of antibodies to Sin Nombre virus in humans living in rural areas of southern New Mexico and western Texas. Virus Res 2001;74:177–9. CrossRefExternal PubMedExternal
  6. Zeitz PS, Graber JM, Voorhees RA, et al. Assessment of occupational risk for hantavirus infection in Arizona and New Mexico. J Occup Environ Med 1997;39:463–7. CrossRefExternal PubMedExternal
Return to your place in the textTABLE. Laboratory findings associated with hantavirus pulmonary syndrome and Sin Nombre virus infection in a patient, by specimen collection date — Colorado, July 2016
Clinical specimen and laboratory test Reference range Collection date
July 23 July 24 July 26
Hantavirus IgM antibodies (ELISA)* <2.00 7.13
Hantavirus IgG antibodies (ELISA)* <2.00 10.05
Sin Nombre virus IgM antibodies (ELISA)§ <1:100 1:6400
Sin Nombre virus IgG antibodies (ELISA)§ <1:100 1:100
Sin Nombre virus IgM antibodies (ELISA)* <0.80 4.83; 4.01
White blood cells (103/μL) 4.8–10.8 7 8.9 9.4
Hematocrit (%) 42.0–52.0 49 44 43
Platelets (103/μL) 130–400 47 59 144

Abbreviations: ELISA = enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; IgG = immunoglobulin G; IgM = immunoglobulin M.
* Commercial reference laboratory.
Data not collected.
§ Colorado State Department of Public Health and Environment laboratory.
Confirmatory reflex testing was performed twice.


Suggested citation for this article: Marx G, Stinson K, Deatrich M, Albanese B. Notes from the Field: Hantavirus Pulmonary Syndrome in a Migrant Farm Worker — Colorado, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2017;66:62–63. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6602a6External.

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to mmwrq@cdc.gov.

View Page In:Cdc-pdf
Page last reviewed: August 1, 2017