Notes from the Field: Health Care–Associated Outbreak of Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis — West Virginia, 2015
Weekly / April 15, 2016 / 65(14);382–383
Article MetricsViews equals page views plus PDF downloads
Joel Massey, MD1,2; Roberto Henry, MPH3,4; Linda Minnich, MS5; Daryl M. Lamson6; Kirsten St.George, PhD6 (View author affiliations)View suggested citation
On September 4, 2015, the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health (WVBPH) was notified by an urban ophthalmology practice of 13 patients with epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) diagnosed during the preceding 3 weeks. EKC is an eye infection characterized by severe inflammation of the conjunctiva and cornea, and can result in vision loss (1). Pathogens commonly detected in EKC outbreaks are human adenovirus (HAdV) serotypes 8, 19, and 37, which are spread person-to-person or by fomites; no vaccines or effective antiviral treatments are available (2). HAdVs that cause EKC are resistant to desiccation and certain common surface disinfectants (3). Incubation periods of approximately 14 days, prolonged viral shedding, and persistence of live virus on some surfaces for up to 30 days (3) hamper outbreak prevention and control efforts. EKC often occurs simultaneously in health care settings and the community (2). EKC is not a reportable disease and outbreak reporting is often delayed (2); the incidence in West Virginia is unknown.
The local health department, with support from WVBPH, conducted an investigation to determine the source, identify additional cases, and implement control measures. An EKC case was defined as an ophthalmologist-diagnosed acute nonbacterial eye disease, characterized by conjunctival inflammation and lacrimation with ≥2 of the following symptoms: foreign body sensation, light sensitivity, eye pain, or conjunctival edema. A practice-associated EKC case was defined as a case of EKC diagnosed in a person who visited the ophthalmology practice or who lived with a patient who visited the practice ≤14 days before symptom onset. Practice-associated cases were ascertained by medical record review. A local health advisory was released to increase case-finding; symptomatic patients not associated with the practice were interviewed by telephone to ascertain symptoms and determine case status. By September 14, an additional 10 cases had been reported; eight were practice-associated, including two in practice staff members; two cases were in patients not previously associated with the practice.
Laboratory testing for HAdV was established on September 5. Fifteen patient conjunctival swab specimens were collected from symptomatic patients at the practice during September 5–October 5, and stored by a regional hospital virology laboratory. Site visits were conducted by the local health department on September 10 and September 15; seven environmental swab samples were collected during the September 15 site visit. The Wadsworth Laboratory, New York State Department of Health, confirmed HAdV presence with real-time polymerase chain reaction, and performed HAdV molecular serotyping on the first 12 conjunctival swab specimens collected and on the seven environmental samples. HAdV-8 was detected in 10 of 12 patient specimens; HAdV-3 was detected in one; and one specimen had no detectable virus. HAdV-8 was also detected in three of the seven environmental samples; these were recovered from an exam chair hand rest, a slit lamp chin rest, and an applanation tonometer (a device used to measure intraocular pressure) in a single examination room.
Infection control procedures identified during site visits included an unwritten protocol of once daily cleaning of commonly touched surfaces, and wiping instruments with alcohol pads after each patient contact. The local health department recommended a written infection control policy using cleaning agents effective against HAdV contamination (3), cleaning all touched surfaces between symptomatic patient encounters, segregating infectious patients from others, mandatory leave for symptomatic staff members, and patient education regarding EKC transmission prevention. Control recommendations were implemented on September 15.
During August 14–December 1, a total of 52 EKC cases were identified, with symptom onset July 28–November 8. Overall, 38 (73%) cases were practice-associated (Figure). Laboratory confirmation of HAdV-8 among practice-associated cases and HAdV-8 contaminating the practice environment suggest that health care–associated transmission occurred during the 1 month between the first EKC diagnosis and implementation of control measures.
This investigation highlights the importance of effective control measures for HAdV decontamination in health care settings to prevent transmission within clinical settings and the community. Eye care providers should maintain written infection control protocols addressing EKC, and other infection risks, as recommended by CDC (4). Timely reporting of outbreaks and deployment of an EKC outbreak toolkit that includes patient education, a health advisory to providers, and a chart abstraction template, might reduce transmission; a toolkit is available upon request to WVBPH, Division of Infectious Disease Epidemiology.
Charleston Area Medical Center Infection Prevention Team, West Virginia; Kanawha-Charleston Health Department Division of Epidemiology and Threat Preparedness, West Virginia; West Virginia Bureau for Public Health Division of Infectious Disease Epidemiology.
Corresponding author: Joel Massey, JMassey@cdc.gov, 304-356-5358.
1Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 2West Virginia Bureau for Public Health; 3Public Health Associate Program, Office for State, Tribal, Local, and Territorial Support, CDC; 4Kanawha-Charleston Health Department, West Virginia; 5Charleston Area Medical Center, West Virginia; 6New York State Department of Health.
- American Academy of Pediatrics. Adenovirus infections. In: Pickering LK, Baker CJ, Kimberlin DW, Long SS, eds. Red book: 2012 report of the committee on infectious diseases. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2012.
- CDC. Adenovirus-associated epidemic keratoconjunctivitis outbreaks—four states, 2008–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2013;62:637–41.
- Rutala WA, Peacock JE, Gergen MF, Sobsey MD, Weber DJ. Efficacy of hospital germicides against adenovirus 8, a common cause of epidemic keratoconjunctivitis in health care facilities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50:1419–24. CrossRef
- CDC. Guide to infection prevention for outpatient settings: minimum expectations for safe care. Version 2.2, November 2015. Atlanta GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2015. http://www.cdc.gov/hai/pdfs/guidelines/Ambulatory-Care+Checklist_508_11_2015.pdf
Suggested citation for this article: Massey J, Henry R, Minnich L, Lamson DM, St.George K. Notes from the Field. Health Care–Associated Outbreak of Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis — West Virginia, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:382–383. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6514a5.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.
All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Page last reviewed: August 25, 2017
- Page last updated: August 25, 2017
- Content source: