Targeted Testing, 2020

Table of Contents

Table 1. Persons sought, enlisted, or registered for targeted testing projects

Figure 1. Persons who sought, enlisted, or registered for targeted testing by treatment disposition

Table 2. Persons who are diagnosed with latent TB infection (LTBI), by risk type and by initial and final treatment regimen

Table 3. Reasons for stopping treatment for persons identified with latent TB infection (LTBI) through targeted testing

Evaluation Indices, 2020

Table 4. Targeted testing evaluation indices

Table 5. Targeted testing evaluation indices, by risk type

 

Targeted testing is an effective prevention strategy for reducing the morbidity and mortality of tuberculosis (TB) disease in the United States. Targeted testing is used to identify and treat persons infected with M. tuberculosis. Identifying and treating persons who have latent infection (LTBI) is important as an estimated 80% of US TB cases are believed to be the result of longstanding, untreated LTBI.[1]

Beginning in 2020, CDC-funded state and city TB programs with ≥150 TB cases are required to submit targeted testing data (as outlined in the cooperative agreements). TB programs report results of their targeted testing activities to CDC by entering the data into the Aggregate Reports for Tuberculosis Program Evaluation (ARPE) form through the National Tuberculosis Indicators Project (NTIP) performance-monitoring tool. This report summarizes 2020 targeted testing data and is the first report summarizing this information.

Because targeted testing reporting includes treatment outcomes, final reporting extends over a 12-month period. For example, this means that individuals with TB infection identified in December 2020 would have until December 2021 to finish treatment, and the data would then be reported in 2022.

Targeted testing data are submitted using the following 3 categories:

Project: testing for groups done at sites outside the health department, as determined by the needs or convenience of the groups being tested. Testing projects might be held once, or they might be recurrent (e.g., annual testing at a correctional facility) or ongoing (e.g., testing of all new admissions to a homeless shelter).

Individual: testing for individuals or groups that occurs outside of testing projects; testing is often done at a health department clinic.

Administrative: testing for LTBI that is done when testing is a low public health priority because the tested persons or groups are not at risk for TB and might not be candidates for LTBI treatment. This testing is often required by regulations or policies created outside the TB control program.[2]

The number submitted in each category indicates the number of individuals the program classified under that category.

The following states and cities were required to report targeted testing data in 2020 because they had >150 TB cases in 2019: California, Georgia, Florida, Illinois, Los Angeles, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, New York City, North Carolina, San Diego, Texas, Virginia, and Washington. Not all these states and cities reported or reported fully, and no TB programs with <150 cases reported targeted testing activities in 2020.”

Targeted Testing, 2020

Data shown in tables and figures are up to date as of August 2, 2022.

Table 1. Persons sought, enlisted, or registered for targeted testing

Appendix A. Counts and Indices for Investigation of Sputum AFB Smear-Positive TB Cases, 2015-2019
Targeted testing project* Targeted testing individual Administrative§ Total
Sought, enlisted, or registered 14,152 4,056 5,230 23,438
U.S.–born 9,936 96 201 10,233
Non-U.S.–born 1,567 397 124 2,088
Evaluated 13,810 3,591 4,198 21,599
TST 160 >65 2,224 2,449
IGRA 12,122 453 385 12,960
TB disease 5 27 24 56
Latent TB infection 1,393 1,324 452 3,169

Note. Programs reporting include California, Los Angeles, San Diego, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia.

*Targeted testing project: Usually, testing projects for groups are done at sites outside the health department, as determined for the convenience or by the needs of the groups being tested. Such testing projects might be done only once during a limited period, or they might be recurrent (e.g., annual testing at a correctional facility) or ongoing (e.g., testing of all new admissions to a homeless shelter).

Targeted testing individual: The sum of testing that is done one person at a time or by group but outside of testing projects, when testing is in accordance with national, state, or local guidelines for selecting persons who are at risk for TB and who are expected to be candidates for treatment if they have LTBI. The testing is often done at a health department clinic.

§Targeted testing administrative: Testing for LTBI that is done when testing is a low public health priority because the tested persons or groups are at low risk for TB and might not even be candidates for LTBI treatment. This testing often is required by regulations or policies created outside the TB control program.

Optional reporting fields.

 

Figure 1. Persons who sought, enlisted, or registered for targeted testing by treatment disposition

Figure 1. Persons who sought, enlisted, or registered for targeted testing by treatment disposition

Table 2. Persons diagnosed with latent TB infection (LTBI), by risk type and by starting and completing treatment regimen

Table 3: Contact Investigation Evaluation Indices, Smear-Positive Cases
Targeted testing project medical risk* Targeted testing project population risk† Targeted testing individual medical risk* Targeted testing individual population risk† Administrative Total
Latent TB infection 14 1,379 216 1,108 452 3,169
Candidates for treatment 12 1,025 180 949 402 2,568
Started treatment 12 451 140 622 253 1,478
Completed treatment 10 351 110 458 163 1,092

Note. Programs reporting include California, Los Angeles, San Diego, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia.

* Medical risk: Persons with LTBI who have a condition that has been associated with predisposition to TB disease, usually a concurrent medical diagnosis. LTBI treatment has increased urgency for persons in this target category.

† Population risk: Persons with LTBI who are members of socially or demographically defined groups that have been associated with high prevalence of TB infection or a high transmission rate.

Table 3. Reasons patient stopped treatment for persons identified with latent TB infection (LTBI) through targeted testing

Table 5: Reasons Contacts Stopped LTBI Treatment – Smear-Negative, Culture-Positive Cases
Targeted testing project Targeted testing individual Administrative Total
Contacts stopping treatment (n) 34 158 69 261
Active TB developed 0 0 0 0
Adverse effect of medicine 3 16 6 25
Death 0 0 1 1
Patient chose to stop 5 43 26 74
Patient lost to follow-up 25 92 33 150
Patient moved (follow-up unknown) 1 7 3 11

Note. Programs reporting for each project type include:

Targeted testing project: Los Angeles, San Diego, Florida, New Jersey, New York, and North Carolina.

Targeted testing individual: Florida, New York, North Carolina

Administrative: Florida, New York, North Carolina

Evaluation Indices, 2020

Table 4. Targeted testing evaluation indices

Table 6: Contact Investigation Evaluation Indices – Smear-Negative, Culture-Positive Cases
Targeted testing project Targeted testing individual Administrative
Evaluation % 97.6 88.5 80.3
Disease % 0.0 0.8 0.6
Latent TB infection % 10.1 36.9 10.8

Note. Programs reporting include California, Los Angeles, San Diego, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia.

Table 5. Targeted testing evaluation indices, by risk type

Table 7: Counts of Contacts, Other Cases
Targeted testing project medical risk* Targeted testing project population risk† Targeted testing individual medical risk* Targeted testing individual population risk† Administrative
Candidate % 85.7 74.3 83.3 85.6 88.9
Treatment % 100 44.0 77.8 65.5 62.9
Completion% 83.3 77.8 78.6 73.6 64.4

Note. Programs reporting include California, Los Angeles, San Diego, Florida, Georgia, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, and Virginia.

* Medical risk: Persons with LTBI who have a condition that has been associated with predisposition to TB disease, usually a concurrent medical diagnosis. LTBI treatment has increased urgency for persons in this target category.

Population risk: Persons with LTBI who are members of socially or demographically defined groups that have been associated with high prevalence of TB infection or a high transmission rate