Effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Preventing COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Among Adults with Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection — United States, June 2021–February 2022
Weekly / April 15, 2022 / 71(15);549-555
On April 12, 2022, this report was posted online as an MMWR Early Release.
Ian D. Plumb, MBBS1,2,*; Leora R. Feldstein, PhD1,2,*; Eric Barkley3; Alexander B. Posner, MPH3; Howard S. Bregman, MD3; Melissa Briggs Hagen, MD1,2; Jacqueline L. Gerhart, MD3 (View author affiliations)View suggested citation
What is already known about this topic?
Persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection have some protection against reinfection leading to hospitalization, but there is limited evidence regarding the additional benefit of vaccination among these persons.
What is added by this report?
Among persons with previous infection, COVID-19 mRNA vaccination provided protection against subsequent COVID-19–associated hospitalization. Estimated vaccine effectiveness against reinfection leading to hospitalization during the Omicron-predominant period was approximately 35% after dose 2, and 68% after a booster dose.
What are the implications for public health practice?
To prevent COVID-19–associated hospitalization, all eligible persons should stay up to date with vaccination, including those with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Views equals page views plus PDF downloads
Previous infection with SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, has been estimated to confer up to 90% protection against reinfection, although this protection was lower against the Omicron variant compared with that against other SARS-CoV-2 variants (1–3). A test-negative design was used to estimate effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in preventing subsequent COVID-19–associated hospitalization among adults aged ≥18 years with a previous positive nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) or diagnosis of COVID-19.† The analysis used data from Cosmos, an electronic health record (EHR)–aggregated data set (4), and compared vaccination status of 3,761 case-patients (positive NAAT result associated with hospitalization) with 7,522 matched control-patients (negative NAAT result). After previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, estimated vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19–associated hospitalization was 47.5% (95% CI = 38.8%–54.9%) after 2 vaccine doses and 57.8% (95% CI = 32.1%–73.8%) after a booster dose during the Delta-predominant period (June 20–December 18, 2021), and 34.6% (95% CI = 25.5%–42.5%) after 2 doses and 67.6% (95% CI = 61.4%–72.8%) after a booster dose during the Omicron-predominant period (December 19, 2021–February 24, 2022). Vaccination provides protection against COVID-19–associated hospitalization among adults with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, with the highest level of protection conferred by a booster dose. All eligible persons, including those with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, should stay up to date with vaccination to prevent COVID-19–associated hospitalization.
Data were obtained from Cosmos (4), an EHR data set that includes information from more than 135 million patients and 154 health care organizations in the United States.§ Patients eligible for inclusion in the analysis met the following four criteria: 1) age ≥18 years, 2) residence in the United States, 3) at least one hospital admission for a COVID-19–like illness,¶ with a hospitalization-associated NAAT performed from 10 days before through 3 days after admission during June 20, 2021–February 24, 2022, and 4) a previous positive NAAT result or diagnostic code of COVID-19 (with or without hospitalization) >90 days before the date of the NAAT associated with the subsequent hospitalization.** Patients under the billing category of “observation” and patients who were admitted and discharged on the same day were excluded. Vaccination status was categorized on the day of the NAAT associated with the hospitalization as 1) unvaccinated, 2) after dose 1, 3) after dose 2, or 4) after a booster dose††; patients were excluded if they did not meet one of these definitions or if the previous positive NAAT result or COVID-19 diagnosis was after the date of the most recent vaccine dose. Vaccination information was collected during the 14 days after hospitalization or other health care visit from a patient’s health system, other health systems via clinical record exchanges, state registries, and patient-reported history.§§
VE was estimated using conditional logistic regression, comparing the vaccination status among case-patients and control-patients. VE after each vaccine dose was estimated using the unvaccinated group as a referent. For estimation of relative VE after a booster dose, the referent group had received dose 2 (but not a booster dose) ≥5 months previously. Eligible case-patients were matched with control-patients using a 1:2 ratio by 2-week period of the hospitalization-associated NAAT, 10-year age group, and state of residence. After matching, estimates were adjusted for sex, race/ethnicity, number of clinical encounters during 2019, number of underlying health conditions, and days since the previous infection.¶¶ The period June 20–December 18, 2021, was categorized as Delta-predominant, and the period December 19, 2021–February 24, 2022, as Omicron-predominant; periods were defined as range of dates when estimated national prevalence of a SARS-CoV-2 variant exceeded 50%.*** In a sensitivity analysis, VE was also estimated defining previous infection as a positive NAAT result. Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and chi-square tests were used to compare group medians and proportions, respectively; p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Data were analyzed using R software (version 4.1.2; R Foundation). This activity was reviewed by CDC and was conducted consistent with applicable federal law and CDC policy.†††
Among 5,116,024 adults aged ≥18 years with an initial positive NAAT result or diagnosis of COVID-19, 51,609 patients were hospitalized with COVID-19–like illness associated with a NAAT result >90 days after the previous infection,§§§ including 5,048 (9.8%) with a positive NAAT result. Among these 5,048 case-patients, 2,436 (48.3%; median = 67 reinfections per week) were admitted during the Delta-predominant period, and 2,612 (51.7%; median = 343 reinfections per week) during the Omicron-predominant period (Supplementary Figure, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/116026).
After 7,569 patients were excluded, 11,283 of 44,040 eligible patients were matched and included in the analysis, 3,761 (87.1%) of 4,319 eligible case-patients and 7,522 (18.9%) of 39,721 eligible control-patients. Case- and control-patients were demographically similar, with fewer underlying conditions and previous health care encounters among case-patients (Table 1). Overall, 61.2% of case-patients were unvaccinated, 4.3% had received 1 vaccine dose, 27.6% had received 2 doses, and 6.9% had received a booster dose, compared with 47.5%, 5.5%, 33.2%, and 13.9% of control-patients, respectively.
During the Delta-predominant period, estimated adjusted VE was 58.8% (95% CI = 41.3%–71.1%) after dose 1, 47.5% (95% CI = 38.8%–54.9%) after dose 2, and 57.8% (95% CI = 32.1%–73.8%) after a booster dose; during the Omicron-predominant period, adjusted VE was 33.0% (95% CI = 15.0%–47.2%) after dose 1, 34.6% (95% CI = 25.5%–42.5%) after dose 2, and 67.6% (95% CI = 61.4%–72.8%) after a booster dose (Table 2). VE estimates were similar whether hospitalizations were <90 days or ≥90 days after the most recent vaccine dose. Similar estimates were obtained in a sensitivity analysis that included 2,146 case-patients and 4,887 control-patients with previous infection confirmed by NAAT (Supplementary Table, https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/116025).
During the analysis period, among persons who had a previous positive NAAT result or COVID-19 diagnosis before the first vaccine dose, estimated VE was 43.1% (95% CI = 30.7%–53.2%) after dose 1, 41.7% (95% CI = 35.5%–47.3%) after dose 2, and 70.3% (95% CI = 64.1%–75.4%) after a booster dose (Table 3). Among persons whose initial infection occurred between dose 2 and a booster dose, VE after the booster dose was 50.0% (95% CI = 26.9%–65.8%). Estimated VE of a booster dose was similar among persons aged <65 years (67.7%; 95% CI = 57.7%–75.3%) and ≥65 years (64.5%; 95% CI 56.0%–71.4%). Relative VE of a booster dose compared with ≥5 months after dose 2 was 55.9% (95% CI = 43.6%–65.5%).
Among persons with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 diagnosis, receipt of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine provided protection against subsequent COVID-19 hospitalization. The highest level of protection was conferred by a booster vaccine dose, with similar VE during the Delta- and Omicron-predominant periods (approximately 60%–70%). In contrast, VE of 1 or 2 doses declined from 50%–60% during the Delta-predominant to approximately 35% during the Omicron-predominant period. Receiving a booster dose conferred protection even if the previous infection occurred after receipt of the second vaccine dose. Findings from this report indicate that SARS-CoV-2 reinfections leading to COVID-19–associated hospitalizations are preventable by COVID-19 vaccination.
Benefit of vaccination after previous SARS-CoV-2 infection was also indicated by an analysis of surveillance data from New York City that estimated approximately 50%–70% protection against hospitalization from reinfection (5). A case-control analysis using surveillance data from Brazil estimated 90% protection by 2 doses of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine against hospitalization or death after reinfection (6); the high estimated VE might partly reflect recent vaccination in the context of potential decreased infection-induced immunity. The similar estimated benefit from 1 or 2 vaccine doses in preventing reinfection leading to hospitalization in the current study is consistent with evidence that vaccination elicits a more rapid immunologic response if preceded by a SARS-CoV-2 infection¶¶¶ (7). In the current analysis, a booster dose offered superior protection against reinfection leading to hospitalization.
Immunity from previous SARS-CoV-2 infection wanes over time (1,8) and was lower against the Omicron variant compared with immunity against other virus variants (2). However, protection is estimated to have remained stable against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection leading to hospitalization or death (2). Previous studies have indicated that, in general, protection by a hybrid of infection-induced and vaccination-induced immunity is superior to that from either alone and is less likely to wane over time (1,8). Compared with unvaccinated persons without previous infection, persons with a booster dose of mRNA vaccine have been estimated to have 90% protection against hospitalization with COVID-19 during the Omicron period; the highest estimated protection was among vaccinated persons with previous infection.****
The findings in this report are subject to at least five limitations. First, underascertainment of vaccination status from available information would likely lead to an underestimation of VE, particularly if vaccinated control-patients were misclassified as unvaccinated; this might have led to lower estimated VE compared with similar analyses (5,6,9). Second, generalizability might be limited by incomplete data or by missing data from persons who do not seek health care; however, Cosmos data are broadly representative of the U.S. population (4). Third, several VE estimates were imprecise, with broad CIs; estimates should be interpreted with caution. Fourth, underascertainment of previous infection might have occurred because of dependence on EHR data; however, findings were similar when restricting analyses to case-patients with positive initial NAAT results, and the test-negative design for an endpoint of severe illness mitigates the risk for selection bias. Finally, there might be residual or unmeasured confounding by characteristics associated with exposure, vaccination, or hospitalization that were not recorded in the data set.
An increasing proportion of the U.S. population has had SARS-CoV-2 infection†††† and might be at risk for SARS-CoV-2 reinfection leading to hospitalization. In the current analysis, approximately 50% of these reinfections occurred during the Omicron-predominant period. Vaccination remains the safest strategy for preventing complications of SARS-CoV-2 infection. COVID-19 vaccination offers additional protection against reinfection leading to hospitalization, with a booster dose offering the highest level of protection. To prevent COVID-19–associated hospitalization, all eligible persons should stay up to date with vaccination, including those with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Caleb Cox, Joseph Deckert, Joseph Haddock, Paul Jacobs, Epic Research, Epic Systems Corporation, Verona, Wisconsin; Adi Gundlapalli, Ruth Link-Gelles, Claire Midgley, Tamara Pilishvili, Heather Scobie, CDC.
Corresponding author: Ian D. Plumb, firstname.lastname@example.org.
All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. Eric Barkley, Alexander B. Posner, Howard S. Bregman, and Jacqueline L. Gerhart report support from Epic Research, Epic Systems Corporation. No other potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
* These authors contributed equally to this report.
† A test-negative design is a type of vaccine effectiveness study that compares the vaccination status of persons who seek testing in the same way (in this study, with COVID-19–like illness) and received either positive results (case-patients) or negative results (control-patients). Potential selection bias is limited by including patients who receive positive or negative test results but are otherwise similar. Vaccine effectiveness is estimated as the percentage of protection by being in a specified vaccination group compared with a referent group.
§ Cosmos is an aggregated EHR data platform of participating health systems that use software provided by Epic Systems Corporation that includes more than 135 million patients with similar demographics to U.S. Census data. Of 154 heath systems included in the Cosmos dataset, 130 health systems that had data available since 2019 were included in the current analysis. https://epicresearch.org/about-cosmosexternal icon
¶ COVID-19–like illness diagnoses included acute respiratory illness (e.g., COVID-19, respiratory failure, or pneumonia) or related signs or symptoms (cough, fever, dyspnea, vomiting, or diarrhea) using diagnosis codes from the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision.
** COVID-19 was defined as a clinical encounter with any of the following International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision diagnostic codes: U07.1, J12.81, and J12.82. A difference of >90 days was used consistent with the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists case definition of COVID-19: https://ndc.services.cdc.gov/case-definitions/coronavirus-disease-2019-2021/.
†† Patients were categorized on the date of NAAT associated with hospitalization as unvaccinated if no COVID-19 vaccine had been received; after dose 1 if ≥14 days had elapsed since receipt of the first dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine and before any second dose; and after dose 2 if ≥14 days had elapsed since completion of a second mRNA vaccine dose, and no subsequent dose was received. To limit early additional doses (for example, among immunocompromised persons), patients were categorized as after booster if ≥14 days had elapsed since receipt of an mRNA booster dose administered ≥5 months after a second dose, and if no further doses had been received. Patients were excluded from the analysis if they received a non-mRNA COVID-19 vaccine; the day of the NAAT-associated hospitalization was <14 days after dose 1, dose 2 or a booster dose; dose 2 was received <14 days after dose 1; any booster dose was <5 months after dose 2; they received >3 doses of vaccine; or their previous positive NAAT or COVID-19 diagnosis was after the most recent vaccine dose. In addition, if patients had more than one hospitalization-associated NAAT, they were considered a case-patient if their NAAT was positive at any point and were excluded from being a control-patient, (i.e., cases-patients could not also serve as control-patients).
§§ Vaccination information for each patient was collected from four sources: 1) vaccine doses administered within the health system, 2) electronic health records, 3) vaccination information obtained from other health systems using a shared data platform, and 4) vaccination information obtained directly from a state or other vaccine registry.
¶¶ Characteristics were classified on the date of the NAAT associated with the hospital admission. Underlying conditions were extracted from EHR clinical encounter data and were based on a CDC list of conditions associated with the highest risk for COVID-19 (https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/clinical-care/underlyingconditions.html, accessed March 23, 2022) and included the following: alcoholic liver disease, autoimmune hepatitis, bronchiectasis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cancer, cardiomyopathy, cerebrovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, cirrhosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, current smoker, receipt of nontopical glucocorticoids within the previous 12 months, heart failure, HIV, immune deficiency, receipt of immunosuppressive medications within the previous 12 months, interstitial lung disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, obesity, pulmonary arterial hypertension, pulmonary embolus, pregnancy, solid organ transplant, tuberculosis, and type 1 or 2 diabetes.
††† 45 C.F.R. part 46, 21 C.F.R. part 56; 42 U.S.C. Sect. 241(d); 5 U.S.C. Sect. 552a; 44 U.S.C. Sect. 3501 et seq.
§§§ Among 25,641 patients with a positive NAAT >90 days after an initial positive SARS-CoV-2 NAAT or diagnosis of COVID-19 during June 20–December 31, 2021, 2,378 (9.3%) were admitted to a hospital with COVID-19–like illness between 10 days after and 3 days before the subsequent positive NAAT result, indicating reinfection with COVID-19–associated hospitalization.
- Hall V, Foulkes S, Insalata F, et al.; SIREN Study Group. Protection against SARS-CoV-2 after Covid-19 vaccination and previous infection. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1207–20. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2118691external icon PMID:35172051external icon
- Altarawneh HN, Chemaitelly H, Hasan MR, et al. Protection against the Omicron variant from previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. N Engl J Med 2022;386:1288–90. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc2200133external icon PMID:35139269external icon
- CDC. Science brief: SARS-CoV-2 infection-induced and vaccine-induced immunity. Atlanta, GA: US Department of Health and Human Services, CDC; 2021. Accessed March 25, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/science/science-briefs/vaccine-induced-immunity.html
- Tarabichi Y, Frees A, Honeywell S, et al. The Cosmos Collaborative: a vendor-facilitated electronic health record data aggregation platform. ACI open 2021;5:e-36–46. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731004external icon
- Levin-Rector A, Firestein L, McGibbon E, et al. Reduced odds of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection after vaccination among New York City adults, June–August 2021. medrxiv [Preprint posted online December 11, 2021]. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.09.21267203v1external icon
- Cerqueira-Silva T, Andrews JR, Boaventura VS, et al. Effectiveness of CoronaVac, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2, and Ad26.COV2.S among individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infection in Brazil: a test-negative, case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis 2022. Epub April 1, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(22)00140-2external icon
- Goel RR, Apostolidis SA, Painter MM, et al. Distinct antibody and memory B cell responses in SARS-CoV-2 naïve and recovered individuals following mRNA vaccination. Sci Immunol 2021;6:eabi6950. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciimmunol.abi6950external icon PMID:33858945external icon
- Goldberg Y, Mandel M, Bar-On YM, Bodenheimer O, Freedman L, Ash N, et al. Protection and waning of natural and hybrid COVID-19 immunity. medRxiv. [Preprint posted online December 5, 2021]. https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.12.04.21267114v1external icon
- Ozasa K. The effect of misclassification on evaluating the effectiveness of influenza vaccines. Vaccine 2008;26:6462–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.039external icon PMID:18573297external icon
Suggested citation for this article: Plumb ID, Feldstein LR, Barkley E, et al. Effectiveness of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccination in Preventing COVID-19–Associated Hospitalization Among Adults with Previous SARS-CoV-2 Infection — United States, June 2021–February 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2022;71:549-555. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7115e2external icon.
MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.
All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version (https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr) and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.
Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to email@example.com.