Patient Characteristics and Product Use Behaviors Among Persons with E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use–Associated Lung Injury — Indiana, June ̶ October 2019

Kathryn L. Gaub, DVM1,2; Sara Hallyburton, MPH2; Claudine Samanic, PhD2,3; Deanna Paddack2; Charles R. Clark, MPH2; Shawn Pence2; Jennifer A. Brown, DVM2; Eric Hawkins, MS2 (View author affiliations)

View suggested citation


What is already known about this topic?

As of December 4, 2019, 2,291 U.S. persons have been hospitalized with cases of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use–associated lung injury (EVALI). Among those with available data, 80% reported using products containing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC).

What is added by this report?

During August 8–October 28, 2019, 97 patients in Indiana were hospitalized with confirmed or probable cases of EVALI. Interviews were completed for 29 patients; among these, 69% reported using THC-containing products.

What are the implications for public health practice?

The percentage of Indiana EVALI patients reporting THC use was low compared with that reported for all U.S. EVALI patients. This might be due to underreporting of THC use but could also suggest that EVALI is not exclusively associated with THC use.

Article Metrics

Views equals page views plus PDF downloads

Related Materials

As of December 4, 2019, a total of 2,291 cases of hospitalized e-cigarette, or vaping, product use–associated lung injury (EVALI) have been reported from 50 states, the District of Columbia, and two U.S. territories (Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands) (1). State health departments, including the Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH), are working with their local health departments and with CDC, the Food and Drug Administration, and other clinical and public health partners in investigating this outbreak of EVALI. On August 7, 2019, ISDH issued an advisory regarding patients hospitalized in Wisconsin with severe acute lung injury who reported the use of e-cigarette, or vaping, products (2); health care providers were requested to notify ISDH of similar cases. On August 8, 2019, ISDH received reports of five similar cases among Indiana residents. Suspected cases EVALI reported to ISDH were investigated further only among patients who required hospitalization. Established case definitions were used to classify cases.* Medical record abstractions and patient interviews were completed using nationally standardized forms to ascertain patient characteristics, medical care received, and product-use behaviors.

A total of 127 suspected EVALI cases were reported to ISDH during August 8–October 28, 2019; among these, 97 (76%) patients met the confirmed (41; 42%) or probable (56; 58%) case definitions and were hospitalized, including three (3%) who died. Because of staffing constraints, medical record abstractions could only be completed for 54 (56%) patients; among these, the median age was 26 years (range = 16–68 years), and 38 (70%) were male (Table 1). Among the patients for whom information on medical care was available, 13 of 51 (25%) were admitted to an intensive care unit, 34 of 52 (65%) were treated with steroids, and seven of 50 (14%) required intubation and mechanical ventilation. Among the 54 patients with available information documenting preexisting conditions, nine (14%) had asthma, 12 (22%) had depression, and 14 (26%) had anxiety.

Interviews were successfully completed for 29 (30%) of 97 patients (Table 2); 33 (34%) patients were lost to follow-up or refused to be interviewed. Among the 29 patients interviewed, seven (24%) reported using only tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-containing products, seven (24%) reported using only nicotine-containing products, 13 (45%) reported using both, and two (7%) reported using flavored products containing neither THC nor nicotine. A total of 20 (69%) reported using any THC-containing product; among those with available information on product use, eight of 15 (53%) reported using the product daily, 14 of 19 (74%) reported using products labeled “Dank Vapes,” and 10 of 20 (50%) obtained the products from a friend or other acquaintance.

The percentage of Indiana EVALI patients who reported using THC-containing products (69%) was lower than that reported by patients in Utah (92%), Illinois and Wisconsin (80%), and nationally (80%) (13). Reported concurrent use of THC-containing and nicotine-containing products in Indiana (45%) was also slightly lower than that reported nationally (52%) (1). Further, nearly one third (31%) of Indiana patients reported using products that did not contain THC. These findings need to be investigated to determine whether Indiana patients might have underreported THC use or whether use of multiple product types might cause EVALI. Results of this investigation of Indiana EVALI patients were consistent with findings from Illinois that frequently using THC-containing products and obtaining these products through personal contacts has been associated with EVALI (4). In addition, the high proportion of reported use of Dank Vape products might be important, because these products are largely counterfeit (4).

The findings in this report are subject to at least four limitations. First, medical record abstractions were completed for one half of EVALI patients in Indiana, and only one third were interviewed, which might result in selection bias and inaccurate estimates of patient characteristics and product use patterns. Second, preexisting conditions and details of medical care were not consistently documented in medical records. Therefore, percentages reported here could be underestimates. Third, because THC-containing products are illegal in Indiana, use of these products might be underreported for fear of legal repercussions or perceived stigma. Finally, only hospitalized cases in Indiana were investigated, potentially leading to bias related to the severity of cases.

The specific cause, or causes, of EVALI has not yet been determined. Vitamin E acetate, frequently used as a thickening agent in THC-containing products, has been detected in bronchoalveolar lavage samples from 29 EVALI patients in 10 states and five EVALI patients in Minnesota (5,6). However, it is possible that more than one compound or ingredient could be the cause, and evidence is not yet sufficient to rule out contributions of other toxicants to EVALI. CDC recommends not using e-cigarette, or vaping, products containing THC, especially those obtained from informal sources such as friends, family, or in-person or online dealers (1). Because the specific cause or causes of lung injury are not yet known, persons should consider refraining from use of all e-cigarette, or vaping, products (1). Youths, young adults, or women who are pregnant should never use e-cigarette, or vaping, products (1).


Amanda Billman, Cyndy Fohrman, Kayley Humm, Nyehla Irsheid, Lindsay Joy-Wenning, Tracy Larcheveque, Dawn McDevitt, Lauren Milroy, Brandy Paul, Payton Revolt, Katelin Rupp, Ali Snively, Jill Stauffer, Christopher Tarrand, Kiefer Taylor, Christina Wheeler, Indiana State Department of Health; Anna Heilers, Ellen Polley, Indiana University–Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana; Stacey A. Bosch, CDC.

Corresponding author: Kathryn Gaub,, 317-234-4704.

1Epidemic Intelligence Service, CDC; 2Indiana State Department of Health; 3Division of Population Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC.

All authors have completed and submitted the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors form for disclosure of potential conflicts of interest. No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.


  1. Lozier MJ, Wallace B, Anderson K, et al. Update: demographic, product, and substance-use characteristics of hospitalized patients in a nationwide outbreak of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use–associated lung injuries—United States, December 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019. Epub December 6, 2019. CrossRef
  2. Layden JE, Ghinai I, Pray I, et al. Pulmonary illness related to e-cigarette use in Illinois and Wisconsin—preliminary report. N Engl J Med 2019. Epub September 6, 2019. CrossRef
  3. Lewis N, McCaffrey K, Sage K, et al. E-cigarette use, or vaping, practices and characteristics among persons with associated lung injury—Utah, April–October 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:953–6. CrossRef PubMed
  4. Navon L, Jones CM, Ghinai I, et al. Risk factors for e-cigarette, or vaping, product use–associated lung injury (EVALI) among adults who use e-cigarette, or vaping, products—Illinois, July–October 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:1034–9. CrossRef PubMed
  5. Blount BC, Karwowski MP, Morel-Espinosa M, et al. Evaluation of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients in an outbreak of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use–associated lung injury—10 states, August–October 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:1040–1. CrossRef PubMed
  6. Taylor J, Wiens T, Peterson J, et al.; Lung Injury Response Task Force. Characteristics of e-cigarette, or vaping, products used by patients with associated lung injury and products seized by law enforcement—Minnesota, 2018 and 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:1096–100. CrossRef PubMed
TABLE 1. Characteristics of patients hospitalized with e-cigarette, or vaping, product use–associated lung injury ascertained from medical record abstraction (N = 54) — Indiana, June–October 2019Return to your place in the text
Patient characteristic (no. with available information) No. (%*)
Sex (54)
Male 38 (70)
Female 16 (30)
Age group (yrs) (54)
13–17 7 (13)
18–29 27 (50)
30–39 12 (22)
40–49 3 (6)
50–59 3 (6)
≥60 2 (4)
Symptoms on admission (54)
Shortness of breath 48 (89)
Cough 44 (81)
Chest pain 17 (31)
Nausea 27 (50)
Vomiting 27 (50)
Diarrhea 15 (28)
Abdominal pain 12 (22)
Weight loss 8 (15)
Sweating 11 (20)
Preexisting conditions (54)
Asthma 9 (17)
COPD 2 (4)
Depression 12 (22)
Anxiety 14 (26)
Medical care received
Antibiotics (51) 44 (86)
Steroids (52) 34 (65)
Bronchoscopy (44) 13 (30)
Lung biopsy (45) 7 (16)
ICU admission (51) 13 (25)
Intubation and mechanical ventilation (50) 7 (14)

Abbreviations: COPD = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; ICU = intensive care unit.
* Percentages rounded and therefore might not sum to 100% in each category.

TABLE 2. Product use preferences and behaviors of patients hospitalized with e-cigarette, or vaping product use–associated lung injury identified through patient interview (N = 29) — Indiana, June–October 2019Return to your place in the text
Product preference/behavior (no. with available information No. (%*)
Type of product (29)
THC-containing only 7 (24)
Nicotine-containing only 7 (24)
Both THC- and nicotine-containing 13 (45)
Neither THC- nor nicotine-containing 2 (7)
Nicotine-containing brands used (19)
Juul 8 (42)
Njoy 2 (11)
Nicotine-containing product use frequency (19)
Daily 16 (84)
2–3 times per week 2 (11)
Monthly or less 1 (5)
THC-containing brands used (19)
Dank Vapes 14 (74)
Chronic Carts 2 (11)
Exotic Carts 2 (11)
THC-containing product use frequency (15)
Daily 8 (53)
2–3 times per week 3 (20)
Monthly or less 4 (27)
Source of THC-containing products (20)
Friend or acquaintance 10 (50)
Online 1 (5)

Abbreviation: THC = tetrahydrocannabinol.
* Percentages rounded and therefore might not sum to 100% in each category.

Suggested citation for this article: Gaub KL, Hallyburton S, Samanic C, et al. Patient Characteristics and Product Use Behaviors Among Persons with E-cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use–Associated Lung Injury — Indiana, June ̶ October 2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2019;68:1139–1141. DOI:

MMWR and Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report are service marks of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Use of trade names and commercial sources is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
References to non-CDC sites on the Internet are provided as a service to MMWR readers and do not constitute or imply endorsement of these organizations or their programs by CDC or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. CDC is not responsible for the content of pages found at these sites. URL addresses listed in MMWR were current as of the date of publication.

All HTML versions of MMWR articles are generated from final proofs through an automated process. This conversion might result in character translation or format errors in the HTML version. Users are referred to the electronic PDF version ( and/or the original MMWR paper copy for printable versions of official text, figures, and tables.

Questions or messages regarding errors in formatting should be addressed to

View Page In: PDF [137K]