U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
CDC-RFA-PS09-902
Announcement Type:
Funding Opportunity Number: CDC-RFA-PS09-902
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number: 93.977
Key Dates:
Letter of Intent Deadline: NA
Application Deadline: August 25, 2008
Executive Summary: NA
This announcement contains the following information:
Authority: This program is authorized under Section 318 (a) (b) (c) of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. Section 247c (a) (b) and (c)] and Section 301 of the Public Health Service Act [42 U.S.C. Section 241], as amended. Regulations governing the implementation of this legislation are covered under 42 CFR Part 51b, Subpart A.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Funding Opportunity Description and General Guidance
A.
Background ……………………………………….……… …3B.
Purpose ……………………………………………..….…….5C. Activities….……………………………………………….…11
1.
Comprehensive STD Prevention System.…...112.
Infertility Prevention Project………………...263.
Syphilis Elimination Effort..………………...314.
Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project ........395.
CDC ………………………………………...40D. Application Content…………………………………………41
1.
Executive Summary…………………………412.
Comprehensive STD Prevention System……423.
Infertility Prevention Project………………...484.
Syphilis Elimination Effort………………….555.
Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project….…606.
Chlamydia Evaluation Initiative……….…….61
II. Award Information …………………………………………….63
III Eligibility Information……………………………………….…66
IV Application and Submission Information………………………71
A. Content and Form of Submission………….…72
B. Submission Dates and Times…………………77
C. Funding Restrictions……………………….…79
D. Other Submission Requirements…………..…81
V Application Review Information………………………………82
A.
Review and Selection Process…………….….87B.
Anticipated Award Dates…………………….87
VI. Award Administration Information ……………………………87
VII. Agency Contacts………………………………………………90
VIII. Other Information…………………………………………….92
Background:
Sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) remain among the most challenging public health problems facing the United States. CDC estimates that approximately 19 million new sexually transmitted infections occur each year and that almost half of them are among young people ages 15 to 24. Untreated, chlamydia and gonorrhea increase a woman’s risk for pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and infertility. Furthermore, most STDs facilitate the sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In addition to the physical and psychological consequences of STDs, these diseases exact a tremendous economic toll; direct medical costs associated with STDs in the United States are estimated to be as much as $14.7 billion annually. The substantial physical, emotional, and fiscal costs are unnecessary because STDs are preventable, and early detection and treatment through routine screening can forestall costly and severe complications.
Although rates of STD infections vary by jurisdiction and region of the country, on a national level, African American, American Indian/Alaska Natives, and Hispanic populations suffer disproportionately from STDs. In addition, there is considerable STD morbidity among Whites and Asian/Pacific Islanders. Race and ethnicity, by themselves, are not risk factors for sexually transmitted infections, however, because of a complex set of historical, structural, environmental, and cultural factors, African Americans, even when compared to others with similar risk behaviors, are at greater risk for STDs. In 2006, compared to whites, African Americans were approximately six times more likely to be infected with syphilis, eight times more likely to be infected with chlamydia, and 18 times more likely to be infected with gonorrhea. Among African American adolescents, the persistent heavy burden of STDs is even more critical. In 2006, young African American women (15-19 years old) had the highest reported gonorrhea rate of any group (2,898 per 100,000) and young African American men (15-19 years old) had a reported gonorrhea rate (1,503 per 100,000) that is 39 times higher than their white peers. In addition, the rates of chlamydia among American Indian/Alaska Natives in 2006, were more than five times higher than whites, and gonorrhea rates for Hispanics were more than two times higher than whites.
Men who have sex with men (MSM) are another population with a heavy burden of STDs. This increased disease burden includes HIV infection, which compounds the problem and complicates prevention, detection, and medical management of STDs. In 2006, an estimated two-thirds of primary and secondary (P&S) syphilis cases were among MSM.
Addressing these disparities will require significant efforts from health departments, health care providers, and affected communities. It will also require health departments to collect and assess morbidity, behavioral, and other data to identify significant trends for each STD. This information should be used to develop plans and implement activities designed to best reduce morbidity and related disparities. Concurrently, health departments, through direct services and clear guidance to medical institutions and other care providers, must strive to ensure the consistent delivery of comprehensive STD prevention services (fully integrated STD, HIV, and hepatitis prevention services), especially to individuals and communities disproportionately affected by STDs.
CDC’s Division of STD Prevention (DSTDP) works to help people be safer and healthier through prevention and control of STDs and their complications. DSTDP’s priority disease prevention goals and strategies are: (1) Prevention of STD-related infertility and other complications of PID by screening and treating at-risk persons, primarily women <26 years of age, and by working to reduce racial/ethnic disparities in gonorrhea and chlamydia; (2) Prevention of STD-related outcomes of pregnancy by reducing congenital syphilis, reducing adult male and female syphilis, increasing screening and treatment of syphilis, testing for chlamydia, gonorrhea and syphilis during pregnancy, and reducing neo-natal herpes; (3) Prevention of STD-related cancers by decreasing human papilloma virus (HPV) infection and its sequelae and increasing adult hepatitis B vaccination; and (4) Prevention of STD-related HIV transmission and acquisition and other STD-HIV interactions by decreasing bacterial STDs, increasing HIV screening among those with STD and those with behavioral risks, ensuring routine STD screening among HIV infected persons, and reducing genital herpes. Achieving these specific disease prevention goals will involve understanding the social determinants of health in the promotion of sexual health and the primary prevention of sexually transmitted infections.
Purpose:
The purpose of this program is to enhance the prevention and control of STD by supporting and improving the ability of public health departments to (1) design, implement, and evaluate Comprehensive STD Prevention Systems (CSPS); (2) implement the Infertility Prevention Project (IPP) and promote interventions that prevent STD-related infertility; (3) implement the Syphilis Elimination Effort (SEE) in designated high morbidity areas (HMAs) to enhance activities to prevent, control and eliminate syphilis; and (4) implement the Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP) in eligible jurisdictions. Grantees implementing these programs must primarily focus their efforts on the prevention of chlamydia, gonorrhea, and syphilis among disproportionately impacted populations. Grantees also have the option of applying for additional funds under the Chlamydia Evaluation Initiative (CEI), a project designed to support program evaluation activities to estimate chlamydia screening and partner treatment rates.
The ‘Comprehensive STD Prevention Systems’ (CSPS) provides an overarching framework on which grantees may develop their comprehensive STD prevention program plans, regardless of funding source. CSPS is comprised of eight essential functions; as outlined in the Program Operations Guidelines (POG), they are: (1) Community and Individual Behavior Change Services, (2) Medical and Laboratory Services, (3) Partner Services, (4) Leadership and Program Management, (5) Surveillance and Data Management, (6) Training and Professional Development, (7) STD Outbreak Response, and (8) Program Evaluation. (For more information about the essential functions, please access DSTDP’s Program Operations Guidelines, http://www.cdc.gov/std/program/#resources.).
Although CSPS has a firm foundation in the eight essential functions contained in the Program Operations Guidelines, the ordering of these strategies have been realigned in this program announcement in the following format:
The purpose of this reformatting is to emphasize the importance of using key surveillance, program, and other data to effectively focus prevention efforts on the populations currently at greatest risk for STDs. CDC recognizes that, because funding is limited, grantees will need to prioritize their activities within the CSPS essential functions and tailor them to the at-risk populations identified by local epidemiology. The data used to develop the epidemiological profile must be of a high quality in order to ensure that significant morbidity trends and service gaps are identified and addressed. In turn, implementing effective, high quality interventions requires ongoing assessment of program activities. Program managers must routinely review epidemiological, behavioral, and program data so that programs can be modified and updated in response to changing epidemiology or implementation weaknesses.
STD control programs typically have broad responsibilities within their jurisdictions beyond the scope of this announcement for surveillance, subject matter expertise, medical services, professional and public education, and guidance of other STD prevention activities. Funds provided by this program announcement are not sufficient to achieve all of the goals of STD prevention. Investments from other sources (e.g., state and local governments and the health care delivery sector) in STD programming are necessary and critical to providing comprehensive STD prevention services to persons and communities in need. Given the need for comprehensive services, to maximize efficient use of limited resources and to provide high quality prevention services to persons in need, grantees should engage in meaningful collaborations with appropriate public and private health care and other non-medical partners, particularly organizations serving at-risk populations. Furthermore, while epidemiologists and program managers need to carefully investigate morbidity and individual interventions for each STD, grantees must also ensure that services are comprehensive, tailored to the needs of the populations they serve, and fully integrated at the client services level (e.g., STD screening and treatment, HIV testing, hepatitis B vaccination). To enhance such collaborations, grantees should consider the recommendations made by the National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention’s (NCHHSTP) strategy calling for Program Collaboration and Service Integration (PCSI). PCSI promotes improved comprehensive services at the client level through enhanced collaboration at the program level, thereby offering opportunities to (1) increase efficiency, reduce redundancy, and eliminate missed opportunities; (2) increase flexibility and better adapt to overlapping epidemics and risk behaviors; and (3) improve operations through the use of shared data. Examples of collaborative activities include: providing opt-out HIV testing in STD clinics; normalizing comprehensive STD/HIV testing in emergency departments, jails, family planning and other medical settings serving populations at increased risk; collaborating on structural interventions to increase adherence to chlamydia screening guidance in clinical settings; offering adult hepatitis B vaccination and STD screening in high prevalence areas or settings where high risk individuals seek services; and promoting HPV immunization in populations for whom the vaccine is recommended. Grantees should collaborate with programs addressing HIV prevention, viral hepatitis prevention, HIV treatment, immunizations, and reproductive health care to routinely offer comprehensive STD services and disseminate holistic prevention messages for populations at-risk for multiple problems.
In addition, significant prevention opportunities exist in certain venues, such as sites where risk behaviors occur or where individuals meet their drug using or sexual partners. These are important places because they offer opportunities to provide at-risk individuals with prevention messages or services. Often, these risk-associated venues are identified through partner elicitation interviews with infected persons. Identifying risk-associated venues is an essential first step to enhancing STD prevention messages and services for social and sexual networks of persons at increased risk for STDs, including HIV. For MSM in particular, sexually focused internet sites are increasingly identified as venues where men meet other men to arrange sexual encounters that are often unsafe. Health departments should ensure that staff have the tools and skills needed to conduct Internet Partner Services and provide prevention messages on-line. Developing and maintaining these new essential capacities will require considerable training, technical assistance, protocol and policy development, and ongoing strong support from health department leadership.
This program addresses “Healthy People 2010” focus area 25, Sexually Transmitted Diseases (STD), http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/html/volume2/25stds.htm . It also supports the overarching goals of Healthy People 2010: (1) to increase years and quality of healthy life and (2) eliminate disparities among subgroups of the population.
This program also addresses the CDC Health Protection Goals of: healthy people in every stage of life, and healthy people in healthy places.
Measurable outcomes of the program will be in alignment with one (or more) of the following performance goals for the Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases (CCID), National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP): (1) Reduce the rates of non-HIV sexually transmitted diseases in the United States. Furthermore, this program supports the NCHHSTP programmatic imperatives of program collaboration and service integration, and reduction of health disparities.
This announcement is only for non-research activities supported by CDC. If research is proposed, the application will not be reviewed. For the definition of research, please see the CDC Web site at the following Internet address: http://www.cdc.gov/od/science/regs/hrpp/researchDefinition.htm
Activities:
Award amount may vary in subsequent years commensurate with changes in public health needs, changes in information technology, emerging trends in STDs and related risk behaviors, and future availability of funding.
Comprehensive STD Prevention Services (CSPS)
CSPS Activities
In order to reduce rates of reportable STDs in their jurisdictions, grantees must develop program plans with goals, measurable objectives, and monitoring plans that address the program announcement’s purposes. In developing program plans within the context of the CSPS framework, grantees must:
e. Improve program evaluation, i.e., collecting, analyzing and using data to guide program activities and developing strong monitoring and evaluation plans for surveillance and program interventions.
I. Surveillance
A. Surveillance and Data Management
Surveillance is the ongoing and systematic collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of standardized health data for the purpose of public health action. Data management is the conversion of information into usable or storable form. Through surveillance and data management activities, STD programs identify populations affected by syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia, including racial and ethnic minorities, MSM, adolescents, and persons living in areas with high morbidity. Programs also need to identify co-infection rates with other STDs (i.e., HIV, hepatitis B) as well as rates of repeat STD infections. High quality surveillance and data management are essential to the implementation of effective STD prevention programs and should include the following activities:
1. Establish and maintain information systems to monitor incidence of reportable STDs by relevant geographic and subpopulation categories including sex, race/ethnicity, provider type, and sexual orientation. Information systems should allow for routine assessment of STD/HIV co-infections and support the monitoring and evaluation of program activities, evidence-based action plans, and Performance Measures.
2. Promptly investigate reports of STD from all sources to assure appropriate diagnosis, treatment and follow up of infected individuals and their partners.
3. Assure complete laboratory and provider adherence to STD reporting regulations through written protocols to monitor and evaluate timeliness, completeness, and accuracy of reporting; and to provide regular feedback through periodic written updates, phone, and on-site visitation.
4. Establish confidentiality and security guidelines for the collection, storage, and use of STD data received by the grantee.
5. Routinely conduct, analyze, and report on STD prevalence monitoring activities.
6. Routinely analyze and disseminate STD data by relevant geographic and subpopulation categories for the purposes of informing needs assessment, planning, and policy development, including standards setting and intervention strategy design; identify those populations and locales where prevention efforts should be implemented or enhanced.
7. Establish and maintain written protocols for informing and updating physicians and other medical care providers on local morbidity trends and requirements for morbidity reporting.
8. Identify or develop other potential sources of data for behavioral, clinical, laboratory, and/or programmatic information that can be used to guide STD prevention and control activities.
B. Outbreak Response Plan
In order to detect and respond promptly to STD outbreaks, STD programs must create, maintain, and utilize Outbreak Response Plans. Plans should include (1) standards for surveillance and procedures for analysis of data; (2) a timetable and schedule for review of disease trends; (3) disease thresholds for gonorrhea and syphilis at which the plan is to be initiated; (4) meaningful involvement of the affected community and their medical service providers in the effort; (5) proposed duties and activities for staffing including number, disciplinary mix, and specific responsibilities of members of response teams; (6) notification to CDC; (7) evaluation of the effectiveness of the outbreak response; and (8) schedule for the periodic review of both the outbreak plan and the surveillance system attributes. At a minimum, grantees should review age, race, gender, sexual orientation, provider type, and geographic information to identify populations experiencing increased incidence of gonorrhea and syphilis.
1. Establish an STD Outbreak Response Plan that reflects the above-mentioned elements.
II. Interventions
STDs are controlled and prevented through interventions that address detection and treatment of infections and provide services to exposed partners. Additionally, behavioral interventions enhance measures to reduce risk behavior. All STD prevention activities should be part of comprehensive STD prevention services, which includes STD, HIV, and viral hepatitis prevention activities. Interventions (medical and laboratory, partner services and community and individual behavioral change services) should be focused on at-risk populations, especially those significantly impacted by health disparities (e.g., racial, ethnic, sexual orientation, or residing in areas with elevated morbidity rates), which are identified through local morbidity, behavioral assessments and other data sources.
A. Medical and Laboratory Services: High quality, accessible medical and laboratory services are essential elements in the prevention of STDs within any community. This intervention provides assurance of access to diagnostic and treatment services and targeted screening based on local and national recommendations in both public and private settings. Assurance of such services should consistently include the following:
1. Ensure the provision of comprehensive STD diagnostic and treatment services in public STD clinics, i.e., implement high quality standards of care consistent with CDC’s guidelines and recommendations, including HIV opt-out testing. (See budget section for funding restrictions on clinical care) http://www.cdc.gov/std/treatment/2006/toc.htm
2. Promote and implement the use of STD screening services recommended by CDC and other professional organizations with expert knowledge of STD screening practices, including annual chlamydia screening for sexually active women <26 years of age.
3. Use local epidemiology to identify populations at greatest risk and locations where at-risk individuals can access STD screening, treatment, and other appropriate prevention services (e.g., promotion of enhanced gonorrhea screening by providers serving young adults in geographical areas with elevated prevalence).
4. Implement evidence-based, locally-driven screening activities.
5. Facilitate screening and treatment of partners of STD-infected individuals.
6. Ensure prompt treatment of persons with STDs through the adoption of protocols for presumptive treatment (e.g., epi-treat STD-associated syndromes) and the consistent availability of on-site, “stat” (immediate) STD laboratory tests (Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments [CLIA] adherence required) in laboratories in public STD clinics.
7. Enhance access to STD services by developing and disseminating information that addresses health services availability and facilitates health services utilization.
8. Increase awareness of providers in both public and private sectors of CDC STD screening recommendations and local priority populations. Encourage all providers serving at-risk populations to consistently offer recommended STD screening and treatment services, and to report morbidity promptly and accurately. This can be accomplished through provider visitations, grand rounds, and regular updates. All providers should be strongly encouraged to offer HCV testing, hepatitis B vaccination, and HIV screening, to at-risk persons as part of comprehensive STD prevention services.
B. Partner Services: Partner Services is the process by which sex partners of an individual diagnosed with an STD are identified, contacted, and notified of their exposure, and promptly offered appropriate clinical services and treatment to reduce their risk of complications of infection or further transmission of the disease; and to identify unnamed partners or persons with symptoms or at-risk for disease. Partner services are a set of key STD prevention activities designed to rapidly identify infected and exposed persons, ensure their prompt treatment and ultimately reduce the overall burden of disease. Assurance of such services includes the following activities:
1. Conduct partner elicitation and notification activities for all cases of early syphilis, and assure prompt partner evaluation and treatment.
2. Conduct partner elicitation and notification activities for gonorrhea and chlamydia, as indicated by local epidemiology and priorities.
3. Develop and implement strategies and innovative methods to assure and enhance prompt partner evaluation and treatment for all partners of patients with gonorrhea and chlamydia through approaches such as provider referral, patient referral (self-referral or provider-assisted), expedited partner therapy (EPT) where permitted, and presumptive interviews in a manner which minimizes time and effort required by health department staff and maximizes prompt treatment of exposed partners.
4. Offer comprehensive STD/HIV partner services to individuals co-infected with HIV and those exposed to multiple diseases.
5. Assess effectiveness and productivity of partner services for each disease independently (e.g., HIV, syphilis, gonorrhea, and chlamydia).
6. Assess the feasibility of offering EPT to partners of infected persons, and where appropriate and permitted by local statutes and regulations, develop and implement protocols.
7. Develop and implement protocols for Internet Partner Services (IPS).
8. Ensure comprehensive STD services for all examined partners.
C. Community and Individual Level Behavioral Change Services: Behavioral interventions are an important part of STD prevention services. Used in conjunction with biomedical approaches for the treatment and prevention of STDs, behavioral interventions should complement and enhance these efforts. Behavioral intervention components include health education and community and individual behavior change interventions. Assurance of these activities includes the following:
1. Provide STD prevention education for at-risk individuals and populations to include: the role of abstinence, behavioral and other types of risk reduction (reducing multiple concurrent partnerships), correct and consistent condom use, symptom recognition, routine recommended screening, vaccination against HBV and HPV, prompt health-care seeking behavior, and partner services.
2. Promote the use of appropriate health education materials for use by public and private health care providers, institutions, schools, community-based organizations, and other STD prevention partners.
3. Collaborate with other prevention programs (i.e., HIV, viral hepatitis, Reproductive Health, Family Planning, and Immunization) to design and implement comprehensive STD prevention messages and health education materials for individuals and communities with multiple risks.
4. Integrate STD prevention messages into HIV testing and treatment services, and HIV prevention and other evidence-based behavioral interventions.
5. Collaborate with experts in the fields of communication, behavioral and social science, social marketing and advertising who are reaching at-risk populations to design and disseminate STD prevention messages.
6. Refer individuals at-risk for HIV infection to appropriate HIV risk-reduction programs.
III. Evaluation
The purpose of evaluation is to identify and consistently collect data regarding program activities to improve program performance. Program evaluation should be based on monitoring activities implemented to achieve program goals and objectives and should be fully integrated into program activities from their conception. Evaluation may include activities relevant to STD control but not funded under this FOA (e.g., STD clinical services). STD prevention program evaluation activities should be guided by the comprehensive program evaluation guidance that can be found at http://www.cdc.gov/std/Program/pupestd.htm
or in the Program Operations Guidelines at http://www.cdc.gov/std/program/#resources.
Evaluation activities that are required of all grantees include Process Evaluation, Performance Measures, and Program Improvement Plans. Evidence-based action plans are required from syphilis HMAs.
A. Process Evaluation: Process evaluation determines whether program activities are implemented as intended. Information gathered is used for refining or modifying the activities and related procedures to improve their effectiveness. Steps of Process Evaluation include:
1. Engage stakeholders and determine which program activities to evaluate.
2. Develop logic models to link specific program activities with outputs.
3. Develop questions that evaluation should answer.
4. Develop and implement a plan to collect and analyze data to answer the evaluation questions developed.
5. Determine appropriate next steps for program activity based on the assessment of the data analysis.
B. Performance Measures: As part of program evaluation, grantees are required to report on a set of Performance Measures. The primary purposes of collecting and analyzing data for Performance Measures are to improve STD prevention programs and to provide national data on performance of key program indicators. Performance Measures (or indicators) represent quantifiable information that provides insight into the yield or impact of a particular element of an STD prevention program. Performance Measures complement local program evaluation activities and are important tools for program management. They allow programs to monitor progress toward specified outcomes, facilitate the comparison of programmatic efforts over time, and encourage project areas to identify and implement “best practices”. These Measures are outlined in the CSPS application content section. Performance Measures may be reviewed and revised throughout the project period. Comprehensive guidance on Performance Measures can be accessed through http://www.cdc.gov/std/program/#perform .
For each Performance Measure, grantees should:
1. Ensure that systems are in place to capture complete and accurate data.
2. Ensure that quality assurance mechanisms for data collection and reporting are in place and utilized.
3. Use Performance Measure data to inform program planning, implementation, evaluation, and program improvement.
C. Program Improvement Plans: Programs should develop approaches for using surveillance and evaluation data to improve program performance at least yearly. Plans should be developed based on analysis of morbidity trends, Performance Measures data, and evaluation findings. Program Improvement Plans should:
1. Address program gaps and needs identified through the review of epidemiological and surveillance data, program evaluation findings, Performance Measures, input through technical reviews, and site visits.
2. Identify the steps necessary to build on program strengths and remedy weaknesses identified.
3. Include key milestones and timelines, key champions for implementation, and indicators for evaluating success.
4. Include a request for technical assistance from outside sources, as needed.
D. Evidence-Based Action Plans: An evidence–based action plan guides the collection of information of the target populations, services being provided, resource allocation, and outcomes of programs in order to make decisions about program activities, identify technical assistance and training needs, improve program effectiveness, and inform choices about future program development. Currently, evidence-based action plans are required as part of the evaluation process for syphilis elimination activities in the HMAs. However, evidence-based action plans may also be used as an effective tool for CSPS and IPP interventions. For comprehensive guidance on evidence-based action plans, please see the syphilis elimination website at http://www.cdc.gov/stopsyphilis/plan.htm. Programs should consider:
1. Developing evidence-based action plans for significant STD prevention interventions.
2. Regularly reviewing the data collected using the action plan guidance to determine the effectiveness of the intervention and allocation of resources.
3. Assessing the findings to improve interventions or reallocate resources.
IV. Program Support Systems
STD program management should ensure that human, material, financial and technological resources are used in the most effective and cost-effective way to reach the program’s goals and objectives. Program support must be provided through leadership and program management, and training and professional development.
A. Leadership and Program Management: Leadership provides the vision and context in which management activities are implemented. It includes the initial development and implementation of policies and collaborations through partnerships with other entities in both public and private arenas, (e.g., actively collaborating with community partners to increase chlamydia screening among sexually active women <26 years of age across all segments of the community and seeking opportunities for program collaboration and service integration). Program Management oversees the implementation of elements created by leadership. Assurance of leadership and program management services includes the following:
1. Develop plans, based on epidemiologic and prevention activity data, to strengthen and promote comprehensive STD prevention activities; and to provide infrastructure, technical capacity, and public health leadership skills to perform and ensure delivery of STD prevention activities.
2. Develop and support STD education and screening services targeted to populations in geographical areas of elevated incidence.
3. Develop and/or provide technical assistance on STD prevention activities.
4. Develop strategies to keep key decision and policy makers apprised of local STD/HIV epidemiology and prevention strategies, including health disparities and the value of program collaboration and service integration.
5. Educate the public about policies, legislation, and resources to assure access to STD prevention and clinical services.
6. Create and facilitate partnerships between public STD, HIV, and hepatitis prevention programs, laboratories, HIV care providers, community based organizations, health care providers, correctional facilities, and others to enhance program collaboration and service integration.
7. Identify alternative/additional resources to expand the capacity of the health care system to improve the delivery of comprehensive STD prevention services.
8. Provide infrastructure and communications structures that support private and public collaborations.
9. Implement initiatives to increase chlamydia screening in sexually active
women <26 years of age in public and private settings.
10.
Implement initiatives to reduce health disparities (e.g., enhanced
gonorrhea screening of African Americans).
11. Promote the delivery of STD prevention services and opt-out HIV testing
in settings serving at-risk populations.
12. Work with communities disproportionately impacted by STD to increase
awareness of STD risks, symptoms, risk reduction activities, and
availability of services.
B. Training and Professional Development: Training is a set of activities designed to develop specific skills of workers who perform public health functions. The training process includes assessment of staff proficiency and identification of training needs; delivery of training to address skill and knowledge deficiencies; and evaluation of the effectiveness of the training on performance. Professional development is a strategy to develop the necessary professional expertise within the targeted workforce. Public health professionals should receive training and professional development designed to ensure their ability to consistently implement and conduct culturally, perhaps linguistically appropriate prevention activities. Training plans should be developed and updated annually based on assessments of staff training needs and program performance on objectives and Performance Measures. Training plans should address the needs of all STD program staff including clinicians, disease intervention specialists (DIS), supervisors, and program managers. Activities include:
1. Systematically assess the training needs of STD staff and external partners including the ability to implement STD interventions and services.
2. Provide CDC developed, sponsored or recognized training for public STD and HIV professionals including, but not limited to, DIS, counselors, clinicians, public health nurses, and supervisors through collaboration with the National Network of Prevention Training Centers (NNPTCs) and other entities. Training should include relevant updates on epidemiology and prevention strategies.
3. Collaborate with professional organizations in support of continuing education for health professionals and others associated with STD/HIV prevention.
4. Enhance STD prevention capacity of private providers through regular updates of surveillance and STD prevention control strategies.
5. Provide consultation and assistance to providers and laboratories related to STD diagnostics, treatment, and reporting.
Infertility Prevention Project (IPP)
Purpose
The purpose of the Infertility Prevention Project (IPP) is to reduce infertility among women through the screening and treatment of chlamydia and gonorrhea. These STDs are considered major causes of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID), ectopic pregnancy and related infertility among women in the United States. Funds are intended to support and improve the ability of state and local health departments to design, implement, and evaluate activities specific to the prevention of STD-related infertility. IPP funded interventions should be based on a thorough scientific understanding of local chlamydia and gonorrhea epidemiology, including geographic and racial/ethnic health disparities, public and private provider screening practices, and national guidelines.
This program addresses the “Healthy People 2010” focus area(s) of Sexually Transmitted Disease, http://www.healthypeople.gov/document/html/volume2/25stds.htm.
Measurable outcomes of the program will be in alignment with the following performance goal(s) for the National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP): Reduction of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease.
Measurable outcomes of the program will be in alignment with one (or more) of the following performance goals for the Coordinating Center for Infectious Diseases (CCID), National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP): (1) Reduce the rates of non-HIV sexually transmitted diseases in the United States. Furthermore, this program supports the NCHHSTP programmatic imperatives of program collaboration and service integration, and reduction of health disparities.
IPP Activities
All IPP activities must be designed to reduce morbidity of those STDs which contribute to infertility. These activities are broadly categorized as 1) Clinical and Partner Services, 2) Laboratory Support, 3) Surveillance, Prevalence Monitoring and Data Management, and 4) Program Management and Leadership. The goal of reducing morbidity among STDs which contribute to infertility should be achieved by providing chlamydia screening to sexually active women <26 years of age as well as gonorrhea screening to young women at-risk. Programs should ensure prompt treatment of infected women and their sex partners. Programs should 1) provide chlamydia and gonorrhea test kits and other screening materials to public sector medical providers serving this population and 2) promote routine chlamydia screening of sexually active women <26 years of age seen by other health care providers in the public and private sectors.
Grantees should develop program plans for infertility prevention based on access to at-risk populations, local prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea, current recommendations and guidelines, and available resources (federal, state, local, and private). Program plans should be consistent with regional IPP infrastructure plans and developed in collaboration with Family Planning and Laboratory partners. Grantees must:
1. Conduct surveillance and maintain prevalence monitoring and data management systems to ensure collection of all IPP core data elements.
2. Ensure clinical and partner services which includes routine chlamydia screening of sexually active women <26 years of age, geographically-targeted gonorrhea screening of young sexually active women residing in high prevalence areas, and prompt treatment of infected women and their sex partners. All persons infected with chlamydia and gonorrhea should promptly be offered partner services. Appropriate chlamydia and gonorrhea partner services should be evidence-based and may include traditional health department provided partner elicitation, notification, and referral; or various types of patient referral, including patient notification and EPT. Grantees interested in developing and implementing EPT protocols should identify potential barriers in their jurisdiction (i.e., prohibitions by state or local laws, public health codes and/or administrative rules and regulations, policy conflicts or ambiguities, and resistance of professional boards) and identify ways to address these barriers before implementing this strategy.
3. Support laboratory testing by encouraging laboratory partners to adopt test technologies that are cost-effective, sensitive, and specific.
4. Provide Program Management and Leadership including the development and distribution of materials and training for public and private medical care providers, as well as the general public, on chlamydia and gonorrhea prevalence, screening, treatment, and partner services.
5. Assess both chlamydia and gonorrhea morbidity at the jurisdictional level. Identify subpopulations of young women with higher prevalence of chlamydia and gonorrhea and develop interventions to reach them, including those affected by health disparities, those residing in high morbidity geographical areas, or seen by providers serving at-risk women.
6. Develop program plans to address STD health disparities by using local data to identify the populations and health care providers for targeted services.
7. Devote the majority of IPP resources toward the following strategies/activities:
a. Increase adherence to recommendations for chlamydia screening among sexually active women <26 years of age in public and private sectors.
b. Improve gonorrhea detection through targeted screening of young sexually active women in public and private sectors based on local prevalence, positivity, and/or morbidity.
c. Educate providers on local chlamydia and gonorrhea morbidity trends, screening and treatment recommendations, and available partner services activities.
d. Improve access to screening, treatment, and partner services in the public and private sectors for populations disproportionately affected by STDs.
e. Conduct ongoing program evaluation including the consistent collection of standardized data to use in analyzing and assessing site-specific prevalence trends and the quality of services implemented. Evaluation results should lead to improved program activities.
Grantees are expected to use the most cost-effective approaches available and provide a rationale for the approaches selected. To improve cost-effectiveness, programs should target screening to sexually active women <26 years of age in settings with a chlamydia prevalence among these women of at least three percent (family planning clinics, STD clinics, adolescent health clinics, Indian Health Service sites, community health centers, school-based health centers, juvenile detention centers, jails, and other sites serving women who live in high morbidity locations). Screening men is generally not cost-effective unless the prevalence among men is substantially higher than the prevalence among women.
Grantees should refer to the male screening consultation meeting report for additional information, http://www.cdc.gov/std/chlamydia/ChlamydiaScreening-males.pdf
The grantee must provide the Regional IPP Coordinator a draft copy of the CSPS Background section, IPP plan, and IPP budget in sufficient time to provide feedback prior to local clearance. Any comments from the Regional IPP Coordinator received seven days before submission to local clearance should be considered by the project area for incorporation in the application.
Syphilis Elimination Effort (SEE)
Purpose
The purpose of the Syphilis Elimination Effort (SEE) is to promote health and quality of life by preventing, controlling, and eliminating endemic transmission of syphilis from the United States. All SEE funds must be used to support prevention program activities that directly relate to syphilis elimination activities. High Morbidity Areas (HMAs) and post-High Morbidity Areas (post-HMAs) may use funds for infrastructure development to support syphilis elimination activities. Additionally, for HMAs, 15 to 30 percent of funds must be awarded to community organizations that serve affected populations.
Measurable outcomes of the program will be in alignment with the following performance goal(s) for the National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD and TB Prevention (NCHHSTP): Elimination of Syphilis.
The National Plan to Eliminate Syphilis from the United States, 2006, has three goals: 1) Investing in public health services; 2) Delivering prioritized, culturally competent interventions; and 3) Increasing accountability of services and interventions. Each goal has three recommended areas of focus (the “3 By 3” approach to syphilis elimination), resulting in a total of nine activities: Surveillance, Clinical and Partner Services, Community Mobilization, Health Care Provider Mobilization; Tailoring of Interventions; Evidence-based Action Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation; Training and Staff Development; and Research (not covered under this announcement). These strategies are interrelated (e.g., enhancing SEE interventions will require evaluation); however, it is not intended that state and local health departments implement all of the activities described in the plan. Rather, sites should consider these activities as a compendium of effective or promising interventions from which their local syphilis elimination plan can be drawn upon. Further details on the strategies and activities are available at http://www.cdc.gov/stopsyphilis/plan.htm.
Project areas should use local epidemiological and behavioral risk surveillance data (e.g.,
case reports, prevalence data, etc.) to identify interventions and set appropriate targets. SEE efforts should be specifically directed towards populations disproportionately affected by syphilis (e.g., MSM, HIV+ MSM, commercial sex workers, African Americans).
Eligibility
SEE funds are available to project areas defined as HMAs. A project area is a HMA if it has a minimum of 100 P&S cases or a case rate of 2.2/100,000 with a minimum of 60 P&S cases based on provisional data from the most recent calendar year reported by MMWR week 20 of the following year (e.g., 2009 HMA status is based on 2007 provisional data reported by May 17, 2008). SEE funds will be allocated based on these criteria:
High Morbidity Areas
Post-High Morbidity Areas
post-HMA, and receive base funding for two years after the area no longer
meets the HMA criteria.
SEE Activities
Applicants should adhere to the National Plan to Eliminate Syphilis from the United States when developing program plans. The nine major activities for syphilis elimination are as follows:
1. Surveillance: Improve and enhance syphilis surveillance and outbreak response. Strong surveillance capacity must be in place in order to characterize the epidemic, inform or direct programmatic efforts, tailor interventions to populations at-risk, and monitor and evaluate their effects. Grantees should ensure that surveillance data are shared routinely with appropriate providers and community stakeholders and that outbreak identification and response plans are in place to effectively identify, diagnose, manage, and report rapid increases in syphilis.
a. Collect and report gender of sex partners/ sexuality data to CDC.
b. Promote routine and regular (at least quarterly) analysis of epidemiologic data on syphilis.
c. Encourage and monitor (quarterly basis) syphilis reporting from public and private providers.
d. Use reactor grids to prioritize follow up of syphilis cases. These should be evaluated annually or more frequently if the local epidemiology changes.
e. Develop a Syphilis Outbreak Response Plan. This should be reviewed and updated if necessary, on an annual basis. Additionally, grantees should develop an area-specific criterion that determines when the outbreak response plan is to be implemented. This should be reviewed and updated, if necessary, on an annual basis
2. Clinical and Partner Services: Prompt quality clinical management of persons diagnosed with or exposed to infectious syphilis is a fundamental component for the prevention and control of syphilis. Clinical services for syphilis include early access to care, accurate diagnosis and staging, appropriate treatment, patient counseling, partner management, and follow up. Partner services is a key strategy to the control of syphilis through reducing the proportion of infectious persons in the population.
a. Apply optimum interviewing techniques to maximize the number of partners elicited and partners initiated.
b. Use the geographic and socio-demographic concentration of syphilis to inform DIS of the best locations to screen at-risk persons.
c. Communicate and collaborate with other parties interested in partner notification for the elimination of syphilis (e.g., community-based organizations, health care providers especially in HIV care settings, and jails).
3. Laboratory Services: High quality laboratory services are essential for an enhanced response for syphilis elimination. Serologic testing remains the most frequent method for diagnoses of the disease. STD clinics and other clinical settings serving at-risk individuals should consistently offer rapid testing (e.g., stat RPR) and darkfield microscopy to all persons exposed to or suspected of having early syphilis. DIS should routinely conduct laboratory visits to address reporting requirements, types of test performed, and frequency of reporting.
4. Community Mobilization: The current U.S. epidemic of infectious syphilis disproportionately affects disadvantaged ethnic minority communities and MSM. Community mobilization is an essential component of community and public health programs. Successful community participation in public health efforts is best achieved when affected community members collaborate in equal partnership with health professionals to determine health goals, implement interventions, and evaluate outcomes.
a. Ensure ongoing monitoring of surveillance data in order to track the evolution in local epidemics and inform appropriate community partners.
b. Establish meaningful community participation in local SEE efforts.
c. Ensure that local data are regularly reviewed with community partners and used to inform community-driven prevention efforts.
5. Tailored Interventions: Tailored interventions strive for greater program efficiency and impact by identifying and utilizing the characteristics that are distinct to the targeted topic, context, or population. Interventions can be tailored to address a specific issue or a specific population.
a. Assess health-care seeking behaviors; health care access; partner services; and screening for ethnic minority populations affected by syphilis to inform the development or tailoring of culturally appropriate interventions.
6. Health Provider Mobilization: Individuals receive STD prevention and care services not only at public STD clinics, but also from private practice settings, HIV care providers, community health centers, emergency rooms, family planning clinics, correctional settings, jails, and other health care facilities. Mobilization requires the building of relationships and alliances with these and other providers and can include epidemiologic data sharing, DIS provider visitations, grand rounds, treatment recommendations, and prompt response to clinical and prevention provider questions.
a. Conduct provider visitations, including education and morbidity updates to encourage screening, appropriate treatment, and timely reporting of individuals with STDs.
b. Create partnerships with local drug treatment centers and programs to facilitate treatment for drug users with STDs.
c. Create partnerships with corrections facilities to facilitate screening, appropriate treatment, and timely reporting of individuals with STDs.
d. Create alliances with health care providers to improve information management systems and data sharing capabilities.
e. Ensure screening and treatment of all pregnant women for syphilis, using the recommendations contained in the CDC Treatment Guidelines.
f. Undertake congenital syphilis relevant surveillance, monitoring and evaluation activities, including improving surveillance systems and strengthening monitoring and evaluation systems.
7. Train and Develop Staff: Staff training is critical to develop and maintain knowledgeable and credible clinical and prevention staff involved with SEE. The NNPTCs can play a substantial role in ensuring that opportunities are available for training of health department staff, laboratorians, and public and private practitioners.
Required for HMAs only
a. Identify nationally and locally available training opportunities and resources.
b. Ensure adequate training of supervisors to support local SEE activities.
8. Evidence-Based Action Planning: An evidence–based action plan guides the collection of information of the target populations, services being provided, resource allocation, and outcomes of programs in order to make decisions about program activities, identifies technical assistance and training needs, improves program effectiveness, and informs choices about future program development. Monitoring involves assessing and documenting program procedures to assure that activities have been appropriately performed and are contributing to the success of the program. Evaluation is a systematic way to improve and account for actions.
a. Develop evidence-based action plans that are supported by surveillance or research evidence.
b. Prioritize risk groups and interventions for syphilis elimination.
c. Disseminate findings of evaluation activities to appropriate partners.
9. Research: not funded by this program announcement.
For a complete listing of the 75 sub-activities that complements the above, please go to the National Plan at www.cdc.gov/stopsyphilis .
Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project (GISP)
The Gonococcal Isolate Project (GISP) was established to monitor trends in antimicrobial susceptibilities of strains of gonorrhea in the United States to establish a rational basis for the selection of gonococcal therapies. Activities associated with GISP include:
1. At participating STD clinics, collect urethral isolates of N. Gonorrhoeae
(based on a presumptive or confirmed identification) from the first 25 men
with urethral gonococcal infection (regardless of symptom status) each
month, along with required demographic and clinical data.
2. Collect, handle, ship, and store gonorrhea specimens.
3. Report demographic and clinical data in a timely manner to CDC and their
respective state/local public health authorities.
CDC Activities
In a cooperative agreement, CDC staff is substantially involved in program activities above and beyond routine grant monitoring.
CDC activities for this program are as follows:
1.
Provide consultation and technical assistance (TA) to health departments on various aspects of their STD prevention programs (e.g., performance measurement, program evaluation, outbreak response planning). Program consultants will facilitate the joint development, implementation, and evaluation of grantee-specific Program Improvement Plans.2.
Work with grantees to assess training needs and provide training to managers, supervisors, and disease intervention staff, or other prevention programs, including hepatitis coordinators, HIV program managers, reproductive health representatives, and family planning partners either directly or through the NNPTCs or other training partners.3.
Disseminate current information, including national surveillance data, prevention, and management recommendations in all areas of STD prevention, including STD-related infertility prevention and syphilis elimination.4.
Support and facilitate program collaboration with other CDC programs and HHS offices to enhance and improve integration of services.5.
Monitor grantee progress toward achieving stated target levels of performance, from objectives and Performance Measures, and work with the grantee to make improvements if target levels are not met through consultation via site visits, email, telephone, and review of progress reports.6.
Oversee the recruitment, development, and management of all directly assigned STD prevention field staff.7.
Provide up-to-date national guidance in essential program functions (e.g., Community and Individual Behavioral Change Services, Medical and Laboratory Services, Partner Services, Leadership and Program Management, Surveillance and Data Management, Training and Professional development, STD Outbreak response, and Program Evaluation) to facilitate local program activities as well as local and national public health policy. These can be downloaded from www.cdc.gov/std.8.
Provide programmatic consultation, technical assistance, and reference/diagnostic services for STDs through reference laboratory activities.9.
Support and facilitate program collaboration to enhance and improve integration of services.
Application Content
1. Executive Summary
The executive summary should include a clear and succinct description of the program including, but not limited to, the funding being applied for (CSPS, IPP, SE, and GISP), program mission and purpose, program structure, and overarching goals of the program for which funding is requested.
2. CSPS
A. Background and Need for CSPS
This section should describe the grantee’s total STD program (not just the portion that is federally funded), STD prevention needs, and plans for proposed CSPS, IPP, and SE funded activities. The grantee must include the following:
1. An Epidemiologic profile focusing on syphilis (all stages), gonorrhea, chlamydia and related health disparities. Data presented should include P&S syphilis, Early Latent syphilis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea morbidity categorized by race and year of report (2003-2007). The profile should also include epidemiologic trends by relevant characteristics including gender, age, race/ethnicity, geography. Health disparities should be assessed and discussed. Five-year trend data should be presented by number reported and case rate, as well as a comparison of reported case numbers for the time periods January-June in 2008 and January-June 2007.
2. A description of P&S syphilis, Early Latent syphilis, chlamydia, and gonorrhea categorized by gender (male, female, and total) and age (standard age groups) and year of report (2003-2007).
3. A description of P&S syphilis cases co-infected with HIV. Data (number of cases, number of cases with partner information, number of cases co-infected with HIV, number of cases known to be HIV negative or of unknown HIV status) should be presented by gender. For male cases include a discussion about the number of MSM cases co-infected with HIV and those MSM cases known to be HIV negative or of unknown status.
4. Discussion of significant behavioral trends of groups affected by STDs (e.g., sexual risk, substance abuse, and health care seeking); health services delivery trends (e.g., number of dedicated STD clinics, clinic attendance, approximate number of patients turned-away for services due to fees or appointments, health department relationships with private providers); and program management (e.g., organizational structure, funding, federal and local staffing, resource limitations) trends over the past five years. Include any other relevant information or trends that may be major factors affecting STD morbidity within the project area.
5. An overview of the STD program to include discussion of surveillance, including an outbreak response plan, interventions (Medical and Laboratory, Partner Services, Community and Individual Behavior Change Services) and program support systems (Leadership and Program Management, Training and Staff Development) as outlined in the CSPS activities section of this guidance.
6. Discussion of community and key provider involvement and organizational partnerships in planning, implementing and evaluating program activities, including successes and barriers. Specifically describe the degree to which service level and programmatic integration are being conducted. Describe program collaboration and service integration activities with other governmental and non-governmental entities (e.g., regional infertility prevention projects, reproductive health programs, school-based clinics, correctional centers, HIV Prevention and Care Programs, Hepatitis Programs, HIV Prevention and Ryan White planning groups, correctional health, substance abuse treatment, Indian Health Services, faith-based organizations, private sector providers, NNPTCs, AIDS Education and Training Centers).
7. Discussion of the activities and the process used to meaningfully involve American Indian tribal governments, Tribal organizations representing those governments, or Alaska Native Villages and Corporations located within your jurisdiction. Describe how Tribes are involved in the delivery of STD Prevention services and how your health department supports of provides services on behalf of the tribes.
8. Report on each of the 2008 objectives and Performance Measures for the period January-June 2008. For each applicable Performance Measure, the grantee should discuss the following:
a. Performance level, including numerator and denominator values.
b. Data sources used for the numerator and denominator.
c. Action plan for improving performance.
d. Barriers encountered in collecting data or improving performance.
e. Technical assistance needs for data collection, data use, or program performance improvement.
In addition to reporting on the Performance Measures in the Background and Need section, grantees must enter January 1-June 30, 2008, Performance Measures data into the PM database (https://webappa.cdc.gov/STD-PM/ ) by September 30, 2008.
B. Proposed 2009 Objectives
Develop measurable and quantitative five-year project period goals and one-year budget period objectives. These goals and objectives should relate to the program priorities identified and justified in the background and need sections of the application. These goals and objectives should relate to the program priorities identified and justified in the background and need sections of the application and CDC STD program priorities. Goals and one to six objectives must be written for each of the program elements: surveillance and data management,