1975 NIOSH presents its cancer guidelines at the Conference on Occupational Carcinogenesis, organized by the New York Academy of Sciences. Published in 1976, these guidelines recommend “no detectable exposure levels for proven carcinogenic substances”.
Fairchild EJ [1976]. Guidelines for a NIOSH policy on occupational carcinogenesis. Ann NY Acad Sci 271:200-207.
1978 NIOSH testifies on the OSHA Notice of Proposed Rulemaking on the Identification, Classification, and Regulation of Toxic Substances Posing a Potential Occupational Carcinogenic Risk (i.e. the OSHA Cancer Policy). NIOSH commits to cooperating with OSHA in developing and applying this generic standard for potential occupational carcinogens. NIOSH indicates that good public health policy dictates that health risk be the primary consideration in the determination of exposure limits. NIOSH testifies to its general agreement with the definition of “potential occupational carcinogen” as stated in the OSHA Cancer policy:
““any substance, or combination or mixture of substances, which causes an increased incidence of benign and/or malignant neoplasms, or a substantial decrease in the latency period between exposure and onset of neoplasms in humans or in one or more experimental mammalian species as the result of any oral, respiratory, or dermal exposure, or any other exposure which results in the induction of tumors at a site other than the site of administration. This definition also includes any substance that is metabolized into one or more potential occupational carcinogens by mammals ( 29 CFR 1990.103 , OSHA Cancer Policy).”
NIOSH recommends the following categories for carcinogens:
- Category I: Probable [or Confirmed] Occupational Carcinogen
- Category II: Suspect Occupational Carcinogen
- Category III: Carcinogenic Evidence Inconclusive
1978 NIOSH uses the term “potential occupational carcinogen” in the NIOSH Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Exposure to Glycidyl Ethers and other NIOSH documents.
1984 NIOSH reaffirms its support for and adoption of the OSHA Cancer Policy in several Current Intelligence Bulletins including dioxin, 1,3-butadiene, and cadmium, with variations on the following text: “There are several classifications for identifying a substance as a carcinogen. Such classifications have been developed by the U.S. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, National Toxicology Program, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, and OSHA. NIOSH considers the OSHA classification the most appropriate for use in identifying carcinogens in the workplace. This classification is outlined in 29 CFR 1990.103.”
1988 NIOSH testifies on the OSHA Proposed Rule on Air Contaminants which includes proposed updates on many OSHA Permissible Exposure Limits (PELs). NIOSH reaffirms its policy that carcinogens should be restricted to the lowest feasible level. NIOSH indicates that OSHA should include carcinogen designations for all chemicals that meet the OSHA definition of “potential occupational carcinogen” as established in the OSHA Cancer Policy.
NIOSH 1988 Testimony to OSHA on the Proposed Rule on Air Contaminants
1995 The current NIOSH REL policy is issued for chemical carcinogens and other safety or health hazards, incorporating advances in science and approaches in risk assessment and risk management. It states that NIOSH RELs “will be based on risk evaluations using human or animal health effects data, and on an assessment of what levels can be feasibly achieved by engineering controls and measured by analytical techniques. To the extent feasible, NIOSH will project not only a no-effect exposure, but also exposure levels at which there may be residual risks. This policy applies to all workplace hazards, including carcinogens, and is responsive to Section 20(a)(3) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
“The effect of this new policy will be the development, whenever possible, of quantitative RELs that are based on human and/or animal data, as well as on the consideration of technological feasibility for controlling workplace exposures to the REL. Under the old policy, RELs for most carcinogens were non-quantitative values labeled “lowest feasible concentration (LFC).” [Note: There are a few exceptions to LFC RELs for carcinogens (e.g., RELs for asbestos, formaldehyde, benzene, and ethylene oxide are quantitative values based primarily on analytical limits of detection or technological feasibility). Also, in 1989, NIOSH adopted several quantitative RELs for carcinogens from OSHA’s permissible exposure limit (PEL) update.]
… Under the new policy, NIOSH will also recommend the complete range of respirators (as determined by the NIOSH Respirator Decision Logic) for carcinogens with quantitative RELs. In this way, respirators will be consistently recommended regardless of whether a substance is a carcinogen or a non-carcinogen.”
NIOSH Pocket Guide to Chemical Hazards – Appendix A – NIOSH Potential Occupational Carcinogens
NIOSH Respirator Use Policy for Protection Against Carcinogens
2011 NIOSH requests public comments on the NIOSH cancer and REL policies. A public meeting is held December 12, in Washington, DC, to obtain public and stakeholder input.
Introduction to the NIOSH Public Meeting, Dr. Schulte’s Presentation
2013 NIOSH requests public comments on the draft NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin: Update of NIOSH Carcinogen Classification and Target Risk Level Policy for Chemical Hazards in the Workplace. A public meeting is held in December in Washington, DC to obtain public and stakeholder input.
Transcript of NIOSH Public Meeting, December 2013
NIOSH Presentation at the Public Meeting, December 2013
2014 NIOSH continues re-evaluating its chemical carcinogen policy with public and stakeholder input. The draft NIOSH Current Intelligence Bulletin: Update of NIOSH Carcinogen Classification and Target Risk Level Policy for Chemical Hazards in the Workplace was available for public comment until February 13, 2014.
