Mining Publication: Comparison of Methods: Dynamic Versus Hydrostatic Testing of Mine Ventilation Seals

Original creation date: September 2008

Peer Reviewed Journal Article - September 2008

NIOSHTIC2 Number: 20034425

Min Eng 2008 Sep; 60(9):147-153

From 2001 to 2007, the Pittsburgh Research Laboratory (PRL) of the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) conducted studies to develop alternative methodologies to full-scale explosion testing for determining the ultimate strength of mine seals. As a result, the PRL developed and proposes an alternative seal-strength evaluation method based on a hydrostatic pressure-loading concept. The researchers suggest pressure loading a seal using water to twice the expected dynamic design load. The hydrostatic chamber test offers a means of validating seal designs, establishing appropriate resistance functions and determining the ultimate strength of seals through testing to failure. This article contrasts the full-scale explosion and hydrostatic testing of mine seals using a simple dynamic system model and principles.

Authors: MJ Sapko, SP Harteis, ES Weiss

Image of publication Comparison of Methods: Dynamic Versus Hydrostatic Testing of Mine Ventilation Seals
Peer Reviewed Journal Article - September 2008

NIOSHTIC2 Number: 20034425

Min Eng 2008 Sep; 60(9):147-153


Page last reviewed: 9/21/2012 Page last updated: 9/21/2012