Text for Figures and Slides in TB Behavioral
and Social Science Research Forum Proceedings
POTENTIAL FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES
Kathryn O’Toole, M.B.A.
Associate Director of Management and Operations,
Division of Tuberculosis Elimination,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Slide #1: DTBE Appropriation and Funding
Kate O’Toole, MBA
Associate Director for Management and Operations
Return to Slide Set
Slide #2: FY2003 Congressional Appropriation
to CDC for Tuberculosis
- FY2003 Appropriation = $136,514,000 (includes S&E)
- Earmark = $125,000 in PHPPO’s budget
Return to Slide Set
Slide #3: FY 2003 Gross-to-Net CDC Funding
(Appropriation including S & E)
- Rescission = $887,341
- Indirect = $7,159,327
- 1x tap for GAP = $270,000
- To other divisions = $19,870
- NCHHSTP overhead = $2,776,112
- Adjust for GAP overhead = $62,633
- HIV = $10,728,670
- Onondaga after taps = $119,573
Return to Slide Set
Slide #4: USAID Funding to DTBE
- USAID total funding = $2,551,246
- Overhead tap (15%) = $382,687
- Balance = $2,168,559
Return to Slide Set
Slide #5: This slide shows a pie chart
of the discretionary funding to DTBE/NCHHSTP. The divisions of the chart
include TB, HIV, and USAID.
Return to Slide Set
Slide #6: Project Concept Solicitation:
April 1, 2003
- DTBE solicited research concepts from CDC, TBESC, and TBTC investigators.
- A standardized “project concept form” was used.
- For CDC staff, all funding proposals (research and other) were submitted,
but only research proposals were forwarded to the CDC/TBESC research
concept reviewers.
Return to Slide Set
Slide #7: Determination of Appropriateness
for TBESC: Early April 2003
- TBESC Research Chair and the DTBE Associate Director for Science
(ADS) determined if a appropriate for TBESC.
Return to Slide Set
Slide #8: TBESC RC Review of Project
Concepts: April 10, 2003
- Before and at the TBESC semi-annual meeting, the RC reviewed the
research concepts that were considered appropriate for TBESC.
- Prioritized each project concept by giving it a score of high, medium,
or low.
- TBESC and CDC investigators whose concepts were ranked high or medium
were allowed to revise and resubmit their project concepts incorporating
the RC’s comments/recommendations.
Return to Slide Set
Slide #9: TB Leads review of project
concepts: Early May
- The DTBE Senior Staff independently reviewed the project concepts
using the same ranking system as the RC: low, medium and high with
comments/recommendations.
- They ranked concepts based on the merit of the concept to the Division
and its mission, and the comprehensiveness of collaboration.
Return to Slide Set
Slide #10: Joint TBESC RC/DTBE TB Leads
meeting: May 12, 2003
- The joint TBESC RC/DTBE TB Leads group met in Atlanta to discuss
the TBESC RC/TB Leads report.
- The final report to the TBESC and CDC investigators included the
summary ranking of the TBESC RC and TB Leads group (including discrepant
results) and recommendations to the PIs from each group.
- Investigators whose concepts were ranked high by both groups were
encouraged to develop their concepts into full TB Leads proposals.
- A number of investigators whose proposals were ranked high and medium
were also encouraged to develop their concepts into full proposals.
Return to Slide Set
Slide #11: Submission of TB Leads proposals:
October 1, 2003
- TBESC and CDC investigators and their collaborators developed and
submitted proposals.
- Only investigators who submitted project concepts were allowed to
submit TB Leads proposals.
Return to Slide Set
Slide #12: TB Leads Evaluation: October 14,
2003
- The proposals were reviewed by the DTBE TB Leads group and ranked.
This included both research proposals and non-research related proposals
that did not go through the TBESC review process. Final funding decisions
will be made when the congressional budget for TB is available but no
projects are expected to be funded in FY2004.
Return to Slide
Set
Slide #13: FY2005
- Similar process
- Later initial deadlines
- Earlier decisions
Return to Slide
Set
|
