NIOSH Home > Safety and Health Topics >Skin Exposures and Effects > Int. Conference on Occupational & Environmental Exposures of Skin to Chemicals > Abstracts

Proceedings of the International Conference on
Occupational & Environmental Exposures of Skin to Chemicals:
Science & Policy
Hilton Crystal City     September 8-11, 2002
 

Site Contents
Main Page
General
Information
Conference Agenda
Posters
Attendees
Authors
Course Information
Vendor Exhibits
Products
Workshop Discussion Paper (Version of 20 August 2002)

Disclaimer

Development of an Analytical Method to Quantify Dermal Exposure to Hexamethylene Diisocyanate

Chris B. Trent, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Chapel Hill, NC, USA (Corresponding Author)
Leena A. Nylander-French, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Louise M. Ball, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Avram Gold, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
Hasan Koc, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Occupational exposure to diisocyanates is well documented as a cause of respiratory sensitization and occupational asthma. Hexamethylene diisocyanate (HDI) is a commonly used diisocyanate in the surface coating industry. The focus of research in the past has been on the inhalation hazards associated with the use of HDI. However, inhalation exposure may account for only part of the total body dose resulting from exposure in occupational settings. Recent animal studies have suggested a link between dermal exposure to diisocyanates and respiratory sensitization, but dermal exposure assessment methods and techniques for these compounds have been slow to emerge.

An analytical method using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was developed to detect and quantify dermal exposure to HDI. NIOSH Method 5521: “Isocyanates, Monomeric”, originally developed for air samples, was modified for use with our non-invasive dermal tape-stripping technique. HDI was detected as the urea derivative by monitoring its protonated molecular ion at m/z 553.7. An octamethylene diisocyanate (ODI) urea derivative (1000 pmol spike) was used as an internal standard for all samples, and was detected using the protonated molecular ion at m/z 581.7. A standard curve developed with pure HDI urea derivative and spiked with 1000 pmol of the internal standard was used to evaluate sample results. Evaluation of the method included storage stability and extraction efficiency tests.

To evaluate sample stability during storage, tape strips (in triplicate) were spiked with a known amount of HDI-containing paint and held in a toluene/1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine solution at 4°C for a period of time ranging from 1 to 13 days. Samples were acetylated, evaporated, and redissolved in methanol before analysis by LC-MS. Results were evaluated using a standard curve prepared on each day of analysis.

Extraction efficiency of the method was also investigated. Tape strips (in triplicate) were spiked with known amounts of base paint and pure liquid HDI, and held overnight in a toluene/1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazine solution at 4°C. The extraction efficiency was evaluated for eight different amounts of pure HDI, ranging from <10 pmol to 1000 pmol. Samples were analyzed by LC-MS on the next day and the results evaluated using a standard curve.

The method will be evaluated in upcoming field studies of industrial spray-painting operations.

 

Return