INTRODUCTION
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), announces that grant
applications are being accepted for innovative small projects relating
to occupational safety and health in the agriculture industry. Such projects
are intended to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of methods or approaches
for preventing injuries and illnesses among agricultural workers. Thus,
this announcement is not intended for traditional hypothesis-testing research
projects to identify and investigate the relationships between health outcomes
and occupational exposures to hazardous agents.
CDC is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention
objectives of "Healthy People 2000," a national activity to reduce
morbidity and mortality and improve the quality of life. This announcement
is related to the priority area of "Occupational Safety and Health."
(For ordering a copy of "Healthy People 2000," see the section
"WHERE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION.")
AUTHORITY
This program is authorized under the Public Health Service Act, as amended,
Section 301(a) (42 U.S.C. 241(a)), and the Occupational Safety and Health
Act of 1970, Section 20(a) (29 U.S.C. 669(a)) and Section 22 (29 U.S.C.
671). The applicable program regulation is 42 CFR Part 52.
ELIGIBLE APPLICANTS
Eligible applicants include nonprofit and for-profit organizations,
universities, colleges, research institutions, and other public and private
organizations, including State and local governments and small, minority-
and/orwoman-owned businesses.
NOTE: An organization described in section 501(c)(4) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986 which engages in lobbying activities shall not be
eligible to receive Federal funds constituting an award, grant, contract,
loan, or any other form.
SMOKE-FREE WORKPLACE
CDC strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free
workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products, and Public Law
103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities
that receive Federal funds in which education, library, day care, health
care, and early childhood development services are provided to children.
AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS
About $500,000 is available in fiscal year (FY) 1997 to fund approximately
3 to 4 project grants. The amount of funding available may vary and is
subject to change. Awards are anticipated to range from $150,000 to $200,000
in total costs (direct and indirect) per year. Awards are expected to begin
on or about September 1, 1997. Awards will be made for a 12-month budget
period within a project period not to exceed 3 years. Continuation awards
within the project period will be made on the basis of satisfactory progress
and availability of funds.
USE OF FUNDS
RESTRICTIONS ON LOBBYING
Applicants should be aware of restrictions on the use of HHS funds for
lobbying of Federal or State legislative bodies. Under the provisions of
31 U.S.C. Section 1352 (which has been in effect since December 23, 1989),
recipients (and their subtier contractors) are prohibited from using appropriated
Federal funds (other than profits from a Federal contract) for lobbying
Congress or any Federal agency in connection with the award of a particular
contract, grant, cooperative agreement, or loan. This includes grants/cooperative
agreements that, in whole or in part, involve conferences for which Federal
funds cannot be used directly or indirectly to encourage participants to
lobby or to instruct participants on how to lobby.
In addition, the FY 1997 HHS Appropriations Act, which became effective
October 1, 1996, expressly prohibits the use of 1997 appropriated funds
for indirect or "grass roots" lobbying efforts that are designed
to support or defeat legislation pending before State legislatures. This
new law, Section 503 of Pub. L. No. 104-208, provides as follows:
Sec. 503(a) No part of any appropriation contained in this Act shall
be used, other than for normal and recognized executive-legislative relationships,
for publicity or propaganda purposes, for the preparation, distribution,
or use of any kit, pamphlet, booklet, publication, radio, television, or
video presentation designed to support or defeat legislation pending before
the Congress, . . . except in presentation to the Congress or any State
legislative body itself.
(b) No part of any appropriation contained in this Act shall be used
to pay the salary or expenses of any grant or contract recipient, or agent
acting for such recipient, related to any activity designed to influence
legislation or appropriations pending before the Congress or any State
legislature.
Department of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Education, and Related
Agencies Appropriations Act, 1997, as enacted by the Omnibus Consolidated
Appropriations Act, 1997, Division A, Title I, Section 101(e), Pub. L.
No. 104-208 (September 30, 1996).
BACKGROUND
Agricultural workers represent a major workforce in the United States.
The agricultural industry, by classification, includes those involved in
farming, agricultural technology, fishing, and forestry. The health and
safety effects in this industry are diverse, and the potential for disease
and injury covers a wide range of populations and work.
Hired workers, farm owner-operators, and unpaid family members who live
in the work environment are exposed to the health and safety hazards of
farming in the United States. The number of hired workers varies widely
by season from 600,000 to 950,000 workers (United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) National Agricultural Statistics Service, Farm Labor,
1995 and 1996). USDA data show 5.9 million persons own, operate, and manage
farms or are family members who live on these farms (Farm Costs and Return
Survey, 1993). It is unknown how many children and other family members
of migrant or seasonal workers who are not recorded as working are exposed.
These agricultural workers and their families experience a disproportionate
share of fatalities, injuries and diseases associated with many physical,
chemical, and biological hazards. Because many who work in agriculture
are not covered by traditional protections (e.g., workers' compensation,
Occupational Safety and Health Administration regulations), data on such
injuries are more difficult to reach and available data are likely to under
estimate the scope of the problem.
According to the National Traumatic Occupational Fatality surveillance
system, the fatality rate for agricultural industries is 2.6 times greater
than the national average for all industries; the average is more than
740 deaths annually. Data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Annual Survey
for 1994 indicate that the rate for injuries involving lost workdays in
the agricultural industries exceeds all industry sectors (including mining)
except construction and transportation.
Agricultural workers are also more likely to develop serious work-related
illnesses or disabling conditions. In particular, agricultural workers
experience increased rates of certain forms of lung disease (e.g., occupational
asthma and hypersensitivity pneumonitis); cumulative trauma disorders such
as carpal tunnel syndrome and other musculoskeletal disorders; noise-induced
hearing loss; and certain types of cancer (e.g., leukemia, non-Hodgkin's
lymphoma, and multiple myeloma).
In 1989, Congress directed CDC to sponsor broad-based, public health
initiatives to reduce the significant injuries and illnesses among agriculture
workers and their families. Through cooperative agreement awards, the National
Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) established cooperative
efforts with universities, public health departments, and others, to address
the research, surveillance, and intervention priorities of the agricultural
industry. These programs included laboratory research, broad-based epidemiology,
public health surveillance, education and training, and the provision of
basic health and hazard control services in the agricultural community.
In December 1994, an external review panel evaluated the NIOSH Agriculture
Initiative. The panel recommended that NIOSH continue its strong support
of the Agriculture Initiative; and in addition to its current efforts,
provide for intervention research grants to enable current and previous
collaborators, as well as other groups, the opportunity to propose innovative
research or demonstrations projects. Interventions include techniques such
as engineering control technologies, model standards, worker participation
programs, training, and community programs to prevent disease or injury.
Intervention research determines the efficacy and efficiency of these techniques
or combinations of these techniques.
Although many intervention strategies have been applied to various work
settings, knowledge about what works best is limited. Employers, owner-operators,
agricultural workers, public decision makers, cooperative extension services
agents, and others, need this information to make informed decisions about
prevention strategies that work well and support the use of limited resources.
Research is needed to pilot and evaluate prevention intervention efforts
which, if successful, can be adopted on a wider scale in a region or throughout
the nation. This work should be done in cooperation with agricultural workers
and employers to assure consideration of the economic and organizational
factors that determine if interventions will be adopted.
PURPOSE
NIOSH seeks to prevent work-related diseases and injuries in the agricultural
production industry by designing, implementing, and evaluating measures
to reduce occupational hazards. If prevention measures are currently unavailable,
new technologies should be developed for controlling hazardous exposures.
Such new technologies must be evaluated to determine if prevention measures
are feasible, even for smaller agricultural operations. Intervention research--including
control technology, educational programs, health promotion activities,
and community-based initiatives--examines the utility and impact of new
and existing preventive measures in the workplace.
PROGRAMMATIC INTEREST
The focus of these grants should facilitate progress in preventing adverse
effects among agricultural workers. A project that is proposed to develop
or test the efficacy of an intervention should be designed to establish,
discover, develop, elucidate, or confirm information relating to occupational
safety and health, including innovative methods, techniques, and approaches
for solving occupational safety and health problems. These grants should
not be directed at the development of an intervention, but to test the
efficacy of a known intervention.
A project that is proposed to demonstrate the effectiveness of an intervention
should address, either on a pilot or full-scale basis, the technical or
economic feasibility of implementing a new/improved innovative procedure,
method, technique, or system for preventing occupational safety or health
problems. A demonstration project should be conducted in an actual workplace
where a baseline measure of the occupational problem will be defined, the
new/improved approach will be implemented, a follow-up measure of the problem
will be documented, and an evaluation of the benefits will be conducted.
NIOSH and its partners in the public and private sectors developed the
high priority areas identified below to provide a framework to guide occupational
safety and health research in the next decade-not only for NIOSH but also
for the entire occupational safety and health community. Approximately
500 organizations and individuals outside NIOSH provided input into the
development of the National Occupational Research Agenda (NORA). This attempt
to guide and coordinate research nationally is responsive to a broadly
perceived need to address systematically those topics that are most pressing
and most likely to yield gains to the worker and the nation. Fiscal constraints
on occupational safety and health research are increasing, making even
more compelling the need for a coordinated and focused research agenda.
NIOSH intends to support projects that facilitate progress in understanding
and preventing adverse effects among workers. The conditions or examples
listed under each category are selected examples, not comprehensive definitions
of the category. Investigators may also apply in other areas related to
agricultural safety and health, but the rationale for the significance
of the research and demonstrations to agriculture must be developed in
the application.
The NORA identifies 21 research priorities. These priorities reflect
a remarkable degree of concurrence among a large number of stakeholders.
The NORA priority research areas are grouped into three categories: Disease
and Injury, Work Environment and Workforce, and Research Tools and Approaches.
This announcement relates primarily to the priority research area, Intervention
Effectiveness Research, number 18 on the list. The NORA document is available
through the NIOSH Home Page: /niosh/nora.html.
NORA Priority Research Areas
Disease and Injury
1. Allergic and Irritant Dermatitis
2. Asthma and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
3. Fertility and Pregnancy Abnormalities
4. Hearing Loss
5. Infectious Diseases
6. Low Back Disorders
7. Musculoskeletal Disorders of the Upper Extremities
8. Traumatic Injuries
Work Environment and Workforce
9. Emerging Technologies
10. Indoor Environment
11. Mixed Exposures
12. Organization of Work
13. Special Populations at Risk
Research Tools and Approaches
14. Cancer Research Methods
15. Control Technology and Personal Protective Equipment
16. Exposure Assessment Methods
17. Health Services Research
18. Intervention Effectiveness Research
19. Risk Assessment Methods
20. Social and Economic Consequences of Workplace Illness and Injury
21. Surveillance Research Methods
Potential applicants with questions concerning the acceptability of
their proposed work are strongly encouraged to contact the programmatic
technical assistance person identified in this announcement in the section
"WHERE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION."
TECHNICAL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
Progress reports are required annually as part of the continuation application
(75 days prior to the start of the next budget period). The annual progress
reports must contain information on accomplishments during the previous
budget period and plans for each remaining year of the project. Financial
status reports (FSR) are required no later than 90 days after the end of
the budget period.
The final performance and financial status reports are required 90 days
after the end of the project period. The final performance report should
include, at a minimum, a statement of original objectives, a summary of
research methodology, a summary of positive and negative findings, and
a list of publications resulting from the project. Research papers, project
reports, or theses are acceptable items to include in the final report.
The final report should stand alone rather than citing the original application.
Three copies of reprints of publications prepared under the grant should
accompany the report.
EVALUATION CRITERIA
Upon receipt, applications will be reviewed by CDC for completeness
and responsiveness. Applications determined to be incomplete or unresponsive
to this announcement will be returned to the applicant without further
consideration. If the proposed project involves organizations or persons
other than those affiliated with the applicant organization, letters of
support and/or cooperation must be included.
Applications that are complete and responsive to the announcement will
be reviewed by an initial review (IRG) group (peer review) in which they
will be determined to be competitive or noncompetitive based on the review
criteria. Applications determined to be noncompetitive will be withdrawn
from further consideration and the principal investigator/program director
and the official signing for the applicant organization will be promptly
notified. Applications judged to be competitive will be discussed and assigned
a priority score.
Review criteria for technical merit are as follows:
1. Technical significance and originality of the proposed project.
2. Appropriateness and adequacy of the study design and methodology proposed to carry out the project.
3. Qualifications and research experience of the Principal Investigator and staff, particularly but not exclusively in the area of the proposed project.
4. Availability of resources necessary to perform the project.
5. Documentation of cooperation from other participants in the project, where applicable.
6. Adequacy of plans to include both sexes and minorities and their subgroups as appropriate for the scientific goals of the project. (Plans for the recruitment and retention of subjects will also be evaluated.)
7. Appropriateness of budget and period of support.
8. Human Subjects - Procedures adequate for the protection of human
subjects must be documented. Recommendations on the adequacy of protections
include: (1) protections appear adequate and there are no comments to make
or concerns to raise, (2) protections appear adequate, but there are comments
regarding the protocol, (3) protections appear inadequate and the IRG has
concerns related to human subjects, or (4) disapproval of the application
is recommended because the research risks are sufficiently serious and
protection against the risks are inadequate as to make the entire application
unacceptable.
The following will be considered in making funding decisions:
1. Quality of the proposed project as determined by peer review.
2. Availability of funds.
3. Program balance among priority areas of the announcement.
EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 REVIEW
Applications are not subject to the review requirements of Executive
Order 12372.
PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM REPORTING REQUIREMENT
This program is not subject to the Public Health System Reporting Requirements.
CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance number is 93.262.
OTHER REQUIREMENTS
Paperwork Reduction Act
Projects that involve the collection of information from 10 or more
individuals and funded by the grant will be subject to review and approval
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the Paperwork Reduction
Act.
Human Subjects
The applicant must comply with the Department of Health and Human Services
Regulations, 45 CFR Part 46, regarding the protection of human subjects.
Assurances must be provided to demonstrate that the project will be subject
to initial and continuing review by an appropriate institutional review
committee. The applicant will be responsible for providing assurance in
accordance with the appropriate guidelines provided in the application
kit.
Women and Racial and Ethnic Minorities
It is the policy of the CDC to ensure that women and racial and ethnic
groups will be included in CDC supported research projects involving human
subjects, whenever feasible and appropriate. Racial and ethnic groups are
those defined in OMB Directive No. 15 and include American Indian, Alaskan
Native, Asian, Pacific Islander, Black and Hispanic. Applicants shall ensure
that women and racial and ethnic minority populations are appropriately
represented in applications for research involving human subjects. Where
clear and compelling rationale exists that inclusion is not feasible, this
situation must be explained as part of the application. In conducting the
review of applications for scientific merit, review groups will evaluate
proposed plans for inclusion of minorities and both sexes as part of the
scientific assessment and assigned score. This policy does not apply to
research studies when the investigator cannot control the race, ethnicity
and/or sex of subjects. Further guidance to this policy is contained in
the Federal Register, Vol. 60, No. 179, Friday, September 15, 1995,
pages 47947-47951.
APPLICATION SUBMISSION AND DEADLINES:
A. Preapplication Letter of Intent
Although not a prerequisite of application, a non-binding letter of
intent-to-apply is requested from potential applicants. The letter should
be submitted to the Grants Management Officer (whose address is reflected
in section B., "Applications"). It should be postmarked no later
than June 9, 1997. The letter should identify the announcement number,
name of the principal investigator, and specify the priority area to be
addressed by the proposed project. The letter of intent does not influence
review or funding decisions, but it will enable CDC to plan the review
more efficiently, and will ensure that each applicant receives timely and
relevant information prior to application submission.
B. Applications
Applicants should use Form PHS-398 (OMB Number 0925-0001) and adhere
to the ERRATA Instruction Sheet for Form PHS-398 contained in the Grant
Application Kit. Please submit an original and five copies on or before
July 15, 1997 to: Ron Van Duyne, Grants Management Officer, Grants Management
Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention, (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry Road, NE., Room 321, MS-E13, Atlanta,
GA 30305.
C. Deadlines
1. Applications shall be considered as meeting a deadline if they are either:
A. Received at the above address on or before the deadline date, or
B. Sent on or before the deadline date to the above address, and received in time for the review process.
Applicants should request a legibly dated U.S. Postal Service postmark or obtain a legibly dated receipt from a commercial carrier or the U.S. Postal Service. Private metered postmarks shall not be accepted as proof of timely mailings.
2. Applications which do not meet the criteria above are considered
late applications and will be returned to the applicant.
WHERE TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
To receive an application kit, call (404) 332-4561. You will be asked
to leave your name, address, and telephone number and will need to refer
to announcement 736. You will receive a complete application kit. Business
management information may be obtained from Joanne Wojcik, Grants Management
Specialist, Grants Management Branch, Procurement and Grants Office, Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 255 East Paces Ferry Road, NE.,
MS-E13, Atlanta, GA 30305, telephone (404) 842-6535; fax: (404) 842-6513;
Internet: jcw6@cdc.gov.
Programmatic technical assistance may be obtained from Roy M. Fleming,
Sc.D., Associate Director for Grants, National Institute for Occupational
Safety and Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 1600
Clifton Road, NE., Building 1, Room 3053, MS-D30, Atlanta, GA 30333, telephone
(404) 639-3343; fax: (404) 639-4616; Internet: rmf2@cdc.gov.
PLEASE REFER TO ANNOUNCEMENT NUMBER 736 WHEN REQUESTING INFORMATION
AND SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION.
This and other CDC Announcements can be found on the CDC home page at http://www.cdc.gov. CDC will not send application kits by facsimile or express mail. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" (Full Report, Stock No. 017-001-00474-0) or "Healthy People 2000" (Summary Report, Stock No. 017-001-00473-1) through the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, DC 20402-9325, telephone (202) 512-1800.