Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home
Share
Compartir

Mining Publication: Biomechanical Modeling of Asymmetric Lifting Tasks in Constrained Lifting Postures

NOTE: This page is archived for historical purposes and is no longer being maintained or updated.

October 1997

Image of publication Biomechanical Modeling of Asymmetric Lifting Tasks in Constrained Lifting Postures

A biomechanical model was used to study internal forces acting on the lumbar spine during asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures. Twelve healthy male subjects, nine of them experienced underground miners, participated in the study. Three independent variables were used; posture (Pos) for the lift (stooped or kneeling), height (Hgt) to which a box was lifted (35 or 70 centimeters (cm)), and weight (Wgt) of box (15, 20, or 25 kilograms (kg)). The lifting tasks were performed under a 1.2 meter roof that restricted posture. Electromyograms (EMGs) of eight trunk muscles (left and right erectores spinae, latissimus dorsi, external oblique, and rectus abdominis) were recorded during the lifting tasks and later digitized to derive a biomechanical model. The model produced estimates of muscle forces. Results showed that compression involved a significant PosxWgt interaction, and that it increased at a higher rate for kneeling than for stooping, although total compression was higher when kneeling. Lifting to a higher shelf increased compression. Peak lateral shear tended towards a nonsignificant increase in the kneeling position. Muscle recruitment was complicated due to changing conditions. Interaction of PosxHgtxWgt achieved significance at the 0.001 level. The activity of the latissimus dorsi were higher in the stooped posture than when kneeling, whereas increased erectores spinae activity was consistently seen while kneeling. The rectus abdominis muscles were slightly more active in the stooped position. The authors conclude that although the current model seems to give a good picture of the muscle loading on the spine, and will assist in the development of recommendations for lifting tasks in the mining environment, the model does not explain biomechanical factors responsible for the production of low back pain.

Authors: S Gallagher, CA Hamrick, AC Love

Conference PaperOctober - 1997

  • Adobe Acrobat - Portable Document Format (.PDF)

    0.26 MB

NIOSHTIC2 Number: 00207997

In: Karwowski W, Wogalter MS, Dempsey PG, eds. Ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders: research on manual materials handling, 1983-1996. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1997 Oct; :86-90

 
Contact Us:
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    1600 Clifton Rd
    Atlanta, GA 30333
  • 800-CDC-INFO
    (800-232-4636)
    TTY: (888) 232-6348
  • Contact CDC–INFO
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO
A-Z Index
  1. A
  2. B
  3. C
  4. D
  5. E
  6. F
  7. G
  8. H
  9. I
  10. J
  11. K
  12. L
  13. M
  14. N
  15. O
  16. P
  17. Q
  18. R
  19. S
  20. T
  21. U
  22. V
  23. W
  24. X
  25. Y
  26. Z
  27. #