Mining Publication: Comparison of Rotary and In-Hole Motor Techniques for Drilling Horizontal Boreholes in Coal

Original creation date: January 1985

Authors: SL Kravits, A Sainato, GL Finfinger

Report of Investigations - January 1985

NIOSHTIC2 Number: 10004416

Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, RI 8933, 1985 Jan; :1-31

This Bureau of Mines report describes and compares the procedures, capital investments, and operating costs of rotary and in-hole motor drilling techniques used to drain methane gas from the Pittsburgh coalbed in an underground mine located in southwestern Pennsylvania. A timestudy was conducted during the drilling of each of two boreholes, and the data were collected to serve as a base for comparing drilling procedures and operating costs. Findings indicate that drilling with an in-hole motor offers four advantages over rotary drilling; namely, an increase in drilling productivity, fewer worker-hours required, ease of maintaining vertical and horizontal bit trajectory, and less expensive drilling cost per foot of borehole.

Image of publication Comparison of Rotary and In-Hole Motor Techniques for Drilling Horizontal Boreholes in Coal
Report of Investigations - January 1985

NIOSHTIC2 Number: 10004416

Pittsburgh, PA: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Mines, RI 8933, 1985 Jan; :1-31


Page last reviewed: September 21, 2012
Page last updated: September 21, 2012