|

Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
in Health-Care Settings, 2005
Prepared by
Paul A. Jensen, PhD, Lauren A. Lambert, MPH, Michael F. Iademarco, MD, Renee Ridzon, MD
Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention
The material in this report originated in the National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, Kevin Fenton, MD, PhD, Director; and the Division
of Tuberculosis Elimination, Kenneth G. Castro, MD, Director.
Corresponding preparer: Paul A. Jensen, PhD, Division of Tuberculosis Elimination, National Center for HIV, STD, and TB Prevention, 1600
Clifton Rd., NE, MS E-10, Atlanta, GA 30333. Telephone: 404-639-8310; Fax: 404-639-8604; E-mail:
pej4@cdc.gov.
Summary
In 1994, CDC published the Guidelines for Preventing the Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
in HealthCare Facilities, 1994. The guidelines were issued in response to 1) a resurgence of tuberculosis (TB) disease
that occurred in the United States in the mid-1980s and early 1990s, 2) the documentation of several high-profile
health-care--associated (previously termed "nosocomial") outbreaks related to an increase in the prevalence of TB disease and
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection, 3) lapses in infectioncontrol practices, 4) delays in the diagnosis and treatment
of persons with infectious TB disease, and 5) the appearance and transmission of multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB strains.
The 1994 guidelines, which followed statements issued in 1982 and 1990, presented recommendations for TBinfection
control based on a risk assessment process that classified health-care facilities according to categories of TB risk, with a
corresponding series of administrative, environmental, and respiratoryprotection control measures.
The TB infectioncontrol measures recommended by CDC in 1994 were implemented widely in health-care facilities in
the United States. The result has been a decrease in the number of TB outbreaks in health-care settings reported to CDC and
a reduction in health-care--associated transmission of
Mycobacterium tuberculosis to patients and health-care
workers (HCWs). Concurrent with this success, mobilization of the nation's TBcontrol programs succeeded in reversing the upsurge
in reported cases of TB disease, and case rates have declined in the subsequent 10 years. Findings indicate that although the
2004 TB rate was the lowest recorded in the United States since national reporting began in 1953, the declines in rates for
2003 (2.3%) and 2004 (3.2%) were the smallest since 1993. In addition, TB infection rates greater than the U.S.
average continue to be reported in certain racial/ethnic populations. The threat of MDR TB is decreasing, and the transmission of
M. tuberculosis in health-care settings continues to decrease because of implementation of infection-control measures
and reductions in community rates of TB.
Given the changes in epidemiology and a request by the Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis (ACET)
for review and update of the 1994 TB infectioncontrol document, CDC has reassessed the TB infectioncontrol guidelines
for health-care settings. This report updates TB control recommendations reflecting shifts in the epidemiology of TB, advances
in scientific understanding, and changes in health-care practice that have occurred in the United States during the
preceding decade. In the context of diminished risk for health-care--associated transmission of
M. tuberculosis, this document places emphasis on actions to maintain momentum and expertise needed to avert another TB resurgence and to eliminate
the lingering threat to HCWs, which is mainly from patients or others with unsuspected and undiagnosed infectious TB
disease. CDC prepared the current guidelines in consultation with experts in TB, infection control, environmental control,
respiratory protection, and occupational health. The new guidelines have been expanded to address a broader concept;
health-care--associated settings go beyond the previously defined facilities. The term "health-care setting" includes many types, such
as inpatient settings, outpatient settings, TB clinics, settings in correctional facilities in which health care is delivered, settings
in which home-based health-care and emergency medical services are provided, and laboratories handling clinical specimens
that might contain M. tuberculosis. The term "setting" has been chosen over the term "facility," used in the previous guidelines,
to broaden the potential places for which these guidelines apply.
Introduction
Overview
In 1994, CDC published the Guidelines for Preventing the
Transmission of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Health
Care Facilities, 1994 (1). The guidelines were issued in response to 1) a resurgence of tuberculosis (TB) disease that occurred in
the United States in the mid-1980s and early 1990s, 2) the documentation of multiple high-profile
health-care--associated (previously "nosocomial") outbreaks related to an increase in the prevalence of TB disease and human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV) coinfection, 3) lapses in infectioncontrol practices, 4) delays in the diagnosis and treatment of persons with
infectious TB disease (2,3), and 5) the appearance and transmission of multidrug-resistant (MDR) TB strains
(4,5).
The 1994 guidelines, which followed CDC statements
issued in 1982 and 1990 (1,6,7), presented recommendations for
TB infection control based on a risk assessment process. In this process, health-care facilities were classified according to
categories of TB risk,with a corresponding series of environmental and respiratoryprotection control measures.
The TB infectioncontrol measures recommended by CDC in 1994 were implemented widely in health-care
facilities nationwide (8--15). As a result, a decrease has occurred in
1) the number of TB outbreaks in health-care settings reported
to CDC and 2) health-care--associated transmission of
M. tuberculosis to patients and health-care workers (HCWs)
(9,16--23). Concurrent with this success, mobilization of the nation's TBcontrol programs succeeded in reversing the
upsurge in reported cases of TB disease, and case rates have declined in the subsequent 10 years
(4,5). Findings indicate that although the 2004
TB rate was the lowest recorded in the United States since national reporting began in 1953, the
declines in rates for 2003 (2.3%) and 2004 (3.2%) were the lowest since 1993. In addition, TB rates higher than the U.S. average continue to be reported
in certain racial/ethnic populations (24). The threat of MDR TB is decreasing, and the transmission of
M. tuberculosis in health-care settings continues to decrease because of implementation of
infection-control measures and reductions in
community rates of TB (4,5,25).
Despite the general decline in TB rates in recent years, a marked geographic variation in TB case rates persists, which
means that HCWs in different areas face different risks
(10). In 2004, case rates varied per 100,000 population: 1.0 in Wyoming,
7.1 in New York, 8.3 in California, and 14.6 in the District of Columbia
(26). In addition, despite the progress in the
United States, the 2004 rate of 4.9 per 100,000 population remained higher than the 2000 goal of 3.5. This goal was established
as part of the national strategic plan for TB elimination; the final goal is <1 case per 1,000,000 population by 2010
(4,5,26).
Given the changes in epidemiology and a request by the Advisory Council for the Elimination of Tuberculosis (ACET)
for review and updating of the 1994 TB infectioncontrol document, CDC has reassessed the TB infectioncontrol guidelines
for health-care settings. This report updates TBcontrol recommendations, reflecting shifts in the epidemiology of TB
(27), advances in scientific understanding, and changes in health-care practice that have occurred in the United States in
the previous decade (28). In the context of diminished risk for health-care--associated transmission of
M. tuberculosis, this report emphasizes actions to maintain momentum and
expertise needed to avert another TB resurgence and eliminate the
lingering threat to HCWs, which is primarily from patients or other persons with unsuspected and undiagnosed infectious TB disease.
CDC prepared the guidelines in this report in consultation with experts in TB, infection control, environmental
control, respiratory protection, and occupational health. This report replaces all previous CDC guidelines for TB infection control
in health-care settings (1,6,7). Primary references citing
evidence-based science are used in this report to
support explanatory material and recommendations. Review articles, which include primary references, are used for editorial style
and brevity.
The following changes differentiate this report from previous guidelines:
- The risk assessment process includes the assessment of additional aspects of infection control.
- The term "tuberculin skin tests" (TSTs) is used instead of purified protein derivative (PPD).
- The whole-blood interferon gamma release assay (IGRA),
QuantiFERON®TB Gold test (QFTG) (Cellestis
Limited, Carnegie, Victoria, Australia), is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)--approved in vitro cytokine-based assay for
cell-mediated immune reactivity to M. tuberculosis
and might be used instead of TST in TB screening programs for
HCWs. This IGRA is an example of a blood assay for
M. tuberculosis (BAMT).
- The frequency of TB screening for HCWs has been
decreased in various settings, and the criteria for determination
of screening frequency have been changed.
- The scope of settings in which the guidelines apply has been broadened to include laboratories and additional
outpatient and nontraditional facilitybased settings.
- Criteria for serial testing for M. tuberculosis
infection of HCWs are more clearly defined. In certain settings, this change
will decrease the number of HCWs who need serial TB screening.
- These recommendations usually apply to an entire health-care setting rather than areas within a setting.
- New terms, airborne infection precautions (airborne precautions) and airborne infection isolation room (AII room),
are introduced.
- Recommendations for annual respirator training, initial respirator fit testing, and periodic respirator fit testing have
been added.
- The evidence of the need for respirator fit testing is summarized.
- Information on ultraviolet germicidal irradiation (UVGI) and room-air recirculation units has been expanded.
- Additional information regarding MDR TB and HIV infection has been included.
In accordance with relevant local, state, and federal laws, implementation of all recommendations must safeguard
the confidentiality and civil rights of all HCWs and patients who have been infected with
M. tuberculosis and TB disease.
The 1994 CDC guidelines were aimed primarily at
hospital-based facilities, which frequently refer to a physical building
or set of buildings. The 2005 guidelines have been expanded to address a broader concept. Setting has been chosen instead
of "facility" to expand the scope of potential places for which these guidelines apply (Appendix A). "Setting" is used
to describe any relationship (physical or organizational) in which HCWs might share air space with persons with TB disease or
in which HCWs might be in contact with clinical specimens. Various setting types might be present in a single
facility. Healthcare settings include inpatient settings, outpatient settings, and nontraditional facilitybased settings.
- Inpatient settings include patient rooms, emergency
departments (EDs), intensive care units (ICUs), surgical
suites, laboratories, laboratory procedure areas, bronchoscopy suites, sputum induction or inhalation therapy rooms,
autopsy suites, and embalming rooms.
- Outpatient settings include TB treatment facilities, medical offices, ambulatory-care settings, dialysis units, and
dental-care settings.
- Nontraditional facilitybased settings include emergency medical service (EMS), medical settings in correctional
facilities (e.g., prisons, jails, and detention centers), home-based health-care and outreach settings, long-term--care settings
(e.g., hospice-skilled nursing facilities), and homeless shelters. Other settings in which suspected and confirmed TB
patients might be encountered might include cafeterias, general stores, kitchens, laundry areas, maintenance shops,
pharmacies, and law enforcement settings.
HCWs Who Should Be Included in a TB Surveillance Program
HCWs refer to all paid and unpaid persons working in health-care settings who have the potential for exposure to
M. tuberculosis through air space shared with persons with infectious TB disease. Part time, temporary, contract, and full-time
HCWs should be included in TB screening programs. All HCWs who have duties that involve faceto-face contact with patients
with suspected or confirmed TB disease (including transport staff) should be included in a TB screening program.
The following are HCWs who should be included in a TB screening program:
- Administrators or managers
- Bronchoscopy staff
- Chaplains
- Clerical staff
- Computer programmers
- Construction staff
- Correctional officers
- Craft or repair staff
- Dental staff
- Dietician or dietary staff
- ED staff
- Engineers
- Food service staff
- Health aides
- Health and safety staff
- Housekeeping or custodial staff
- Homeless shelter staff
- Infectioncontrol staff
- ICU staff
- Janitorial staff
- Laboratory staff
- Maintenance staff
- Morgue staff
- Nurses
- Outreach staff
- Pathology laboratory staff
- Patient transport staff, including EMS
- Pediatric staff
- Pharmacists
- Phlebotomists
- Physical and occupational therapists
- Physicians (assistant, attending, fellow, resident, or intern), including
--- anesthesiologists
--- pathologists
--- psychiatrists
--- psychologists
- Public health educators or teachers
- Public safety staff
- Radiology staff
- Respiratory therapists
- Scientists
- Social workers
- Students (e.g., medical, nursing, technicians, and allied health)
- Technicians (e.g., health, laboratory, radiology, and animal)
- Veterinarians
- Volunteers
In addition, HCWs who perform any of the following
activities should also be included in the TB screening program.
- entering patient rooms or treatment rooms whether or not a patient is present;
- participating in aerosol-generating or aerosol-producing procedures (e.g., bronchoscopy, sputum induction,
and administration of aerosolized medications)
(29);
- participating in suspected or confirmed M. tuberculosis
specimen processing; or
- installing, maintaining, or replacing environmental
controls in areas in which persons with TB disease are
encountered.
Pathogenesis, Epidemiology, and Transmission of
M. tuberculosis
M. tuberculosis is carried in airborne particles called droplet nuclei that can be generated when persons who have
pulmonary or laryngeal TB disease cough, sneeze, shout, or sing
(30,31). The particles are approximately 1--5
µm; normal air currents can keep them airborne for prolonged periods and spread them throughout a room or building
(32). M. tuberculosis is usually transmitted only through air, not by surface contact. After the droplet nuclei are in the alveoli, local infection might
be established, followed by dissemination to draining lymphatics and hematogenous spread throughout the body
(33). Infection occurs when a susceptible person inhales droplet nuclei containing
M. tuberculosis, and the droplet nuclei traverse the
mouth or nasal passages, upper respiratory tract, and bronchi to reach the alveoli. Persons with TB pleural
effusions might also have concurrent unsuspected pulmonary or laryngeal TB disease.
Usually within 2--12 weeks after initial infection with
M. tuberculosis, the immune response limits additional
multiplication of the tubercle bacilli, and immunologic test results for
M. tuberculosis infection become positive. However, certain
bacilli remain in the body and are viable for multiple years. This condition is referred to as latent tuberculosis
infection (LTBI). Persons with LTBI are asymptomatic (they have no symptoms of TB disease) and are not infectious.
In the United States, LTBI has been diagnosed traditionally based on a PPD-based TST result after TB disease has
been excluded. In vitro cytokine-based immunoassays for the
detection of M. tuberculosis infection have been the focus of
intense research and development. One such blood assay for
M. tuberculosis (or BAMT) is an IGRA, the
QuantiFERON®TB test (QFT), and the subsequently developed version, QFTG. The QFTG measures cell-mediated immune responses to peptides from
two M. tuberculosis proteins that are not present in any Bacille Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine strain and that are absent from
the majority of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM), also known as mycobacteria other than TB (MOTT). QFTG was
approved by FDA in 2005 and is an available option for detecting
M. tuberculosis infection. CDC recommendations for the United
States regarding QFT and QFTG have been published
(34,35). Because this field is rapidly evolving, in this report, BAMT will
be used generically to refer to the test currently available in the United States.
Additional cytokine-based immunoassays are under development and might be useful in the diagnosis of
M. tuberculosis infection. Future FDA-licensed products in combination with CDC-issued recommendations might provide
additional diagnostic alternatives. The latest CDC recommendations for guidance on diagnostic use of these and related technologies
are available at
http://www.cdc.gov/nchstp/tb/pubs/mmwrhtml/Maj_guide/Diagnosis.htm.
Typically, approximately 5%--10% of persons who become infected with
M. tuberculosis and who are not treated for
LTBI will develop TB disease during their lifetimes
(1). The risk for progression of LTBI to TB disease is highest during the
first several years after infection (36--38).
Persons at Highest Risk for Exposure to and Infection with
M. tuberculosis
Characteristics of persons exposed to M. tuberculosis
that might affect the risk for infection are not as well defined.
The probability that a person who is exposed to
M. tuberculosis will become infected depends primarily on the concentration
of infectious droplet nuclei in the air and the duration of
exposure to a person with infectious TB disease. The closer
the proximity and the longer the duration of exposure, the higher the risk is for being infected.
Close contacts are persons who share the same air space in a household or other enclosed environment for a
prolonged period (days or weeks, not minutes or hours) with a person with pulmonary TB disease
(39). A suspect TB patient is a person in whom a diagnosis of TB disease is being considered, whether or not antituberculosis treatment has been started.
Persons generally should not remain a suspect TB patient for >3 months
(30,39).
In addition to close contacts, the following persons are also at higher risk for exposure to and infection with
M. tuberculosis. Persons listed who are also close contacts should be top priority.
- Foreign-born persons, including children, especially those who have arrived to the United States within 5 years after
moving from geographic areas with a high incidence of TB disease (e.g., Africa, Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, and
Russia) or who frequently travel to countries with a high prevalence of TB disease.
- Residents and employees of congregate settings that are high risk (e.g., correctional facilities,
long-term--care facilities [LTCFs], and homeless shelters).
- HCWs who serve patients who are at high risk.
- HCWs with unprotected exposure to a patient with TB disease before the identification and correct airborne precautions
of the patient.
- Certain populations who are medically underserved and who have low income, as defined locally.
- Populations at high risk who are defined locally as having an increased incidence of TB disease.
- Infants, children, and adolescents exposed to adults in high-risk categories.
Persons Whose Condition is at High Risk for Progression From LTBI to TB Disease
The following persons are at high risk for progressing from LTBI to TB disease:
- persons infected with HIV;
- persons infected with M. tuberculosis within the previous 2 years;
- infants and children aged <4 years;
- persons with any of the following clinical conditions or other immunocompromising conditions
--- silicosis,
--- diabetes mellitus,
--- chronic renal failure,
--- certain hematologic disorders (leukemias and lymphomas),
--- other specific malignancies (e.g., carcinoma of the head, neck, or lung),
--- body weight >10% below ideal body weight,
--- prolonged corticosteroid use,
--- other immunosuppressive treatments (including tumor necrosis factor-alpha
[TNFa] antagonists),
--- organ transplant,
--- end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and
--- intestinal bypass or gastrectomy; and
- persons with a history of untreated or inadequately treated TB disease, including persons with chest radiograph
findings consistent with previous TB disease.
Persons who use tobacco or alcohol
(40,41), illegal drugs, including injection drugs and crack cocaine
(42--47), might also be at increased risk for infection and disease. However, because of multiple other potential risk factors that commonly
occur among such persons, use of these substances has been difficult to identify as separate risk factors.
HIV infection is the greatest risk factor for progression from LTBI to TB disease
(22,39,48,49). Therefore, voluntary HIV counseling, testing, and referral should be routinely offered to all persons at risk for LTBI
(1,50,51). Healthcare settings should be particularly aware of the need for preventing transmission of
M. tuberculosis in settings in which persons
infected with HIV might be encountered or might work
(52).
All HCWs should be informed regarding the risk for developing TB disease after being infected with
M. tuberculosis (1). However, the rate of TB disease among persons who are HIVinfected and untreated for LTBI in the United States
is substantially higher, ranging from 1.7--7.9 TB cases per 100 person-years
(53). Persons infected with HIV who are
already severely immunocompromised and who become newly
infected with M. tuberculosis have a greater risk for developing
TB disease, compared with newly infected persons without HIV infection
(39,53--57).
The percentage of patients with TB disease who are HIVinfected is decreasing in the United States because of
improved infectioncontrol practices and better diagnosis and treatment of both HIV infection and TB. With increased voluntary
HIV counseling and testing and the increasing use of treatment for LTBI, TB disease will probably continue to
decrease among HIVinfected persons in the United States
(58). Because the risk for disease is particularly high among HIVinfected
persons with M. tuberculosis infection, HIVinfected contacts of persons with infectious pulmonary or laryngeal TB disease must
be evaluated for M. tuberculosis infection, including the exclusion of TB disease, as soon as possible after learning of
exposure (39,49,53).
Vaccination with BCG probably does not affect the risk for infection after exposure, but it might decrease the risk
for progression from infection with M. tuberculosis
to TB disease, preventing the development of miliary and meningeal disease
in infants and young children (59,60). Although HIV infection increases the likelihood of progression from LTBI to TB
disease (39,49), whether HIV infection increases the risk for becoming infected if exposed to
M. tuberculosis is not known.
Characteristics of a Patient with TB Disease That Increase the Risk for Infectiousness
The following characteristics exist in a patient with TB disease that increases the risk for infectiousness:
- presence of cough;
- cavitation on chest radiograph;
- positive acid-fast bacilli (AFB) sputum smear result;
- respiratory tract disease with involvement of the larynx (substantially infectious);
- respiratory tract disease with involvement of the lung or pleura (exclusively pleural involvement is less infectious);
- failure to cover the mouth and nose when coughing;
- incorrect, lack of, or short duration of antituberculosis treatment; and
- undergoing cough-inducing or aerosol-generating procedures (e.g., bronchoscopy, sputum induction, and administration
of aerosolized medications) (29).
Environmental Factors That Increase the Risk for Probability of Transmission of
M. tuberculosis
The probability of the risk for transmission of
M. tuberculosis is increased as a result of various environmental factors.
- Exposure to TB in small, enclosed spaces.
- Inadequate local or general ventilation that results in
insufficient dilution or removal of infectious droplet
nuclei.
- Recirculation of air containing infectious droplet nuclei.
- Inadequate cleaning and disinfection of medical
equipment.
- Improper procedures for handling specimens.
Risk for Health-Care--Associated Transmission of
M. tuberculosis
Transmission of M. tuberculosis is a risk in health-care settings
(57,61--79). The magnitude of the risk varies by
setting, occupational group, prevalence of TB in the community,
patient population, and effectiveness of TB
infectioncontrol measures. Healthcare--associated transmission of
M. tuberculosis has been linked to close contact with persons with TB
disease during aerosol-generating or aerosol-producing procedures, including bronchoscopy
(29,63,80--82), endotracheal intubation, suctioning
(66), other respiratory procedures
(8,9,83--86), open abscess irrigation
(69,83), autopsy (71,72,77), sputum induction, and aerosol treatments that induce coughing
(87--90).
Of the reported TB outbreaks in health-care settings, multiple outbreaks involved transmission of MDR TB strains to
both patients and HCWs (56,57,70,87,91--94). The majority of the patients and certain HCWs were HIVinfected,
and progression to TB and MDR TB disease was rapid. Factors contributing to these outbreaks included delayed diagnosis of
TB disease, delayed initiation and inadequate airborne precautions, lapses in AII practices and precautions for cough-inducing
and aerosol-generating procedures, and lack of adequate respiratory protection. Multiple studies suggest that the decline in
health-care--associated transmission observed in specific institutions is associated with the rigorous implementation
of infectioncontrol measures (11,12,18--20,23,
95--97). Because various interventions were implemented
simultaneously, the effectiveness of each intervention could not be determined.
After the release of the 1994 CDC infectioncontrol guidelines, increased implementation of recommended
infectioncontrol measures occurred and was documented in multiple national surveys
(13,15,98,99). In a survey of approximately 1,000
hospitals, a TST program was present in nearly all sites, and 70% reported having an AII room
(13). Other surveys have documented improvement in the proportion of AII rooms meeting CDC criteria and proportion of HCWs using
CDC-recommended respiratory protection and receiving serial TST
(15,98). A survey of New York City hospitals with high caseloads of TB
disease indicated 1) a decrease in the time that patients with TB disease spent in EDs before being transferred to a hospital room, 2)
an increase in the proportion of patients initially placed in AII rooms, 3) an increase in the proportion of patients started
on recommended antituberculosis treatment and reported to the local or state health department, and 4) an increase in the use
of recommended respiratory protection and environmental controls
(99). Reports of increased implementation of recommended
TB infection controls combined with decreased reports of outbreaks of TB disease in health-care settings suggest that
the recommended controls are effective in reducing and preventing health-care--associated transmission of
M. tuberculosis (28).
Less information is available regarding the implementation of CDC-recommended TB infectioncontrol measures
in settings other than hospitals. One study identified major barriers to implementation that contribute to the costs of a
TST program in health departments and hospitals, including personnel costs, HCWs' time off from work for TST
administration and reading, and training and education of HCWs
(100). Outbreaks have occurred in outpatient settings (i.e.,
private physicians' offices and pediatric settings) where the guidelines were not followed
(101--103). CDC-recommended TB infectioncontrol measures are implemented in correctional facilities, and certain variations might relate to resources,
expertise, and oversight (104--106).
Fundamentals of TB Infection Control
One of the most critical risks for health-care--associated transmission of
M. tuberculosis in health-care settings is
from patients with unrecognized TB disease who are not promptly handled with appropriate airborne precautions
(56,57,93,104) or who are moved from an AII room too soon (e.g., patients with unrecognized TB and MDR TB)
(94). In the United States, the problem of MDR TB, which was amplified by health-care--associated transmission, has been substantially reduced by
the
use of standardized antituberculosis treatment regimens in the initial phase of therapy, rapid
drug-susceptibility testing, directly observed therapy (DOT), and improved infectioncontrol practices
(1). DOT is an adherence-enhancing strategy
in which an HCW or other specially trained health professional watches a patient swallow each dose of medication and
records the dates that the administration was
observed. DOT is the standard of care for all patients with TB disease and should
be used for all doses during the course of therapy for TB disease and for LTBI, whenever
feasible.
All health-care settings need a TB infectioncontrol program designed to ensure prompt detection, airborne precautions,
and treatment of persons who have suspected or confirmed TB disease (or prompt referral of persons who have suspected
TB disease for settings in which persons with TB disease are not expected to be encountered). Such a program is based on a
three-level hierarchy of controls, including
administrative, environmental, and respiratory protection
(86,107,108).
Administrative Controls
The first and most important level of TB controls is the use of administrative measures to reduce the risk for exposure
to persons who might have TB disease. Administrative controls consist of the following activities:
- assigning responsibility for TB infection control in the setting;
- conducting a TB risk assessment of the setting;
- developing and instituting a written TB infectioncontrol plan to ensure prompt detection, airborne precautions,
and treatment of persons who have suspected or confirmed TB disease;
- ensuring the timely availability of recommended laboratory processing, testing, and reporting of results to the
ordering physician and infectioncontrol team;
- implementing effective work practices for the management of patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease;
- ensuring proper cleaning and sterilization or disinfection of potentially contaminated equipment (usually endoscopes);
- training and educating HCWs regarding TB, with specific focus on prevention, transmission, and symptoms;
- screening and evaluating HCWs who are at risk for TB disease or who might be exposed to
M. tuberculosis (i.e., TB screening program);
- applying epidemiologic-based prevention principles,
including the use of setting-related infectioncontrol data;
- using appropriate signage advising respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette; and
- coordinating efforts with the local or state health department.
HCWs with TB disease should be allowed to return to work when they 1) have had three negative AFB sputum
smear results (109--112) collected 8--24 hours apart, with at least one being an early morning specimen because
respiratory secretions pool overnight; and 2) have responded to antituberculosis treatment that will probably be effective based
on susceptibility results. In addition, HCWs with TB disease should be allowed to return to work when a
physician knowledgeable and experienced in managing TB disease determines that HCWs are noninfectious (see Treatment
Procedures for LTBI and TB Disease). Consideration should also be given to the type of setting and the potential risk to patients
(e.g., general medical office versus HIV clinic) (see Supplements, Estimating the Infectiousness of a TB Patient;
Diagnostic Procedures for LTBI and TB Disease; and Treatment Procedures for LTBI and TB Disease).
Environmental Controls
The second level of the hierarchy is the use of environmental controls to prevent the spread and reduce the concentration
of infectious droplet nuclei in ambient air.
Primary environmental controls consist of controlling the source of infection by
using local exhaust ventilation (e.g., hoods, tents, or booths) and diluting and removing contaminated air by using general ventilation
Secondary environmental controls consist of controlling the airflow to prevent contamination of air in areas adjacent to
the source (AII rooms) and cleaning the air by using high efficiency particulate air (HEPA), filtration, or UVGI.
Respiratory-Protection Controls
The first two control levels minimize the number of areas in which exposure to
M. tuberculosis might occur and, therefore, minimize the number of persons exposed. These control levels also reduce, but do not eliminate, the risk for exposure in
the limited areas in which exposure can still occur. Because persons entering these areas might be exposed to
M. tuberculosis, the third level of the hierarchy is the use of respiratory protective equipment in situations that pose a high risk for exposure. Use
of respiratory protection can further reduce risk for exposure of HCWs to infectious droplet nuclei that have been expelled
into
the air from a patient with infectious TB disease (see Respiratory Protection). The following measures can be taken to
reduce the risk for exposure:
- implementing a respiratoryprotection program,
- training HCWs on respiratory protection, and
- training patients on respiratory hygiene and cough
etiquette procedures.
Relevance to Biologic Terrorism Preparedness
MDR M. tuberculosis is classified as a category C agent of biologic terrorism
(113). Implementation of the TB infectioncontrol guidelines described in this document is
essential for preventing and controlling transmission
of M. tuberculosis in health-care settings. Additional information is at
http://www.bt.cdc.gov and
http://www.idsociety.org/bt/toc.htm (114).
Recommendations for Preventing Transmission of
M. tuberculosis in Health-Care Settings
TB Infection-Control Program
Every health-care setting should have a TB infectioncontrol plan that is part of an overall infectioncontrol program.
The specific details of the TB infectioncontrol program will differ, depending on whether patients with suspected or
confirmed TB disease might be encountered in the setting or whether patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease will be
transferred to another health-care setting. Administrators making this distinction should obtain medical and epidemiologic
consultation from state and local health departments.
TB Infection-Control Program for Settings in Which Patients with Suspected or Confirmed
TB Disease Are Expected To Be Encountered
The TB infectioncontrol program should consist of
administrative controls, environmental controls, and
a respiratoryprotection program. Every setting in which services are provided to persons who have suspected or
confirmed infectious TB disease, including laboratories and nontraditional facilitybased settings, should have a TB
infection-control plan. The following steps should be taken to establish a TB infectioncontrol program in these settings:
- Assign supervisory responsibility for the TB infectioncontrol program to a designated person or group with expertise
in LTBI and TB disease, infection control, occupational health, environmental controls, and respiratory protection.
Give the supervisor or supervisory body the support and authority to conduct a TB risk assessment, implement and
enforce TB infectioncontrol policies, and ensure recommended training and education of HCWs.
--- Train the persons responsible for implementing and enforcing the TB infectioncontrol program.
--- Designate one person with a back-up as the TB
resource person to whom questions and problems should
be addressed, if supervisory responsibility is assigned to a committee.
- Develop a written TB infectioncontrol plan that outlines a protocol for the prompt recognition and initiation
of airborne precautions of persons with suspected or confirmed TB disease, and update it annually.
- Conduct a problem evaluation (see Problem Evaluation) if a case of suspected or confirmed TB disease is not
promptly recognized and appropriate airborne precautions not initiated, or if administrative, environmental,
or respiratoryprotection controls fail.
- Perform a contact investigation in collaboration with the local or state health department if
health-care--associated transmission of M. tuberculosis
is suspected (115). Implement and monitor corrective action.
- Collaborate with the local or state health department to develop administrative controls consisting of the risk
assessment, the written TB infectioncontrol plan, management of patients with suspected or confirmed TB
disease, training and education of HCWs, screening and
evaluation of HCWs, problem evaluation, and coordination.
- Implement and maintain environmental controls, including AII room(s) (see Environmental Controls).
- Implement a respiratoryprotection program.
- Perform ongoing training and education of HCWs (see Suggested Components of an Initial TB Training and
Education Program for HCWs).
- Create a plan for accepting patients who have suspected or confirmed TB disease if they are transferred
from another setting.
TB Infection-Control Program for Settings in Which Patients with Suspected or Confirmed
TB Disease Are Not Expected To Be Encountered
Settings in whichT patients might stay before transfer should still have a TB infectioncontrol program in place consisting
of administrative, environmental, and respiratoryprotection controls. The following steps should be taken to establish a
TB infectioncontrol program in these settings:
- Assign responsibility for the TB infectioncontrol program to appropriate personnel.
- Develop a written TB infectioncontrol plan that outlines a protocol for the prompt recognition and transfer of
persons who have suspected or confirmed TB disease to another health-care setting. The plan should indicate procedures
to follow to separate persons with suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease from other persons in the setting until
the time of transfer. Evaluate the plan annually, if possible, to ensure that the setting remains one in which persons who
have suspected or confirmed TB disease are not encountered and that they are promptly transferred.
- Conduct a problem evaluation (see Problem Evaluation) if a case of suspected or confirmed TB disease is not
promptly recognized, separated from others, and transferred.
- Perform an investigation in collaboration with the local or state health department if health-care--associated
transmission of M. tuberculosis is suspected.
- Collaborate with the local or state health department to develop administrative controls consisting of the risk
assessment and the written TB infectioncontrol plan.
TB Risk Assessment
Every health-care setting should conduct initial and ongoing evaluations of the risk for transmission of
M. tuberculosis, regardless of whether or not patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease are expected to be encountered in the
setting. The TB risk assessment determines the types of administrative, environmental, and respiratoryprotection controls needed
for a setting and serves as an ongoing evaluation tool of the quality of TB infection control and for the identification of
needed improvements in infectioncontrol measures. Part of the risk assessment is similar to a program review that is conducted by
the local TBcontrol program (42). The TB Risk Assessment Worksheet (Appendix B) can be used as a guide for conducting a
risk assessment. This worksheet frequently does not specify values for acceptable performance indicators because of the lack
of scientific data.
TB Risk Assessment for Settings in Which Patients with Suspected or Confirmed TB Disease
Are Expected To Be Encountered
The initial and ongoing risk assessment for these settings should consist of the following steps:
- Review the community profile of TB disease in collaboration with the state or local health department.
- Consult the local or state TBcontrol program to
obtain epidemiologic surveillance data necessary to conduct a TB
risk assessment for the health-care setting.
- Review the number of patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease who have been encountered in the
setting during at least the previous 5 years.
- Determine if persons with unrecognized TB disease have been admitted to or were encountered in the setting during
the previous 5 years.
- Determine which HCWs need to be included in a TB screening program and the frequency of screening (based on
risk classification) (Appendix C).
- Ensure the prompt recognition and evaluation of suspected episodes of health-care--associated transmission of
M. tuberculosis.
- Identify areas in the setting with an increased risk for health-care--associated transmission of
M. tuberculosis, and target them for improved TB infection controls.
- Assess the number of AII rooms needed for the setting. The risk classification for the setting should help to make
this determination, depending on the number of TB patients examined. At least one AII room is needed for settings
in which TB patients stay while they are being treated, and additional AII rooms might be needed, depending on
the magnitude of patient-days of cases of suspected or confirmed TB disease. Additional AII rooms might be considered
if options are limited for transferring patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease to other settings with AII rooms.
- Determine the types of environmental controls needed other than AII rooms (see TB Airborne Precautions).
- Determine which HCWs need to be included in the respiratoryprotection program.
- Conduct periodic reassessments (annually, if possible) to ensure
--- proper implementation of the TB infectioncontrol plan,
--- prompt detection and evaluation of suspected TB cases,
--- prompt initiation of airborne precautions of suspected infectious TB cases,
--- recommended medical management of patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease
(31),
--- functional environmental controls,
--- implementation of the respiratoryprotection
program, and
--- ongoing HCW training and education regarding TB.
- Recognize and correct lapses in infection control.
TB Risk Assessment for Settings in Which Patients with Suspected or Confirmed TB Disease
Are Not Expected To Be Encountered
The initial and ongoing risk assessment for these settings should consist of the following steps:
- Review the community profile of TB disease in collaboration with the local or state health department.
- Consult the local or state TBcontrol program to obtain epidemiologic surveillance data necessary to conduct a TB
risk assessment for the health-care setting.
- Determine if persons with unrecognized TB disease were encountered in the setting during the previous 5 years.
- Determine if any HCWs need to be included in the TB screening program.
- Determine the types of environmental controls that are currently in place, and determine if any are needed in the
setting (see Environmental Controls; Appendices A and D).
- Document procedures that ensure the prompt recognition and evaluation of suspected episodes of
health-care--associated transmission of M.
tuberculosis.
- Conduct periodic reassessments (annually, if possible) to ensure 1) proper implementation of the TB infectioncontrol plan; 2) prompt detection and evaluation of suspected TB cases; 3) prompt initiation of airborne precautions
of suspected infectious TB cases before transfer; 4) prompt transfer of suspected infectious TB cases; 5) proper
functioning of environmental controls, as applicable; and 6) ongoing TB training and education for HCWs.
- Recognize and correct lapses in infection control.
Use of Risk Classification to Determine Need for TB Screening and Frequency of Screening HCWs
Risk classification should be used as part of the risk assessment to determine the need for a TB screening program
for HCWs and the frequency of screening (Appendix C). A risk classification usually should be determined for the entire
setting. However, in certain settings (e.g., health-care organizations that encompass multiple sites or types of services), specific
areas defined by geography, functional units, patient population, job type, or location within the setting might have separate
risk classifications. Examples of assigning risk classifications have been provided (see Risk Classification
Examples).
TB Screening Risk Classifications
The three TB screening risk classifications are low risk, medium risk, and potential ongoing transmission. The
classification of low risk should be applied to settings in which persons with TB disease are not expected to be encountered, and,
therefore, exposure to M. tuberculosis is unlikely. This classification should also be applied to HCWs who will never be exposed
to persons with TB disease or to clinical specimens that might contain
M. tuberculosis.
The classification of medium risk should be applied to settings in which the risk assessment has determined that HCWs
will or will possibly be exposed to persons with TB disease or to clinical specimens that might contain
M. tuberculosis.
The classification of potential ongoing transmission should be temporarily applied to any setting (or group of HCWs)
if evidence suggestive of personto-person (e.g.,
patient-to-patient, patient-to-HCW, HCWto-patient, or
HCWto-HCW) transmission of M. tuberculosis has occurred in the setting during the preceding year. Evidence of
personto-person transmission of M. tuberculosis
includes 1) clusters of TST or BAMT conversions, 2) HCW with confirmed TB
disease, 3) increased rates of TST or BAMT conversions,
4) unrecognized TB disease in patients or HCWs, or 5) recognition of
an identical strain of M. tuberculosis in patients or HCWs with TB disease identified by deoxyribonucleic acid
(DNA) fingerprinting.
If uncertainty exists regarding whether to classify a setting as low risk or medium risk, the setting typically should
be classified as medium risk.
TB Screening Procedures for Settings (or HCWs) Classified as Low Risk
- All HCWs should receive baseline TB screening upon hire, using two-step TST or a single BAMT to test for infection
with M. tuberculosis.
- After baseline testing for infection with M.
tuberculosis, additional TB screening is not necessary unless an exposure to
M. tuberculosis occurs.
- HCWs with a baseline positive or newly positive test
result for M. tuberculosis infection (i.e., TST or BAMT)
or documentation of treatment for LTBI or TB disease should receive one chest radiograph result to exclude TB disease
(or an interpretable copy within a reasonable time frame, such as 6 months). Repeat radiographs are not needed
unless symptoms or signs of TB disease develop or unless recommended by a clinician
(39,116).
TB Screening Procedures for Settings (or HCWs) Classified as Medium Risk
- All HCWs should receive baseline TB screening upon hire, using two-step TST or a single BAMT to test for infection
with M. tuberculosis.
- After baseline testing for infection with M.
tuberculosis, HCWs should receive TB screening annually (i.e., symptom screen
for all HCWs and testing for infection with M. tuberculosis
for HCWs with baseline negative test results).
- HCWs with a baseline positive or newly positive test
result for M. tuberculosis infection or documentation of
previous treatment for LTBI or TB disease should receive one chest radiograph result to exclude TB disease. Instead of
participating in serial testing, HCWs should receive a symptom screen annually. This screen should be accomplished by educating
the HCW about symptoms of TB disease and instructing the HCW to report any such symptoms immediately to
the occupational health unit. Treatment for LTBI should be considered in accordance with CDC guidelines
(39).
TB Screening Procedures for Settings (or HCWs) Classified as Potential Ongoing Transmission
- Testing for infection with M. tuberculosis
might need to be performed every 8--10 weeks until lapses in infection
control have been corrected, and no additional evidence of ongoing transmission is apparent.
- The classification of potential ongoing transmission should be used as a temporary classification only. It warrants
immediate investigation and corrective steps. After a determination that ongoing transmission has ceased, the setting should
be reclassified as medium risk. Maintaining the classification of medium risk for at least 1 year is recommended.
Settings Adopting BAMT for Use in TB Screening
Settings that use TST as part of TB screening and want to adopt BAMT can do so directly (without any overlapping TST)
or in conjunction with a period of evaluation (e.g., 1 or 2 years) during which time both TST and BAMT are used. Baseline
testing for BAMT would be established as a single step test.
As with the TST, BAMT results should be recorded in detail. The
details should include date of blood draw, result in specific units, and the laboratory interpretation (positive, negative,
or indeterminate---and the concentration of cytokine measured, for example, interferon-gamma
[IFN-g]).
Risk Classification Examples
Inpatient Settings with More Than 200 Beds
If less than six TB patients for the preceding year, classify as low risk. If greater than or equal to six TB patients for
the preceeding year, classify as medium risk.
Inpatient Settings with Less Than 200 Beds
If less than three TB patients for the proceeding year, classify as low risk. If greater than or equal to three TB patients for
the preceeding year, classify as medium risk.
Outpatient, Outreach, and Home-Based Health-Care Settings
If less than three TB patients for the preceding year, classify as low risk. If greater than or equal to three TB patients for
the preceeding year, classify as medium risk.
Hypothetical Risk Classification Examples
The following hypothetical situations illustrate how assessment data are used to assign a risk classification. The risk
classifications are for settings in which patients with suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease are expected to be encountered.
Example A. The setting is a 150-bed hospital located in a small city. During the preceding year, the hospital admitted
two patients with a diagnosis of TB disease. One was admitted directly to an AII room, and one stayed on a medical ward for
2 days before being placed in an AII room. A contact
investigation of exposed HCWs by hospital infectioncontrol personnel
in consultation with the state or local health department
did not identify any health-care--associated transmission-.
Risk classification: low risk.
Example B. The setting is an ambulatory-care site in which a TB clinic is held 2 days per week. During the preceding
year, care was delivered to six patients with TB disease and approximately 50 persons with LTBI. No instances of transmission
of M. tuberculosis were noted. Risk classification: medium
risk (because it is a TB clinic).
Example C. The setting is a large publicly funded hospital in a major metropolitan area. The hospital admits an average
of 150 patients with TB disease each year, comprising 35% of the city burden. The setting has a strong TB infectioncontrol program (i.e., annually updates infectioncontrol plan, fully implements infectioncontrol plan, and has enough AII
rooms [see Environmental Controls]) and an annual conversion rate (for tests for
M. tuberculosis infection) among HCWs of
0.5%. No evidence of health-care--associated transmission is apparent. The hospital has strong collaborative linkages with the state
or local health department. Risk classification: medium
risk (with close ongoing surveillance for episodes of transmission
from unrecognized cases of TB disease, test conversions for
M. tuberculosis infection in HCWs as a result of
health-care--associated transmission, and specific groups or areas in which a higher risk for health-care--associated transmission exists).
Example D. The setting is an inpatient area of a correctional facility. A proportion of the inmates were born in
countries where TB disease is endemic. Two cases of TB disease were diagnosed in inmates during the preceding year. Risk
classification: medium risk (Correctional facilities should be classified as at least medium risk).
Example E. A hospital located in a large city admits 35 patients with TB disease per year, uses QFT-G to
measure M. tuberculosis infection, and has an overall HCW
M. tuberculosis infection test conversion rate of 1.0%. However, on
annual testing, three of the 20 respiratory therapists tested had QFT-G conversions, for a rate of 15%. All of the respiratory
therapists who tested positive received medical evaluations, had TB disease excluded, were diagnosed with LTBI, and were offered
and completed a course of treatment for LTBI. None of the respiratory therapists had known exposures to
M. tuberculosis outside the hospital. The problem evaluation revealed that 1) the respiratory therapists who converted had spent part of their time
in the pulmonary function laboratory where induced sputum specimens were collected, and 2) the ventilation in the
laboratory was inadequate. Risk classification: potential ongoing transmission for the respiratory
therapists (because of evidence of health-care--associated transmission). The rest of the setting was classified as medium risk. To address the problem, booths
were installed for sputum induction. On subsequent testing for
M. tuberculosis infection, no conversions were noted at the
repeat testing 3 months later, and the respiratory therapists were then reclassified back to medium risk.
Example F. The setting is an ambulatory-care center associated with a large health maintenance organization (HMO).
The patient volume is high, and the HMO is located in the inner city where TB rates are the highest in the state. During
the preceding year, one patient who was known to have TB disease was evaluated at the center. The person was recognized as a
TB patient on his first visit and was promptly triaged to an ED with an AII room capacity. While in the
ambulatory-care center, the patient was held in an area separate from HCWs and other patients and instructed to wear a surgical or procedure mask,
if possible. QFT-G was used for infection-control surveillance purposes, and a contact investigation was conducted
among exposed staff, and no QFT-G conversions were noted. Risk classification: low risk.
Example G. The setting is a clinic for the care of persons infected with HIV. The clinic serves a large metropolitan area
and a patient population of 2,000. The clinic has an AII room and a TB infectioncontrol program. All patients are screened
for TB disease upon enrollment, and airborne precautions are promptly initiated for anyone with respiratory complaints while
the patient is being evaluated. During the preceding year, seven patients who were encountered in the clinic were
subsequently determined to have TB disease. All patients were promptly put into an AII room, and no contact investigations
were performed. The local health department was promptly notified in all cases. Annual TST has determined a conversion rate
of 0.3%, which is low compared with the rate of the hospital with which the clinic is associated. Risk classification: medium
risk (because persons infected with HIV might be encountered).
Example H. A home health-care agency employs 125 workers, many of whom perform duties, including nursing,
physical therapy, and basic home care. The agency did not care for any patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease during
the preceding year. Approximately 30% of the agency's workers are foreign-born, many of whom have immigrated within
the previous 5 years. At baseline two-step testing, four had a positive initial TST result, and two had a positive second-step
TST result. All except one of these workers was foreign-born. Upon further screening, none were determined to have TB
disease. The home health-care agency is based in a major metropolitan area and delivers care to a community where the
majority persons are poor and medically underserved and TB case rates are higher than the community as a whole. Risk
classification: low risk (because HCWs might be from populations at higher risk for LTBI and subsequent progression to TB disease
because of foreign birth and recent immigration or HIVinfected clients might be overrepresented, medium risk could be considered).
Screening HCWs Who Transfer to Other Health-Care Settings
All HCWs should receive baseline TB screening, even in settings considered to be low risk. Infectioncontrol plans
should address HCWs who transfer from one health-care setting to another and consider that the transferring HCWs might be at
an equivalent or higher risk for exposure in different settings. Infectioncontrol plans might need to be customized to balance
the assessed risks and the efficacy of the plan based on consideration of various logistical factors. Guidance is provided based
on different scenarios.
Because some institutions might adopt BAMT for the purposes of testing for
M. tuberculosis infection, infectioncontrol programs might be confronted with interpreting historic and current TST and BAMT results when HCWs transfer to
a different setting. On a case-by-case basis, expert medical opinion might be needed to interpret results and refer patients
with discordant BAMT and TST baseline results. Therefore, infectioncontrol programs should keep all records when
documenting previous test results. For example, an infectioncontrol program using a BAMT strategy should request and keep historic
TST results of a HCW transferring from a previous setting. Even if the HCW is transferring from a setting that used BAMT to
a setting that uses BAMT, historic TST results might be needed when in the future the HCW transfers to a setting that
uses TST. Similarly, historic BAMT results might be needed when the HCW transfers from a setting that used TST to a
setting that uses BAMT.
HCWs transferring from low-risk to low-risk settings.
After a baseline result for infection with M. tuberculosis
is established and documented, serial testing for
M. tuberculosis infection is not necessary.
HCWs transferring from low-risk to medium-risk settings.
After a baseline result for infection with M. tuberculosis
is established and documented, annual TB screening (including a symptom screen and TST or BAMT for persons
with previously negative test results) should be performed.
HCWs transferring from low- or medium-risk settings to settings with a temporary classification of
potential ongoing transmission. After a baseline result for infection with
M. tuberculosis is established, a decision should be
made regarding follow-up screening on an individual basis. If transmission seems to be ongoing, consider including the HCW in
the screenings every 8--10 weeks until a determination has been made that ongoing transmission has ceased. When the setting
is reclassified back to medium-risk, annual TB screening should be resumed.
Calculation and Use of Conversion Rates for M. tuberculosis
Infection
The M. tuberculosis infection conversion rate is the percentage of HCWs whose test result for
M. tuberculosis infection has converted within a specified period. Timely detection of
M. tuberculosis infection in HCWs not only facilitates treatment
for LTBI, but also can indicate the need for a source case investigation and a revision of the risk assessment for the
setting. Conversion in test results for M.
tuberculosis, regardless of the testing method used, is usually interpreted as
presumptive
evidence of new M. tuberculosis infection, and recent infections are associated with an increased risk for progression to
TB disease.
For administrative purposes, a TST conversion is
>10 mm increase in the size of the TST induration during a 2-year
period in 1) an HCW with a documented negative (<10 mm) baseline two-step TST result or 2) a person who is not an HCW with
a negative (<10 mm) TST result within 2 years.
In settings conducting serial testing for M. tuberculosis
infection (medium-risk settings), use the to estimate the risk for
test conversion in HCWs.
- Calculate a conversion rate by dividing the number of conversions among HCWs in the setting in a specified
period (numerator) by the number of HCWs who received tests in the setting over the same period (denominator) multiplied
by 100 (see Use of Conversion Test Data for M. tuberculosis
Infection To Identify Lapses in Infection Control).
- Identify areas or groups in the setting with a potentially high risk for
M. tuberculosis transmission by comparing
conversion rates in HCWs with potential exposure to patients with TB disease to conversion rates in HCWs for whom
health-care--associated exposure to M. tuberculosis
is not probable.
Use of Conversion Test Data for M. tuberculosis
Infection To Identify Lapses in Infection Control
- Conversion rates above the baseline level (which will be different in each setting) should instigate an investigation to
evaluate the likelihood of health-care--associated transmission. When testing for
M. tuberculosis infection, conversions are
determined to be the result of well-documented community exposure or probable false-positive test results; the risk classification of
the setting does not need to be adjusted.
- For settings that no longer perform serial testing for
M. tuberculosis infection among HCWs, reassessment of the risk for
the setting is essential to ensure that the infectioncontrol program is effective. The setting should have ongoing
communication with the local or state health department regarding incidence and epidemiology of TB in the population served and
should ensure that timely contact investigations are performed for HCWs or patients with unprotected exposure to a person with
TB disease.
Example Calculation of Conversion Rates
Medical Center A is classified as medium risk and uses TST for annual screening. At the end of 2004, a total of
10,051 persons were designated as HCWs. Of these, 9,246 had negative baseline test results for
M. tuberculosis infection. Of the HCWs tested, 10 experienced an increase in TST result by
>10 mm. The overall setting conversion rate for 2004 is 0.11%.
If five of the 10 HCWs whose test results converted were among the 100 HCWs employed in the ICU of Hospital X
(in Medical Center A), then the ICU setting-specific conversion rate for 2004 is 5%.
Evaluation of HCWs for LTBI should include information from a serial testing program, but this information must
be interpreted as only one part of a full assessment. TST or BAMT conversion criteria for administrative (surveillance)
purposes are not applicable for medical evaluation of HCWs for the diagnosis of LTBI (see Supplement, Surveillance and Detection
of M. tuberculosis Infections in HealthCare Workers [HCWs]).
Evaluation of TB InfectionControl Procedures and Identification of Problems
Annual evaluations of the TB infectioncontrol plan are needed to ensure the proper implementation of the plan and
to recognize and correct lapses in infection control. Previous hospital admissions and outpatient visits of patients with TB
disease should be noted before the onset of TB symptoms. Medical records of a sample of patients with suspected and confirmed
TB disease who were treated or examined at the setting should be reviewed to identify possible problems in TB infection control.
The review should be based on the factors listed on the TB Risk Assessment Worksheet (Appendix B).
- Time interval from suspicion of TB until initiation of airborne precautions and antituberculosis treatment.
--- suspicion of TB disease and patient triage to proper AII room or referral center for settings that do not provide care
for patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease;
--- admission until TB disease was suspected;
--- admission until medical evaluation for TB disease was performed;
--- admission until specimens for AFB smears and polymerase chain reaction (PCR)--based nucleic
acid amplification (NAA) tests for M. tuberculosis
were ordered;
--- admission until specimens for mycobacterial culture were ordered;
--- ordering of AFB smears, NAA tests, and mycobacterial culture until specimens were collected;
--- collection of specimens until performance and AFB smear results were reported;
--- collection of specimens until performance and culture results were reported;
--- collection of specimens until species identification was reported;
--- collection of specimens until drug-susceptibility test results were reported;
--- admission until airborne precautions were initiated; and
--- admission until antituberculosis treatment was
initiated.
- Duration of airborne precautions.
- Measurement of meeting criteria for discontinuing airborne precautions. Certain patients might be correctly
discharged from an AII room to home.
- Patient history of previous admission.
- Adequacy of antituberculosis treatment regimens.
- Adequacy of procedures for collection of follow-up sputum specimens.
- Adequacy of discharge planning.
- Number of visits to outpatient setting from the start of symptoms until TB disease was suspected (for outpatient settings).
Work practices related to airborne precautions should be observed to determine if employers are enforcing all practices,
if HCWs are adhering to infectioncontrol policies, and if patient adherence to airborne precautions is being enforced.
Data from the case reviews and observations in the annual risk assessment should be used to determine the need to modify
1) protocols for identifying and initiating prompt airborne precautions for patients with suspected or confirmed infectious
TB disease, 2) protocols for patient management, 3) laboratory procedures, or 4) TB training and education programs for HCWs.
Environmental Assessment
- Data from the most recent environmental evaluation should be reviewed to determine if recommended
environmental controls are in place (see Suggested Components of an Initial TB Training and Education Program for HCWs).
- Environmental control maintenance procedures and logs should not be reviewed to determine if maintenance is
conducted properly and regularly.
- Environmental control design specifications should be compared with guidelines from the American Institute of
Architects (AIA) and other ventilation guidelines
(117,118) (see Risk Classification Examples) and the
installed system performance.
- Environmental data should be used to assist building managers and engineers in evaluating the performance of the
installed system.
- The number and types of aerosol-generating or aerosol-producing procedures (e.g., specimen processing and
manipulation, bronchoscopy, sputum induction, and administration
of aerosolized medications) performed in the setting should
be assessed.
- The number of AII rooms should be suitable for the setting based on AIA Guidelines and the setting risk assessment.
The Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) has adapted the AIA guidelines
when accrediting facilities (118).
Suggested Components of an Initial TB Training and Education Program for HCWs
The following are suggested components of an initial TB training and education program:
1. Clinical Information
Basic concepts of M. tuberculosis transmission, pathogenesis, and diagnosis, including the difference between LTBI and
TB disease and the possibility of reinfection after previous infection with
M. tuberculosis or TB disease.
- Symptoms and signs of TB disease and the importance of a high index of suspicion for patients or HCWs with
these symptoms.
- Indications for initiation of airborne precautions of
inpatients with suspected or confirmed TB disease.
- Policies and indications for discontinuing airborne precautions.
- Principles of treatment for LTBI and for TB disease
(indications, use, effectiveness, and potential adverse
effects).
2. Epidemiology of TB
- Epidemiology of TB in the local community, the United States, and worldwide.
- Risk factors for TB disease.
3. Infection-Control Practices to Prevent and Detect
M. tuberculosis Transmission in Health-Care Settings
- Overview of the TB infectioncontrol program.
- Potential for occupational exposure to infectious TB disease in health-care settings.
- Principles and practices of infection control to reduce the risk for transmission of
M. tuberculosis, including the hierarchy of TB infectioncontrol measures, written policies and procedures, monitoring, and control measures for HCWs
at increased risk for exposure to M.
tuberculosis.
- Rationale for infectioncontrol measures and documentation evaluating the effect of these measures in
reducing occupational TB risk exposure and M. tuberculosis
transmission.
- Reasons for testing for M. tuberculosis infection, importance of a positive test result for
M. tuberculosis infection, importance of participation in a TB screening program, and importance of retaining documentation of previous test result for
M. tuberculosis infection, chest radiograph results, and treatment for LTBI and TB disease.
- Efficacy and safety of BCG vaccination and principles of screening for
M. tuberculosis infection and interpretation in
BCG recipients.
- Procedures for investigating an M. tuberculosis
infection test conversion or TB disease occurring in the workplace.
- Joint responsibility of HCWs and employers to ensure prompt medical evaluation after
M. tuberculosis test conversion or development of symptoms or signs of TB disease in HCWs.
- Role of HCW in preventing transmission of M. tuberculosis.
- Responsibility of HCWs to promptly report a diagnosis of TB disease to the setting's administration and
infectioncontrol program.
- Responsibility of clinicians and the infectioncontrol program to report to the state or local health department a
suspected case of TB disease in a patient (including
autopsy findings) or HCW.
- Responsibilities and policies of the setting, the local health department, and the state health department to
ensure confidentiality for HCWs with TB disease or LTBI.
- Responsibility of the setting to inform EMS staff who transported a patient with suspected or confirmed TB disease.
- Responsibilities and policies of the setting to ensure that an HCW with TB disease is noninfectious before
returning to duty.
- Importance of completing therapy for LTBI or TB disease to protect the HCW's health and to reduce the risk to others.
- Proper implementation and monitoring of environmental controls (see Environmental Controls).
- Training for safe collection, management, and disposal of clinical specimens.
- Required Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) record keeping on HCW test conversions for
M. tuberculosis infection.
- Record-keeping and surveillance of TB cases among
patients in the setting.
- Proper use of (see Respiratory Protection) and the need to inform the infectioncontrol program of factors that might
affect the efficacy of respiratory protection as required
by OSHA.
- Success of adherence to infectioncontrol practices in
decreasing the risk for transmission of M. tuberculosis
in health-care settings.
4. TB and Immunocompromising Conditions
- Relationship between infection with M. tuberculosis
and medical conditions and treatments that can lead
to impaired immunity.
- Available tests and counseling and referrals for persons with HIV infection, diabetes, and other
immunocompromising conditions associated with an increased risk for progression to TB disease.
- Procedures for informing employee health or infectioncontrol personnel of medical conditions associated
with immunosuppression.
- Policies on voluntary work reassignment options for immunocompromised HCWs.
- Applicable confidentiality safeguards of the health-care setting, locality, and state.
5. TB and Public Health
- Role of the local and state health department's TBcontrol program in screening for LTBI and TB disease,
providing treatment, conducting contact investigations and outbreak investigations, and providing education, counseling,
and responses to public inquiries.
- Roles of CDC and of OSHA.
- Availability of information, advice, and counseling from community sources, including universities, local experts,
and hotlines.
- Responsibility of the setting's clinicians and infection-control program to promptly report to the state or local
health department a case of suspected TB disease or a cluster of TST or BAMT conversions.
- Responsibility of the setting's clinicians and infectioncontrol program to promptly report to the state or local
health department a person with suspected or confirmed TB disease who leaves the setting against medical advice.
Managing Patients Who Have Suspected or Confirmed TB Disease:
General Recommendations
The primary TB risk to HCWs is the undiagnosed or unsuspected patient with infectious TB disease. A high index
of suspicion for TB disease and rapid implementation of precautions are essential to prevent and interrupt transmission.
Specific precautions will vary depending on the setting.
Prompt Triage
Within health-care settings, protocols should be implemented and enforced to promptly identify, separate from others,
and either transfer or manage persons who have suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease. When patients' medical histories
are taken, all patients should be routinely asked about 1) a history of TB exposure, infection, or disease; 2) symptoms or signs
of TB disease; and 3) medical conditions that increase their risk for TB disease (see Supplements, Diagnostic Procedures for
LTBI and TB Disease; and Treatment Procedures for LTBI and TB Disease). The medical evaluation should include an
interview conducted in the patient's primary language, with the assistance of a qualified medical
interpreter, if necessary. HCWs who are the first point of contact should be trained to ask questions that will facilitate
detection of persons who have suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease. For assistance with language interpretation, contact the local and state health
department. Interpretation resources are also available
(119) at http://www.atanet.org;
http://www.languageline.com; and
http://www.ncihc.org.
A diagnosis of respiratory TB disease should be considered for any patient with symptoms or signs of infection in the
lung, pleura, or airways (including larynx), including coughing for >3 weeks, loss of appetite, unexplained weight loss, night
sweats, bloody sputum or hemoptysis, hoarseness,
fever, fatigue, or chest pain. The index of suspicion for TB disease will vary
by geographic area and will depend on the population served by the setting. The index of suspicion should be substantially
high for geographic areas and groups of patients characterized by high TB incidence
(26).
Special steps should be taken in settings other than TB clinics. Patients with symptoms suggestive of undiagnosed
or inadequately treated TB disease should be promptly referred so that they can receive a medical evaluation. These
patients should not be kept in the setting any longer than required to arrange a referral or transfer to an AII room. While in the
setting, symptomatic patients should wear a surgical or procedure mask, if possible, and should be instructed to observe
strict respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette procedures (see Glossary)
(120--122).
Immunocompromised persons, including those who are HIVinfected, with infectious TB disease should be
physically separated from other persons to protect both themselves and others. To avoid exposing HIVinfected or otherwise
severely immunocompromised persons to M.
tuberculosis, consider location and scheduling issues to avoid exposure.
TB Airborne Precautions
Within health-care settings, TB airborne precautions should be initiated for any patient who has symptoms or signs of
TB disease, or who has documented infectious TB disease and has not completed antituberculosis treatment. For patients
placed in AII rooms because of suspected infectious TB disease of the lungs, airway, or larynx, airborne precautions may
be discontinued when infectious TB disease is considered unlikely and either 1) another diagnosis is made that explains
the clinical syndrome or 2) the patient has three consecutive, negative AFB sputum smear results
(109--112,123). Each of the
three sputum specimens should be collected in 8--24-hour intervals
(124), and at least one specimen should be an
early morning specimen because respiratory secretions pool overnight. Generally, this method will allow patients with
negative sputum smear results to be released from airborne precautions in 2 days.
The classification of the risk assessment of the health-care setting is used to determine how many AII rooms each
setting needs, depending on the number of TB patients examined. At least one AII room is needed for settings in which
TB patients stay while they are being treated, and additional AII rooms might be needed depending on the magnitude of
patient-days of persons with suspected or confirmed TB disease
(118). Additional rooms might be considered if options are limited
for transferring patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease to other settings with AII rooms. For
example, for a hospital with 120 beds, a minimum of one AII room is needed, possibly more, depending on how many TB patients are examined in 1 year.
TB Airborne Precautions for Settings in Which Patients with Suspected or Confirmed TB Disease Are Expected To
Be Encountered
Settings that plan to evaluate and manage patients with TB disease should have at least one AII room or enclosure
that meets AII requirements (see Environmental Controls; and Supplement, Environmental Controls). These settings
should develop written policies that specify 1) indications for airborne precautions, 2) persons authorized to initiate and
discontinue airborne precautions, 3) specific airborne precautions, 4) AII room-monitoring procedures, 5) procedures for
managing patients who do not adhere to airborne precautions, and 6) criteria for discontinuing airborne precautions.
A high index of suspicion should be maintained for TB disease. If a patient has suspected or confirmed TB disease,
airborne precautions should be promptly initiated. Persons with suspected or confirmed TB disease who are inpatients should remain
in AII rooms until they are determined to be noninfectious and have demonstrated a clinical response to a standard
multidrug antituberculosis treatment regimen or until an alternative diagnosis is made. If the alternative diagnosis cannot be
clearly established, even with three negative sputum smear results, empiric treatment of TB disease should strongly be considered
(see Supplement, Estimating the Infectiousness of a TB Patient). Outpatients with suspected or confirmed infectious TB
disease should remain in AII rooms until they are transferred or until their visit is complete.
TB Airborne Precautions for Settings in Which Patients with Suspected or Confirmed TB Disease Are Not
Expected To Be Encountered
Settings in which patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease are not expected to be encountered do not need an
AII room or a respiratoryprotection program for the prevention of transmission of
M. tuberculosis. However, follow the
following steps in these settings.
A written protocol should be developed for referring
patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease to a
collaborating referral setting in which the patient can be evaluated and managed properly. The referral setting should
provide documentation of intent to collaborate. The protocol should be reviewed routinely and revised as needed.
Patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease should be placed in an AII room, if available, or in a room that meets
the requirements for an AII room, or in a separate room with the door closed, apart from other patients and not in an
open waiting area. Adequate time should elapse to ensure removal of
M. tuberculosis--contaminated room air before allowing
entry by staff or another patient (see Environmental Controls;
Tables 1 and 2).
If an AII room is not available, persons with suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease should wear a surgical
or procedure mask, if possible. Patients should be instructed to keep the mask on and to change the mask if it becomes wet.
If patients cannot tolerate a mask, they should observe strict respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette procedures.
AII Room Practices
AII rooms should be single-patient rooms in which environmental factors and entry of visitors and HCWs are controlled
to minimize the transmission of M.
tuberculosis. All HCWs who enter an AII room should wear at least N95
disposable respirators (see Respiratory Protection). Visitors may be offered respiratory protection (i.e., N95) and should be instructed
by HCWs on the use of the respirator before entering an AII room. AII rooms have specific requirements for
controlled ventilation, negative pressure, and air filtration
(118) (see Environmental Controls). Each inpatient AII room should have
a private bathroom.
Settings with AII Rooms
Health-care personnel settings with AII rooms should
- keep doors to AII rooms closed except when patients, HCWs, or others must enter or exit the room
(118);
- maintain enough AII rooms to provide airborne precautions of all patients who have suspected or confirmed TB
disease. Estimate the number of AII rooms needed based on the results of the risk assessment for the setting;
- monitor and record direction of airflow (i.e., negative pressure) in the room on a daily basis, while the room is being
used for TB airborne precautions. Record results in an electronic or readily retrievable document;
- consider grouping AII rooms in one part of the health-care setting to limit costs, reduce the possibility of transmitting
M. tuberculosis to other patients, facilitate the care of TB patients, and facilitate the installation and maintenance of
optimal environmental controls (particularly ventilation). Depending on the architecture and the
environmental control systems of a particular setting, AII rooms might be grouped either horizontally (e.g., a wing of a facility) or vertically (e.g., the
last few rooms of separate floors of a facility);
- perform diagnostic and treatment procedures (e.g., sputum collection and inhalation therapy) in an AII room.
- ensure patient adherence to airborne precautions. In their primary language, with the assistance of a qualified
medical interpreter, if necessary, educate patients (and family and visitors) who are placed in an AII room
about M. tuberculosis transmission and the reasons for airborne precautions. For assistance with language interpretation,
contact the local and state health department. Interpretation resources are available
(119) at http://www.atanet.org;
http://www.languageline.com; and
http://www.ncihc.org. Facilitate patient adherence by using incentives (e.g.,
provide telephones, televisions, or radios in AII rooms; and grant special dietary requests) and other measures.
Address problems that could interfere with adherence (e.g., management of withdrawal from addictive substances, including tobacco); and
- ensure that patients with suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease who must be transported to another area of
the setting or to another setting for a medically essential procedure bypass the waiting area and wear a surgical or
procedure mask, if possible. Drivers, HCWs, and other
staff who are transporting persons with suspected or confirmed infectious
TB disease might consider wearing an N95 respirator. Schedule procedures on patients with TB disease when a
minimum number of HCWs and other patients are present and as the last procedure of the day to maximize the time available
for removal of airborne contamination (see Environmental Controls;
Tables 1 and 2).
Diagnostic Procedures
Diagnostic procedures should be performed in settings with appropriate infectioncontrol capabilities. The
following recommendations should be applied for diagnosing TB disease and for evaluating patients for potential infectiousness.
Clinical Diagnosis
A complete medical history should be obtained, including symptoms of TB disease, previous TB disease and
treatment, previous history of infection with M.
tuberculosis, and previous treatment of LTBI or exposure to persons with TB disease.
A physical examination should be performed, including chest radiograph, microscopic examination, culture, and,
when indicated, NAA testing of sputum
(39,53,125,126). If possible, sputum induction with aerosol inhalation is
preferred, particularly when the patient cannot produce sputum. Gastric aspiration might be necessary for those patients,
particularly children, who cannot produce sputum, even with aerosol inhalation
(127--130). Bronchoscopy might be needed for
specimen collection, especially if sputum specimens have been nondiagnostic and doubt exists as to the diagnosis
(90,111, 127,128,131--134).
All patients with suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease should be placed under airborne precautions until they
have been determined to be noninfectious (see Supplement, Estimating the Infectiousness of a TB Patient). Adult and
adolescent patients who might be infectious include persons who are coughing; have cavitation on chest radiograph; have positive
AFB sputum smear results; have respiratory tract disease with involvement of the lung, pleura or airways, including larynx, who
fail to cover the mouth and nose when coughing; are not on antituberculosis treatment or are on incorrect
antituberculosis treatment; or are undergoing cough-inducing or aerosol-generating procedures (e.g., sputum induction, bronchoscopy,
and airway suction) (30,135).
Persons diagnosed with extrapulmonary TB disease should be evaluated for the presence of concurrent pulmonary
TB disease. An additional concern in infection control with children relates to adult household members and visitors who
might be the source case (136). Pediatric patients, including adolescents, who might be infectious include those who have
extensive pulmonary or laryngeal involvement, prolonged cough, positive sputum AFB smears results, cavitary TB on chest
radiograph
(as is typically observed in immunocompetent adults with TB disease), or those for whom
cough-inducing or aerosol-generating procedures are performed
(136,137).
Although children are uncommonly infectious, pediatric patients should be evaluated for infectiousness by using the
same criteria as for adults (i.e., on the basis of pulmonary or laryngeal involvement). Patients with suspected or confirmed
TB disease should be immediately reported to the local public health authorities so that arrangements can be made for
tracking their treatment to completion, preferably through a case management system, so that DOT can be arranged and
standard procedures for identifying and evaluating TB contacts can be initiated. Coordinate efforts with the local or state
health department to arrange treatment and long-term follow-up and evaluation of contacts.
Laboratory Diagnosis
To produce the highest quality laboratory results, laboratories performing mycobacteriologic tests should be skilled in
both the laboratory and the administrative aspects of specimen processing. Laboratories should use or have prompt
access to the most rapid methods available: 1) fluorescent
microscopy and concentration for AFB smears; 2) rapid NAA testing for
direct detection of M. tuberculosis in patient specimens
(125); 3) solid and rapid broth culture methods for isolation of
mycobacteria; 4) nucleic acid probes or high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) for species identification; and 5) rapid broth
culture methods for drug susceptibility testing. Laboratories should incorporate other more rapid or sensitive tests as they
become available, practical, and affordable (see Supplement, Diagnostic Procedures for LTBI and TB Disease)
(138,139).
In accordance with local and state laws and regulations, a system should be in place to ensure that laboratories report
any positive results from any specimens to clinicians within 24 hours of obtaining the result
(139,140). Certain settings perform AFB smears on-site for rapid results (and results should be reported to clinicians within 24 hours) and then send specimens
or cultures to a referral laboratory for identification and drug-susceptibility testing. This referral practice can speed the receipt
of smear results but delay culture identification and drug-susceptibility results. Settings that cannot provide the full range
of mycobacteriologic testing services should contract with their referral laboratories to ensure rapid results while
maintaining proficiency for on-site testing. In addition, referral laboratories should be instructed to store isolates in case additional
testing is necessary.
All drug susceptibility results on M. tuberculosis
isolates should be reported to the local or state health department as soon
as these results are available. Laboratories that rarely
receive specimens for mycobacteriologic analysis should refer specimens to
a laboratory that performs these tests routinely. The reference laboratory should provide rapid testing and
reporting. Out-of-state reference laboratories should provide all results to the local or state health department from which the
specimen originated.
Special Considerations for Persons Who Are at High Risk for TB Disease or in Whom TB Disease Might Be
Difficult to Diagnose
The probability of TB disease is higher among patients who 1) previously had TB disease or were exposed to
M. tuberculosis, 2) belong to a group at high risk for TB disease or, 3) have a positive TST or BAMT result. TB disease is strongly suggested
if the diagnostic evaluation reveals symptoms or signs of TB disease, a chest radiograph consistent with TB disease, or AFB
in sputum or from any other specimen. TB disease can occur simultaneously in immunocompromised persons
who have pulmonary infections caused by other organisms (e.g.,
Pneumocystis jaroveci [formerly P.
carinii] and M. avium complex) and should be considered in the diagnostic evaluation of all such patients with symptoms or signs of TB disease
(53).
TB disease can be difficult to diagnose in persons who have HIV infection
(49) (or other conditions associated with severe
suppression of cell mediated immunity) because of nonclassical or normal radiographic presentation or
the simultaneous occurrence of other pulmonary infections (e.g.,
P. jaroveci or M. avium complex)
(2). Patients who are HIV-infected are also at greater risk for having extrapulmonary TB
(2). The difficulty in diagnosing TB disease in HIVinfected
can be compounded by the possible lower sensitivity and specificity of sputum smear results for detecting AFB
(53,141) and the overgrowth of cultures with
M. avium complex in specimens from patients infected with both
M. tuberculosis and M. avium complex. The TST in patients with advanced HIV infection is unreliable and cannot be used in clinical
decision making (35,53,142).
For immunocompromised patients who have respiratory symptoms or signs that are attributed initially to infections
or conditions other than TB disease, conduct an evaluation for coexisting TB disease. If the patient does not respond
to recommended treatment for the presumed cause of the pulmonary abnormalities, repeat the evaluation (see
Supplement,
Diagnostic Procedures for LTBI and TB Disease). In certain settings in which immunocompromised patients and
patients with TB disease are examined, implementing airborne precautions might be prudent for all persons at high risk. These
persons include those infected with HIV who have an abnormal chest radiograph or respiratory symptoms, symptomatic
foreign-born persons who have immigrated within the previous 5 years from TBendemic countries, and persons with pulmonary
infiltrates on chest radiograph, or symptoms or signs of TB disease.
Initiation of Treatment
For patients who have confirmed TB disease or who are considered highly probable to have TB disease, promptly
start antituberculosis treatment in accordance with current guidelines (see Supplements, Diagnostic Procedures for LTBI and
TB Disease; and Treatment Procedures for LTBI and TB Disease)
(31). In accordance with local and state regulations,
local health departments should be notified of all cases of suspected TB.
DOT is the standard of care for all patients with TB disease and should be used for all doses during the course of therapy
for treatment of TB disease. All inpatient medication should be administered by DOT and reported to the state or local
health department. Rates of relapse and development of drug-resistance are decreased when DOT is used
(143--145). All patients on intermittent (i.e., once or twice per week) treatment for TB disease or LTBI should receive DOT. Settings should
collaborate with the local or state health department on decisions concerning inpatient DOT and arrangements for outpatient DOT
(31).
Managing Patients Who Have Suspected or Confirmed TB Disease:
Considerations for Special Circumstances and Settings
The recommendations for preventing transmission of
M. tuberculosis are applicable to all health-care
settings, including those that have been described (Appendix A). These settings should each have independent risk assessments if
they are stand-alone settings, or each setting should have a detailed section written as part of the risk assessment for the
overall setting.
Minimum Requirements
The specific precautions for the settings included in this section vary, depending on the setting.
Inpatient Settings
Emergency Departments (EDs)
The symptoms of TB disease are usually symptoms for which patients might seek treatment in EDs. Because TB
symptoms are common and nonspecific, infectious TB disease could be encountered in these settings. The use of ED-based TB
screening has not been demonstrated to be consistently effective
(146).
The amount of time patients with suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease spend in EDs and urgent-care
settings should be minimized. Patients with suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease should be promptly identified,
evaluated, and separated from other patients. Ideally, such patients should be placed in an AII room. When an AII room is not
available, use a room with effective general ventilation, and use air cleaning technologies (e.g., a portable HEPA filtration system),
if available, or transfer the patient to a setting or area with recommended infectioncontrol capacity. Facility
engineering personnel with expertise in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) and air handlers have evaluated how this
option is applied to ensure no over pressurization of
return air or unwanted alternations exists in design of air flow in the zone.
EDs with a high volume of patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease should have at least one AII room (see TB
Risk Assessment). Air-cleaning technologies (e.g., HEPA filtration and UVGI) can be used to increase equivalent air changes
per hour (ACH) in waiting areas (Table 1). HCWs entering an AII room or any room with a patient with infectious TB
disease should wear at least an N95 disposable respirator. After a patient with suspected or confirmed TB disease exits a room,
allow adequate time to elapse to ensure removal of
M. tuberculosis-contaminated room air before allowing
entry by staff or another patient (see Environmental Controls; Tables 1 and
2).
Before a patient leaves an AII room, perform an assessment of 1) the patient's need to discontinue airborne precautions,
2) the risk for transmission and the patient's ability to observe strict respiratory hygiene, and 3) cough etiquette
procedures. Patients with suspected or confirmed infectious
TB who are outside an AII room should wear a surgical or procedure mask,
if
possible. Patients who cannot tolerate masks because of medical conditions should observe strict respiratory hygiene
and cough etiquette procedures.
Intensive Care Units (ICUs)
Patients with infectious TB disease might become sick enough to require admission to an ICU. Place ICU patients
with suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease in an AII room, if possible. ICUs with a high volume of patients with
suspected or confirmed TB disease should have at least one AII room (see TB Risk Assessment Worksheet) [Appendix B].
Air-cleaning technologies (e.g., HEPA filtration and UVGI) can be used to increase equivalent ACH in waiting areas (see
Environmental Controls).
HCWs entering an AII room or any room with a patient with infectious TB disease should wear at least an N95
disposable respirator. To help reduce the risk for contaminating a ventilator or discharging
M. tuberculosis into the ambient air when mechanically ventilating (i.e., with a ventilator or manual resuscitator) a patient with suspected or confirmed TB disease,
place a bacterial filter on the patient's endotracheal tube (or at the expiratory side of the breathing circuit of a ventilator)
(147--151). In selecting a bacterial filter, give preference to models specified by the manufacturer to filter particles 0.3
µm in size in both the unloaded and loaded states with a filter efficiency of >95% (i.e., filter penetration of <5%) at the maximum
design flow rates of the ventilator for the service life of the filter, as specified by the manufacturer.
Surgical Suites
Surgical suites require special infectioncontrol considerations for preventing transmission of
M. tuberculosis. Normally, the direction of airflow should be from the operating room (OR) to the hallway (positive pressure) to minimize contamination
of the surgical field. Certain hospitals have procedure rooms with reversible airflow or pressure, whereas others have
positive-pressure rooms with a negative pressure anteroom. Surgical staff, particularly those close to the surgical field, should
use respiratory protection (e.g., a valveless N95 disposable respirator) to protect themselves and the patient
undergoing surgery.
When possible, postpone non-urgent surgical procedures on patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease until
the patient is determined to be noninfectious or determined to not have TB disease. When surgery cannot be
postponed, procedures should be performed in a surgical suite with recommended ventilation controls. Procedures should be
scheduled for patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease when a minimum number of HCWs and other patients are present in
the surgical suite, and at the end of the day to maximize the time available for removal of airborne contamination
(see Environmental Controls; Tables 1 and 2).
If a surgical suite or an OR has an anteroom, the anteroom should be either 1) positive pressure compared with both
the corridor and the suite or OR (with filtered supply air) or 2) negative pressure compared with both the corridor and the
suite or OR. In the usual design in which an OR has no anteroom, keep the doors to the OR closed, and minimize traffic into
and out of the room and in the corridor. Using additional air-cleaning technologies (e.g., UVGI) should be considered to
increase the equivalent ACH. Air-cleaning systems can be placed in the room or in surrounding areas to minimize contamination
of the surroundings after the procedure
(114) (see Environmental Controls).
Ventilation in the OR should be designed to provide a sterile environment in the surgical field while
preventing contaminated air from flowing to other areas in the health-care setting. Personnel steps should be taken to reduce the risk
for contaminating ventilator or anesthesia equipment or discharging tubercle bacilli into the ambient air when operating on
a patient with suspected or confirmed TB disease
(152). A bacterial filter should be placed on the patient's endotracheal tube
(or at the expiratory side of the breathing circuit of a ventilator or anesthesia machine, if used)
(147--151). When selecting a bacterial filter, give preference to models specified by the manufacturer to filter particles 0.3 µm in size in both
the unloaded and loaded states with a filter efficiency of
>95% (i.e., filter penetration of <5%) at the maximum design flow
rates of the ventilator for the service life of the filter, as specified by the manufacturer.
When surgical procedures (or other procedures that require a sterile field) are performed on patients with suspected
or confirmed infectious TB, respiratory protection should be worn by HCWs to protect the sterile field from the
respiratory secretions of HCWs and to protect HCWs from the
infectious droplet nuclei generated from the patient. When
selecting respiratory protection, do not use valved or positive-pressure respirators, because they do not protect the sterile field.
A respirator with a valveless filtering facepiece (e.g., N95 disposable respirator) should be used.
Postoperative recovery of a patient with suspected or confirmed TB disease should be in an AII room in any location
where the patient is recovering (118). If an AII or comparable room is not available for surgery or postoperative recovery,
air-cleaning
technologies (e.g., HEPA filtration and UVGI) can be used to increase the number of equivalent ACH (see
Environmental Controls); however, the infectioncontrol committee should be involved in the selection and placement of these
supplemental controls.
Laboratories
Staff who work in laboratories that handle clinical specimens encounter risks not typically present in other areas of a
health-care setting (153--155). Laboratories that handle TB specimens include 1) pass-through facilities that forward specimens
to reference laboratories for analysis; 2) diagnostic laboratories that process specimens and perform acid-fast staining and
primary culture for M. tuberculosis; and 3) facilities that perform extensive identification, subtyping, and susceptibility studies.
Procedures involving the manipulation of specimens or
cultures containing M. tuberculosis introduce additional
substantial risks that must be addressed in an effective TB infection-control program. Personnel who work with
mycobacteriology specimens should be thoroughly trained in methods that minimize the production of aerosols and
undergo periodic competency testing to include direct observation of their work practices. Risks for transmission of
M. tuberculosis in laboratories include aerosol formation during any specimen or isolate manipulation and percutaneous inoculation
from accidental exposures. Biosafety recommendations for laboratories performing diagnostic testing for TB have been
published (74,75,138,156,157).
In laboratories affiliated with a health-care setting (e.g., a hospital) and in free-standing laboratories, the laboratory
director, in collaboration with the infectioncontrol staff for the setting, and in consultation with the state TB laboratory, should develop
a risk-based infectioncontrol plan for the laboratory that minimizes the risk for exposure to
M. tuberculosis. Consider factors including 1) incidence of TB disease (including drug-resistant TB) in the community and in patients served by settings
that submit specimens to the laboratory, 2) design of the laboratory, 3) level of TB diagnostic service offered, 4) number of
specimens processed, and 5) whether or not aerosol-generating or aerosol-producing procedures are performed and the frequency at
which they are performed. Referral laboratories should store isolates in case additional testing is necessary.
Biosafety level (BSL)-2 practices and procedures, containment equipment, and facilities are required for
nonaerosol-producing manipulations of clinical specimens (e.g., preparing direct smears for acid-fast staining when done in
conjunction with training and periodic checking of competency)
(138). All specimens suspected of containing
M. tuberculosis (including specimens processed for other microorganisms) should be handled in a Class I or II biological safety cabinet (BSC)
(158,159). Conduct all aerosol-generating activities (e.g.,
inoculating culture media, setting up biochemical and
antimicrobic susceptibility tests, opening centrifuge cups, and performing sonication) in a Class I or II BSC
(158).
For laboratories that are considered at least medium risk (Appendix C), conduct testing for
M. tuberculosis infection at least annually among laboratorians who perform TB diagnostics or manipulate specimens from which
M. tuberculosis is commonly isolated (e.g., sputum, lower respiratory secretions, or tissues) (Appendix D). More frequent testing for
M. tuberculosis is recommended in the event of a documented conversion among laboratory staff or a laboratory accident that poses a risk
for exposure to M. tuberculosis (e.g., malfunction of a centrifuge leading to aerosolization of a sample).
Based on the risk assessment for the laboratory, employees should use personal protective equipment (including
respiratory protection) recommended by local regulations for each activity. For activities that have a low risk for generating
aerosols, standard personal protective equipment consists of protective laboratory coats, gowns, or smocks designed specifically for
use in the laboratory. Protective garments should be left in the laboratory before going to nonlaboratory areas.
For all laboratory procedures, disposable gloves should be worn. Gloves should be disposed of when work is completed,
the gloves are overtly contaminated, or the integrity of the glove is compromised. Local or state regulations
should determine procedures for the disposal of gloves. Face protection (e.g., goggles, full-facepiece respirator, face shield, or
other splatter guard) should also be used when manipulating specimens inside or outside a BSC. Use respiratory protection
when performing procedures that can result in aerosolization outside a BSC. The minimum level of respiratory protection is an
N95 filtering facepiece respirator. Laboratory workers who use respiratory protection should be provided with the same training
on respirator use and care and the same fit testing as other HCWs.
After documented laboratory accidents, conduct an investigation of exposed laboratory workers. Laboratories in
which specimens for mycobacteriologic studies (e.g., AFB smears and cultures) are processed should follow the AIA and
CDC/National Institute of Health guidelines
(118,159) (see Environmental Controls). BSL-3 practices, containment equipment,
and facilities are recommended for the propagation and
manipulation of cultures of M. tuberculosis
complex (including M. bovis) and for animal studies in which primates that are experimentally or naturally infected with
M. tuberculosis or M. bovis are
used.
Animal studies in which guinea pigs or mice are used can be conducted at animal BSL-2. Aerosol infection methods
are recommended to be conducted at BSL-3
(159).
Bronchoscopy Suites
Because bronchoscopy is a cough-inducing procedure that might be performed on patients with suspected or confirmed
TB disease, bronchoscopy suites require special attention
(29,81,160,161). Bronchoscopy can result in the transmission of
M. tuberculosis either through the airborne route
(29,63,81,86,162) or a contaminated bronchoscope
(80,82,163--170). Closed and effectively filtered ventilatory circuitry and minimizing opening of such circuitry in intubated and mechanically
ventilated patients might minimize exposure (see Intensive Care Units)
(149).
If possible, avoid bronchoscopy on patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease or postpone the procedure until
the patient is determined to be noninfectious, by confirmation of the three negative AFB sputum smear results
(109--112). When collection of spontaneous sputum specimen is not adequate or possible, sputum induction has been demonstrated to
be equivalent to bronchoscopy for obtaining specimens for culture
(110). Bronchoscopy might have the advantage
of confirmation of the diagnosis with histologic specimens, collection of additional specimens, including post
bronchoscopy sputum that might increase the diagnostic yield, and the opportunity to confirm an alternate diagnosis. If the diagnosis of
TB disease is suspected, consideration should be given to empiric antituberculosis treatment.
A physical examination should be performed, and a chest radiograph, microscopic examination, culture, and NAA testing
of sputum or other relevant specimens should also be
obtained, including gastric aspirates (125), as indicated
(53,126,131,130). Because 15%--20% of patients with TB disease have negative TST results, a negative TST result is of limited value in
the evaluation of the patient with suspected TB disease, particularly in patients from high TB incidence groups in whom
TST positive rates exceed 30% (31).
Whenever feasible, perform bronchoscopy in a room that meets the ventilation requirements for an AII room (same as
the AIA guidelines parameters for bronchoscopy rooms) (see Environmental Controls). Air-cleaning technologies (e.g.,
HEPA filtration and UVGI) can be used to increase equivalent ACH.
If sputum specimens must be obtained and the patient cannot produce sputum, consider sputum induction
before bronchoscopy (111). In a patient who is intubated and mechanically ventilated, minimize the opening of circuitry. At
least N95 respirators should be worn by HCWs while present during a bronchoscopy procedure on a patient with suspected
or confirmed infectious TB disease. Because of the increased risk for
M. tuberculosis transmission during the performance
of bronchoscopy procedures on patients with TB disease, consider using a higher level of respiratory protection than an
N95 disposable respirator (e.g., an elastomeric full-facepiece respirator or a powered air-purifying respirator [PAPR]
[29]) (see Respiratory Protection).
After bronchoscopy is performed on a patient with suspected or confirmed infectious TB disease, allow adequate time
to elapse to ensure removal of M.
tuberculosis--contaminated room air before performing another procedure in the same
room (see Environmental Controls; Tables 1 and
2). During the period after bronchoscopy when the patient is still coughing,
collect at least one sputum for AFB to increase the yield of the procedure. Patients with suspected or confirmed TB disease who
are undergoing bronchoscopy should be kept in an AII room until coughing subsides.
Sputum Induction and Inhalation Therapy Rooms
Sputum induction and inhalation therapy induces coughing, which increases the potential for transmission
of M. tuberculosis (87,88,90). Therefore, appropriate precautions should be taken when working with patients with suspected
or confirmed TB disease. Sputum induction procedures for persons with suspected or confirmed TB disease should be
considered after determination that self-produced sputum collection is inadequate and that the AFB smear result on other
specimens collected is negative. HCWs who order or perform sputum induction or inhalation therapy in an environment without
proper controls for the purpose of diagnosing conditions other than TB disease should assess the patient's risk for TB disease.
Cough-inducing or aerosol-generating procedures in patients with diagnosed TB should be conducted only after an
assessment of infectiousness has been considered for each patient and should be conducted in an environment with proper controls.
Sputum induction should be performed by using local exhaust ventilation (e.g., booths with special ventilation) or alternatively in a
room that |