Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home
Share
Compartir
May 1994
 

Documentation for Immediately Dangerous To Life or Health Concentrations (IDLHs)


Isoamyl alcohol (primary & secondary)

CAS number: 123-51-3 (primary), 528–75–4 (secondary)

NIOSH REL: 100 ppm (360 mg/m3) TWA, 125 ppm (450 mg/m3) STEL

Current OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (360 mg/m3) TWA

1989 OSHA PEL: 100 ppm (360 mg/m3) TWA, 125 ppm (450 mg/m3) STEL

1993-1994 ACGIH TLV: 100 ppm (361 mg/m3) TWA, 125 ppm (452 mg/m3) STEL

Description of substance: Colorless liquids with a disagreeable odor.

LEL(primary): 1.2% (10% LEL, 1,200 ppm)

LEL (secondary): Unknown

Original (SCP) IDLH: 10,000 ppm [LEL]

Basis for original (SCP) IDLH: The chosen IDLH is based on the lower explosive limit (LEL) of 12,000 ppm and the statement in Patty [1963] attributed to Smyth [1956] that rats survived 8,000 ppm.

Short-term exposure guidelines: None developed

ACUTE TOXICITY DATA:

Lethal dose data:

 

SpeciesReferenceRouteLD50

(mg/kg)

LDLo

(mg/kg)

Adjusted LDDerived value
Rabbit

Rat

Munch 1972

Purchase 1969

oral

oral

3,438

1,300

-----

-----

6,557 ppm

2,480 ppm

656 ppm

248 ppm

Other animal data: RD50 (mouse), 4,452 ppm [Alarie 1981].

Human data: An oral dose of 24.3 grams has been lethal for adults [Gosselin et al. 1984]. [Note: An oral dose of 24.3 grams is equivalent to a worker being exposed to 4,000 ppm for 30 minutes, assuming a breathing rate of 50 liters per minute and 100% absorption.]

 

Revised IDLH: 500 ppm

Basis for revised IDLH: No inhalation toxicity data are available on which to base an IDLH for isoamyl alcohol. Therefore, the revised IDLH for isoamyl alcohol (primary & secondary) is 500 ppm based on acute oral toxicity data in humans [Gosselin et al. 1984] and animals [Munch 1972]. This may be a conservative value due to the lack of relevant acute inhalation toxicity data for workers.

REFERENCES:

1. Alarie Y [1981]. Dose-response analysis in animal studies: prediction of human responses. Environ Health Perspect 42:9-13.

2. Gosselin RE, Smith RP, Hodge HC [1984]. Clinical toxicology of commercial products. 5th ed. Section II. Ingredients Index. Baltimore, MD: Williams & Wilkins Company, p. 175.

3. Munch JC [1972]. Aliphatic alcohols and alkyl esters: narcotic and lethal potencies to tadpoles and to rabbits. Ind Med Surg 41:31-33.

4. Patty FA, ed. [1963]. Industrial hygiene and toxicology. 2nd rev. ed. Vol. II. Toxicology. New York, NY: Interscience Publishers, Inc., p. 1454.

5. Purchase IFH [1969]. Studies in kaffircorn malting and brewing. XXII. The acute toxicity of some fusel oils found in Bantu beer. S Afr Med J 43:795-798.

6. Smyth HF Jr [1956]. Improved communication: hygienic standards for daily inhalation. Am Ind Hyg Assoc Q 17(2):129-185.

 
Contact Us:
USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO