2015 Summary of Early Intervention (EI) Among Infants Identified with Permanent Hearing Loss

PAGE 9 of 15

View Table of Contents

October 2019

Download page [PDF – 39 KB]

Data Source: 2015 CDC EHDI Hearing Screening & Follow-up Survey (HSFS)

LFU / LTD: Loss to Follow-up / Loss to Documentation

2015 Summary of Early Intervention (EI) Among Infants Identified with Permanent Hearing Loss
State / Territory (n = 56) Total Hearing Loss Total Enrolled in EI (Part C & Non-Part C) Percent Enrolled in EI (Part C & Non-Part C) Total Enrolled in Part C EI Services Total from Non-Part C EI Services Only Total Received Only Monitoring Services No EI Services: LFU/LTD
Parents / Family Contacted but Unresponsive Unable to Contact Unknown Overall Number LFU/LTD: Due to Contacted but Unresponsive + Unable to Contact + Unknown Overall Percent LFU/LTD1: Due to Contacted but Unresponsive + Unable to Contact + Unknown Percent LFU/LTD2: Due to Unable to Contact and Unknown Percent Unresponsive3:  Due to Parents / Family Contacted but Unresponsive
Alabama* 69 16 23.2 16 0 1 0 6 15 21 30.4 30.4 0.0
Alaska* 19 12 63.2 12 0 0 2 2 1 5 26.3 15.8 10.5
American Samoa* 3 2 66.7 2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Arizona* 190 85 44.7 85 0 0 3 2 22 27 14.2 12.6 1.6
Arkansas* 38 33 86.8 6 27 0 0 0 5 5 13.2 13.2 0.0
California 1,106 951 86.0 951 0 0 20 6 0 26 2.4 0.5 1.8
Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands* 3 2 66.7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Connecticut 103 62 60.2 62 0 0 16 0 9 25 24.3 8.7 15.5
Delaware* 25 16 64.0 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
District of Columbia* 12 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 12 12 100.0 100.0 0.0
Florida 291 190 65.3 190 0 0 42 0 14 56 19.2 4.8 14.4
Georgia* 221 168 76.0 136 32 0 6 1 1 8 3.6 0.9 2.7
Guam* 3 2 66.7 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Hawaii* 74 40 54.1 40 0 11 5 1 1 7 9.5 2.7 6.8
Idaho* 63 39 61.9 39 0 0 8 2 7 17 27.0 14.3 12.7
Illinois* 279 179 64.2 179 0 0 0 0 89 89 31.9 31.9 0.0
Indiana* 113 79 69.9 79 0 0 0 14 2 16 14.2 14.2 0.0
Iowa* 68 25 36.8 25 0 0 5 2 16 23 33.8 26.5 7.4
Kansas* 57 49 86.0 49 0 0 1 1 0 2 3.5 1.8 1.8
Kentucky* 90 75 83.3 74 1 0 0 0 10 10 11.1 11.1 0.0
Louisiana 84 65 77.4 52 13 0 3 1 0 4 4.8 1.2 3.6
Maine 31 13 41.9 13 0 0 0 1 14 15 48.4 48.4 0.0
Marshall Islands* 5 3 60.0 0 3 2 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Maryland* 105 82 78.1 82 0 0 0 7 0 7 6.7 6.7 0.0
Massachusetts 182 154 84.6 154 0 1 0 1 14 15 8.2 8.2 0.0
Michigan* 164 86 52.4 86 0 0 0 0 72 72 43.9 43.9 0.0
Micronesia* 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Mississippi 58 50 86.2 50 0 0 3 2 0 5 8.6 3.4 5.2
Missouri* 121 90 74.4 90 0 0 0 6 1 7 5.8 5.8 0.0
Montana* 23 18 78.3 15 3 0 1 0 3 4 17.4 13.0 4.3
Nebraska* 59 38 64.4 38 0 0 0 3 0 3 5.1 5.1 0.0
Nevada 52 46 88.5 46 0 1 1 0 3 4 7.7 5.8 1.9
New Hampshire* 30 25 83.3 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
New Jersey* 115 85 73.9 85 0 0 4 7 10 21 18.3 14.8 3.5
New Mexico* 59 34 57.6 34 0 0 0 0 25 25 42.4 42.4 0.0
New York* 305 268 87.9 268 0 0 0 0 15 15 4.9 4.9 0.0
North Carolina* 202 157 77.7 155 2 0 2 7 2 11 5.4 4.5 1.0
North Dakota* 15 9 60.0 8 1 0 0 2 0 2 13.3 13.3 0.0
Ohio 202 102 50.5 102 0 0 32 7 22 61 30.2 14.4 15.8
Oklahoma* 89 80 89.9 43 37 0 0 0 7 7 7.9 7.9 0.0
Oregon* 122 98 80.3 97 1 0 3 2 2 7 5.7 3.3 2.5
Palau* 1 1 100.0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Pennsylvania* 169 92 54.4 92 0 0 0 0 75 75 44.4 44.4 0.0
Puerto Rico* 19 14 73.7 14 0 0 0 1 2 3 15.8 15.8 0.0
Rhode Island* 27 25 92.6 25 0 0 0 0 1 1 3.7 3.7 0.0
South Carolina 106 68 64.2 68 0 0 1 0 28 29 27.4 26.4 0.9
South Dakota 30 1 3.3 1 0 0 0 0 26 26 86.7 86.7 0.0
Tennessee* 138 79 57.2 79 0 0 0 0 52 52 37.7 37.7 0.0
Texasǂ 491 83 16.9 83 0 0 0 53 325 378 77.0 77.0 0.0
Utah* 98 74 75.5 74 0 3 4 1 2 7 7.1 3.1 4.1
Vermont* 9 8 88.9 8 0 1 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Virginia* 167 101 60.5 90 11 0 29 13 13 55 32.9 15.6 17.4
Washington* 162 100 61.7 100 0 0 0 3 30 33 20.4 20.4 0.0
West Virginia*^ 14 8 57.1 8 0 0 2 0 4 6 42.9 28.6 14.3
Wisconsin* 142 89 62.7 89 0 0 9 0 7 16 11.3 4.9 6.3
Wyoming* 19 14 73.7 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Totals 6,442 4,285 66.5 4,153 132 21 202 154 959 1,315 20.4 17.3 3.1

Notes

*Jurisdiction reported using revised “Parents/Family Contacted but Unresponsive” definition.

ǂData reported may not reflect information on signed IFSP date and status.

^Data reported may be incomplete.

Formulas:

Percent Enrolled in EI (Part C and Non-Part C): (# Total Enrolled in EI / # Total Hearing Loss) *100

Overall Percent LFU / LTD1: ((# Unable to Contact + # Contacted but Unresponsive + # Unknown) / # Total Hearing Loss) * 100

Percent LFU / LTD2: ((# Unable to Contact + # Unknown) / # Total Hearing Loss) * 100

Percent Unresponsive3: (# Contacted but Unresponsive / # Total Hearing Loss) * 100

View Page In: PDF [187K]